Both Clintons are as crooked as they come.

greggerypeccary wrote on May 3^rd, 2023 at 6:48am:




That was quoted in 2002, or 2003.
Bloody hell.


Trump booted ep in 2007ish, due to his behaviour towards a members daughter at trumps club, then had nothing to do with the bloke ever since.  So that would make it nearly 20yrs that he knew him.

There is a difference, young women v underage women.
Do you have a problem with Bernie Ecclestone, or the late Hugh Hefner?


Funny how stormy has to pay another 130k to trump.
Why is that? 
If trump was guilty of anything, he'd have been hung by now. But you got nothing except CNN saying trump threatened.... Yeah bullshyte.

Facts bud.
Try using the facts for once. 
It's okay not to like someone but you're unhinged towards trump because you've been brainwashed by cnn to in a big way, and your imagination won't let you see what's right in front of you. Thing is, you're not alone. There's a lot of you with TDS.

Don't cut my post up either.
Respond in full, or farrkkk off.

greggerypeccary wrote on May 3^rd, 2023 at 1:25pm:


Or, would you prefer facts like this: upon seeing a ten-year-old child inside Trump Tower, the very first thing that came to criminal defendant Trump's mind was when he would be able to date her.  He viewed her as a sexual object.  Ten-years-old.

In audio from the tape, Mr Trump can be heard asking the 10-year-old if she is going up an escalator inside Trump Tower in New York, to which she responds: “Yeah”.

He then turns to the camera and says: “I’m going to be dating her in 10 years. Can you believe it?”

greggerypeccary wrote on May 3^rd, 2023 at 1:33pm:



Good.
Now you're dealing with facts.
Sure, he's not right in saying that, but is it against the law to say it?
Aqua did the math for you.


Here in Australia the term was known as a laybye when I was younger. 
I bet you heard the term, and said nothing in defence of the girls.

Captain Caveman wrote on May 3^rd, 2023 at 2:08pm:


No.  It's an indisputable fact.

Criminal defendant Trump was accused in a New York court of raping a small child - with best friend Jeffrey Epstein - and then threatening to kill her and her family if she told anyone.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
---------------------------------------------------------------
JANE DOE, proceeding under a pseudonym,
Plaintiff,
v.
DONALD J. TRUMP and JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN,
Defendants.
)
)
Case No.:
JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
---------------------------------------------------------------
COMPLAINT FOR RAPE, SEXUAL MISCONDUCT, CRIMINAL SEXUAL ACTS,
SEXUAL ABUSE, FORCIBLE TOUCHING, ASSAULT, BATTERY, INTENTIONAL
AND RECKLESS INFLICTION OF EMOTIONAL DISTRESS, DURESS, FALSE
IMPRISONMENT, AND DEFAMATION

Captain Caveman wrote on May 3^rd, 2023 at 1:59pm:


I can safely say that I have never heard that term used in that particular context in my life.

Anyone who looks at a ten year old girl and immediately thinks of how soon they can be having sex with her is not someone who should be in the White House.

Sure, it's not illegal, but would you leave them alone with a child?

"It's okay, he's only alleged to have raped a small child with a convicted child sex offender and then threatened to kill her, and when he looks at ten-year-old girls he's imagining having sex with them in the future so it's all cool.  I can see no problem leaving him alone in a house totally unsupervised with a prepubescent girl (or boy) - what could possibly go wrong?"

Quote:



Yes they got out the official CIA Ouija board and held a seance. He is dead you know.