https://www.noticer.news/beagle-bay-australia-boat-people-pakistan-illegal-immigrants/

So the AUSTRALIAN NAVY are on the piss in Bangcock ?

---

Seems like it.

At the minute we don't have an ADF worth squat.

They couldn't knock a sick granny off a pot.

Let alone defend this country.

Where are our coastal patrol boats and coastal surveillance aircraft?

30 illegal Pakistani men just lob off a boat at Cape Leveque totally unnoticed.

What's going on in Pakistan that they have to flee to Australia?

Illegal country shopping economic migrants..... not asylum seeking refugees.

On the first plane & back to Karachi.


Quote:

‘GOVT HAS LOST CONTROL’ OF AUSTRALIAN BORDERS The Albanese government has been accused of losing control of the country’s borders following the arrival of up to 30 alleged asylum seekers by boat in Western Australia. Opposition Leader Peter Dutton made the claim on Friday afternoon following the arrival of about 30 men, reportedly from Pakistan, who were found on the side of the road near Broome. The Australian reports a local of the small Indigenous community of Beagle Bay, 128km north of Broome, found the men seeking shade in bushes on Cape Leveque Rd about 10am local time. It’s understood the driver then took them to Beagle Bay where one of the men told a local they were from Pakistan, the Australian reports. They were reportedly in good health, dressed in T-shirts and trousers, and were given water at the local store. The Australian Border Force (ABF) descended on the small community and confirmed they were conducting an operation on Friday afternoon. “The ABF is undertaking an operation in the north west of Western Australia. As this operation is ongoing, no further information will be provided,” the ABF said. Mr Dutton said the government was not taking border protection seriously. “There are disturbing reports about the latest boat arrival, it is least 12 under this Prime Minister’s watch,” Mr Dutton said in a press conference. “People smugglers can pick out a weak leader, a weak prime minister and a weak minister, and this is what they have done. “We have warned about this for some time, releasing the 149 criminals, watering down Operation Sovereign Borders, that sends a clear message to the people smugglers. “It demonstrates that this government has lost control of our borders. “I think clearly the government has not taken border protection seriously, the Prime Minister has never believed in border protection, along with (Immigration Minister) Andrew Giles.” Prime Minister Anthony Albanese told reporters he had no information about the arrival of the alleged asylum seekers during a press conference in NSW earlier on Friday. “I’ve been travelling in the car, so I haven’t been advised about that,” he said. “But our policies are clear, which is that boats that arrive in that fashion … we have policies in place that ensure they are dealt with.” The ABF said the only way to travel to Australia was legally with a visa. “Australia’s tough border protection policies means no one who travels unauthorised by boat will ever be allowed to settle permanently in Australia. The only way to travel to Australia is legally, with an Australian visa,” it said. “Australia remains committed to protecting its borders, stamping out people smuggling and preventing vulnerable people from risking their lives on futile journeys. The people smuggling business model is built on the exploitation of information and selling lies to vulnerable people.” It comes after the landing of 12 people at the remote Truscott air base, 500km northeast of Kununurra, in November 2023. They were reportedly detained by the ABF, who refused to comment at the time due to operational matters.

Is there a threat of nuclear exchange going on over there that they have to come half-way around the world to escape it?

Are they actually Pakistanis?  Or Afghans?  I know the Paki govt is repatriating millions of Afghans back to Afghanistan. 

No matter who they are or where they came from there are woke lefturds here who demand we must accept them on their own say-so.  Let's hope the immigration lawyers don't get involved because the High Court is no friend to the Australian people when it comes to illegals.   

Well the ADF bangs out this propaganda to the Media to show what a great job they are doing.
https://www.msn.com/en-au/news/australia/australian-border-force-crackdown-nets-30-foreign-fishers-destroys-three-boats-off-kimberley-coast/ar-AA1mi7S1?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=ACTS&cvid=a43169544a1f47b2be79a8e4610d9c04&ei=44

Which is a load of crap considering a 1/3rd of drug imports land on northern shores (are dumped and picked up by internal sources).

Second group of asylum seekers found on property near Beagle Bay in northern Western Australia

A second group of asylum seekers has turned up at a remote outstation north of the Aboriginal community of Beagle Bay where a group of about 30 men was taken into custody by border force authorities on Friday, prompting concerns that more than one asylum boat has landed in the area in recent days and that some arrivals may still be missing or lost.

The undetected group of 13 men walked into the campsite of Pender Bay on Western Australia’s remote Dampier Peninsula on Friday afternoon. They were bailed up by the owners’ dogs. Pender Bay is about 51km by road north of Beagle Bay where the first group was given shade and water by locals at about 10am on Friday. The second group spent two hours at the camp with its Aboriginal occupants, who tried to calm them and assure them they were safe. WA Police arrived late in the afternoon.

This means the total number of asylum seekers discovered on WA’s north coast on Friday is not approximately 30 as first thought but more than 40.

Like the men found earlier near the old church mission of Beagle Bay, the second group of asylum seekers had cuts and other injuries from scrambling on rocks and walking in mangroves. An Aboriginal man at the camp tended to their wounds and encouraged the men not to go back into the bush, The Australian has learned.

The Australian has confirmed the second group comprised 12 Bangladeshi men and one Indian man. This second group has not been acknowledged publicly by the Australian Border Force, WA Police or the Prime Minsiter. They appeared to have no knowledge of the asylum seekers at Beagle Bay who had been picked up earlier in the day. This has prompted concerns inside Border Force that there may have been more than one asylum boat arrival on the Dampier Peninsula in recent days.


https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GGhVEtCaMAA8pUU?.jpg


Phew!! Our supply of trolley collectors is assured.
The guy third from there right has a message from all such queues jumpers to the people of Australia.

Freeloaders.

They should be turned back immediately.

I regards to the Australian Navy, what Navy? There was an article a few days ago talking about how ADF personnel are discharging in droves. They have had a gutful of the organisation. It is more focused on being woke than anything else.

You have young Aussies, especially from conservative country areas, signing up to serve Australia, then find out the ADF has a totally different focus. Why would they stick around?

They actually have ships in extended maintenance due to staffing issues. For example, they don't have the sailors to man one of the frigates and therefore it is sitting idle over in Western Australia.

Here is an article, written by Kim Beazley, on the issue:
aspistrategist.org.au/australias-disappeared-surface-combatant-fleet/

tens of thousands have been flying in and nobody cares at all ?

20 people on a boat and the world is going to end.

How many of these 500,000 Indian & East Asian immigrants will join the ADF to help protect Australia?

Answer: None

Dnarever wrote on Feb 18^th, 2024 at 8:31pm:

tens of thousands have been flying in and nobody cares at all ? 20 people on a boat and the world is going to end.

People do care, duckwit.

But get this, if you can ( probably can't)

Flying in - you have a verified ID.

Boating in - you don't.

Frank wrote on Feb 18^th, 2024 at 8:33pm:

Dnarever wrote on Feb 18th, 2024 at 8:31pm: tens of thousands have been flying in and nobody cares at all ? 20 people on a boat and the world is going to end. People do care, duckwit. But get this, if you can ( probably can't) Flying in - you have a verified ID. Boating in - you don't.

So, you're okay with illegal immigrants as long as they have verified ID.

Interesting.

Quote:

People do care,

Come off it Frank.  Since when have you qualified as 'people'? You're 'slime' at best

greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 18^th, 2024 at 8:34pm:

Frank wrote on Feb 18th, 2024 at 8:33pm: Dnarever wrote on Feb 18th, 2024 at 8:31pm: tens of thousands have been flying in and nobody cares at all ? 20 people on a boat and the world is going to end. People do care, duckwit. But get this, if you can ( probably can't) Flying in - you have a verified ID. Boating in - you don't. So, you're okay with illegal immigrants as long as they have verified ID. Interesting.

Not ok, slimey turd. But there is a difference between knowing who you are dealing with and not knowing.

Even you can see that even if you will not admit it, being a lying, dishonest unflushable slime ball.

Frank wrote on Feb 18^th, 2024 at 8:33pm:

Dnarever wrote on Feb 18th, 2024 at 8:31pm: tens of thousands have been flying in and nobody cares at all ? 20 people on a boat and the world is going to end. People do care, duckwit. But get this, if you can ( probably can't) Flying in - you have a verified ID. Boating in - you don't.

Quote:

Flying in - you have a verified ID.

Not necessarily.


Quote:

Boating in - you don't.

Most boat arrivals have a lot of documents.

Dnarever wrote on Feb 18^th, 2024 at 8:56pm:

Frank wrote on Feb 18th, 2024 at 8:33pm: Dnarever wrote on Feb 18th, 2024 at 8:31pm: tens of thousands have been flying in and nobody cares at all ? 20 people on a boat and the world is going to end. People do care, duckwit. But get this, if you can ( probably can't) Flying in - you have a verified ID. Boating in - you don't. Quote: Flying in - you have a verified ID. Not necessarily. [quote]Boating in - you don't.

Most boat arrivals have a lot of documents.
[/quote]
;D ;D ;D ;D ;D You wanker!!!!

Jasin wrote on Feb 18^th, 2024 at 9:58pm:

Dnarever wrote on Feb 18th, 2024 at 8:56pm: Frank wrote on Feb 18th, 2024 at 8:33pm: Dnarever wrote on Feb 18th, 2024 at 8:31pm: tens of thousands have been flying in and nobody cares at all ? 20 people on a boat and the world is going to end. People do care, duckwit. But get this, if you can ( probably can't) Flying in - you have a verified ID. Boating in - you don't. Quote: Flying in - you have a verified ID. Not necessarily. [quote]Boating in - you don't. Most boat arrivals have a lot of documents.

;D ;D ;D ;D ;D You wanker!!!![/quote]

There is a lot of info that supports that fact, I understand you do not want to believe it.

Still a Wanker and you're probably an illegal pleb loser yourself.

Dnarever wrote on Feb 18^th, 2024 at 10:01pm:

Jasin wrote on Feb 18th, 2024 at 9:58pm: Dnarever wrote on Feb 18th, 2024 at 8:56pm: Frank wrote on Feb 18th, 2024 at 8:33pm: Dnarever wrote on Feb 18th, 2024 at 8:31pm: tens of thousands have been flying in and nobody cares at all ? 20 people on a boat and the world is going to end. People do care, duckwit. But get this, if you can ( probably can't) Flying in - you have a verified ID. Boating in - you don't. Quote: Flying in - you have a verified ID. Not necessarily. [quote]Boating in - you don't. Most boat arrivals have a lot of documents. ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D You wanker!!!!

There is a lot of info that supports that fact, I understand you do not want to believe it.
[/quote]


You are talking duckshite, Agent Duckwit.

Only 317 – or two per cent – of 16,510 Channel migrants had passports with them when they were picked up by Border Force, according to the data, released under Freedom of Information laws. That means 16,300 – 98 per cent – arrived in the UK without documentation.

People-smugglers encourage migrants to destroy ID papers because it boosts their chances of securing asylum and makes it hard to deport them as officials have nowhere to send them.


https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2022/02/24/almost-channel-migrants-arrive-without-passports-told-shred/


It was no different in Australia before Abbott put an end to it and is no different on the Mexico-US border and the Mediterranean.

Aquarius wrote on Feb 18^th, 2024 at 12:59pm:

Are they actually Pakistanis?  Or Afghans?  I know the Paki govt is repatriating millions of Afghans back to Afghanistan.  No matter who they are or where they came from there are woke lefturds here who demand we must accept them on their own say-so.  Let's hope the immigration lawyers don't get involved because the High Court is no friend to the Australian people when it comes to illegals.

Todays paper says Paki, Indian, Bangladeshi.

But who would know if they have no documents.

Dnarever wrote on Feb 18^th, 2024 at 8:31pm:

tens of thousands have been flying in and nobody cares at all ? 20 people on a boat and the world is going to end.

It's approx 40 duckwit.

And I can assure you people are as concerned about those flying in as this lot ...

it's just that you don't hear about them  ... now do you?

And if it's so easy to just fly in ...... why on earth would this group choose to hop on a leaky boat from Indonesia? ......

which probably cost more than a plane ticket.

Dnarever wrote on Feb 18^th, 2024 at 8:56pm:

Frank wrote on Feb 18th, 2024 at 8:33pm: Dnarever wrote on Feb 18th, 2024 at 8:31pm: tens of thousands have been flying in and nobody cares at all ? 20 people on a boat and the world is going to end. People do care, duckwit. But get this, if you can ( probably can't) Flying in - you have a verified ID. Boating in - you don't. Quote: Flying in - you have a verified ID. Not necessarily. [quote]Boating in - you don't.

Most boat arrivals have a lot of documents.
[/quote]

Lie.

That's why it takes so long trying to verify who they are.

I'm a supporter of refugees but not of mass immigration.... Stop The Planes and give fair dealing to asylum claimants.... if found to be valid let them stay - if not pack their bags for them...

Someone complained yesterday about people coming here for a BETTER education in their chosen profession - then staying instead of 'going home' to take the benefits to their own people.  You could say that my GP could be one such - Sri Lankan by birth - came here during the troubles there, and has done multiple courses HERE and is way above most GPs in my eyes.  When she rings specialists and says: "You should do this!" she is so respected they answer, "Yes, Ma'am!"

Wouldn't trade her for the world - but she is not perfect... nobody is.... she missed the early signs of my heart failure, but I'm an Aussie bloke - we don't complain about mere death.... coupla days in bed and all's Jake again...

Storm coming....  (I know.. I know)......

Gnads wrote on Feb 19^th, 2024 at 9:31am:

Dnarever wrote on Feb 18th, 2024 at 8:31pm: tens of thousands have been flying in and nobody cares at all ? 20 people on a boat and the world is going to end. It's approx 40 duckwit. And I can assure you people are as concerned about those flying in as this lot ... it's just that you don't hear about them  ... now do you? And if it's so easy to just fly in ...... why on earth would this group choose to hop on a leaky boat from Indonesia? ...... which probably cost more than a plane ticket.

Because they don't have a passport or visa.

They're asylum seekers.

Frank wrote on Feb 18^th, 2024 at 8:50pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 18th, 2024 at 8:34pm: Frank wrote on Feb 18th, 2024 at 8:33pm: Dnarever wrote on Feb 18th, 2024 at 8:31pm: tens of thousands have been flying in and nobody cares at all ? 20 people on a boat and the world is going to end. People do care, duckwit. But get this, if you can ( probably can't) Flying in - you have a verified ID. Boating in - you don't. So, you're okay with illegal immigrants as long as they have verified ID. Interesting. Not ok, slimey turd. But there is a difference between knowing who you are dealing with and not knowing.

You figured that out for yourself?

Verified ID or not, they can still seek asylum.

Gnads wrote on Feb 19^th, 2024 at 9:31am:

Dnarever wrote on Feb 18th, 2024 at 8:31pm: tens of thousands have been flying in and nobody cares at all ? 20 people on a boat and the world is going to end. It's approx 40 duckwit. And I can assure you people are as concerned about those flying in as this lot ... it's just that you don't hear about them  ... now do you? And if it's so easy to just fly in ...... why on earth would this group choose to hop on a leaky boat from Indonesia? ...... which probably cost more than a plane ticket.

Labor didn't stop them before, why would they stop them now? These boat people will be processed off shore and then let into Australia on the sly. The two rigor mortis parties know that we have short memories, and that the media won't say a word

The right to asylum is essentially about identity.
If you destroy your id documents before seeking asylum you destroy the fundamental proof of the truth of your claim.
In addition, you cannot be repatriated even if you cannot prove that you deserve protection.

This is why they are destroying their identity documents before entering Australian waters - but NOT before entering Indonesia or Malaysia through airports there.   Smugglers don't care whether you are genuine or not, their price is the same.

It is a racket here, into Europe and into America.

greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 19^th, 2024 at 1:06pm:

Gnads wrote on Feb 19th, 2024 at 9:31am: Dnarever wrote on Feb 18th, 2024 at 8:31pm: tens of thousands have been flying in and nobody cares at all ? 20 people on a boat and the world is going to end. It's approx 40 duckwit. And I can assure you people are as concerned about those flying in as this lot ... it's just that you don't hear about them  ... now do you? And if it's so easy to just fly in ...... why on earth would this group choose to hop on a leaky boat from Indonesia? ...... which probably cost more than a plane ticket. Because they don't have a passport or visa. They're asylum seekers.

You're full o shyte.

If they didn't have a visa or passport they wouldn't have got to Indonesia.

So no they're not ... they're economic illegal migrants.

All well dressed with mobile phones.

Where's all the women & children? ::) ::)

All future Drug Dealers, that's what they are.
Escaped criminals in their own countries on the run from public stonings.

👀

---

Boat arrival of asylum seekers thrusts remote WA community of Beagle Bay into spotlight 8-)

Stupid.  ::)

Frank wrote on Feb 19^th, 2024 at 9:23am:

You are talking duckshite, Agent Duckwit. Only 317 – or two per cent – of 16,510 Channel migrants had passports with them when they were picked up by Border Force, according to the data, released under Freedom of Information laws. That means 16,300 – 98 per cent – arrived in the UK without documentation. People-smugglers encourage migrants to destroy ID papers because it boosts their chances of securing asylum and makes it hard to deport them as officials have nowhere to send them. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2022/02/24/almost-channel-migrants-arrive-without-passports-told-shred/ It was no different in Australia before Abbott put an end to it and is no different on the Mexico-US border and the Mediterranean.

Sorry I didn't realise we were discussing the UK.

Jasin wrote on Feb 19^th, 2024 at 3:29pm:

Stupid.  ::)

You testing a new signature block?

Dnarever wrote on Feb 19^th, 2024 at 4:37pm:

Jasin wrote on Feb 19th, 2024 at 3:29pm: Stupid.  ::) You testing a new signature block?

No. I was calling you out and you answered.

Dnarever wrote on Feb 19^th, 2024 at 4:36pm:

Frank wrote on Feb 19th, 2024 at 9:23am: You are talking duckshite, Agent Duckwit. Only 317 – or two per cent – of 16,510 Channel migrants had passports with them when they were picked up by Border Force, according to the data, released under Freedom of Information laws. That means 16,300 – 98 per cent – arrived in the UK without documentation. People-smugglers encourage migrants to destroy ID papers because it boosts their chances of securing asylum and makes it hard to deport them as officials have nowhere to send them. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2022/02/24/almost-channel-migrants-arrive-without-passports-told-shred/ It was no different in Australia before Abbott put an end to it and is no different on the Mexico-US border and the Mediterranean. Sorry I didn't realise we were discussing the UK.

We are discussing illegal immigration. We have had illegals in recent days. I bet they have no IDs for the same reason illegals flooding into North America and Europe don't.
Australia dealt with it under Abbott.
None of the democracies have dealt with the large number of illegals entering under false pretences and staying or claiming asylum on bogus grounds and most of whom are not deported even if their asylum claim fails, even if they commit serious crimes.


Stopping illegals at entry is one issue. Deporting bogus aslyum claimant and illegal immigrants is another. The international human rights lobby sabotages the latter at every step. They are squealing about the former as well in America and Europe. Australia stared them down, to the envy of Europe and America. 

You have the right to ask for asylum. You do not have the right to demand permanent resettlement. No country owes you anything except your own. You do not have the right to foist yourself on another country that has rejected your asylum claim.

Gee. I wish I could walk into Switzerland without ID, papers and the correct 'paid' route of legality as everyone else. ::)
Maybe I can threaten them with emotional blackmail and say I will kill myself if they send me back?

Frank wrote on Feb 19^th, 2024 at 5:15pm:

Dnarever wrote on Feb 19th, 2024 at 4:36pm: Frank wrote on Feb 19th, 2024 at 9:23am: You are talking duckshite, Agent Duckwit. Only 317 – or two per cent – of 16,510 Channel migrants had passports with them when they were picked up by Border Force, according to the data, released under Freedom of Information laws. That means 16,300 – 98 per cent – arrived in the UK without documentation. People-smugglers encourage migrants to destroy ID papers because it boosts their chances of securing asylum and makes it hard to deport them as officials have nowhere to send them. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2022/02/24/almost-channel-migrants-arrive-without-passports-told-shred/ It was no different in Australia before Abbott put an end to it and is no different on the Mexico-US border and the Mediterranean. Sorry I didn't realise we were discussing the UK. We are discussing illegal immigration. We have had illegals in recent days.

No.  They are perfectly legal.

They are claiming asylum.

Claiming asylum is not illegal in this country, dear.

Frank wrote on Feb 19^th, 2024 at 5:15pm:

Dnarever wrote on Feb 19th, 2024 at 4:36pm: Frank wrote on Feb 19th, 2024 at 9:23am: You are talking duckshite, Agent Duckwit. Only 317 – or two per cent – of 16,510 Channel migrants had passports with them when they were picked up by Border Force, according to the data, released under Freedom of Information laws. That means 16,300 – 98 per cent – arrived in the UK without documentation. People-smugglers encourage migrants to destroy ID papers because it boosts their chances of securing asylum and makes it hard to deport them as officials have nowhere to send them. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2022/02/24/almost-channel-migrants-arrive-without-passports-told-shred/ It was no different in Australia before Abbott put an end to it and is no different on the Mexico-US border and the Mediterranean. Sorry I didn't realise we were discussing the UK. We are discussing illegal immigration. We have had illegals in recent days. I bet they have no IDs for the same reason illegals flooding into North America and Europe don't. Australia dealt with it under Abbott. None of the democracies have dealt with the large number of illegals entering under false pretences and staying or claiming asylum on bogus grounds and most of whom are not deported even if their asylum claim fails, even if they commit serious crimes. Stopping illegals at entry is one issue. Deporting bogus aslyum claimant and illegal immigrants is another. The international human rights lobby sabotages the latter at every step. They are squealing about the former as well in America and Europe. Australia stared them down, to the envy of Europe and America.  You have the right to ask for asylum. You do not have the right to demand permanent resettlement. No country owes you anything except your own. You do not have the right to foist yourself on another country that has rejected your asylum claim.

Actually you do, Soren.  The hosting country does not have the right to deport you.  Tsk, tsk, tsk...  ::) ::)

greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 19^th, 2024 at 7:26pm:

Frank wrote on Feb 19th, 2024 at 5:15pm: Dnarever wrote on Feb 19th, 2024 at 4:36pm: Frank wrote on Feb 19th, 2024 at 9:23am: You are talking duckshite, Agent Duckwit. Only 317 – or two per cent – of 16,510 Channel migrants had passports with them when they were picked up by Border Force, according to the data, released under Freedom of Information laws. That means 16,300 – 98 per cent – arrived in the UK without documentation. People-smugglers encourage migrants to destroy ID papers because it boosts their chances of securing asylum and makes it hard to deport them as officials have nowhere to send them. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2022/02/24/almost-channel-migrants-arrive-without-passports-told-shred/ It was no different in Australia before Abbott put an end to it and is no different on the Mexico-US border and the Mediterranean. Sorry I didn't realise we were discussing the UK. We are discussing illegal immigration. We have had illegals in recent days.  No.  They are perfectly legal. They are claiming asylum. Claiming asylum is not illegal in this country, dear.

Why do you delete and ignore the main point, slimey turd?

What is it about your dishonest, slimey ethos that makes you always pretend that a dishonest editing is the way for you to make a Lying, dishonest point?

Why ARE you a lying, dishonest, despicable, lying turd, despicable lying turd?

Please explain yourself.

Brian Ross wrote on Feb 19^th, 2024 at 7:40pm:

Frank wrote on Feb 19th, 2024 at 5:15pm: Dnarever wrote on Feb 19th, 2024 at 4:36pm: Frank wrote on Feb 19th, 2024 at 9:23am: You are talking duckshite, Agent Duckwit. Only 317 – or two per cent – of 16,510 Channel migrants had passports with them when they were picked up by Border Force, according to the data, released under Freedom of Information laws. That means 16,300 – 98 per cent – arrived in the UK without documentation. People-smugglers encourage migrants to destroy ID papers because it boosts their chances of securing asylum and makes it hard to deport them as officials have nowhere to send them. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2022/02/24/almost-channel-migrants-arrive-without-passports-told-shred/ It was no different in Australia before Abbott put an end to it and is no different on the Mexico-US border and the Mediterranean. Sorry I didn't realise we were discussing the UK. We are discussing illegal immigration. We have had illegals in recent days. I bet they have no IDs for the same reason illegals flooding into North America and Europe don't. Australia dealt with it under Abbott. None of the democracies have dealt with the large number of illegals entering under false pretences and staying or claiming asylum on bogus grounds and most of whom are not deported even if their asylum claim fails, even if they commit serious crimes. Stopping illegals at entry is one issue. Deporting bogus aslyum claimant and illegal immigrants is another. The international human rights lobby sabotages the latter at every step. They are squealing about the former as well in America and Europe. Australia stared them down, to the envy of Europe and America.  You have the right to ask for asylum. You do not have the right to demand permanent resettlement. No country owes you anything except your own. You do not have the right to foist yourself on another country that has rejected your asylum claim. Actually you do, Soren.  The hosting country does not have the right to deport you.  Tsk, tsk, tsk...  ::) ::)

They have the right. But being the spineless, lying worms just like you, Bbwian, they say they don't.

Frank wrote on Feb 19^th, 2024 at 7:45pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 19th, 2024 at 7:26pm: Frank wrote on Feb 19th, 2024 at 5:15pm: Dnarever wrote on Feb 19th, 2024 at 4:36pm: Frank wrote on Feb 19th, 2024 at 9:23am: You are talking duckshite, Agent Duckwit. Only 317 – or two per cent – of 16,510 Channel migrants had passports with them when they were picked up by Border Force, according to the data, released under Freedom of Information laws. That means 16,300 – 98 per cent – arrived in the UK without documentation. People-smugglers encourage migrants to destroy ID papers because it boosts their chances of securing asylum and makes it hard to deport them as officials have nowhere to send them. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2022/02/24/almost-channel-migrants-arrive-without-passports-told-shred/ It was no different in Australia before Abbott put an end to it and is no different on the Mexico-US border and the Mediterranean. Sorry I didn't realise we were discussing the UK. We are discussing illegal immigration. We have had illegals in recent days.  No.  They are perfectly legal. They are claiming asylum. Claiming asylum is not illegal in this country, dear. Why do you delete and ignore the main point, slimey turd? What is it about your dishonest, slimey ethos that makes you always pretend that a dishonest editing is the way for you to make a Lying, dishonest point? Why ARE you a lying, dishonest, despicable, lying turd, despicable lying turd? Please explain yourself.

Why did you lie and say it's illegal immigration?

Frank wrote on Feb 19^th, 2024 at 7:47pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Feb 19th, 2024 at 7:40pm: Frank wrote on Feb 19th, 2024 at 5:15pm: Dnarever wrote on Feb 19th, 2024 at 4:36pm: Frank wrote on Feb 19th, 2024 at 9:23am: You are talking duckshite, Agent Duckwit. Only 317 – or two per cent – of 16,510 Channel migrants had passports with them when they were picked up by Border Force, according to the data, released under Freedom of Information laws. That means 16,300 – 98 per cent – arrived in the UK without documentation. People-smugglers encourage migrants to destroy ID papers because it boosts their chances of securing asylum and makes it hard to deport them as officials have nowhere to send them. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2022/02/24/almost-channel-migrants-arrive-without-passports-told-shred/ It was no different in Australia before Abbott put an end to it and is no different on the Mexico-US border and the Mediterranean. Sorry I didn't realise we were discussing the UK. We are discussing illegal immigration. We have had illegals in recent days. I bet they have no IDs for the same reason illegals flooding into North America and Europe don't. Australia dealt with it under Abbott. None of the democracies have dealt with the large number of illegals entering under false pretences and staying or claiming asylum on bogus grounds and most of whom are not deported even if their asylum claim fails, even if they commit serious crimes. Stopping illegals at entry is one issue. Deporting bogus aslyum claimant and illegal immigrants is another. The international human rights lobby sabotages the latter at every step. They are squealing about the former as well in America and Europe. Australia stared them down, to the envy of Europe and America.  You have the right to ask for asylum. You do not have the right to demand permanent resettlement. No country owes you anything except your own. You do not have the right to foist yourself on another country that has rejected your asylum claim. Actually you do, Soren.  The hosting country does not have the right to deport you.  Tsk, tsk, tsk...  ::) ::) They have the right. But being the spineless, lying worms just like you, Bbwian, they say they don't.

They ceded that right when they signed the UN Convention, Soren.  Tsk, tsk, tsk...  ::) ::)

Can we exploit and enslave these illegal immigrants to earn their worth?
Maybe use them for science experiments?
Maybe give them to the Ukraine for frontline defense?

Dnarever wrote on Feb 19^th, 2024 at 4:36pm:

Frank wrote on Feb 19th, 2024 at 9:23am: You are talking duckshite, Agent Duckwit. Only 317 – or two per cent – of 16,510 Channel migrants had passports with them when they were picked up by Border Force, according to the data, released under Freedom of Information laws. That means 16,300 – 98 per cent – arrived in the UK without documentation. People-smugglers encourage migrants to destroy ID papers because it boosts their chances of securing asylum and makes it hard to deport them as officials have nowhere to send them. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2022/02/24/almost-channel-migrants-arrive-without-passports-told-shred/ It was no different in Australia before Abbott put an end to it and is no different on the Mexico-US border and the Mediterranean. Sorry I didn't realise we were discussing the UK.

Do you live in a bubble?

All western nations are suffering the same waves of illegal economic immigrants ...... same MO of all of them.

Wakey wakey.

greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 19^th, 2024 at 7:26pm:

Frank wrote on Feb 19th, 2024 at 5:15pm: Dnarever wrote on Feb 19th, 2024 at 4:36pm: Frank wrote on Feb 19th, 2024 at 9:23am: You are talking duckshite, Agent Duckwit. Only 317 – or two per cent – of 16,510 Channel migrants had passports with them when they were picked up by Border Force, according to the data, released under Freedom of Information laws. That means 16,300 – 98 per cent – arrived in the UK without documentation. People-smugglers encourage migrants to destroy ID papers because it boosts their chances of securing asylum and makes it hard to deport them as officials have nowhere to send them. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2022/02/24/almost-channel-migrants-arrive-without-passports-told-shred/ It was no different in Australia before Abbott put an end to it and is no different on the Mexico-US border and the Mediterranean. Sorry I didn't realise we were discussing the UK. We are discussing illegal immigration. We have had illegals in recent days.  No.  They are perfectly legal. They are claiming asylum. Claiming asylum is not illegal in this country, dear.

Ahhh but claiming as such doesn't make it true .... now does it? ::)

greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 19^th, 2024 at 8:08pm:

Frank wrote on Feb 19th, 2024 at 7:45pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 19th, 2024 at 7:26pm: Frank wrote on Feb 19th, 2024 at 5:15pm: Dnarever wrote on Feb 19th, 2024 at 4:36pm: Frank wrote on Feb 19th, 2024 at 9:23am: You are talking duckshite, Agent Duckwit. Only 317 – or two per cent – of 16,510 Channel migrants had passports with them when they were picked up by Border Force, according to the data, released under Freedom of Information laws. That means 16,300 – 98 per cent – arrived in the UK without documentation. People-smugglers encourage migrants to destroy ID papers because it boosts their chances of securing asylum and makes it hard to deport them as officials have nowhere to send them. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2022/02/24/almost-channel-migrants-arrive-without-passports-told-shred/ It was no different in Australia before Abbott put an end to it and is no different on the Mexico-US border and the Mediterranean. Sorry I didn't realise we were discussing the UK. We are discussing illegal immigration. We have had illegals in recent days.  No.  They are perfectly legal. They are claiming asylum. Claiming asylum is not illegal in this country, dear. Why do you delete and ignore the main point, slimey turd? What is it about your dishonest, slimey ethos that makes you always pretend that a dishonest editing is the way for you to make a Lying, dishonest point? Why ARE you a lying, dishonest, despicable, lying turd, despicable lying turd? Please explain yourself. Why did you lie and say it's illegal immigration?

Because if you had an gram of honesty you'd say/know that's what it is.

Jasin wrote on Feb 19^th, 2024 at 9:23pm:

Can we exploit and enslave these illegal immigrants to earn their worth? Maybe use them for science experiments? Maybe give them to the Ukraine for frontline defense?

We can't do that with our own bludgers ... now can we?  ;D

Gnads wrote on Feb 20^th, 2024 at 7:41am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 19th, 2024 at 8:08pm: Frank wrote on Feb 19th, 2024 at 7:45pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 19th, 2024 at 7:26pm: Frank wrote on Feb 19th, 2024 at 5:15pm: Dnarever wrote on Feb 19th, 2024 at 4:36pm: Frank wrote on Feb 19th, 2024 at 9:23am: You are talking duckshite, Agent Duckwit. Only 317 – or two per cent – of 16,510 Channel migrants had passports with them when they were picked up by Border Force, according to the data, released under Freedom of Information laws. That means 16,300 – 98 per cent – arrived in the UK without documentation. People-smugglers encourage migrants to destroy ID papers because it boosts their chances of securing asylum and makes it hard to deport them as officials have nowhere to send them. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2022/02/24/almost-channel-migrants-arrive-without-passports-told-shred/ It was no different in Australia before Abbott put an end to it and is no different on the Mexico-US border and the Mediterranean. Sorry I didn't realise we were discussing the UK. We are discussing illegal immigration. We have had illegals in recent days.  No.  They are perfectly legal. They are claiming asylum. Claiming asylum is not illegal in this country, dear. Why do you delete and ignore the main point, slimey turd? What is it about your dishonest, slimey ethos that makes you always pretend that a dishonest editing is the way for you to make a Lying, dishonest point? Why ARE you a lying, dishonest, despicable, lying turd, despicable lying turd? Please explain yourself. Why did you lie and say it's illegal immigration? Because if you had an gram of honesty you'd say/know that's what it is.

https://twitter.com/Ye_Olde_Holborn/status/1759495863519285535

Gnads wrote on Feb 20^th, 2024 at 7:41am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 19th, 2024 at 8:08pm: Frank wrote on Feb 19th, 2024 at 7:45pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 19th, 2024 at 7:26pm: Frank wrote on Feb 19th, 2024 at 5:15pm: Dnarever wrote on Feb 19th, 2024 at 4:36pm: Frank wrote on Feb 19th, 2024 at 9:23am: You are talking duckshite, Agent Duckwit. Only 317 – or two per cent – of 16,510 Channel migrants had passports with them when they were picked up by Border Force, according to the data, released under Freedom of Information laws. That means 16,300 – 98 per cent – arrived in the UK without documentation. People-smugglers encourage migrants to destroy ID papers because it boosts their chances of securing asylum and makes it hard to deport them as officials have nowhere to send them. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2022/02/24/almost-channel-migrants-arrive-without-passports-told-shred/ It was no different in Australia before Abbott put an end to it and is no different on the Mexico-US border and the Mediterranean. Sorry I didn't realise we were discussing the UK. We are discussing illegal immigration. We have had illegals in recent days.  No.  They are perfectly legal. They are claiming asylum. Claiming asylum is not illegal in this country, dear. Why do you delete and ignore the main point, slimey turd? What is it about your dishonest, slimey ethos that makes you always pretend that a dishonest editing is the way for you to make a Lying, dishonest point? Why ARE you a lying, dishonest, despicable, lying turd, despicable lying turd? Please explain yourself. Why did you lie and say it's illegal immigration? Because if you had an gram of honesty you'd say/know that's what it is.

Claiming asylum isn't illegal immigration.

Quite the opposite.

Gnads wrote on Feb 20^th, 2024 at 7:38am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 19th, 2024 at 7:26pm: Frank wrote on Feb 19th, 2024 at 5:15pm: Dnarever wrote on Feb 19th, 2024 at 4:36pm: Frank wrote on Feb 19th, 2024 at 9:23am: You are talking duckshite, Agent Duckwit. Only 317 – or two per cent – of 16,510 Channel migrants had passports with them when they were picked up by Border Force, according to the data, released under Freedom of Information laws. That means 16,300 – 98 per cent – arrived in the UK without documentation. People-smugglers encourage migrants to destroy ID papers because it boosts their chances of securing asylum and makes it hard to deport them as officials have nowhere to send them. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2022/02/24/almost-channel-migrants-arrive-without-passports-told-shred/ It was no different in Australia before Abbott put an end to it and is no different on the Mexico-US border and the Mediterranean. Sorry I didn't realise we were discussing the UK. We are discussing illegal immigration. We have had illegals in recent days.  No.  They are perfectly legal. They are claiming asylum. Claiming asylum is not illegal in this country, dear. Ahhh but claiming as such doesn't make it true .... now does it? ::)

It makes it true that they are asylum seekers - everyone who says they are seeking asylum is an asylum seeker.

However, it doesn't necessarily mean they are refugees.

All claims for asylum must be processed, but making a claim is not illegal. Quite the opposite, in fact.

greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 20^th, 2024 at 1:24pm:

Gnads wrote on Feb 20th, 2024 at 7:38am: greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 19th, 2024 at 7:26pm: Frank wrote on Feb 19th, 2024 at 5:15pm: Dnarever wrote on Feb 19th, 2024 at 4:36pm: Frank wrote on Feb 19th, 2024 at 9:23am: You are talking duckshite, Agent Duckwit. Only 317 – or two per cent – of 16,510 Channel migrants had passports with them when they were picked up by Border Force, according to the data, released under Freedom of Information laws. That means 16,300 – 98 per cent – arrived in the UK without documentation. People-smugglers encourage migrants to destroy ID papers because it boosts their chances of securing asylum and makes it hard to deport them as officials have nowhere to send them. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2022/02/24/almost-channel-migrants-arrive-without-passports-told-shred/ It was no different in Australia before Abbott put an end to it and is no different on the Mexico-US border and the Mediterranean. Sorry I didn't realise we were discussing the UK. We are discussing illegal immigration. We have had illegals in recent days.  No.  They are perfectly legal. They are claiming asylum. Claiming asylum is not illegal in this country, dear. Ahhh but claiming as such doesn't make it true .... now does it? ::) It makes it true that they are asylum seekers - everyone who says they are seeking asylum is an asylum seeker. However, it doesn't necessarily mean they are refugees. All claims for asylum must be processed, but making a claim is not illegal. Quite the opposite, in fact.

Oh, the tautology 'argument'.  Needless to say, the point is not about asking for asylum (But you will latch onto it tenaciously, turd).


1. The point is entering a country illegally, far from a legal entry point, without passport or a visa, having paid people smugglers.
2. Being undeportable when the bogus asylum claim is rejected by the country they invaded.
3. Living on welfare, being totally useless to the country they foisted themselves on.

greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 20^th, 2024 at 1:21pm:

Gnads wrote on Feb 20th, 2024 at 7:41am: greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 19th, 2024 at 8:08pm: Frank wrote on Feb 19th, 2024 at 7:45pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 19th, 2024 at 7:26pm: Frank wrote on Feb 19th, 2024 at 5:15pm: Dnarever wrote on Feb 19th, 2024 at 4:36pm: Frank wrote on Feb 19th, 2024 at 9:23am: You are talking duckshite, Agent Duckwit. Only 317 – or two per cent – of 16,510 Channel migrants had passports with them when they were picked up by Border Force, according to the data, released under Freedom of Information laws. That means 16,300 – 98 per cent – arrived in the UK without documentation. People-smugglers encourage migrants to destroy ID papers because it boosts their chances of securing asylum and makes it hard to deport them as officials have nowhere to send them. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2022/02/24/almost-channel-migrants-arrive-without-passports-told-shred/ It was no different in Australia before Abbott put an end to it and is no different on the Mexico-US border and the Mediterranean. Sorry I didn't realise we were discussing the UK. We are discussing illegal immigration. We have had illegals in recent days.  No.  They are perfectly legal. They are claiming asylum. Claiming asylum is not illegal in this country, dear. Why do you delete and ignore the main point, slimey turd? What is it about your dishonest, slimey ethos that makes you always pretend that a dishonest editing is the way for you to make a Lying, dishonest point? Why ARE you a lying, dishonest, despicable, lying turd, despicable lying turd? Please explain yourself. Why did you lie and say it's illegal immigration? Because if you had an gram of honesty you'd say/know that's what it is. Claiming asylum isn't illegal immigration. Quite the opposite.

but its still fraudulent in most cases
most are economic refugees
its similar to "its not illegal to claim a celebrity touched me up so i can get more publicity for my book"
it may not be illegal but most "real" citizens see it as fraud and take a very dim view of it

Frank wrote on Feb 20^th, 2024 at 2:25pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 20th, 2024 at 1:24pm: Gnads wrote on Feb 20th, 2024 at 7:38am: greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 19th, 2024 at 7:26pm: Frank wrote on Feb 19th, 2024 at 5:15pm: Dnarever wrote on Feb 19th, 2024 at 4:36pm: Frank wrote on Feb 19th, 2024 at 9:23am: You are talking duckshite, Agent Duckwit. Only 317 – or two per cent – of 16,510 Channel migrants had passports with them when they were picked up by Border Force, according to the data, released under Freedom of Information laws. That means 16,300 – 98 per cent – arrived in the UK without documentation. People-smugglers encourage migrants to destroy ID papers because it boosts their chances of securing asylum and makes it hard to deport them as officials have nowhere to send them. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2022/02/24/almost-channel-migrants-arrive-without-passports-told-shred/ It was no different in Australia before Abbott put an end to it and is no different on the Mexico-US border and the Mediterranean. Sorry I didn't realise we were discussing the UK. We are discussing illegal immigration. We have had illegals in recent days.  No.  They are perfectly legal. They are claiming asylum. Claiming asylum is not illegal in this country, dear. Ahhh but claiming as such doesn't make it true .... now does it? ::) It makes it true that they are asylum seekers - everyone who says they are seeking asylum is an asylum seeker. However, it doesn't necessarily mean they are refugees. All claims for asylum must be processed, but making a claim is not illegal. Quite the opposite, in fact. Oh, the tautology 'argument'.  Needless to say, the point is not about asking for asylum (But you will latch onto it tenaciously, turd). 1. The point is entering a country illegally, far from a legal entry point, without passport or a visa, having paid people smugglers.

Perfectly legal.

People seeking asylum are desperate, they don't usually have access to passports or visas, and often have to flee in the middle of the night in order to avoid being discovered by their persecutors.

As long as they're seeking asylum, and have their claims processed by the proper authorities, it's all good.

aquascoot wrote on Feb 20^th, 2024 at 2:50pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 20th, 2024 at 1:21pm: Gnads wrote on Feb 20th, 2024 at 7:41am: greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 19th, 2024 at 8:08pm: Frank wrote on Feb 19th, 2024 at 7:45pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 19th, 2024 at 7:26pm: Frank wrote on Feb 19th, 2024 at 5:15pm: Dnarever wrote on Feb 19th, 2024 at 4:36pm: Frank wrote on Feb 19th, 2024 at 9:23am: You are talking duckshite, Agent Duckwit. Only 317 – or two per cent – of 16,510 Channel migrants had passports with them when they were picked up by Border Force, according to the data, released under Freedom of Information laws. That means 16,300 – 98 per cent – arrived in the UK without documentation. People-smugglers encourage migrants to destroy ID papers because it boosts their chances of securing asylum and makes it hard to deport them as officials have nowhere to send them. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2022/02/24/almost-channel-migrants-arrive-without-passports-told-shred/ It was no different in Australia before Abbott put an end to it and is no different on the Mexico-US border and the Mediterranean. Sorry I didn't realise we were discussing the UK. We are discussing illegal immigration. We have had illegals in recent days.  No.  They are perfectly legal. They are claiming asylum. Claiming asylum is not illegal in this country, dear. Why do you delete and ignore the main point, slimey turd? What is it about your dishonest, slimey ethos that makes you always pretend that a dishonest editing is the way for you to make a Lying, dishonest point? Why ARE you a lying, dishonest, despicable, lying turd, despicable lying turd? Please explain yourself. Why did you lie and say it's illegal immigration? Because if you had an gram of honesty you'd say/know that's what it is. Claiming asylum isn't illegal immigration. Quite the opposite. but its still fraudulent in most cases most are economic refugees

No, not at all.

The majority of asylum seekers who come by boat are found to be refugees. i.e. a person who has been forced to leave their country in order to escape war, persecution, or natural disaster.

The ones who come by plane, however, are predominantly "economic refugees".

no because they come thru indonesia and hence have to have their id to enter that country


there may be a very very rare person genuinely fleeing for fear of their life


same with a woman who takes 30 years to report a sexual assault.

most would be doing it for some reason other then to have justice served


there may be the very very rare person who genuinely takes 30 years to locate a police station on google maps

aquascoot wrote on Feb 20^th, 2024 at 2:59pm:

no ...

Yes.

They can go through as many countries as they like.

Fact: The majority of asylum seekers who come by boat are found to be refugees. i.e. a person who has been forced to leave their country in order to escape war, persecution, or natural disaster.

Fact: The ones who come by plane, however, are predominantly "economic refugees".

Drug smugglers and paedophiles, not reffos.
They'll be buggering each other in the Detention Centres then needing rectum repair jobs at Private Hospitals upon the Australian Taxpayer's bill.

Jasin wrote on Feb 20^th, 2024 at 3:39pm:

Drug smugglers and paedophiles, not reffos.

Why wouldn't drug smugglers and paedophiles just get a passport, buy a plane ticket, and then enter the country like everyone else?

Why would they choose to be detained and then investigated?

I'm curious.

greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 20^th, 2024 at 3:49pm:

Jasin wrote on Feb 20th, 2024 at 3:39pm: Drug smugglers and paedophiles, not reffos. Why wouldn't drug smugglers and paedophiles just get a passport, buy a plane ticket, and then enter the country like everyone else? Why would they choose to be detained and then investigated? I'm curious.

Why don't you ask them?
I have, when they came in for their rectum repairs.
Lowlifes don't pay their way, they expect others to do so.
Its their nature.

Jasin wrote on Feb 20^th, 2024 at 3:53pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 20th, 2024 at 3:49pm: Jasin wrote on Feb 20th, 2024 at 3:39pm: Drug smugglers and paedophiles, not reffos. Why wouldn't drug smugglers and paedophiles just get a passport, buy a plane ticket, and then enter the country like everyone else? Why would they choose to be detained and then investigated? I'm curious. Why don't you ask them?

That's easy: the people whom you describe don't exist, so it's impossible to ask them.

Your white flag has been accepted, and your astounding ignorance duly noted.

greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 20^th, 2024 at 2:54pm:

Frank wrote on Feb 20th, 2024 at 2:25pm: Oh, the tautology 'argument'.  Needless to say, the point is not about asking for asylum (But you will latch onto it tenaciously, turd). 1. The point is entering a country illegally, far from a legal entry point, without passport or a visa, having paid people smugglers. Perfectly legal. People seeking asylum are desperate, they don't usually have access to passports or visas, and often have to flee in the middle of the night in order to avoid being discovered by their persecutors. As long as they're seeking asylum, and have their claims processed by the proper authorities, it's all good.

Why do you pretend that the other two points that make up the whole picture are not relevant and can be ignored? Why are you such a slimey, lying, dishonest turd, turd?


Oh, the tautology 'argument'.  Needless to say, the point is not about asking for asylum (But you will latch onto it tenaciously, turd).


1. The point is entering a country illegally, far from a legal entry point, without passport or a visa, having paid people smugglers.
2. Being undeportable when the bogus asylum claim is rejected by the country they invaded.
3. Living on welfare, being totally useless to the country they foisted themselves on.


I think you CULTIVATE the moronic, the idiotic, the bbwianesque, like, well, bbwian, arse sniffing paki, thicko Smiff and duckwit. But you have that added slime and intentional, studied dishonesty. It is probably your union background -  a comrade from Slovenia.

Frank wrote on Feb 20^th, 2024 at 5:49pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 20th, 2024 at 2:54pm: Frank wrote on Feb 20th, 2024 at 2:25pm: Oh, the tautology 'argument'.  Needless to say, the point is not about asking for asylum (But you will latch onto it tenaciously, turd). 1. The point is entering a country illegally, far from a legal entry point, without passport or a visa, having paid people smugglers. Perfectly legal. People seeking asylum are desperate, they don't usually have access to passports or visas, and often have to flee in the middle of the night in order to avoid being discovered by their persecutors. As long as they're seeking asylum, and have their claims processed by the proper authorities, it's all good. Why do you pretend that the other two points that make up the whole picture are not relevant and can be ignored? Why are you such a slimey, lying, dishonest turd, turd? Oh, the tautology 'argument'.  Needless to say, the point is not about asking for asylum (But you will latch onto it tenaciously, turd). 1. The point is entering a country illegally, far from a legal entry point, without passport or a visa, having paid people smugglers. 2. Being undeportable when the bogus asylum claim is rejected by the country they invaded. 3. Living on welfare, being totally useless to the country they foisted themselves on. I think you CULTIVATE the moronic, the idiotic, the bbwianesque, like, well, bbwian, arse sniffing paki, thicko Smiff and duckwit. But you have that added slime and intentional, studied dishonesty. It is probably your union background -  a comrade from Slovenia.

Perfectly legal.

People seeking asylum are desperate, they don't usually have access to passports or visas, and often have to flee in the middle of the night in order to avoid being discovered by their persecutors.

As long as they're seeking asylum, and have their claims processed by the proper authorities, it's all good.

greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 20^th, 2024 at 5:57pm:

Frank wrote on Feb 20th, 2024 at 5:49pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 20th, 2024 at 2:54pm: Frank wrote on Feb 20th, 2024 at 2:25pm: Oh, the tautology 'argument'.  Needless to say, the point is not about asking for asylum (But you will latch onto it tenaciously, turd). 1. The point is entering a country illegally, far from a legal entry point, without passport or a visa, having paid people smugglers. Perfectly legal. People seeking asylum are desperate, they don't usually have access to passports or visas, and often have to flee in the middle of the night in order to avoid being discovered by their persecutors. As long as they're seeking asylum, and have their claims processed by the proper authorities, it's all good. Why do you pretend that the other two points that make up the whole picture are not relevant and can be ignored? Why are you such a slimey, lying, dishonest turd, turd? Oh, the tautology 'argument'.  Needless to say, the point is not about asking for asylum (But you will latch onto it tenaciously, turd). 1. The point is entering a country illegally, far from a legal entry point, without passport or a visa, having paid people smugglers. 2. Being undeportable when the bogus asylum claim is rejected by the country they invaded. 3. Living on welfare, being totally useless to the country they foisted themselves on. I think you CULTIVATE the moronic, the idiotic, the bbwianesque, like, well, bbwian, arse sniffing paki, thicko Smiff and duckwit. But you have that added slime and intentional, studied dishonesty. It is probably your union background -  a comrade from Slovenia. Perfectly legal. People seeking asylum are desperate, they don't usually have access to passports or visas, and often have to flee in the middle of the night in order to avoid being discovered by their persecutors. As long as they're seeking asylum, and have their claims processed by the proper authorities, it's all good.

Lying crap. The could not get into Indonesia or Malaysia without passports and visas, you slimey dishones turd.



We have hundreds, thouands of failed asylum claimants, many are convicted criminals. None of them are deported.  The UK and the US have millions.

A complete slimey, one-way scam.

Frank wrote on Feb 20^th, 2024 at 6:04pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 20th, 2024 at 5:57pm: Frank wrote on Feb 20th, 2024 at 5:49pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 20th, 2024 at 2:54pm: Frank wrote on Feb 20th, 2024 at 2:25pm: Oh, the tautology 'argument'.  Needless to say, the point is not about asking for asylum (But you will latch onto it tenaciously, turd). 1. The point is entering a country illegally, far from a legal entry point, without passport or a visa, having paid people smugglers. Perfectly legal. People seeking asylum are desperate, they don't usually have access to passports or visas, and often have to flee in the middle of the night in order to avoid being discovered by their persecutors. As long as they're seeking asylum, and have their claims processed by the proper authorities, it's all good. Why do you pretend that the other two points that make up the whole picture are not relevant and can be ignored? Why are you such a slimey, lying, dishonest turd, turd? Oh, the tautology 'argument'.  Needless to say, the point is not about asking for asylum (But you will latch onto it tenaciously, turd). 1. The point is entering a country illegally, far from a legal entry point, without passport or a visa, having paid people smugglers. 2. Being undeportable when the bogus asylum claim is rejected by the country they invaded. 3. Living on welfare, being totally useless to the country they foisted themselves on. I think you CULTIVATE the moronic, the idiotic, the bbwianesque, like, well, bbwian, arse sniffing paki, thicko Smiff and duckwit. But you have that added slime and intentional, studied dishonesty. It is probably your union background -  a comrade from Slovenia. Perfectly legal. People seeking asylum are desperate, they don't usually have access to passports or visas, and often have to flee in the middle of the night in order to avoid being discovered by their persecutors. As long as they're seeking asylum, and have their claims processed by the proper authorities, it's all good. Lying crap. The could not get into Indonesia or Malaysia without passports and visas, you slimey dishones turd. We have hundreds, thouands of failed asylum claimants, many are convicted criminals. None of them are deported.  The UK and the US have millions. A complete slimey, one-way scam.

The vast majority who come by boat are refugees.

This is a simple fact.

greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 20^th, 2024 at 6:18pm:

Frank wrote on Feb 20th, 2024 at 6:04pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 20th, 2024 at 5:57pm: Frank wrote on Feb 20th, 2024 at 5:49pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 20th, 2024 at 2:54pm: Frank wrote on Feb 20th, 2024 at 2:25pm: Oh, the tautology 'argument'.  Needless to say, the point is not about asking for asylum (But you will latch onto it tenaciously, turd). 1. The point is entering a country illegally, far from a legal entry point, without passport or a visa, having paid people smugglers. Perfectly legal. People seeking asylum are desperate, they don't usually have access to passports or visas, and often have to flee in the middle of the night in order to avoid being discovered by their persecutors. As long as they're seeking asylum, and have their claims processed by the proper authorities, it's all good. Why do you pretend that the other two points that make up the whole picture are not relevant and can be ignored? Why are you such a slimey, lying, dishonest turd, turd? Oh, the tautology 'argument'.  Needless to say, the point is not about asking for asylum (But you will latch onto it tenaciously, turd). 1. The point is entering a country illegally, far from a legal entry point, without passport or a visa, having paid people smugglers. 2. Being undeportable when the bogus asylum claim is rejected by the country they invaded. 3. Living on welfare, being totally useless to the country they foisted themselves on. I think you CULTIVATE the moronic, the idiotic, the bbwianesque, like, well, bbwian, arse sniffing paki, thicko Smiff and duckwit. But you have that added slime and intentional, studied dishonesty. It is probably your union background -  a comrade from Slovenia. Perfectly legal. People seeking asylum are desperate, they don't usually have access to passports or visas, and often have to flee in the middle of the night in order to avoid being discovered by their persecutors. As long as they're seeking asylum, and have their claims processed by the proper authorities, it's all good. Lying crap. The could not get into Indonesia or Malaysia without passports and visas, you slimey dishones turd. We have hundreds, thouands of failed asylum claimants, many are convicted criminals. None of them are deported.  The UK and the US have millions. A complete slimey, one-way scam. The vast majority who come by boat are refugees. This is a simple fact.

a total lie.

20 odd years and they still haven't recovered from their anti refugee Howardian turdism.

Frank wrote on Feb 20^th, 2024 at 7:02pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 20th, 2024 at 6:18pm: Frank wrote on Feb 20th, 2024 at 6:04pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 20th, 2024 at 5:57pm: Frank wrote on Feb 20th, 2024 at 5:49pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 20th, 2024 at 2:54pm: Frank wrote on Feb 20th, 2024 at 2:25pm: Oh, the tautology 'argument'.  Needless to say, the point is not about asking for asylum (But you will latch onto it tenaciously, turd). 1. The point is entering a country illegally, far from a legal entry point, without passport or a visa, having paid people smugglers. Perfectly legal. People seeking asylum are desperate, they don't usually have access to passports or visas, and often have to flee in the middle of the night in order to avoid being discovered by their persecutors. As long as they're seeking asylum, and have their claims processed by the proper authorities, it's all good. Why do you pretend that the other two points that make up the whole picture are not relevant and can be ignored? Why are you such a slimey, lying, dishonest turd, turd? Oh, the tautology 'argument'.  Needless to say, the point is not about asking for asylum (But you will latch onto it tenaciously, turd). 1. The point is entering a country illegally, far from a legal entry point, without passport or a visa, having paid people smugglers. 2. Being undeportable when the bogus asylum claim is rejected by the country they invaded. 3. Living on welfare, being totally useless to the country they foisted themselves on. I think you CULTIVATE the moronic, the idiotic, the bbwianesque, like, well, bbwian, arse sniffing paki, thicko Smiff and duckwit. But you have that added slime and intentional, studied dishonesty. It is probably your union background -  a comrade from Slovenia. Perfectly legal. People seeking asylum are desperate, they don't usually have access to passports or visas, and often have to flee in the middle of the night in order to avoid being discovered by their persecutors. As long as they're seeking asylum, and have their claims processed by the proper authorities, it's all good. Lying crap. The could not get into Indonesia or Malaysia without passports and visas, you slimey dishones turd. We have hundreds, thouands of failed asylum claimants, many are convicted criminals. None of them are deported.  The UK and the US have millions. A complete slimey, one-way scam. The vast majority who come by boat are refugees. This is a simple fact. a total lie.

No.

A verifiable fact.

"Asylum seekers who arrive by boat are subject to the same assessment criteria as all other asylum applicants. Past figures show that between 70 and 100 per cent of asylum seekers arriving by boat at different times have been found to be refugees and granted protection either in Australia or in another country."

70 to 100 per cent is a vast majority.

Year nine maths, innit?

Dnarever wrote on Feb 20^th, 2024 at 7:06pm:

20 odd years and they still haven't recovered from their anti refugee Howardian turdism.

What do YOU like about country shopping pretend refugee invaders?

Frank wrote on Feb 20^th, 2024 at 7:08pm:

Dnarever wrote on Feb 20th, 2024 at 7:06pm: 20 odd years and they still haven't recovered from their anti refugee Howardian turdism. What do YOU like about country shopping pretend refugee invaders?

"Asylum seekers who arrive by boat are subject to the same assessment criteria as all other asylum applicants. Past figures show that between 70 and 100 per cent of asylum seekers arriving by boat at different times have been found to be refugees and granted protection either in Australia or in another country."

greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 20^th, 2024 at 7:09pm:

Frank wrote on Feb 20th, 2024 at 7:08pm: Dnarever wrote on Feb 20th, 2024 at 7:06pm: 20 odd years and they still haven't recovered from their anti refugee Howardian turdism. What do YOU like about country shopping pretend refugee invaders? "Asylum seekers who arrive by boat are subject to the same assessment criteria as all other asylum applicants. Past figures show that between 70 and 100 per cent of asylum seekers arriving by boat at different times have been found to be refugees and granted protection either in Australia or in another country."

That's the problem, right there.

Over 250 odd years ago

White fella come here and stole the land calling Terra nulius

the founding document,  lawful yet its not

In Terra Nulius they said they could take this land

as the indigenous were " not human " and more flora and fauna

Ipso facto all Australians can claim Terra Nulius a

false prima facie document and all laws steming

from that .. so don't bleat about these boat people

hypocriticus much ?

Prima Facie

A Latin term meaning "at first sight" or "at first look." This refers to the standard of proof under which the party with the burden of proof need only present enough evidence to create a rebuttable presumption that the matter asserted is true. A prima facie standard of proof is relatively low.
https://content.next.westlaw.com › P...
Prima Facie | Practical Law - Westlaw

it_is_the_light wrote on Feb 20^th, 2024 at 7:13pm:

Over 250 odd years ago White fella come here and stole the land calling Terra nulius the founding document,  lawful yet its not In Terra Nulius they said they could take this land as the indigenous were " not human " and more flora and fauna Ipso facto all Australians can claim Terra Nulius a false prima facie document and all laws steming from that .. so don't bleat about these boat people hypocriticus much ?

stupid nonsense.
back to your copper pyramid, mong. shoo!! shooo!!

Frank wrote on Feb 20^th, 2024 at 7:15pm:

it_is_the_light wrote on Feb 20th, 2024 at 7:13pm: Over 250 odd years ago White fella come here and stole the land calling Terra nulius the founding document,  lawful yet its not In Terra Nulius they said they could take this land as the indigenous were " not human " and more flora and fauna Ipso facto all Australians can claim Terra Nulius a false prima facie document and all laws steming from that .. so don't bleat about these boat people hypocriticus much ? stupid nonsense. back to your copper pyramid, mong. shoo!! shooo!!

Well I realise your are a self confessed freemasonic lightweight

regarding legal debate and so carry on with your rubbish

all you like .. you are exposed as a parrot for government

and fremasonic doctrinical mind control woo woo impotence .

You have no power here

Frank wrote on Feb 20^th, 2024 at 7:10pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 20th, 2024 at 7:09pm: Frank wrote on Feb 20th, 2024 at 7:08pm: Dnarever wrote on Feb 20th, 2024 at 7:06pm: 20 odd years and they still haven't recovered from their anti refugee Howardian turdism. What do YOU like about country shopping pretend refugee invaders? "Asylum seekers who arrive by boat are subject to the same assessment criteria as all other asylum applicants. Past figures show that between 70 and 100 per cent of asylum seekers arriving by boat at different times have been found to be refugees and granted protection either in Australia or in another country." That's the problem, right there.

White flag accepted.

The British stole this country Australia

Not White Australia.. we are Australians and can tell

the monarch scum that sent Anzacs to their death

at Gallipoli to #$@% off , but Stockholm syndrome imbeciles

still wave the union jack , a total scourge on this land

They killing black and white so wake up asap

---

👀

---

it_is_the_light wrote on Feb 20^th, 2024 at 7:18pm:

Frank wrote on Feb 20th, 2024 at 7:15pm: it_is_the_light wrote on Feb 20th, 2024 at 7:13pm: Over 250 odd years ago White fella come here and stole the land calling Terra nulius the founding document,  lawful yet its not In Terra Nulius they said they could take this land as the indigenous were " not human " and more flora and fauna Ipso facto all Australians can claim Terra Nulius a false prima facie document and all laws steming from that .. so don't bleat about these boat people hypocriticus much ? stupid nonsense. back to your copper pyramid, mong. shoo!! shooo!! Well I realise your are a self confessed freemasonic lightweight regarding legal debate and so carry on with your rubbish all you like .. you are exposed as a parrot for government and fremasonic doctrinical mind control woo woo impotence . You have no power here

:'( :'( :'(

Frank wrote on Feb 20^th, 2024 at 7:08pm:

Dnarever wrote on Feb 20th, 2024 at 7:06pm: 20 odd years and they still haven't recovered from their anti refugee Howardian turdism. What do YOU like about country shopping pretend refugee invaders?

20 years of detachment from reality Frank.

Dnarever wrote on Feb 20^th, 2024 at 7:34pm:

Frank wrote on Feb 20th, 2024 at 7:08pm: Dnarever wrote on Feb 20th, 2024 at 7:06pm: 20 odd years and they still haven't recovered from their anti refugee Howardian turdism. What do YOU like about country shopping pretend refugee invaders? 20 years of detachment from reality Frank.

A duck shite factory detached from reality - I couldn't have characterised you better, duck shite factory.

greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 20^th, 2024 at 4:11pm:

Jasin wrote on Feb 20th, 2024 at 3:53pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 20th, 2024 at 3:49pm: Jasin wrote on Feb 20th, 2024 at 3:39pm: Drug smugglers and paedophiles, not reffos. Why wouldn't drug smugglers and paedophiles just get a passport, buy a plane ticket, and then enter the country like everyone else? Why would they choose to be detained and then investigated? I'm curious. Why don't you ask them? That's easy: the people whom you describe don't exist, so it's impossible to ask them. Your white flag has been accepted, and your astounding ignorance duly noted.

stupid dickhead thing to say for a piss-poor comeback. ::)

Dnarever wrote on Feb 18^th, 2024 at 8:31pm:

tens of thousands have been flying in and nobody cares at all ? 20 people on a boat and the world is going to end.

"Tens of thousands" of illegal immigrants flying into Australia would atleast have not been bringing in flora and fauna through customs that would go on to destroy our wildlife and fragile ecosystem.

20 people on a boat making it to mainland Australia would step off the vessel and head straight to the nearest civilisation. Meanwhile, whatever they brought on their shoes and any other exotic viruses/contaminants are going to infect the ecosystem (even in a small way). Another 100 boats making it to shore with illegals not going through proper channels will make a greater impact on the environment.

Therefore, illegal boat arrivals tend to make a threat to our ecosystem, even though the illegal boat arrivals of asylum seekers might have a better case to make as refugees than those that come by plane in the thousands.

Frank wrote on Feb 18^th, 2024 at 8:33pm:

Flying in - you have a verified ID. Boating in - you don't.

Illegal immigrants flying in might have bogus documentation.

UnSubRocky wrote on Feb 20^th, 2024 at 8:34pm:

Dnarever wrote on Feb 18th, 2024 at 8:31pm: tens of thousands have been flying in and nobody cares at all ? 20 people on a boat and the world is going to end. "Tens of thousands" of illegal immigrants flying into Australia would atleast have not been bringing in flora and fauna through customs that would go on to destroy our wildlife and fragile ecosystem. 20 people on a boat making it to mainland Australia would step off the vessel and head straight to the nearest civilisation. Meanwhile, whatever they brought on their shoes and any other exotic viruses/contaminants are going to infect the ecosystem (even in a small way). Another 100 boats making it to shore with illegals not going through proper channels will make a greater impact on the environment. Therefore, illegal boat arrivals tend to make a threat to our ecosystem, even though the illegal boat arrivals of asylum seekers might have a better case to make as refugees than those that come by plane in the thousands.

1 boat this decade - the sky is falling the sky is falling - run run run.

UnSubRocky wrote on Feb 20^th, 2024 at 8:35pm:

Frank wrote on Feb 18th, 2024 at 8:33pm: Flying in - you have a verified ID. Boating in - you don't. Illegal immigrants flying in might have bogus documentation.

They were flying in on fake passports and fraudulent immigration approvals.

.

How come they didn't bring any pussy with them?
Whats in it for us?

Dnarever wrote on Feb 20^th, 2024 at 8:41pm:

UnSubRocky wrote on Feb 20th, 2024 at 8:35pm: Frank wrote on Feb 18th, 2024 at 8:33pm: Flying in - you have a verified ID. Boating in - you don't. Illegal immigrants flying in might have bogus documentation. They were flying in on fake passports and fraudulent immigration approvals.

So how many lying, cheating illegal immigrants are acceptable?

What to do with them?  Can't seem to be able to deport them.

So what, then? Let them keep coming?

Frank wrote on Feb 20^th, 2024 at 8:50pm:

Dnarever wrote on Feb 20th, 2024 at 8:41pm: UnSubRocky wrote on Feb 20th, 2024 at 8:35pm: Frank wrote on Feb 18th, 2024 at 8:33pm: Flying in - you have a verified ID. Boating in - you don't. Illegal immigrants flying in might have bogus documentation. They were flying in on fake passports and fraudulent immigration approvals. So how many lying, cheating illegal immigrants are acceptable?

None.

Frank wrote on Feb 20^th, 2024 at 8:50pm:

Dnarever wrote on Feb 20th, 2024 at 8:41pm: UnSubRocky wrote on Feb 20th, 2024 at 8:35pm: Frank wrote on Feb 18th, 2024 at 8:33pm: Flying in - you have a verified ID. Boating in - you don't. Illegal immigrants flying in might have bogus documentation. They were flying in on fake passports and fraudulent immigration approvals. So how many lying, cheating illegal immigrants are acceptable? What to do with them?  Can't seem to be able to deport them. So what, then? Let them keep coming?

This was a good one. A little more modest with his profession and he gets away with it.



Quote:

But perhaps no case better illustrates the ease with which Australia’s medical industry can be duped like that of Shyam Acharya, known to his patients as Dr Sarang Chitale. Authorities are currently investigating how Acharya stole the identity of an Indian doctor, obtained Australian citizenship, gained registration with the NSW Medical Board and worked at four NSW hospitals.

.

greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 20^th, 2024 at 1:21pm:

Gnads wrote on Feb 20th, 2024 at 7:41am: greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 19th, 2024 at 8:08pm: Frank wrote on Feb 19th, 2024 at 7:45pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 19th, 2024 at 7:26pm: Frank wrote on Feb 19th, 2024 at 5:15pm: Dnarever wrote on Feb 19th, 2024 at 4:36pm: Frank wrote on Feb 19th, 2024 at 9:23am: You are talking duckshite, Agent Duckwit. Only 317 – or two per cent – of 16,510 Channel migrants had passports with them when they were picked up by Border Force, according to the data, released under Freedom of Information laws. That means 16,300 – 98 per cent – arrived in the UK without documentation. People-smugglers encourage migrants to destroy ID papers because it boosts their chances of securing asylum and makes it hard to deport them as officials have nowhere to send them. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2022/02/24/almost-channel-migrants-arrive-without-passports-told-shred/ It was no different in Australia before Abbott put an end to it and is no different on the Mexico-US border and the Mediterranean. Sorry I didn't realise we were discussing the UK. We are discussing illegal immigration. We have had illegals in recent days.  No.  They are perfectly legal. They are claiming asylum. Claiming asylum is not illegal in this country, dear. Why do you delete and ignore the main point, slimey turd? What is it about your dishonest, slimey ethos that makes you always pretend that a dishonest editing is the way for you to make a Lying, dishonest point? Why ARE you a lying, dishonest, despicable, lying turd, despicable lying turd? Please explain yourself. Why did you lie and say it's illegal immigration? Because if you had an gram of honesty you'd say/know that's what it is. Claiming asylum isn't illegal immigration. Quite the opposite.

It's a false claim & entering the country via incorrect methods is illegal.

Unless they come through a port or airport they have entered the country illegally.

I claimed for Asylum into Switzerland from the oppressive political dictatorship here in Australia as America's 51st State occupation.
They denied access, refused to accept my asylum and requested that I entered their country on 'their terms'.

greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 20^th, 2024 at 2:54pm:

Frank wrote on Feb 20th, 2024 at 2:25pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 20th, 2024 at 1:24pm: Gnads wrote on Feb 20th, 2024 at 7:38am: greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 19th, 2024 at 7:26pm: Frank wrote on Feb 19th, 2024 at 5:15pm: Dnarever wrote on Feb 19th, 2024 at 4:36pm: Frank wrote on Feb 19th, 2024 at 9:23am: You are talking duckshite, Agent Duckwit. Only 317 – or two per cent – of 16,510 Channel migrants had passports with them when they were picked up by Border Force, according to the data, released under Freedom of Information laws. That means 16,300 – 98 per cent – arrived in the UK without documentation. People-smugglers encourage migrants to destroy ID papers because it boosts their chances of securing asylum and makes it hard to deport them as officials have nowhere to send them. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2022/02/24/almost-channel-migrants-arrive-without-passports-told-shred/ It was no different in Australia before Abbott put an end to it and is no different on the Mexico-US border and the Mediterranean. Sorry I didn't realise we were discussing the UK. We are discussing illegal immigration. We have had illegals in recent days.  No.  They are perfectly legal. They are claiming asylum. Claiming asylum is not illegal in this country, dear. Ahhh but claiming as such doesn't make it true .... now does it? ::) It makes it true that they are asylum seekers - everyone who says they are seeking asylum is an asylum seeker. However, it doesn't necessarily mean they are refugees. All claims for asylum must be processed, but making a claim is not illegal. Quite the opposite, in fact. Oh, the tautology 'argument'.  Needless to say, the point is not about asking for asylum (But you will latch onto it tenaciously, turd). 1. The point is entering a country illegally, far from a legal entry point, without passport or a visa, having paid people smugglers. Perfectly legal. People seeking asylum are desperate, they don't usually have access to passports or visas, and often have to flee in the middle of the night in order to avoid being discovered by their persecutors. As long as they're seeking asylum, and have their claims processed by the proper authorities, it's all good.

In the cases of these Pakistanis, Sri Lankans & Bangladeshis ....

who are their "persecutors"?

They're not desperate, they're all well dressed & have mobile pones.

All males .... where's the women & children?

greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 20^th, 2024 at 3:49pm:

Jasin wrote on Feb 20th, 2024 at 3:39pm: Drug smugglers and paedophiles, not reffos. Why wouldn't drug smugglers and paedophiles just get a passport, buy a plane ticket, and then enter the country like everyone else? Why would they choose to be detained and then investigated? I'm curious.

Why wouldn't these? ::)

They've come for White pussy and Centrelink payments.

greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 20^th, 2024 at 6:18pm:

Frank wrote on Feb 20th, 2024 at 6:04pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 20th, 2024 at 5:57pm: Frank wrote on Feb 20th, 2024 at 5:49pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 20th, 2024 at 2:54pm: Frank wrote on Feb 20th, 2024 at 2:25pm: Oh, the tautology 'argument'.  Needless to say, the point is not about asking for asylum (But you will latch onto it tenaciously, turd). 1. The point is entering a country illegally, far from a legal entry point, without passport or a visa, having paid people smugglers. Perfectly legal. People seeking asylum are desperate, they don't usually have access to passports or visas, and often have to flee in the middle of the night in order to avoid being discovered by their persecutors. As long as they're seeking asylum, and have their claims processed by the proper authorities, it's all good. Why do you pretend that the other two points that make up the whole picture are not relevant and can be ignored? Why are you such a slimey, lying, dishonest turd, turd? Oh, the tautology 'argument'.  Needless to say, the point is not about asking for asylum (But you will latch onto it tenaciously, turd). 1. The point is entering a country illegally, far from a legal entry point, without passport or a visa, having paid people smugglers. 2. Being undeportable when the bogus asylum claim is rejected by the country they invaded. 3. Living on welfare, being totally useless to the country they foisted themselves on. I think you CULTIVATE the moronic, the idiotic, the bbwianesque, like, well, bbwian, arse sniffing paki, thicko Smiff and duckwit. But you have that added slime and intentional, studied dishonesty. It is probably your union background -  a comrade from Slovenia. Perfectly legal. People seeking asylum are desperate, they don't usually have access to passports or visas, and often have to flee in the middle of the night in order to avoid being discovered by their persecutors. As long as they're seeking asylum, and have their claims processed by the proper authorities, it's all good. Lying crap. The could not get into Indonesia or Malaysia without passports and visas, you slimey dishones turd. We have hundreds, thouands of failed asylum claimants, many are convicted criminals. None of them are deported.  The UK and the US have millions. A complete slimey, one-way scam. The vast majority who come by boat are refugees. This is a simple fact.

Bullshyte.

Dnarever wrote on Feb 20^th, 2024 at 7:06pm:

20 odd years and they still haven't recovered from their anti refugee Howardian turdism.

I don't know how old you are but you're still a duckwit.

Gnads wrote on Feb 21^st, 2024 at 9:24am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 20th, 2024 at 3:49pm: Jasin wrote on Feb 20th, 2024 at 3:39pm: Drug smugglers and paedophiles, not reffos. Why wouldn't drug smugglers and paedophiles just get a passport, buy a plane ticket, and then enter the country like everyone else? Why would they choose to be detained and then investigated? I'm curious. Why wouldn't these? ::)

They're asylum seekers.

People seeking asylum rarely have access to passports, visas, or airplane tickets.

They're asylum seekers   ::)

it_is_the_light wrote on Feb 20^th, 2024 at 7:13pm:

Over 250 odd years ago White fella come here and stole the land calling Terra nulius the founding document,  lawful yet its not In Terra Nulius they said they could take this land as the indigenous were " not human " and more flora and fauna Ipso facto all Australians can claim Terra Nulius a false prima facie document and all laws steming from that .. so don't bleat about these boat people hypocriticus much ? Prima Facie A Latin term meaning "at first sight" or "at first look." This refers to the standard of proof under which the party with the burden of proof need only present enough evidence to create a rebuttable presumption that the matter asserted is true. A prima facie standard of proof is relatively low. https://content.next.westlaw.com › P... Prima Facie | Practical Law - Westlaw

That is a proven lie.

Gnads wrote on Feb 21^st, 2024 at 9:26am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 20th, 2024 at 6:18pm: Frank wrote on Feb 20th, 2024 at 6:04pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 20th, 2024 at 5:57pm: Frank wrote on Feb 20th, 2024 at 5:49pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 20th, 2024 at 2:54pm: Frank wrote on Feb 20th, 2024 at 2:25pm: Oh, the tautology 'argument'.  Needless to say, the point is not about asking for asylum (But you will latch onto it tenaciously, turd). 1. The point is entering a country illegally, far from a legal entry point, without passport or a visa, having paid people smugglers. Perfectly legal. People seeking asylum are desperate, they don't usually have access to passports or visas, and often have to flee in the middle of the night in order to avoid being discovered by their persecutors. As long as they're seeking asylum, and have their claims processed by the proper authorities, it's all good. Why do you pretend that the other two points that make up the whole picture are not relevant and can be ignored? Why are you such a slimey, lying, dishonest turd, turd? Oh, the tautology 'argument'.  Needless to say, the point is not about asking for asylum (But you will latch onto it tenaciously, turd). 1. The point is entering a country illegally, far from a legal entry point, without passport or a visa, having paid people smugglers. 2. Being undeportable when the bogus asylum claim is rejected by the country they invaded. 3. Living on welfare, being totally useless to the country they foisted themselves on. I think you CULTIVATE the moronic, the idiotic, the bbwianesque, like, well, bbwian, arse sniffing paki, thicko Smiff and duckwit. But you have that added slime and intentional, studied dishonesty. It is probably your union background -  a comrade from Slovenia. Perfectly legal. People seeking asylum are desperate, they don't usually have access to passports or visas, and often have to flee in the middle of the night in order to avoid being discovered by their persecutors. As long as they're seeking asylum, and have their claims processed by the proper authorities, it's all good. Lying crap. The could not get into Indonesia or Malaysia without passports and visas, you slimey dishones turd. We have hundreds, thouands of failed asylum claimants, many are convicted criminals. None of them are deported.  The UK and the US have millions. A complete slimey, one-way scam. The vast majority who come by boat are refugees. This is a simple fact. Bullshyte.

No.

A verifiable fact.

"Asylum seekers who arrive by boat are subject to the same assessment criteria as all other asylum applicants. Past figures show that between 70 and 100 per cent of asylum seekers arriving by boat at different times have been found to be refugees and granted protection either in Australia or in another country."

70 to 100 per cent is a vast majority.

Year nine maths, innit?

greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 21^st, 2024 at 9:27am:

Gnads wrote on Feb 21st, 2024 at 9:24am: greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 20th, 2024 at 3:49pm: Jasin wrote on Feb 20th, 2024 at 3:39pm: Drug smugglers and paedophiles, not reffos. Why wouldn't drug smugglers and paedophiles just get a passport, buy a plane ticket, and then enter the country like everyone else? Why would they choose to be detained and then investigated? I'm curious. Why wouldn't these? ::) They're asylum seekers. People seeking asylum rarely have access to passports, visas, or airplane tickets. They're asylum seekers   ::)

If they came through Indonesia & on an Indonesian boat that is a big fat lie.

No. Kosovo and Rwanda was a case for Asylum as Refugees.

All else have been illegal drug dealing paedophiles wanting 'easy access' under the radar.

They need to be put in chains, whipped and worked turning boulders into gravel stones.

Gnads wrote on Feb 21^st, 2024 at 9:30am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 21st, 2024 at 9:27am: Gnads wrote on Feb 21st, 2024 at 9:24am: greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 20th, 2024 at 3:49pm: Jasin wrote on Feb 20th, 2024 at 3:39pm: Drug smugglers and paedophiles, not reffos. Why wouldn't drug smugglers and paedophiles just get a passport, buy a plane ticket, and then enter the country like everyone else? Why would they choose to be detained and then investigated? I'm curious. Why wouldn't these? ::) They're asylum seekers. People seeking asylum rarely have access to passports, visas, or airplane tickets. They're asylum seekers   ::) If they came through Indonesia & on an Indonesian boat that is a big fat lie.

No.

They can come any way they want.

it_is_the_light wrote on Feb 20^th, 2024 at 7:18pm:

Frank wrote on Feb 20th, 2024 at 7:15pm: it_is_the_light wrote on Feb 20th, 2024 at 7:13pm: Over 250 odd years ago White fella come here and stole the land calling Terra nulius the founding document,  lawful yet its not In Terra Nulius they said they could take this land as the indigenous were " not human " and more flora and fauna Ipso facto all Australians can claim Terra Nulius a false prima facie document and all laws steming from that .. so don't bleat about these boat people hypocriticus much ? stupid nonsense. back to your copper pyramid, mong. shoo!! shooo!! Well I realise your are a self confessed freemasonic lightweight regarding legal debate and so carry on with your rubbish all you like .. you are exposed as a parrot for government and fremasonic doctrinical mind control woo woo impotence . You have no power here

Strangely enough ... neither do you. ;D

Jasin wrote on Feb 21^st, 2024 at 9:31am:

No. Kosovo and Rwanda was a case for Asylum as Refugees. All else have been illegal drug dealing paedophiles wanting 'easy access' under the radar. The need to be put in chains, whipped and worked turning boulders into gravel stones.

If they wanted to fly under the radar, they'd come in by plane with a passport and visa.

Coming by boat without documentation means they will be detained and investigated.

Your claim makes no sense whatsoever.

Invasion by over-population is not Asylum Peccary.

"Asylum seekers who arrive by boat are subject to the same assessment criteria as all other asylum applicants. Past figures show that between 70 and 100 per cent of asylum seekers arriving by boat at different times have been found to be refugees and granted protection either in Australia or in another country."

it_is_the_light wrote on Feb 20^th, 2024 at 7:22pm:

The British stole this country Australia Not White Australia.. we are Australians and can tell the monarch scum that sent Anzacs to their death at Gallipoli to #$@% off , but Stockholm syndrome imbeciles still wave the union jack , a total scourge on this land They killing black and white so wake up asap

They stole nothing.

If it wasn't for them ... you wouldn't be here ... no?

greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 21^st, 2024 at 9:33am:

"Asylum seekers who arrive by boat are subject to the same assessment criteria as all other asylum applicants. Past figures show that between 70 and 100 per cent of asylum seekers arriving by boat at different times have been found to be refugees and granted protection either in Australia or in another country."

I know you believe if you keep repeating the lie it becomes the truth .....

but yeah .. nah.

greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 21^st, 2024 at 9:32am:

Jasin wrote on Feb 21st, 2024 at 9:31am: No. Kosovo and Rwanda was a case for Asylum as Refugees. All else have been illegal drug dealing paedophiles wanting 'easy access' under the radar. The need to be put in chains, whipped and worked turning boulders into gravel stones. If they wanted to fly under the radar, they'd come in by plane with a passport and visa. Coming by boat without documentation means they will be detained and investigated. Your claim makes no sense whatsoever.

You're the one making stupid troll remarks to compensate for your lack of supporting the human rights of Australia's wellbeing. You'll virtual signal yourself with Martin Bryant if you could get away with it.  ::)

Gnads wrote on Feb 21^st, 2024 at 9:34am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 21st, 2024 at 9:33am: "Asylum seekers who arrive by boat are subject to the same assessment criteria as all other asylum applicants. Past figures show that between 70 and 100 per cent of asylum seekers arriving by boat at different times have been found to be refugees and granted protection either in Australia or in another country." I know you believe if you keep repeating the lie it becomes the truth ..... but yeah .. nah.

You hit the Peccary on the head right there!

Gnads wrote on Feb 21^st, 2024 at 9:34am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 21st, 2024 at 9:33am: "Asylum seekers who arrive by boat are subject to the same assessment criteria as all other asylum applicants. Past figures show that between 70 and 100 per cent of asylum seekers arriving by boat at different times have been found to be refugees and granted protection either in Australia or in another country." I know you believe if you keep repeating the lie it becomes the truth ..... but yeah .. nah.

It IS the truth.

Accept it.

Jasin wrote on Feb 21^st, 2024 at 9:34am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 21st, 2024 at 9:32am: Jasin wrote on Feb 21st, 2024 at 9:31am: No. Kosovo and Rwanda was a case for Asylum as Refugees. All else have been illegal drug dealing paedophiles wanting 'easy access' under the radar. The need to be put in chains, whipped and worked turning boulders into gravel stones. If they wanted to fly under the radar, they'd come in by plane with a passport and visa. Coming by boat without documentation means they will be detained and investigated. Your claim makes no sense whatsoever. You're the one making stupid troll remarks to compensate for your lack of supporting the human rights of Australia's wellbeing. You'll virtual signal yourself with Martin Bryant if you could get away with it.  ::)

I'm just stating facts:

"Asylum seekers who arrive by boat are subject to the same assessment criteria as all other asylum applicants. Past figures show that between 70 and 100 per cent of asylum seekers arriving by boat at different times have been found to be refugees and granted protection either in Australia or in another country."

UnSubRocky wrote on Feb 20^th, 2024 at 8:34pm:

Dnarever wrote on Feb 18th, 2024 at 8:31pm: tens of thousands have been flying in and nobody cares at all ? 20 people on a boat and the world is going to end. "Tens of thousands" of illegal immigrants flying into Australia would atleast have not been bringing in flora and fauna through customs that would go on to destroy our wildlife and fragile ecosystem. 20 people on a boat making it to mainland Australia would step off the vessel and head straight to the nearest civilisation. Meanwhile, whatever they brought on their shoes and any other exotic viruses/contaminants are going to infect the ecosystem (even in a small way). Another 100 boats making it to shore with illegals not going through proper channels will make a greater impact on the environment. Therefore, illegal boat arrivals tend to make a threat to our ecosystem, even though the illegal boat arrivals of asylum seekers might have a better case to make as refugees than those that come by plane in the thousands.

You must live under a rock?

Have you ever watched Australian Border Security?

Every show will show you Asians of some kind ... Vietnamese, Cambodian, Chinese, Thai & Indians as well as people from the Middle East bringing suitcases full of prohibited exotic fruits, food & animal products ..... every phukkin show.

They all tick "no" on the declaration forms & when caught go the no english, no understand or get really angry.

As a customs officer said to one of these people with over 20kg of foodstuffs ..."why did you bring so much food... don't you think we have food here in Australia?".

Dnarever wrote on Feb 20^th, 2024 at 8:40pm:

UnSubRocky wrote on Feb 20th, 2024 at 8:34pm: Dnarever wrote on Feb 18th, 2024 at 8:31pm: tens of thousands have been flying in and nobody cares at all ? 20 people on a boat and the world is going to end. "Tens of thousands" of illegal immigrants flying into Australia would atleast have not been bringing in flora and fauna through customs that would go on to destroy our wildlife and fragile ecosystem. 20 people on a boat making it to mainland Australia would step off the vessel and head straight to the nearest civilisation. Meanwhile, whatever they brought on their shoes and any other exotic viruses/contaminants are going to infect the ecosystem (even in a small way). Another 100 boats making it to shore with illegals not going through proper channels will make a greater impact on the environment. Therefore, illegal boat arrivals tend to make a threat to our ecosystem, even though the illegal boat arrivals of asylum seekers might have a better case to make as refugees than those that come by plane in the thousands. 1 boat this decade - the sky is falling the sky is falling - run run run.

;D you living under a rock too?

Dnarever wrote on Feb 20^th, 2024 at 8:56pm:

Frank wrote on Feb 20th, 2024 at 8:50pm: Dnarever wrote on Feb 20th, 2024 at 8:41pm: UnSubRocky wrote on Feb 20th, 2024 at 8:35pm: Frank wrote on Feb 18th, 2024 at 8:33pm: Flying in - you have a verified ID. Boating in - you don't. Illegal immigrants flying in might have bogus documentation. They were flying in on fake passports and fraudulent immigration approvals. So how many lying, cheating illegal immigrants are acceptable? What to do with them?  Can't seem to be able to deport them. So what, then? Let them keep coming? This was a good one. A little more modest with his profession and he gets away with it. Quote: But perhaps no case better illustrates the ease with which Australia’s medical industry can be duped like that of Shyam Acharya, known to his patients as Dr Sarang Chitale. Authorities are currently investigating how Acharya stole the identity of an Indian doctor, obtained Australian citizenship, gained registration with the NSW Medical Board and worked at four NSW hospitals.

His medical skills or lack thereof finally killed some one?

greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 21^st, 2024 at 9:27am:

Gnads wrote on Feb 21st, 2024 at 9:24am: greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 20th, 2024 at 3:49pm: Jasin wrote on Feb 20th, 2024 at 3:39pm: Drug smugglers and paedophiles, not reffos. Why wouldn't drug smugglers and paedophiles just get a passport, buy a plane ticket, and then enter the country like everyone else? Why would they choose to be detained and then investigated? I'm curious. Why wouldn't these? ::) They're asylum seekers. People seeking asylum rarely have access to passports, visas, or airplane tickets. They're asylum seekers   ::)

You passed on the other questions?

How perfectly twisty of you.

greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 21^st, 2024 at 9:31am:

Gnads wrote on Feb 21st, 2024 at 9:30am: greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 21st, 2024 at 9:27am: Gnads wrote on Feb 21st, 2024 at 9:24am: greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 20th, 2024 at 3:49pm: Jasin wrote on Feb 20th, 2024 at 3:39pm: Drug smugglers and paedophiles, not reffos. Why wouldn't drug smugglers and paedophiles just get a passport, buy a plane ticket, and then enter the country like everyone else? Why would they choose to be detained and then investigated? I'm curious. Why wouldn't these? ::) They're asylum seekers. People seeking asylum rarely have access to passports, visas, or airplane tickets. They're asylum seekers   ::) If they came through Indonesia & on an Indonesian boat that is a big fat lie. No. They can come any way they want.

Yes ... but the fact that they would require documentation to get into Indonesia & then come by Indonesian boat complicates the issue now doesn't it.

Makes your claim that they don't have access to passports, visas etc a whole lot of bollocks.

greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 21^st, 2024 at 9:32am:

Jasin wrote on Feb 21st, 2024 at 9:31am: No. Kosovo and Rwanda was a case for Asylum as Refugees. All else have been illegal drug dealing paedophiles wanting 'easy access' under the radar. The need to be put in chains, whipped and worked turning boulders into gravel stones. If they wanted to fly under the radar, they'd come in by plane with a passport and visa. Coming by boat without documentation means they will be detained and investigated. Your claim makes no sense whatsoever.

Neither does yours if they come by Indonesian boat.

greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 21^st, 2024 at 9:37am:

Gnads wrote on Feb 21st, 2024 at 9:34am: greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 21st, 2024 at 9:33am: "Asylum seekers who arrive by boat are subject to the same assessment criteria as all other asylum applicants. Past figures show that between 70 and 100 per cent of asylum seekers arriving by boat at different times have been found to be refugees and granted protection either in Australia or in another country." I know you believe if you keep repeating the lie it becomes the truth ..... but yeah .. nah. It IS the truth. Accept it.

Maybe your truth

& yeah ...nah I won't accept it

figures lie & liars figure

""

In theory, ‘genuine’ refugees are admitted in a timely manner and integrated into society. Those whose claims fail go home. In reality, however, it can take several years to complete the entire process of claiming asylum while the applicants build social and sometimes familial and professional ties in Australia. When they finally receive a rejection, many are unwilling to go home, or have nowhere to return to. Their countries of origin may not want them back. What should host governments do?

While it’s preferable that failed asylum seekers return home voluntarily, ultimately it is the state’s responsibility to ensure that they do not stay unlawfully. The international protection regime is not limited to people who we accept as refugees, but must also grapple with what to do with the people whose claims we reject.

Amid the growing crisis in global governance for protecting migrants and refugees, a consistently enforced yet humane policy of returning rejected asylum seekers has become ever more important.

Between 2010 and 2016, Australia doubled the number of removals of failed asylum seekers from 877 to 1752 per year. The rate of removals to finally rejected asylum claims also rose from 30.7% to 35.4% during this period. However, beyond the increase in numbers and rate, the policy faces several challenges.
https://www.lowyinstitute.org/the-interpreter/what-happens-failed-asylum-seekers#:~:text=In%20theory%2C%20'genuine'%20refugees,and%20professional%20ties%20in%20Australia.


T he process takes far to long - at taxpayers' expense with multiple appeal opportunities -  and the rejected refuse to return and most of them are not booted. Even criminal with no visas cannot be booted out - how much harder is it to then return those whose claim was found to be simply bogus.

Basically, if you made it onshore and claimed asylum, you wil stay as long as you like. this is not right in any sense.

Backstory of a boat arrival and the bizarre day when 39 foreigners landed in a bush community ::)

I could do with a slave or two.
They can run the treadmill conveyor belt like mice and keep my electricity running.  :)

Gnads wrote on Feb 21^st, 2024 at 9:55am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 21st, 2024 at 9:37am: Gnads wrote on Feb 21st, 2024 at 9:34am: greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 21st, 2024 at 9:33am: "Asylum seekers who arrive by boat are subject to the same assessment criteria as all other asylum applicants. Past figures show that between 70 and 100 per cent of asylum seekers arriving by boat at different times have been found to be refugees and granted protection either in Australia or in another country." I know you believe if you keep repeating the lie it becomes the truth ..... but yeah .. nah. It IS the truth. Accept it. Maybe your truth & yeah ...nah I won't accept it figures lie & liars figure

Objective truth:

"Asylum seekers who arrive by boat are subject to the same assessment criteria as all other asylum applicants. Past figures show that between 70 and 100 per cent of asylum seekers arriving by boat at different times have been found to be refugees and granted protection either in Australia or in another country."

Show us your figures.

Dnarever wrote on Feb 20^th, 2024 at 8:40pm:

1 boat this decade - the sky is falling the sky is falling - run run run.

1 boat, with the potential to devastate Australia's agricultural industry... even if the damage is contained to a small section of the coastal region where the boat landed. Yes, we should be concerned.

Jasin wrote on Feb 20^th, 2024 at 8:44pm:

How come they didn't bring any pussy with them? Whats in it for us?

You want Pakistani pussy?

Gnads wrote on Feb 21^st, 2024 at 9:43am:

UnSubRocky wrote on Feb 20th, 2024 at 8:34pm: Dnarever wrote on Feb 18th, 2024 at 8:31pm: tens of thousands have been flying in and nobody cares at all ? 20 people on a boat and the world is going to end. "Tens of thousands" of illegal immigrants flying into Australia would atleast have not been bringing in flora and fauna through customs that would go on to destroy our wildlife and fragile ecosystem. 20 people on a boat making it to mainland Australia would step off the vessel and head straight to the nearest civilisation. Meanwhile, whatever they brought on their shoes and any other exotic viruses/contaminants are going to infect the ecosystem (even in a small way). Another 100 boats making it to shore with illegals not going through proper channels will make a greater impact on the environment. Therefore, illegal boat arrivals tend to make a threat to our ecosystem, even though the illegal boat arrivals of asylum seekers might have a better case to make as refugees than those that come by plane in the thousands. You must live under a rock? Have you ever watched Australian Border Security? Every show will show you Asians of some kind ... Vietnamese, Cambodian, Chinese, Thai & Indians as well as people from the Middle East bringing suitcases full of prohibited exotic fruits, food & animal products ..... every phukkin show. They all tick "no" on the declaration forms & when caught go the no english, no understand or get really angry. As a customs officer said to one of these people with over 20kg of foodstuffs ..."why did you bring so much food... don't you think we have food here in Australia?".

I have watched portions of Australian Border Security. That show just reinforces my point about people are unlikely to get the flora and fauna through customs "that would go on to destroy our wildlife and fragile ecosystem". Sick people would get through customs. The foodstuff and plant material, animals, and such get quarantined or confiscated.

I could imagine that these boat people brought their food and still had some food when they arrived in Australia. And they would have tracked whatever soil on their shoes onto land in Australia. There were no customs to prevent these biohazards from coming onto the mainland.

theres too many people coming here whether boat or by plane verified id or not.  the sudomorphs had verified ids and that hasnt stopped them from being absolute human trash terrorising everyone left and right. what's a few dozen more pakis on top of the absolute mountain of human biomass that is coming here through every conceivable method they do every year. a huge % of them are rorting whatever visa class they are applying under because the visas themselves are designed to be rorted, with an infinite number of appeals and bridging visas you can hop between in order to extend your stay for a very long time, if not indefinitely. that is the point, to pack as many warm bodies into the country as possible.

Gnads wrote on Feb 21^st, 2024 at 9:55am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 21st, 2024 at 9:37am: Gnads wrote on Feb 21st, 2024 at 9:34am: greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 21st, 2024 at 9:33am: "Asylum seekers who arrive by boat are subject to the same assessment criteria as all other asylum applicants. Past figures show that between 70 and 100 per cent of asylum seekers arriving by boat at different times have been found to be refugees and granted protection either in Australia or in another country." I know you believe if you keep repeating the lie it becomes the truth ..... but yeah .. nah. It IS the truth. Accept it. Maybe your truth & yeah ...nah I won't accept it figures lie & liars figure

yes, you've always preferred the voices in your head to facts

Whatever happened to the Australian "Give us your rich, your clever, your educated.."?

Jasin wrote on Feb 21^st, 2024 at 5:09pm:

Whatever happened to the Australian "Give us your rich, your clever, your educated.."?

You're confusing the migration program with the humanitarian program.

After all these years, you still don't understand the difference.

Quite frankly, that's scary.

Who cares?! We don't want pleb spongers freeloading.
You yourself won't take them into your house so shut up.  ;D

Jasin wrote on Feb 21^st, 2024 at 5:18pm:

Who cares?!

Intelligent, rational, caring individuals.

greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 21^st, 2024 at 5:23pm:

Jasin wrote on Feb 21st, 2024 at 5:18pm: Who cares?! Intelligent, rational, caring individuals.

Put em up in your house then.  ;D
You wouldn't even volunteer to 'sponsor' those who had just landed. You just sit in a Forum virtual signalling yourself and expecting others to carry those plebs for it.
You're so full of it, it slimes out of the corners of your mouth.  ;D

Please keep the vast differences between asylum seekers and illegal immigrants crystal clear..... discussing asylum seekers with II s is like inserting intersex people into discussion of 'transgender'.



                                                                             ........Try new ManMilk today!  It's the mother's milk you have when you're not having mother's milk, and is full of rich hormones just right for every new-born's diet.... It's safe, scientifically proven, well researched and easy to use ... it contains no natural additives, only a few adjustment artificial drugs, and no animals were harmed in development of this amazing product ....... Discover ManMilk today - for a better future for YOUR baby .....

Jasin wrote on Feb 21^st, 2024 at 5:26pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 21st, 2024 at 5:23pm: Jasin wrote on Feb 21st, 2024 at 5:18pm: Who cares?! Intelligent, rational, caring individuals. Put em up in your house then.  ;D You wouldn't even volunteer to 'sponsor' those who had just landed. You just sit in a Forum virtual signalling yourself and expecting others to carry those plebs for it. You're so full of it, it slimes out of the corners of your mouth.  ;D

Like scoring the Olympic diving... the judges sit back and wave a virtue flag signifying the number of points.... might be a better way to approve or disprove applicants for IMMIGRATION ...

Newsflash!
Australia donates 10,000 illegal immigrants to Ukraine to fight Russians on the front line.
Ukraine and Australia celebrate!!!

Brian Ross wrote on Feb 19^th, 2024 at 9:19pm:

Frank wrote on Feb 19th, 2024 at 7:47pm: Brian Ross wrote on Feb 19th, 2024 at 7:40pm: Frank wrote on Feb 19th, 2024 at 5:15pm: Dnarever wrote on Feb 19th, 2024 at 4:36pm: Frank wrote on Feb 19th, 2024 at 9:23am: You are talking duckshite, Agent Duckwit. Only 317 – or two per cent – of 16,510 Channel migrants had passports with them when they were picked up by Border Force, according to the data, released under Freedom of Information laws. That means 16,300 – 98 per cent – arrived in the UK without documentation. People-smugglers encourage migrants to destroy ID papers because it boosts their chances of securing asylum and makes it hard to deport them as officials have nowhere to send them. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2022/02/24/almost-channel-migrants-arrive-without-passports-told-shred/ It was no different in Australia before Abbott put an end to it and is no different on the Mexico-US border and the Mediterranean. Sorry I didn't realise we were discussing the UK. We are discussing illegal immigration. We have had illegals in recent days. I bet they have no IDs for the same reason illegals flooding into North America and Europe don't. Australia dealt with it under Abbott. None of the democracies have dealt with the large number of illegals entering under false pretences and staying or claiming asylum on bogus grounds and most of whom are not deported even if their asylum claim fails, even if they commit serious crimes. Stopping illegals at entry is one issue. Deporting bogus aslyum claimant and illegal immigrants is another. The international human rights lobby sabotages the latter at every step. They are squealing about the former as well in America and Europe. Australia stared them down, to the envy of Europe and America.  You have the right to ask for asylum. You do not have the right to demand permanent resettlement. No country owes you anything except your own. You do not have the right to foist yourself on another country that has rejected your asylum claim. Actually you do, Soren.  The hosting country does not have the right to deport you.  Tsk, tsk, tsk...  ::) ::) They have the right. But being the spineless, lying worms just like you, Bbwian, they say they don't. They ceded that right when they signed the UN Convention, Soren.  Tsk, tsk, tsk...  ::) ::)

Stupid, spineless Bbwianesque bollocks, as usual.

The US has EVERY right to deport illegals back to Mexico where they came from, the UK to France, Australia to Indonesia or Malaysia because those bogus asylum seekers were not fleeing Mexico, France or Indonesia/Malaysia.
Sending them back to those countries in NOT refoulment, as they are not fleeing those countries.

If signing the refugee convention means ceding the right to deal with lying, cheating chancers than the sooner we unsign the bloody racket of a thing the better.

I am not at all surprised that you are fully in favour of ANYTHING that nibbles and undermines Western democracies. You are a prime example of the useful idiot class who ALWAYS sides with the enemies of the West.
Because you worked with an Abdul once you imagine yourself an internationalist. But you are just an ignorant idiot who couldn't complete a sentence without contradicting yourself twice.

Jasin wrote on Feb 21^st, 2024 at 6:07pm:

Newsflash! Australia donates 10,000 illegal immigrants to Ukraine to fight Russians on the front line. Ukraine and Australia celebrate!!!

Good idea! Send those Pakis to fight f our freedom in the Ukraine and give them PR if they survive three years.
Same with the hordes flow in into Europe and the US.

Donate them to Ukraine.

🚨

---

greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 21^st, 2024 at 4:02pm:

Gnads wrote on Feb 21st, 2024 at 9:55am: greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 21st, 2024 at 9:37am: Gnads wrote on Feb 21st, 2024 at 9:34am: greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 21st, 2024 at 9:33am: "Asylum seekers who arrive by boat are subject to the same assessment criteria as all other asylum applicants. Past figures show that between 70 and 100 per cent of asylum seekers arriving by boat at different times have been found to be refugees and granted protection either in Australia or in another country." I know you believe if you keep repeating the lie it becomes the truth ..... but yeah .. nah. It IS the truth. Accept it. Maybe your truth & yeah ...nah I won't accept it figures lie & liars figure Objective truth: "Asylum seekers who arrive by boat are subject to the same assessment criteria as all other asylum applicants. Past figures show that between 70 and 100 per cent of asylum seekers arriving by boat at different times have been found to be refugees and granted protection either in Australia or in another country." Show us your figures.

You're the one quoting figures ...

I said - figures lie - liars figure.