Grappler Truth Teller
Gold Member
   
Online

Australian Politics
Posts: 86633
Always was always will be HOME
Gender:
|
Aurora Complexus wrote on Oct 21 st, 2024 at 2:04am: Grappler Truth Teller wrote on Oct 20 th, 2024 at 10:42pm: The truth about British Labour - fascists to the core:- https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/uknews/labour-gender-therapy-plans-risk-criminali..."Labour gender therapy plans ‘risk criminalising parents who don’t want children to transition’Labour’s “trans inclusive” ban on conversion therapy risks “criminalising” parents who do not want their children to transition, Sir Keir Starmer has been warned.
A cross-party group of MPs and peers as well as psychiatrists, psychologists, doctors and consultants has written to the Prime Minister to express their “grave concerns” about his proposals.
They warn that such legislation also risks criminalising therapists who do not “unconditionally affirm” a child’s desire to transition.
The previous government had proposed banning conversion therapy but it was never implemented because of concerns that parents, teachers and therapists could be criminalised for questioning a child’s belief that they were born in the wrong body.
Labour has now resurrected these plans, with the Government earlier this month launching a new Office for Equality and Opportunity, stating that one of its “key immediate priorities” will be “delivering a full, trans-inclusive ban on conversion practices”.
The new cross-departmental body will be spearheaded by Annelise Dodds, the equalities minister, who has previously vowed to make it easier to change gender.
But the letter’s 140 signatories – which include Graham Stringer, senior Labour MP, and Dr David Bell, the former Tavistock Centre governor – warn that if such a ban goes ahead, a “slippery slope towards criminalising parents awaits us”.
They point out the “serious and harmful unintended consequences” of the plans, adding that medical interventions known as “gender-affirming transition” have been revealed as a “major medical scandal”.
Earlier this year, Dr Hilary Cass’s landmark report into the treatment of transgender children, advised that under-18s should not be rushed into treatment which they may later regret.
The report by Dr Cass, a paediatric consultant, called for the “unhurried” care of those under-25 who think they may be transgender, an end to the prescribing of powerful hormone drugs to under-18s and early help for primary school children who want to socially transition.
The letter, organised by James Esses, a campaigner, states that: “Whistleblowers in this field have been vindicated by recent events, such as the final report of the independent Cass Review, the NHS decision to halt the prescription of puberty blockers, the closure of the GIDS gender clinic at the Tavistock, and the revelations contained within the WPATH files, amongst other things.
“Many confused and vulnerable children who medically transitioned through puberty blockers and cross-sex hormones have suffered irreversible developmental issues, physiological damage (such as loss of bone density, infertility and sexual dysfunction) and significant social and relational harms. Those most at risk are children who do not conform to traditional sex stereotypes.”
Last month, a United Nations expert warned that a trans-inclusive bans on conversion therapy could backfire by putting girls and boys at risk of harm if governments rush their implementation.
Reem Alsalem, the UN special rapporteur on violence against women and girls, warned governments considering such a ban that there was a danger it could make it easier to “fast track” lesbian and autistic girls on the path of irreversible medical gender transition.
Labour has previously come under fire over its transgender policies. Earlier this year, the then shadow health secretary Wes Streeting said that Labour has “a lot of work to do to earn the trust” of women in the wake of rows about transgender rights.
He said it had taken the party “a while to navigate what has been a pretty complicated and at times toxic debate”, saying it was now time to “show some humility” for the hurt caused.More in link:- Calling anyone a "fascist" requires more explanation than that. It's a serious issue whether teenagers have a right to choose their own medical care. But you should be careful when it comes to gender. Anyone who demands a right of parental veto for 16-18 year olds for the young person to have sex, is actually a fascist. Age of consent everywhere in the UK, is 16. So what is " “unhurried” care of those under-25 who think they may be transgender," What is this? It violates the age of consent, and it even violates the age of adult responsibility (recognized practically everywhere as 18 years.) It's not medical care - it is radical body alteration treatment, and minors cannot give meaningful consent to such things. Thank you for coming.
|