Australian Politics Forum - Alex Jones confronted by Sandy Hook family in cour

Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register

Forum rules, Recent posts (with text), RSS, Search options, Browse all uploaded images
Home, Articles, Green Tax Shift, Evolution,

Australian Politics Forum › General Discussion › America › Alex Jones confronted by Sandy Hook family in cour

‹ Previous Topic | Next Topic ›

Pages: 1 ... 5 6 7

Alex Jones confronted by Sandy Hook family in cour (Read 2430 times)

Captain Caveman

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 6211
Gender: male

Re: Alex Jones confronted by Sandy Hook family in cour
Reply #90 - Aug 15^th, 2022 at 6:28am

scope wrote on Aug 14^th, 2022 at 8:23am:

Captain Caveman wrote on Aug 14^th, 2022 at 5:13am:

Panther wrote on Aug 13^th, 2022 at 4:35pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Aug 11^th, 2022 at 9:29pm:

Conspiracy theorist Alex Jones insisted Sandy Hook massacre was a hoax, but now he has to pay $65.4 million in damages, so what's next? Shocked

https://imgur.com/yRSSI4H.gif

1995 Texas law could shield Alex Jones from paying the
vast majority of the $50 million defamation case judgment.

Democrats in 1995 enacted lawsuit reforms that limit the amount of damages plaintiffs collect.

Source: Texas Tribune
Quote:

A Texas jury has awarded a nearly $50 million judgment in a defamation trial against extremist talk show host Alex Jones for claiming the 2012 Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting was a hoax. He was sued by the parents of a 6-year-old boy killed in the tragedy.

The question is, will Texas law spare the Infowars host and his company Free Speech Systems tens of millions under a 27-year-old statute limiting the amount that a jury can make a plaintiff pay?

The answer is likely to be decided during the appeals process, but if the statutory limit is applied by the courts to Jones’ case, he could be forced to pay less than $5 million in total damages,
legal experts say........continued

With assets estimated as much as $365+ million Mr. Jones won't even break a bead of sweat, & whatever the final damages to be awarded comes down to, that amount will also probably face multiple appeals.

That's gold.

Lets see if I have this right,
Both of you think that telling outright lies is a good way of making money?
Jones, told lies, by using controversy he increases his audience thereby increasing AD revenue so he makes even more money.
When confronted and proven to be an outright liar in court, you both think that the law which limits his damages is a good thing, am I correct so far?

There is something seriously wrong with both of you if you think that a known liar should be able to say whatever he likes to enable him to make even more money.

It's easy to see how that sort of thinking is smacking this world we live in.
Have you both no morals, you should hang your heads in shame.

Calm down.
It's farrkinng hilarious that he's going to use a law the dems have past, to save his own bacon.

I also do not believe money is the answer to fixing the problem.
Everyone is so farrking greedy these days.
Like mobile speed camera vans. They raise shyte loads of cash but do not stop the problem at all.

IP Logged

Pages: 1 ... 5 6 7

‹ Previous Topic | Next Topic ›

« Forum

‹ Board

Top of this page