Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 ... 6 7 8 9 10 ... 18
Send Topic Print
Hijab, a symbol of oppression. (Read 15349 times)
polite_gandalf
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 20027
Canberra
Gender: male
Re: Hijab, a symbol of oppression.
Reply #105 - Oct 7th, 2022 at 10:53am
 
freediver wrote on Oct 6th, 2022 at 8:54pm:
polite_gandalf wrote on Oct 6th, 2022 at 10:30am:
freediver wrote on Sep 30th, 2022 at 6:18pm:
polite_gandalf wrote on Sep 30th, 2022 at 10:56am:
Its true Frank - you refer to hijabis as any one of:

- a miserable creature with no agency
- too ignorant/brainwashed to know any "better"
- deviantly flaunting symbols of oppression
- someone who is not worthy to be part of this society
- someone who is fare game for ridicule

the terms "hijab" and "hijabis" are pejoratives for you. You make it crystal clear that to wear the hijab is a form of deviancy and/or sign of ignorance or someone who has no agency. These women are nothing but caricatures to you.

So no, I am not emoting when I say you degrade and humiliate any woman who wears the hijab.


How much agency do hijabis generally have?


generally where? In Iran - obviously not much, in Australia, a lot more.

Arguing the degree of agency women have in wearing the hijab in a free country like Australia is a fools errand, and adds nothing to the debate.


Why not? If Australian women are being forced to wear the hijab, why would you not want to know about it and defend their rights?


Such coercion wouldn't occur in a vacuum. If there are grown women who are physically being forced to wear the hijab, then I'd expect there to be far worse things going on that should be dealt with first. We call it domestic abuse, and yes I absolutely stand up for the right of women to not be subjected to that. Mostly though, 'coercion' is probably on the same scale as me being 'coerced' by my community to wear pants. Strictly speaking I don't have agency either in that respect, but it becomes so ingrained that the line between coercion and happily doing it voluntarily becomes very blury. And of couse you have to consider the norms and expectations individual families and particular communities have on their members. All of us have all sorts of "coercions" imposed on us by our families and communities - but mostly we don't feign outrage about them and scream about freedom and rights.

Generally though, in our free society, a woman who is not in a domestic abuse situation (that absolutely should be dealt with), a woman should be considered as having as much agency in what she wears as any of us do.

But what this is really about is the unfair standards and expectations Frank and ilk are imposing on women. They somehow know whats best for them - if they wear the hijab, then by default, there is something wrong with them. They "degrade themselves", as Frank assures us. The fact that they always seem to hone in on outward, visible symbols like the hijab to pass judgement, and not even consider the personality, attitudes or beliefs of the actual person wearing it - says it all.
Back to top
 

A resident Islam critic who claims to represent western values said:
Quote:
Outlawing the enemy's uniform - hijab, islamic beard - is not depriving one's own people of their freedoms.
 
IP Logged
 
polite_gandalf
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 20027
Canberra
Gender: male
Re: Hijab, a symbol of oppression.
Reply #106 - Oct 7th, 2022 at 10:57am
 
Frank wrote on Oct 7th, 2022 at 10:28am:
Women DON'T  want to wear it, that's why they are protesting - and get beaten, even killed.


do you think maybe thats because they are living in a country that forces them to wear it by law? Removing the law won't stop some Iranian women from continuing to wear it. Its the lack of choice they object to.

Bit different situation in Australia wouldn't you agree?
Back to top
 

A resident Islam critic who claims to represent western values said:
Quote:
Outlawing the enemy's uniform - hijab, islamic beard - is not depriving one's own people of their freedoms.
 
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 52479
Gender: male
Re: Hijab, a symbol of oppression.
Reply #107 - Oct 7th, 2022 at 11:09am
 
polite_gandalf wrote on Oct 7th, 2022 at 10:53am:
freediver wrote on Oct 6th, 2022 at 8:54pm:
polite_gandalf wrote on Oct 6th, 2022 at 10:30am:
freediver wrote on Sep 30th, 2022 at 6:18pm:
polite_gandalf wrote on Sep 30th, 2022 at 10:56am:
Its true Frank - you refer to hijabis as any one of:

- a miserable creature with no agency
- too ignorant/brainwashed to know any "better"
- deviantly flaunting symbols of oppression
- someone who is not worthy to be part of this society
- someone who is fare game for ridicule

the terms "hijab" and "hijabis" are pejoratives for you. You make it crystal clear that to wear the hijab is a form of deviancy and/or sign of ignorance or someone who has no agency. These women are nothing but caricatures to you.

So no, I am not emoting when I say you degrade and humiliate any woman who wears the hijab.


How much agency do hijabis generally have?


generally where? In Iran - obviously not much, in Australia, a lot more.

Arguing the degree of agency women have in wearing the hijab in a free country like Australia is a fools errand, and adds nothing to the debate.


Why not? If Australian women are being forced to wear the hijab, why would you not want to know about it and defend their rights?


Such coercion wouldn't occur in a vacuum. If there are grown women who are physically being forced to wear the hijab, then I'd expect there to be far worse things going on that should be dealt with first. We call it domestic abuse, and yes I absolutely stand up for the right of women to not be subjected to that. Mostly though, 'coercion' is probably on the same scale as me being 'coerced' by my community to wear pants. Strictly speaking I don't have agency either in that respect, but it becomes so ingrained that the line between coercion and happily doing it voluntarily becomes very blury. And of couse you have to consider the norms and expectations individual families and particular communities have on their members. All of us have all sorts of "coercions" imposed on us by our families and communities - but mostly we don't feign outrage about them and scream about freedom and rights.

Generally though, in our free society, a woman who is not in a domestic abuse situation (that absolutely should be dealt with), a woman should be considered as having as much agency in what she wears as any of us do.

But what this is really about is the unfair standards and expectations Frank and ilk are imposing on women. They somehow know whats best for them - if they wear the hijab, then by default, there is something wrong with them. They "degrade themselves", as Frank assures us. The fact that they always seem to hone in on outward, visible symbols like the hijab to pass judgement, and not even consider the personality, attitudes or beliefs of the actual person wearing it - says it all.



Why are Iranian women burning it?  What are they so upset about if it is really about female autonomy to wear the hijab?

Back to top
 

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 52479
Gender: male
Re: Hijab, a symbol of oppression.
Reply #108 - Oct 7th, 2022 at 11:17am
 
polite_gandalf wrote on Oct 7th, 2022 at 10:57am:
Frank wrote on Oct 7th, 2022 at 10:28am:
Women DON'T  want to wear it, that's why they are protesting - and get beaten, even killed.


do you think maybe thats because they are living in a country that forces them to wear it by law? Removing the law won't stop some Iranian women from continuing to wear it. Its the lack of choice they object to.

Bit different situation in Australia wouldn't you agree?


I think there is a lot of pressure on Muslim women in the West to conform to Muslim customs.  The relationship between the sexes is very different in Muslim and Western societies. The more Islam, the more repression, especially of women.

It's not just a piece of cloth, as you would like to pretend. No hijabi girl is going to openly date a Christian or Jewish boy - or a Muslim one for that matter. Some will not even shake hands with an infidel. They are not free to live their life as long as they cover their hair and that's it, no further curtailment. No. The hijab signals the whole Islamic system of separating, fencing off females.

Back to top
« Last Edit: Oct 7th, 2022 at 9:21pm by Frank »  

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
polite_gandalf
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 20027
Canberra
Gender: male
Re: Hijab, a symbol of oppression.
Reply #109 - Oct 7th, 2022 at 2:59pm
 
Frank wrote on Oct 7th, 2022 at 11:17am:
I think there is a lot of pressure on Muslim women in the West to conform to Muslim customs.


Of course. No individual is free from the pressures their respective societies bears down on them. Unfortunately, such pressures are disproportionately more on women - always have, since the dawn of mankind. The fact that you are seemingly incapable of understanding that your condescending armchair lectures about women "degrading themselves" is an example of that very pressure  - is the whole problem here.

FD seems to think that rescuing poor oppressed women from the evils of hijab is the answer - but its not. Its just yet another bloke telling women whats best for them. Thats actually the first thing we need to stamp out if we trully want to help women with their freedom and rights - stop lecturing them about what we think is best for them.
Back to top
 

A resident Islam critic who claims to represent western values said:
Quote:
Outlawing the enemy's uniform - hijab, islamic beard - is not depriving one's own people of their freedoms.
 
IP Logged
 
issuevoter
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 9200
The Great State of Mind
Gender: male
Re: Hijab, a symbol of oppression.
Reply #110 - Oct 7th, 2022 at 9:18pm
 
polite_gandalf wrote on Oct 7th, 2022 at 10:53am:
freediver wrote on Oct 6th, 2022 at 8:54pm:
polite_gandalf wrote on Oct 6th, 2022 at 10:30am:
freediver wrote on Sep 30th, 2022 at 6:18pm:
polite_gandalf wrote on Sep 30th, 2022 at 10:56am:
Its true Frank - you refer to hijabis as any one of:

- a miserable creature with no agency
- too ignorant/brainwashed to know any "better"
- deviantly flaunting symbols of oppression
- someone who is not worthy to be part of this society
- someone who is fare game for ridicule

the terms "hijab" and "hijabis" are pejoratives for you. You make it crystal clear that to wear the hijab is a form of deviancy and/or sign of ignorance or someone who has no agency. These women are nothing but caricatures to you.

So no, I am not emoting when I say you degrade and humiliate any woman who wears the hijab.


How much agency do hijabis generally have?


generally where? In Iran - obviously not much, in Australia, a lot more.

Arguing the degree of agency women have in wearing the hijab in a free country like Australia is a fools errand, and adds nothing to the debate.


Why not? If Australian women are being forced to wear the hijab, why would you not want to know about it and defend their rights?


Such coercion wouldn't occur in a vacuum. If there are grown women who are physically being forced to wear the hijab, then I'd expect there to be far worse things going on that should be dealt with first. We call it domestic abuse, and yes I absolutely stand up for the right of women to not be subjected to that. Mostly though, 'coercion' is probably on the same scale as me being 'coerced' by my community to wear pants. Strictly speaking I don't have agency either in that respect, but it becomes so ingrained that the line between coercion and happily doing it voluntarily becomes very blury. And of couse you have to consider the norms and expectations individual families and particular communities have on their members. All of us have all sorts of "coercions" imposed on us by our families and communities - but mostly we don't feign outrage about them and scream about freedom and rights.

Generally though, in our free society, a woman who is not in a domestic abuse situation (that absolutely should be dealt with), a woman should be considered as having as much agency in what she wears as any of us do.

But what this is really about is the unfair standards and expectations Frank and ilk are imposing on women. They somehow know whats best for them - if they wear the hijab, then by default, there is something wrong with them. They "degrade themselves", as Frank assures us. The fact that they always seem to hone in on outward, visible symbols like the hijab to pass judgement, and not even consider the personality, attitudes or beliefs of the actual person wearing it - says it all.


The reason you disagree with Frank is not about women in Islam, it is because you don't like it when members of this Australian forum pointing out sickness running through Islam, of which the hijab is a symbol. But I suppose you have no choice since you adopted Mohammedanism. As a moderator, you should have a more objective view.

Back to top
 

No political allegiance. No philosophy. No religion.
 
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 52479
Gender: male
Re: Hijab, a symbol of oppression.
Reply #111 - Oct 7th, 2022 at 9:20pm
 
polite_gandalf wrote on Oct 7th, 2022 at 2:59pm:
Frank wrote on Oct 7th, 2022 at 11:17am:
I think there is a lot of pressure on Muslim women in the West to conform to Muslim customs.


Of course. No individual is free from the pressures their respective societies bears down on them. Unfortunately, such pressures are disproportionately more on women - always have, since the dawn of mankind. The fact that you are seemingly incapable of understanding that your condescending armchair lectures about women "degrading themselves" is an example of that very pressure  - is the whole problem here.

FD seems to think that rescuing poor oppressed women from the evils of hijab is the answer - but its not. Its just yet another bloke telling women whats best for them. Thats actually the first thing we need to stamp out if we trully want to help women with their freedom and rights - stop lecturing them about what we think is best for them.

I am not restricting them, bozo, you Muslims are.

You buggers bring the old country backwardness stupidity and superstition ipto your 'new' lives which are barely different to your old backward, stupid and superstitious lives.

Coz you are 'free' to stay that way, so you will. You were not free to be any other way there - but coming here you choose to be free the way you were unfree there.

Islam.




Back to top
 

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 52479
Gender: male
Re: Hijab, a symbol of oppression.
Reply #112 - Oct 9th, 2022 at 6:01am
 
...

Back to top
« Last Edit: Oct 9th, 2022 at 6:47am by Frank »  

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 52479
Gender: male
Re: Hijab, a symbol of oppression.
Reply #113 - Oct 9th, 2022 at 6:46am
 
...
Back to top
 

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
Baronvonrort
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 19534
Gender: male
Re: Hijab, a symbol of oppression.
Reply #114 - Oct 9th, 2022 at 7:31pm
 
Quote:
Women in Iran are united to spread revolution. I know what it's like to be one of them


With their hands linked together, Iranian women of every age and background have taken to the streets and online to spread revolution.

Their protests were sparked by the death of Mahsa Amini who was killed in custody after being arrested by Tehran's morality police.

I am watching it unfold from the relative safety of Australia, but I know what it's like to be one of them.

When I go online, I see the backdrop to my childhood, the streets of Iran, broken and bleeding. I see the same horrors that caused me to flee Iran repeated anew.

Although I am in another country, my breath is ragged even though this time there is no tear gas to hurt me. I am imagining my fellow protesters holding a napkin drenched in vinegar over my mouth to help me breathe after being gassed and beaten.

My generation grew up forced to repeat dehumanising chants like, "The blood in our veins is a gift to our leader" or "God protect Khomeini's movement, reduce from our lives and add to his life" every day at school. It ruined so many childhoods.

But the product of these 43 years of brainwashing is a global shout of "Woman, Life, Freedom": a revolutionary manifesto that stands for intersectionality, for the right to life and humanity, and demands the distortion of the Islamic Republic as a terrorist regime.

Now schoolgirls are burning pictures of the supreme leader taken from their books, kicking out a senior education ministry official from their school in Karaj and removing their mandatory hijabs.


Memories are like a physical pain
I was a teacher in Tehran at a prestigious university, advocating for women and children on death row and directing an art therapy project in an orphanage, but I fled persecution with nothing but my daughter Minerva and a bag in 2010.

My brother, too, left Tehran. I still can't forget the sound of his screams when the Islamists dragged him to the ground, into a van and then to their jail when he was a young photojournalist.

When he was released, his body had been crushed by their flogging, his assets confiscated or frozen.

Now he's based in London and works for the BBC.

I can't forget the teenage dissidents who chose to end their life rather than buckle beneath the jackboot of the regime.

I can't forget the voices of my students and classmates that scar the land like shrapnel.

I can't forget the sound of kissing was banned, how love, happiness and dancing were forbidden.

Each memory slams into me with physical pain. Worse still, these crimes are being repeated, re-traumatising Iran and the Iranian diaspora.

Many Iranians see no future under the regime except the possibility of more surveillance, disadvantage, discrimination, and poverty.

Often the unknown frightens us. But for Iranian people, state violence is infused in their daily life and is not an unfamiliar component. Their courage is the antidote to the dreadful desperation to survive.

My people have come to realise that for more than 43 years, they have been living on death row, on a gradual death, where the imagination of any prosperity and freedom was impossible


Memories of growing up in Iran keep flooding back to me.

From the age of six or seven, we were forced to live invisibly.

I remember the veiled body of our childhoods and being forced to go to school wearing only four regulation colours: black, brown, grey, and navy.

Since the Shia Islamists seized power in 1979 there have been many protests against the compulsory hijab.

more here- https://www.abc.net.au/news/2022-10-09/iran-protest-women-standing-up-for-rights...

Back to top
 

Leftists and the Ayatollahs have a lot in common when it comes to criticism of Islam, they don't tolerate it.
 
IP Logged
 
Baronvonrort
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 19534
Gender: male
Re: Hijab, a symbol of oppression.
Reply #115 - Oct 9th, 2022 at 7:34pm
 
Quote:
Iranian police accused of murdering schoolgirl protester Nika Shahkarami and ordering her family to say she killed herself


The mother and other relatives of a girl who died during protests in Iran have been threatened into making "forced confessions" about the 16-year-old's death, according to reports by local media and the BBC.

Nika Shahkarami, who lived in Tehran with her mother, vanished during protests in the capital over the death of another young woman, Mahsa Amini, who died last month in police custody.

Nika was missing for a week before her body was found in a Tehran street and returned to her family, Tasnim news agency reported, adding relatives had not received official word on how she died.

Foreign-based Iranian activists allege she died in police custody, leading to her photo circulating online and her name being used as hashtag in posts associated with the protest movement.

However, authorities have denied any wrongdoing.

In a video sent on Thursday to foreign-based opposition media, Nika's mother, Nasrin Shahkarami, accused authorities of murdering her daughter and using threats to force her to confess that her daughter's death was a suicide.

"I saw my daughter's body myself," Ms Shahkarami said in a video sent on Thursday to Radio Farda, a US-funded media outlet.

"The back of her head showed she had suffered a very severe blow as her skull had caved in. That's how she was killed."


Nika's uncle Mohsen and aunt Atash were detained by authorities after Atash posted messages online about her niece's death and spoke to the media.

On Wednesday night, state media broadcast an interview with Atash, saying that Nika was killed "falling from a building".

more here- https://www.abc.net.au/news/2022-10-07/nika-shakarami-iran-protester-family-forc...
Back to top
 

Leftists and the Ayatollahs have a lot in common when it comes to criticism of Islam, they don't tolerate it.
 
IP Logged
 
issuevoter
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 9200
The Great State of Mind
Gender: male
Re: Hijab, a symbol of oppression.
Reply #116 - Oct 10th, 2022 at 8:31am
 
polite_gandalf wrote on Oct 7th, 2022 at 2:59pm:
Frank wrote on Oct 7th, 2022 at 11:17am:
I think there is a lot of pressure on Muslim women in the West to conform to Muslim customs.


Of course. No individual is free from the pressures their respective societies bears down on them. Unfortunately, such pressures are disproportionately more on women - always have, since the dawn of mankind. The fact that you are seemingly incapable of understanding that your condescending armchair lectures about women "degrading themselves" is an example of that very pressure  - is the whole problem here.

FD seems to think that rescuing poor oppressed women from the evils of hijab is the answer - but its not. Its just yet another bloke telling women whats best for them. Thats actually the first thing we need to stamp out if we trully want to help women with their freedom and rights - stop lecturing them about what we think is best for them.


Yes, but its alright for Islam to lecture the free world and accuse us of satanism, while teaching their children that they are God's chosen people.
Back to top
 

No political allegiance. No philosophy. No religion.
 
IP Logged
 
polite_gandalf
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 20027
Canberra
Gender: male
Re: Hijab, a symbol of oppression.
Reply #117 - Oct 10th, 2022 at 9:32am
 
Frank wrote on Oct 7th, 2022 at 9:20pm:
I am not restricting them


Strawman.

We all know how you cynically champion western values for the sole purpose of denigrating non-westerners/non-whites. Of course we are well aware of your hypocricy - that you would only ever use these values to feign outrage at rights violations imposed by brown people - and that it would never ever extend to criticising other forms of rights violations - like the French hijab and burqa bans. Your *ACTUAL* views on western liberal views on freedom are perfectly articulated in my signature - so lets not pretend that you hold any sort of moral superiority on this - ok?

But thats not really the issue here. Its your caveman attitudes towards women thats the issue. Such that if and when an anti-Islam mullah equivalent came in and did exactly what the mullah's in Iran do - ie tell women what they can and can't wear, and enact laws to effect that - you would, at the very least, not raise even a peep of opposition to such "restrictions". And most likely you would be enthusiastically cheering it on.

Back to top
 

A resident Islam critic who claims to represent western values said:
Quote:
Outlawing the enemy's uniform - hijab, islamic beard - is not depriving one's own people of their freedoms.
 
IP Logged
 
polite_gandalf
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 20027
Canberra
Gender: male
Re: Hijab, a symbol of oppression.
Reply #118 - Oct 10th, 2022 at 9:36am
 
issuevoter wrote on Oct 7th, 2022 at 9:18pm:
The reason you disagree with Frank is not about women in Islam, it is because you don't like it when members of this Australian forum pointing out sickness running through Islam, of which the hijab is a symbol. But I suppose you have no choice since you adopted Mohammedanism. As a moderator, you should have a more objective view.



Do you also believe women "degrade" themselves because they wear a particular style of head dress?
Back to top
 

A resident Islam critic who claims to represent western values said:
Quote:
Outlawing the enemy's uniform - hijab, islamic beard - is not depriving one's own people of their freedoms.
 
IP Logged
 
Bobby.
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 112419
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: Hijab, a symbol of oppression.
Reply #119 - Oct 10th, 2022 at 9:39am
 
Why is showing some hair on your head immoral?

Is it immoral for men too?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 ... 6 7 8 9 10 ... 18
Send Topic Print