Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 ... 34 35 36 37 38 ... 43
Send Topic Print
The fallacy of the Greens (Read 67621 times)
thegreatdivide
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics<br
/>

Posts: 15589
Gender: male
Re: The fallacy of the Greens
Reply #525 - May 18th, 2023 at 12:38pm
 
lee wrote on May 17th, 2023 at 3:11pm:
thegreatdivide wrote on May 17th, 2023 at 2:16pm:
And China must build 60 times the infratstructure, which will take  longer than Oz because China must lift its living standards at the same time (unlike Oz)   



Nope. More machines makes it less times than Oz. With such a large workforce it is easy to upskill. Roll Eyes
 
Wrong again. It takes longer to build new pumped hydro storage and the necessary new transmission grid, than  new coal plants which  can feed into the existing grid.

Therefore China must keep building coal plants to lift the living standards of its poor, while it continues to build renewables faster than any other country. 

Quote:
But NOT India and China. Grin Grin Grin Grin
 

You are still  forgetting the poverty reduction task facing India and China NOW; nevertheless with Dutton and co in Oz, China is likely to achieve net zero before Oz...

Quote:
Yes they are using forced labour but unfortunately we have an expensive workforce and a low population. That means we do have economy of scale to do it here. Roll Eyes


I think you meant we DON'T have economy of scale here?  (Oz PVs will be much more expensive than  China's, just as an Oz NEV would be much more expensive  than a BYD import).

Quote:
So you want a world where everything is free. Roll Eyes
 

Not "everything", just the essentials. Spot the difference?

Quote:
You miss the point. They are made with FF. They can't be made any other way. Roll Eyes


Nonsense. The quantum of renewables powering  the Chinese grid is growing all the time. Eventually eveything will be made with renewables.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
lee
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 21394
Gender: male
Re: The fallacy of the Greens
Reply #526 - May 18th, 2023 at 1:25pm
 
thegreatdivide wrote on May 18th, 2023 at 12:38pm:
It takes longer to build new pumped hydro storage and the necessary new transmission grid, than  new coal plants which  can feed into the existing grid.


Not when you are using the old retired coal plants. Roll Eyes Pumped storage is only one POSSIBLE solution. It depends heavily on topography.

thegreatdivide wrote on May 18th, 2023 at 12:38pm:
Therefore China must keep building coal plants to lift the living standards of its poor, while it continues to build renewables faster than any other country. 


So again, what in effect you are saying, is that cutting emissions is not urgent. Thanks for that. Roll Eyes

thegreatdivide wrote on May 18th, 2023 at 12:38pm:
You are still  forgetting the poverty reduction task facing India and China NOW; nevertheless with Dutton and co in Oz, China is likely to achieve net zero before Oz...


But apparently it is not urgent. Australia's 500Mt vs China 2912Mt. Roll Eyes

thegreatdivide wrote on May 18th, 2023 at 12:38pm:
I think you meant we DON'T have economy of scale here?


Yes, I did.

thegreatdivide wrote on May 18th, 2023 at 12:38pm:
Not "everything", just the essentials. Spot the difference?



And you decide the essentials. Right. Roll Eyes

Realistically, food, power, transportation, medicines, jobs

thegreatdivide wrote on May 18th, 2023 at 12:38pm:
The quantum of renewables powering  the Chinese grid is growing all the time. Eventually eveything will be made with renewables.


Nope. Some of the things are inherently heavy on power.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
lee
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 21394
Gender: male
Re: The fallacy of the Greens
Reply #527 - May 18th, 2023 at 1:27pm
 
*
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
thegreatdivide
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics<br
/>

Posts: 15589
Gender: male
Re: The fallacy of the Greens
Reply #528 - May 18th, 2023 at 1:57pm
 
lee wrote on May 18th, 2023 at 1:25pm:
thegreatdivide wrote on May 18th, 2023 at 12:38pm:
It takes longer to build new pumped hydro storage and the necessary new transmission grid, than  new coal plants which  can feed into the existing grid.


Not when you are using the old retired coal plants. Roll Eyes Pumped storage is only one POSSIBLE solution. It depends heavily on topography.


You aren't using only old retired ones, you are building new ones next the current grid as well, while also building the new renewables infrastructure which takes longer (and pumped hydro storage will be part of the mix). 

Quote:
So again, what in effect you are saying, is that cutting emissions is not urgent.


No Im saying poverty eradication via fast increase in energy use is ALSO urgent in developing countries, unlike in the developed economies.

Quote:
But apparently it is not urgent. Australia's 500Mt vs China 2912Mt. Roll Eyes
 

Addressed above; poverty reduction AND  emissions reductions are both urgent in developing  economies, whereas Oz has no excuse at all  for increasing ff use.

Quote:
And you decide the essentials. Right. Roll Eyes
 

Yes... you blind, greedy "freedom" ideologue.....

Quote:
Realistically, food, power, transportation, medicines, jobs


Well..blow me down, you listed the essentials yourself, except housing; but note, private transport and private housing is NOT an essential, you can still buy whatever house and vehicle you choose to buy, if you can afford it.    

Quote:
Nope. Some of the things are inherently heavy on power.


Irrelevant; you are apparently denying renewables (and maybe nuclear) will one-day power the economy. 
Back to top
« Last Edit: May 18th, 2023 at 2:02pm by thegreatdivide »  
 
IP Logged
 
lee
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 21394
Gender: male
Re: The fallacy of the Greens
Reply #529 - May 18th, 2023 at 3:42pm
 
thegreatdivide wrote on May 18th, 2023 at 1:57pm:
You aren't using only old retired ones, you are building new ones next the current grid as well, while also building the new renewables infrastructure which takes longer (and pumped hydro storage will be part of the mix). 


So they can't use old retired ones? Oh dear. Roll Eyes

thegreatdivide wrote on May 18th, 2023 at 1:57pm:
No Im saying poverty eradication via fast increase in energy use is ALSO urgent in developing countries, unlike in the developed economies.


Which means CO2 emissions are not urgent. Remember the not science base IPCC report said 3 Years. Roll Eyes

thegreatdivide wrote on May 18th, 2023 at 1:57pm:
Addressed above; poverty reduction AND  emissions reductions are both urgent in developing  economies, whereas Oz has no excuse at all  for increasing ff use.


Nope. CO2 emissions either are or are not urgent. Roll Eyes

thegreatdivide wrote on May 18th, 2023 at 1:57pm:
Yes...


Thanks for that. Roll Eyes

thegreatdivide wrote on May 18th, 2023 at 1:57pm:
Irrelevant; you are apparently denying renewables (and maybe nuclear) will one-day power the economy. 



Nope. Only renewables. Too much variation inter hour, inter day, inter month .  Roll Eyes
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
thegreatdivide
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics<br
/>

Posts: 15589
Gender: male
Re: The fallacy of the Greens
Reply #530 - May 18th, 2023 at 4:28pm
 
lee wrote on May 18th, 2023 at 3:42pm:
So they can't use old retired ones? Oh dear. Roll Eyes


You missed "only",  ["You aren't using only old retired ones"]; they might  upgrade old plants even more quickly.  Your back to front thinking exposed again.


Quote:
Which means CO2 emissions are not urgent. Remember the not science base IPCC report said 3 Years. Roll Eyes


Poor constricted thinking; BOTH development and emissions reduction are urgent in a developing economy, whereas in  Oz only emissions reduction is urgent.

Quote:
CO2 emissions either are or are not urgent. Roll Eyes
 

Poor cripppled brain; of course you don't care about poverty reduction as well as emissions reduction. 

Quote:
Nope. Only renewables. Too much variation inter hour, inter day, inter month .  Roll Eyes


Poor crippled brain, as usual. "Nope" is the limit of your powers of analysis.

btw, I accept your concession re "'free'  essentials"....
Back to top
« Last Edit: May 18th, 2023 at 4:37pm by thegreatdivide »  
 
IP Logged
 
lee
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 21394
Gender: male
Re: The fallacy of the Greens
Reply #531 - May 18th, 2023 at 4:50pm
 
thegreatdivide wrote on May 18th, 2023 at 4:28pm:
You missed "only",  ["You aren't using only old retired ones"]; they might  upgrade old plants even more quickly.

Why upgrade when Solar is so cheap and faster to install. Roll Eyes


thegreatdivide wrote on May 18th, 2023 at 4:28pm:
Poor constricted thinking; BOTH development and emissions reduction are urgent in a developing economy, whereas in  Oz only emissions reduction is urgent.


But 3 years makes it most urgent. Development can progress at a slower pace. Roll Eyes

thegreatdivide wrote on May 18th, 2023 at 4:28pm:
Poor cripppled brain; of course you don't care about poverty reduction as well as emissions reduction. 



Actually I don't care about emissions reductions. Poverty reduction yes. But your claim is that emissions MUST be reduced. Roll Eyes

thegreatdivide wrote on May 18th, 2023 at 4:28pm:
"Nope" is the limit of your powers of analysis.


So analyse  inter hour, inter day and inter month variation, but I will add seasonal variation. Roll Eyes

thegreatdivide wrote on May 18th, 2023 at 4:28pm:
btw, I accept your concession re "'free'  essentials"....



So you prove once again you can't pass comprehension. Nothing in my post, or your previous post, said anything about 'free'. Roll Eyes
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
thegreatdivide
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics<br
/>

Posts: 15589
Gender: male
Re: The fallacy of the Greens
Reply #532 - May 19th, 2023 at 12:43pm
 
lee wrote on May 18th, 2023 at 4:50pm:
But 3 years makes it most urgent. Development can progress at a slower pace. Roll Eyes


Easy for a comfortable conseravtive to say. 

Quote:
Actually I don't care about emissions reductions.


And you are in a rapidly decreasing minority, while filthy ffs are also injurious to health, regardless of CO2 emissions. 

Quote:
  Poverty reduction yes. But your claim is that emissions MUST be reduced. Roll Eyes


Pull the other one: confortable conservative "freedom" ideologues, committed to the current neoclassical TINA system,  aren't interested in poverty reduction beyond their failed 'trickle down' BS which definitely doesn't reduce poverty. 

Quote:
So analyse  inter hour, inter day and inter month variation, but I will add seasonal variation. Roll Eyes


No need: sufficient capacity and sufficient storage (perhaps with always on 10% nuclear)  will elinimiate filthy ffs forever.

Quote:
So you prove once again you can't pass comprehension. Nothing in my post, or your previous post, said anything about 'free'. Roll Eyes


Dementia as well as ideologically crippled..; you originally claimed (several posts back) I want "everything for free",  and ignored my expose' of your error .... and now you want to limit the discussion to  "my post, or your previous post".  Got it Smiley

I accept your concession re your false "free" assertion.

 
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Bobby.
Moderator
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 121321
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: The fallacy of the Greens
Reply #533 - May 19th, 2023 at 12:50pm
 
Under the Greens policies we have suffered in Australia.
The prices for electricity have doubled and tripled - people can't afford energy.
Many old people will die from the cold this winter and
many places will go out of business due to the high costs.

We should have built one last large coal fired power station to tide
us over until renewables were cheap enough.
We could have used the cleanest coal in the world -
anthracite from Queensland's Bowen basin.

Meanwhile -
China gets off Scott free and is building scores of coal fired power stations
and has cheap energy.

The Greens are destroying Australia.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Bobby.
Moderator
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 121321
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: The fallacy of the Greens
Reply #534 - May 19th, 2023 at 1:16pm
 
The Greens want a communist utopia so
they need to destroy Australia first.
Aussies were sucked in by them.
The Greens are evil.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
lee
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 21394
Gender: male
Re: The fallacy of the Greens
Reply #535 - May 19th, 2023 at 1:45pm
 
thegreatdivide wrote on May 19th, 2023 at 12:43pm:
Easy for a comfortable conseravtive to say. 


But if CO2 emissions are so important, it must be done. Besides, China is a developing Country in name only. Roll Eyes

"China's loans pushing world’s poorest countries to brink of collapse"
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/clock-hit-midnight-china-loans-050244288.html

thegreatdivide wrote on May 19th, 2023 at 12:43pm:
And you are in a rapidly decreasing minority, while filthy ffs are also injurious to health, regardless of CO2 emissions. 


Being in the minority doesn't make me wrong. Roll Eyes

But you haven't shown where fossil fuels have been "injurious to health". Grin Grin Grin

thegreatdivide wrote on May 19th, 2023 at 12:43pm:
Pull the other one: confortable conservative "freedom" ideologues, committed to the current neoclassical TINA system,  aren't interested in poverty reduction beyond their failed 'trickle down' BS which definitely doesn't reduce poverty.


So says tgd the classical thought policeman. Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin

thegreatdivide wrote on May 19th, 2023 at 12:43pm:
No need: sufficient capacity and sufficient storage (perhaps with always on 10% nuclear)  will elinimiate filthy ffs forever.


And yet you haven't been able to show it.

"You want to run towards that light? Here’s a sneak preview of what you’ll get. The U.S., more advanced than Canada in terms of wind/solar penetration – some states now producing significant proportions of power from wind or solar – recently received a very cold bucket of water over the head with respect to renewables plans from none other than FERC (Federal Energy Regulatory Commission) commissioners.

Note that these commissioners include chairman Willie Phillips, a Biden appointee. Here are quotes from commissioners (including Mr. Phillips) testifying at a Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee hearing: “The United States is heading for a catastrophic situation in terms of reliability…We face unprecedented challenges to the reliability of our nation’s electric system…[there is a] looming reliability crisis in our electricity markets.”"

https://wattsupwiththat.com/2023/05/18/column-net-zero-2050-thats-nothing-hold-m...

Wow. Electricity reliability is falling even before the 2050 cut off date. Roll Eyes

thegreatdivide wrote on May 19th, 2023 at 12:43pm:
Dementia as well as ideologically crippled..; you originally claimed (several posts back) I want "everything for free",  and ignored my expose' of your error .... and now you want to limit the discussion to  "my post, or your previous post".



So you want "everything for free". Why does that apply to me? But I just searched and there are only 3 instances of that phrase. And guess how far back they go? Grin Grin Grin Grin

thegreatdivide wrote on May 19th, 2023 at 12:43pm:
accept your concession re your false "free" assertion.


And another example of your twisting words to suit yourself. Some may call it lying. Roll Eyes
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
thegreatdivide
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics<br
/>

Posts: 15589
Gender: male
Re: The fallacy of the Greens
Reply #536 - May 19th, 2023 at 2:48pm
 
lee wrote on May 19th, 2023 at 1:45pm:
thegreatdivide wrote on May 19th, 2023 at 12:43pm:
Easy for a comfortable conseravtive to say. 


But if CO2 emissions are so important, it must be done. Besides, China is a developing Country in name only. Roll Eyes


China has the largest middle class  (c.400 million)  in the world , yes;  but around double that are still relatively poor, hence its "developing" status.

Quote:
"China's loans pushing world’s poorest countries to brink of collapse"
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/clock-hit-midnight-china-loans-050244288.html


That's hypocritical Western propaganda; the IMF, World Bank and private rich-country lenders are the biggest money lenders (usurers) in the world, China actually helps infrastructure development in poor countries. 

Quote:
Being in the minority doesn't make me wrong. Roll Eyes


But your lies re filthy ffs ARE wrong.

Quote:
So says tgd the classical thought policeman. Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin


Crippled brain stuff: your conservative TINA fallacy, defending neoclassical 'scarcity' BS, is THE  "thought policeman". 

Quote:
And yet you haven't been able to show it.
 

Common sense, but of course, in your case....

Quote:
"You want to run towards that light? Here’s a sneak preview of what you’ll get. The U.S., more advanced than Canada in terms of wind/solar penetration – some states now producing significant proportions of power from wind or solar – recently received a very cold bucket of water over the head with respect to renewables plans from none other than FERC (Federal Energy Regulatory Commission) commissioners.

Note that these commissioners include chairman Willie Phillips, a Biden appointee. Here are quotes from commissioners (including Mr. Phillips) testifying at a Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee hearing: “The United States is heading for a catastrophic situation in terms of reliability…We face unprecedented challenges to the reliability of our nation’s electric system…[there is a] looming reliability crisis in our electricity markets.”"

https://wattsupwiththat.com/2023/05/18/column-net-zero-2050-thats-nothing-hold-m...

Wow. Electricity reliability is falling even before the 2050 cut off date. Roll Eyes
 

Poor planning, due in part to the involvement of  private sector greed trying to prolong ffs via  money gouging of the citizens. 

Quote:
So you want "everything for free". Why does that apply to me? But I just searched and there are only 3 instances of that phrase. And guess how far back they go? Grin Grin Grin Grin


Your argument failed to distiguish between essentials versus  discretionaries. 

Quote:
And another example of your twisting words to suit yourself. Some may call it lying. Roll Eyes


No; another example of the crippled conservative mind; to repeat: I'm not arguing (nor did I) for "everything to be free" as you asserted.
And in subsequent posts you ignored my distinction between essentials and discretionaries.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
lee
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 21394
Gender: male
Re: The fallacy of the Greens
Reply #537 - May 19th, 2023 at 5:17pm
 
thegreatdivide wrote on May 19th, 2023 at 2:48pm:
China has the largest middle class  (c.400 million)  in the world , yes;  but around double that are still relatively poor, hence its "developing" status.


"Relatively poor" is not the same as living in poverty. Roll Eyes

thegreatdivide wrote on May 19th, 2023 at 2:48pm:
hat's hypocritical Western propaganda; the IMF, World Bank and private rich-country lenders are the biggest money lenders (usurers) in the world, China actually helps infrastructure development in poor countries.


Except when they can't pay back. Then they come back with an alternative; like fishing rights. Roll Eyes

thegreatdivide wrote on May 19th, 2023 at 2:48pm:
But your lies re filthy ffs ARE wrong.


And yet you haven't shown that. Roll Eyes

thegreatdivide wrote on May 19th, 2023 at 2:48pm:
Crippled brain stuff: your conservative TINA fallacy, defending neoclassical 'scarcity' BS, is THE  "thought policeman". 


Poor little marxist. The truth hurts doesn't it? Grin Grin Grin

thegreatdivide wrote on May 19th, 2023 at 2:48pm:
Common sense, but of course, in your case....


Ah "common sense" something of which you have show a distinct lack. Seeing as you don't do science, engineering etc, you rely on 'feelings'. Roll Eyes

thegreatdivide wrote on May 19th, 2023 at 2:48pm:
Poor planning, due in part to the involvement of  private sector greed trying to prolong ffs via  money gouging of the citizens. 


Poor planning in that renewables are overtaking the generation scene. That is not the fault of fossil fuel companies.  Closing down ff generators means they no longer have that income stream. Roll Eyes

thegreatdivide wrote on May 19th, 2023 at 2:48pm:
Your argument failed to distiguish between essentials versus  discretionaries. 


And nothing to do with "free". Thanks for that. Roll Eyes

thegreatdivide wrote on May 19th, 2023 at 2:48pm:
No; another example of the crippled conservative mind; to repeat: I'm not arguing (nor did I) for "everything to be free" as you asserted.


And yet you can't provide the quote where I said it? Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin

thegreatdivide wrote on May 19th, 2023 at 2:48pm:
And in subsequent posts you ignored my distinction between essentials and discretionaries.



Did I? Roll Eyes

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
thegreatdivide
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics<br
/>

Posts: 15589
Gender: male
Re: The fallacy of the Greens
Reply #538 - May 20th, 2023 at 11:15am
 
lee wrote on May 19th, 2023 at 5:17pm:
"Relatively poor" is not the same as living in poverty. Roll Eyes
 

...like the c. 10% living in poverty in Oz, while you have your head up your a*rs.

Quote:
Except when they can't pay back. Then they come back with an alternative; like fishing rights. Roll Eyes
 

I'm trying to inform them the whole issue of government 'debt' is a private sector scam enforced on governments by the IMF down; participating BRI countries need not be constrained by debt, but on available resources, and co-operation via voluntary agreement between countries, since money is always created out of thin air 

Quote:
And yet you haven't shown that. Roll Eyes


You don't have google? Sad.

Quote:
Poor little marxist. The truth hurts doesn't it? Grin Grin Grin


No; truth liberates, unlike your monstrous neoclassical TINA ideology which imprisons the world in poverty and war. 

Quote:
Ah "common sense" something of which you have show a distinct lack. Seeing as you don't do science, engineering etc, you rely on 'feelings'. Roll Eyes


The Sahara alone can power the world: your lack of vision re engineering is your problem.

Quote:
Poor planning in that renewables are overtaking the generation scene. That is not the fault of fossil fuel companies.  Closing down ff generators means they no longer have that income stream. Roll Eyes


https://www.msn.com/en-au/news/australia/economist-tells-leaders-to-rethink-gree...

Economist tells leaders to rethink green evolution

Prof Garnaut said there were powerful lessons to be learned from looking back in history, to the two periods when Australia got the settings right for true economic evolution.

"One was post-war reconstruction, where we thought differently about everything."

The result was a quarter of a century of strong employment growth, a growing population, rising incomes, low inflation and low unemployment.


ie, when deficit spending was the norm, before 'balanced (govt.) budgets' became de rigueur

Quote:
And nothing to do with "free". Thanks for that. Roll Eyes


Low IQ: the discussion about "free" was in the context of MMT's "free" money.

Quote:
And yet you can't provide the quote where I said it? Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin


Dementia as well: now you are denying you said "you (ie me) want everything free".


Quote:
Did I? Roll Eyes


Yes, and you are still denying it; of clourse you can take it back now and agree I don't want everything "free".
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
lee
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 21394
Gender: male
Re: The fallacy of the Greens
Reply #539 - May 20th, 2023 at 1:48pm
 
thegreatdivide wrote on May 20th, 2023 at 11:15am:
...like the c. 10% living in poverty in Oz, while you have your head up your a*rs.


So once again it is feelings not facts. "relatively poor" is relative and not the same as poverty. BTW you misspelt a*se. Roll Eyes

thegreatdivide wrote on May 20th, 2023 at 11:15am:
I'm trying to inform them the whole issue of government 'debt' is a private sector scam enforced on governments by the IMF down; participating BRI countries need not be constrained by debt, but on available resources, and co-operation via voluntary agreement between countries, since money is always created out of thin air 



You are trying to tell the Chinese? How is that going? Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin

thegreatdivide wrote on May 20th, 2023 at 11:15am:
You don't have google? Sad.


Yes I do. But you still can't offer proof. Perhaps you don't have google. Roll Eyes

thegreatdivide wrote on May 20th, 2023 at 11:15am:
No; truth liberates, unlike your monstrous neoclassical TINA ideology which imprisons the world in poverty and war. 


So the Marxist countries only did it for love? Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin

thegreatdivide wrote on May 20th, 2023 at 11:15am:
The Sahara alone can power the world: your lack of vision re engineering is your problem.



And yet you said all they had to do was put the solar panels "up in the air". Wind blown sand up to 1,000m and more would suggest that the notion is foolish; but you KNOW better. Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin

thegreatdivide wrote on May 20th, 2023 at 11:15am:
https://www.msn.com/en-au/news/australia/economist-tells-leaders-to-rethink-gree...


Ross Garnaut, definitely an economist, definitely not an engineer. Grin Grin Grin Grin

thegreatdivide wrote on May 20th, 2023 at 11:15am:
Low IQ: the discussion about "free" was in the context of MMT's "free" money.



Ah. See what happens when you explain exactly what you mean. So with free money everything is free? Don't need workers then. Roll Eyes

thegreatdivide wrote on May 20th, 2023 at 11:15am:
Dementia as well: now you are denying you said "you (ie me) want everything free".


Nope. Now you are talking about MMT again. You do get sidetracked easily. Grin Grin Grin Grin

thegreatdivide wrote on May 20th, 2023 at 11:15am:
Yes, and you are still denying it; of clourse you can take it back now and agree I don't want everything "free".



You haven't said anything about paying for goods, except of course to say it is all the capitalists fault for making people (and Countries) pay interest. Your great hope China isn't doing it, and no they are not constrained by the IMF, World Bank or anyone else. Roll Eyes
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 ... 34 35 36 37 38 ... 43
Send Topic Print