Oh dear- that page has been removed from the Wentworth report.   

https://wentworthreport.com/2021/07/22/australian-immigration-policy/

Augusto Zimmermann
Jun 25 2026

Authored by barrister Graham Smith and tabled in the UK Parliament on 16 June 2026, The Independent Rape Gang Inquiry Report was established to examine the organised sexual exploitation of children across the United Kingdom.[[url=https://unherd.com/newsroom/rupert-lowes-rape-gangs-report-is-a-missed-opportuni
ty/]1[/url]] The Inquiry, which was funded through public donations, examined what is almost certainly the most horrendous scandal in Britain’s history.
The evidence presented confirms the systematic targeting of vulnerable children, mostly white British young girls, by predominantly Muslim Pakistanis in towns and villages spread across the country. As noted by Adam Wren, a regular contributor to the British current affairs website UnHerd,

It’s well established now by official reports that even with inadequate data, there’s a clear perpetrator and victim profile: Pakistani men and underage white British girls. Also apparent is the complicity of institutions in covering up these crimes.

The Report’s main findings make for deeply disturbing reading. Survivors described daily rapes, ‘red rooms’ of extreme torture, trafficking between cities, and institutional disbelief that compounded their suffering.[3] Muslims, mostly of Pakistani background, systematically raped and tortured up to 250,000 British girls between eight and twelve years old. Some of these small children were forced to have sex with dogs and beaten with bats, which were inserted anally and vaginally. In one case, a girl was raped by about 80 Muslim men, most of whom were never charged by British authorities.In another case, a little girl’s tongue was nailed to the wall so she couldn’t move while being raped by several men. Another girl was blinded by acid while trying to escape the rapists.

Dr Taj Hargey, imam of the Islamic Congregation of Oxford, notes that virtually all members of these rape gangs were practicing Muslims. The report also explains that that the British Police was warning rapists of complaints while simultaneously threatening victims with prosecution. Even more shocking, in other cases, police officers themselves participated in the collective rapes. When the mother of one of the raped and tortured girls tried calling for help, a British police officer told her: “You should be happy that your daughter is experiencing a different culture.” He then hung up on her.[5]

The evidence presented in this sobering report fully confirms what has long been known, but which has repeatedly been denied by the British establishment, including by many in the political class. The investigation shows how police, social services, schools, the National Health Service (NHS), licensing authorities and governments effectively allowed Muslim rapists to operate with remarkable impunity. Below, an excerpt from the Report’s Executive Summary so that readers can get a proper idea of the magnitude of the scandal:

The scale of the crimes committed is staggering. It has previously established that, at the very least, 250,000 young white girls have been subjected to repeated rape, gang rape, trafficking, torture, pregnancy, forced Islamic conversion, and lifelong trauma. The true number is probably higher. The perpetrators bear primary responsibility, yet the institutional failures that enabled them for decades must also be confronted. In court records and official inquiries, around 87% of those convicted in these group-based child sexual exploitation cases bore distinctively Muslim names. The vast majority of men involved in these gangs were not convicted.[6]

These rape gangs targeted native British girls because they were white, non-Muslim, and vulnerable.[7] The Report explicitly mentions the religious motivation behind such heinous crimes against one of the most vulnerable members of British society (emphasis added):

The demographic and cultural drives are clear. Perpetrators from Pakistani Muslim and other Muslim backgrounds operated under an honour- and shame-based clan code that treated non-Muslim girls, especially white working-class girls, as property available for sexual use.

This pattern was reinforced by eight theological and legal aspects of Islam. These include the doctrine of Muslim superiority drawn from Quranic verses that position Muslims at the top with a duty to correct non-believers.

The gang members’ justification for their crimes can be found in the Islamic principles of loyalty and disavowal known as al-walā’ wa-l-barā. It demands enmity towards non-Muslims, the superiority of men over women, forced marriage combined with the absence of any fixed minimum age of consent, the perception of female sexuality as inherently dangerous, a system of sex slavery that authorises sexual relations with non-Muslim captives, and a religiously sanctioned social hierarchy that subjugates conquered non-Muslims.

https://quadrant.org.au/news-opinions/immigration/the-rape-of-britain/

(From left) Zeeshan Ahmed, Bassam Karrar and Mohammed Karrar (Thames Valley Police)



https://x.com/ZoomerHistorian/status/2066915418002870274

These rape gangs targeted native British girls because they were white, non-Muslim, and vulnerable.[7] The Report explicitly mentions the religious motivation behind such heinous crimes against one of the most vulnerable members of British society (emphasis added):

The demographic and cultural drives are clear. Perpetrators from Pakistani Muslim and other Muslim backgrounds operated under an honour- and shame-based clan code that treated non-Muslim girls, especially white working-class girls, as property available for sexual use.

This pattern was reinforced by eight theological and legal aspects of Islam. These include the doctrine of Muslim superiority drawn from Quranic verses that position Muslims at the top with a duty to correct non-believers.

The gang members’ justification for their crimes can be found in the Islamic principles of loyalty and disavowal known as al-walā’ wa-l-barā. It demands enmity towards non-Muslims, the superiority of men over women, forced marriage combined with the absence of any fixed minimum age of consent, the perception of female sexuality as inherently dangerous, a system of sex slavery that authorises sexual relations with non-Muslim captives, and a religiously sanctioned social hierarchy that subjugates conquered non-Muslims.

These elements, filtered through clannish immigrant sub-cultures, provided religious justification that enabled the systematic rape and even slaughter of White British girls.[8]

So Britain can’t even kick out a foreign-born brute who raped our children. We can’t even expel from our territory a man born overseas who rained sexual terror on our working-class girls. We can’t even deport a Pakistani man who was found guilty of committing 30 child-rape offences in the UK. We can’t even say *uck off to an immigrant who exploited British hospitality by plying vulnerable girls with booze, raping them in dingy flats, and then screaming ‘racist bastard’ at the judge who sentenced him for these misogynist atrocities.


This is what the horrific case of Shabir Ahmed has confirmed. That Britain is so broken – our sovereignty so deracinated, our self-respect so shattered – that we can’t even remove a foreign man who visited untold barbarism on our female citizens. ‘Government “cannot deport”’ this rape-gang ringleader, says the BBC. An ‘anomaly’ in our immigration law means we have no choice but to continue to host him even following his release from prison, says the Telegraph. May I humbly suggest we incinerate every law that meddles in any way whatsoever with our sovereign right to deport this monster, because otherwise we are a nation in name only.

Shabir Ahmed was the ringleader of the Rochdale gang of Pakistani men who used, abused and raped poor white girls. It was one of England’s worst rape gangs, those mobs of mostly Muslim men who for decades groomed and raped vulnerable girls as cops and officialdom looked the other way. His crimes were sickening. He led a group of men who preyed on girls as young as 13.
...
The importance of this cannot be overstated. The nation that cannot remove a foreign-born repeat child-rapist is not a free nation. It is a vassal state of the suicidal ideology of anti-Westernism and its attendant creeds of self-loathing and post-nationhood. The Shabir Ahmed case exposes the monsters that have been birthed by the state-driven cult of grievance. Alongside branding his judge a ‘racist bastard’, Ahmed also bemoaned the ‘11 white jurors’ who found him guilty and said: ‘It’s become fashionable to blame everything on Muslims these days.’ This is the moral inversion that has been inflicted on us courtesy of the cloying cult of ‘Islamophobia’ – a situation where even a Muslim man found guilty of the industrial-scale rape of girls can fantasise that he is the victim.
Spiked

Dnarever wrote on Jul 2^nd, 2026 at 10:58am:



What about Bob Hawke?

Dnarever wrote on Jul 2^nd, 2026 at 8:58pm:



What about the immigrant crime in Melbourne?

What about the terrible housing situation?

Dnarever wrote on Jul 2^nd, 2026 at 10:00pm:



Boĺlocks, duckwit.


In a 1975 cabinet meeting, Prime Minister Gough Whitlam declared:"I'm not having hundreds of *ucking Vietnamese Balts coming into this country with their political and religious hatreds against us."



The Whitlam government generally opposed taking in large numbers of anti-communist South Vietnamese refugees. They were reluctant to antagonize the new North Vietnamese communist government and feared that admitting these refugees would import Cold War-era political tensions into Australia.

Following the dismissal of the Whitlam government in November 1975, the incoming Malcolm Fraser Coalition government dramatically reversed this approach, welcoming tens of thousands of Vietnamese refugees over the following years and laying the foundations for the Vietnamese-Australian community.