thegreatdivide wrote on Nov 21
st, 2022 at 4:07pm:
Oh..I concede; Carpenter was treated well....
It took your lies a long time to catch up.
thegreatdivide wrote on Nov 21
st, 2022 at 4:07pm:
I don't need to meet you, your mind reveals all its vicious RW self-interest....
Nope. That's another fallacy of yours. The fallacious TGD.
thegreatdivide wrote on Nov 21
st, 2022 at 4:07pm:
Not all.
And yet you can't cite any, why is that?
thegreatdivide wrote on Nov 21
st, 2022 at 4:07pm:
Irrelevant for harnessing 100% renewables.
Nope. It is indeed relevant. That's what your lack of science does. It leads you down rabbit holes where you lose your way.
thegreatdivide wrote on Nov 21
st, 2022 at 4:07pm:
Didn't you know - vegetarianism is increasing rapidly, any gathering is likely to feature some.
So the UN idea of eating bugs is out then. Except they don't believe it for themselves.
thegreatdivide wrote on Nov 21
st, 2022 at 4:07pm:
letter to the law stuff again.
Nope. "letter OF the law stuff". So you don't want laws to be followed. What exactly do you want? A free-for all?
thegreatdivide wrote on Nov 21
st, 2022 at 4:07pm:
So as I said -
lee wrote on Nov 20
th, 2022 at 8:11pm:
"There is many a slip twixt cup and lip". or perhaps "the road to hell is paved with good intentions".
thegreatdivide wrote on Nov 21
st, 2022 at 4:07pm:
of dear ...mirror time , you think I mentioned Dan to applaud him for his intended nationalization of the SEC... (I do applaud him for that plan, but that's not WHY I mentioned him..you have obviously forgotten WHY I mentioned it...talk about dotage
Oh you had a reason for mentioning him?
thegreatdivide wrote on Nov 21
st, 2022 at 4:07pm:
Take it up with the experts, many of whom disagree with you, as I said.
And yet you can't cite anyone other than worldinfo which clearly says -
"
lee wrote on Nov 21
st, 2022 at 3:21pm:
"Data without guarantee © WorldData.info, all rights reserved"
And we should accept that?. Oh dear.
thegreatdivide wrote on Nov 21
st, 2022 at 4:07pm:
There IS only 'one trick', to rid the world of the filthy, poisonous, fossil price gougers.
And replace it with the new green Utopian price gougers.
thegreatdivide wrote on Nov 21
st, 2022 at 4:07pm:
Meanwhile it's you who is disagreeing with the UN's climate expert opinion.
But what is the UN expert opinion? The IPCC's? Which parts do you agree with?
"Floods - In summary there is low confidence in the human influence on the changes in high river flows on the global scale. Confidence is in general low in attributing changes in the probability or magnitude of flood events to human influence because of a limited number of studies and differences in the results of these studies, and large modelling uncertainties. "
IPCC AR6 WG1 11.5.4

"Droughts - There is medium confidence in the ability of ESMs to simulate trends and anomalies in precipitation deficits and AED, and also medium confidence in the ability of ESMs and hydrological models to simulate trends and anomalies in soil moisture and streamflow deficits, on global and regional scales"
IPCC AR6 WG1 11.6.3.6

"The high-end scenarios RCP8.5 or SSP5-8.5 have recently been argued
to be implausible to unfold (e.g., Hausfather and Peters, 2020; see
Chapter 3 of the AR6 WGIII)."

IPCC AR6 WG1 4.2.2
Where
IPCC- is the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
AR6 - is the newest report
WG1 - is The Physical Science Basis
And then the Chapters and paragraphs.
Let us know what you disagree with. Please.