Frank wrote on Feb 15^th, 2026 at 5:00pm:




Why was a dog-humping paedo treated like a saint?
When the entertainer’s body was found in an alleyway in Cardiff city centre in January 2023, his death prompted a frenzy of speculation. The BBC ran multiple pieces on the investigation and even covered a vigil held at Windsor Place, Cardiff.

‘It’s rocked the community, that’s all I can say, no one’s safe anywhere’, his friend, Richard Smith, told a BBC reporter. Drag performer Myky Webb warned it was ‘very worrying for Cardiff as a city and for queer people in Cardiff on the scene, to think that this kind of thing still happens in 2023’. Rob Llewelyn said he had watched Moore sing in Cardiff over the past 20 years. ‘Everyone in the gay community knew him, he

The unspoken assumption in the BBC’s reporting was clear: that the dead gay man, who was found in a luminous green dress, blonde wig and diamante heels, had been the victim of a hate crime. Amid the public outpouring, popular children’s drag entertainer Aida H Dee helped raise funds for Moore’s funeral. On the day of the funeral, Cardiff Council and the police went so far as to close roads across the city to accommodate a horse-drawn cortège.

Now, two years on, an inquest has revealed the truth about Moore’s death. And it is grisly. The coroner ruled that this, er, beloved pillar of the community might have died from an allergy to dog semen. I don’t think I have ever written a sentence as grotesque – so that’s a first.

The 39-year-old certainly went out with a bang. He had been on a night out in Cardiff, performing under one of his monikers – Crystal Couture and CC Quinn. He had ‘spent time… with two men’ before leaving a nightclub. Shortly before 6am, he encountered a man walking his dog. The pair went to an alleyway together. The dog went with them. The last man to see Moore alive said he and Moore had sex, before Moore ‘encouraged’ the dog to ‘join in’. The coroner found that ‘at some stage between 5.52am and 6.38am, the man’s dog penetrated Darren’. Although he couldn’t confirm precisely which of the men had goaded the dog, he added that it would have been ‘almost impossible’ for the dog to have performed the act without ‘guidance and encouragement’ from a human. The second man said Moore later fell asleep in the alleyway. This is where he was found dead the next morning.

As deaths from dog ejaculate are exceedingly rare, it was not possible for the coroner to confirm that this was definitely Moore’s cause of death. Nonetheless, he found that he was not able to rule out the dog’s semen – and Moore’s allergy to dogs – as a possibility. The official cause of death was registered as ‘sudden death in a man with bronchial asthma in the cold who had consumed alcohol and in a temporal association with sexual activity including intercourse with a dog’.
...

In 1999, he was convicted on four counts of raping a boy under 16. Twelve years later, in 2011, he was back before the courts, handed a two-year community order and 300 hours of unpaid work for breaching a sex offender’s order. Yet still, this man’s death was presented as a tragedy worthy of multiple BBC articles, and worth shutting down the streets of Cardiff for.

...
Today, drag has become a media shorthand for virtue, a glittery stand-in for ‘British values’, and nowhere more so than at the BBC. As spiked has noted before, the corporation has developed a curious fixation on this genre of performance. It churns out a steady stream of stories about drag-queen story hours, drag workshops and drag ‘educators’, as if these niche entertainers were a cornerstone of British cultural life rather than a small subculture, which most of the gay men I know consider somewhat embarrassing. It is hard not to view the prominence given to these diversity divas as part of an agenda. The BBC uses drag not only to entertain, but also to educate and inform licence-paying plebs about the correct opinions.

The trouble is, once any group is treated as above criticism, journalism slides into propaganda. It leads the likes of the BBC to pretend that a man becomes virtuous simply because he’s gay, or because he wears heels and dies relatively young. The sanctification of drag queens is barking mad.
Spiked

Gnads wrote on Feb 15^th, 2026 at 5:53pm:



Yep:

greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 16^th, 2026 at 2:45pm:

He evidently gives you the horn, despicable, uncleam creep.

You must be onto your 87th keyboard by now, compulsive fapper.

https://thefederalist.com/2026/02/17/malpractice-suits-are-starting-to-bring-dow...

Malpractice Suits Are Starting To Bring Down The Transgender Industrial Complex

True societal pathologies have a limited shelf life, and it turns out the most recent pathology – transgender ideology — is no exception. Detransitioner Fox Varian recently won $2 million against the psychologist and surgeon who led her into mutilation, a double mastectomy, at the age of 16. Almost immediately, the American Society of Plastic Surgeons and the American Medical Association timidly walked back their support of gender-related mutilation of minors. The reckoning has begun.

In A Moon for the Misbegotten, Eugene O’Neill proposes that “[t]here is no present or future — only the past, happening over and over again — now.” The transgender phenomenon — though, in its details, unprecedented in human history — seems to have happened before.

In 1935, Portuguese neurosurgeon Dr. Antonio Egas Moniz created the lobotomy procedure to treat severe mental illness. The first U.S. lobotomy was performed in 1936 by Dr. Walter Freeman and Dr. James Watts at George Washington University Hospital. From the mid-1930s until the late 1950s, approximately 40,000-50,000 U.S. patients were lobotomized. The global community of medical experts was so impressed with this treatment that, in 1949, the Nobel Prize for Physiology or Medicine was awarded to the man who invented it.

As “perfected” by Dr. Freeman, a lobotomy involved plunging an ice pick through the patient’s eye socket and into his brain. The trail of physical and mental ruination was long and wide.

No one does lobotomies anymore. Repulsion caught up with the experts and ended the horror.

In the 1980s, a different type of mania swept the therapeutic world. This one left not physical scars but a wake of emotional, reputational, and family devastation. The phenomenon was called “repressed memories” or “false memories,” aligning with the American Psychiatric Association’s inclusion of “psychogenic amnesia” in its 1980 Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Psychiatric Disorders.

During this time, national alarm about child sex abuse led to media saturation with survivor stories and wildly inflated estimates of the number of child victims. A coterie of psychotherapists sprang up to help patients unearth memories of sexual trauma that were so deeply buried in their psyches that years or even decades could pass with no recollection of harm. Only during intense sessions with these “expert” therapists did patients conclude that maybe dad had done something horrible. The result was a flood of lawsuits against alleged perpetrators that destroyed families and lives.

Repressed-memory claims against supposed sexual abusers peaked between 1992 and 1994 and then suddenly dropped off. Several factors contributed to the abrupt halt. One was the American Psychiatric Association’s acknowledgment of the problematic use of its “psychogenic amnesia” diagnosis in “repressed memory” therapy. It is “not known what proportion of adults who report memories of sexual abuse were actually abused,” the APA warned, and it advised therapists to maintain a neutral stance and avoid techniques that might influence a patient to claim memories that may be false. The APA went further in 1999 and 2000, issuing a position statement urging therapists to focus on a patient’s current difficulties without automatically validating unproven “memories.”

APA developments, though, were perhaps not paramount in the near-disappearance of the phenomenon. Perhaps the primary impetus for the return to sanity occurred when a California dad named Gary Ramona sued his daughter’s therapists for implanting false memories of his abusing her. Ramona lost not only his job but his family because of the accusations, which his daughter had come to believe, via therapy, were genuine. The jury awarded him $500,000 for lost wages and emotional harm.

(continued below) ...