Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Apr 30
th, 2023 at 1:32pm:
....brilliantly contructed sentence...
Ah.. I take it back - you CAN critique an argument, let's see what you got...
Quote:requiring an actualy mental acuity to work it through ....
er , what's wrong with stating the point plainly?
Let's see:
1.
"All rights are equal" ....so the desires of each self-interested individual are "equal" - but are they compatable?
2.
"but the louder rights demands..."
hmm, you mean your "rights" compared with my "rights".....?
3.
..create more equal rights out of thin air."...an interesting reference to how money is created, whether in private banks as at present, or by the national treasury which is the necessary reform of the financial system. But you will see in my subsequent comments "rights" are indeed ALSO created out of thin air..
You will need to disprove that point, to advance your views on "rights".
Quote: ah yes - the killer 'social construct' defence, eh?
Yes - pending your reasoned refutation.
Quote:Question unanswered.
True; so I think we are discussing both "rights" (which are mere individual desires), AND "Rights", which are addressed in the
UN Universal DHR. Quote:To what end? Already refuted by its very own invention and insertion... it's called a canard in the ring...
On the contrary I have analyzed and critiqued all your submissions; whereas your best effort is "ah yes - the killer 'social construct' defence, eh?"...without any attempt to reasonably refute it.
Here it is again:
But in any case, 'rights' are inventions of the human cortex, no more than 'desires' as perceived by the unconsciously/instinctively self-interested individual.
Surely you can see the error in it? (Even if I can't...).