Frank wrote on Oct 20
th, 2023 at 12:46pm:
AusGeoff wrote on Oct 20
th, 2023 at 12:33pm:
Albanese made two major errors of judgement:
Rather than a referendum, it should've first been
put to the people as a plebiscite.
From the get-go, Albanese forced the ill-fated
referendum into a partisan vote—Labor v. Liberal.
Additionally, he should never have toured the country
spruiking the YES vote wearing his vote yes tee-shirt.
By all rights, he should've devoted virtually the same
sort of time elaborating the NO vote. By his actions he
presupposed a positive outcome for his self-defined
referendum, which was overconfident by far, and
totally avoided the NO case—to his political detriment.
Albanese now looks like a weakened, confused,
defocussed politician, who's lucky that a bigger
wanker in the shape of the petty, hateful overbearing
Dutton was his virtual opponent.
(plebiscite: The direct vote of all the members of an
electorate on an important public question such as a
change in the constitution, but which in itself does not
affect the Constitution.
EG: "the administration will hold a plebiscite for the
approval of constitutional reforms".)
Thank you for coming up with an even stupider idea than Albo could manage. You are Labor Leader material, Guff. Kudos.
Can you tell me Frank
why exactly you think an initial
plebiscite would've been a stupid idea?
Surely a non-binding vote would've given the government
a far more accurate picture of the mood of the electorate,
but without the stressors and politicisation of a legally-binding
referendum?
If the Voice plebiscite
had indicated that the electorate
favoured an Aboriginal Voice, then a referendum could've
been included as part of the next Federal election—
at a
fraction of the cost of this Voice failure.