greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 20
th, 2024 at 2:54pm:
Frank wrote on Feb 20
th, 2024 at 2:25pm:
Oh, the tautology 'argument'. Needless to say, the point is not about asking for asylum (But you will latch onto it tenaciously, turd).
1. The point is entering a country illegally, far from a legal entry point, without passport or a visa, having paid people smugglers.
Perfectly legal.
People seeking asylum are desperate, they don't usually have access to passports or visas, and often have to flee in the middle of the night in order to avoid being discovered by their persecutors.
As long as they're seeking asylum, and have their claims processed by the proper authorities, it's all good.
Why do you pretend that the other two points that make up the whole picture are not relevant and can be ignored? Why are you such a slimey, lying, dishonest turd, turd?
Oh, the tautology 'argument'.
Needless to say, the point is not about asking for asylum (But you will latch onto it tenaciously, turd).1. The point is entering a country illegally, far from a legal entry point, without passport or a visa, having paid people smugglers.
2. Being undeportable when the bogus asylum claim is rejected by the country they invaded.
3. Living on welfare, being totally useless to the country they foisted themselves on.
I think you CULTIVATE the moronic, the idiotic, the bbwianesque, like, well, bbwian, arse sniffing paki, thicko Smiff and duckwit. But you have that added slime and intentional, studied dishonesty. It is probably your union background - a comrade from Slovenia.