Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 ... 8 9 10 11 12 ... 43
Send Topic Print
The fallacy of the Greens (Read 61313 times)
lee
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 20250
Gender: male
Re: The fallacy of the Greens
Reply #135 - Jun 15th, 2022 at 4:38pm
 
thegreatdivide wrote on Jun 15th, 2022 at 4:02pm:
A sweeping statement?

Yes.

thegreatdivide wrote on Jun 15th, 2022 at 4:02pm:
Back into your dumb mode: energy (fossil or renewable sourced).

Thanks for clearing that up. Wink

thegreatdivide wrote on Jun 15th, 2022 at 4:02pm:
Overseas contracts involve the Feds, who discouraged the eastern states from a reservation policy -  too "socialist" for Coalition ideologues.



Not all. Stop making sch!t up.

thegreatdivide wrote on Jun 15th, 2022 at 4:02pm:
https://www.appea.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/APPEA-submission-Gas-Reserva...

"In the absence of any clearly established need, APPEA recommends the Australian Government
does not seek to impose a prospective national domestic gas reservation scheme"


So nothing about WA exports then. Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
thegreatdivide
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics<br
/>

Posts: 15248
Gender: male
Re: The fallacy of the Greens
Reply #136 - Jun 16th, 2022 at 5:31pm
 
lee wrote on Jun 15th, 2022 at 4:38pm:
So nothing about WA exports then. Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin


No, because WA Labor had the brains to introduce reservation policy, unlike the Feds who were willingly screwed by the fossil lobby, as noted in the link.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
lee
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 20250
Gender: male
Re: The fallacy of the Greens
Reply #137 - Jun 16th, 2022 at 6:23pm
 
thegreatdivide wrote on Jun 16th, 2022 at 5:31pm:
No, because WA Labor had the brains to introduce reservation policy, unlike the Feds who were willingly screwed by the fossil lobby, as noted in the link.


So somehow WA managed to evade the feds forcing the other states not to have reserved gas? Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
thegreatdivide
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics<br
/>

Posts: 15248
Gender: male
Re: The fallacy of the Greens
Reply #138 - Jun 16th, 2022 at 6:52pm
 
lee wrote on Jun 16th, 2022 at 6:23pm:
thegreatdivide wrote on Jun 16th, 2022 at 5:31pm:
No, because WA Labor had the brains to introduce reservation policy, unlike the Feds who were willingly screwed by the fossil lobby, as noted in the link.


So somehow WA managed to evade the feds forcing the other states not to have reserved gas? Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin

Circumstances were different in WA. , and Labor forced the issue in WA.
Development of the Gladstone gas export terminals and contracts  happened after WA had set its reserve policy, and the fossil companies won the argument with the Feds,  with their greed-based no reservation policy  for Gladstone gas exports. 

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
lee
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 20250
Gender: male
Re: The fallacy of the Greens
Reply #139 - Jun 16th, 2022 at 7:58pm
 
thegreatdivide wrote on Jun 16th, 2022 at 6:52pm:
Circumstances were different in WA.

okay.

thegreatdivide wrote on Jun 16th, 2022 at 6:52pm:
Development of the Gladstone gas export terminals and contracts  happened after WA had set its reserve policy, and the fossil companies won the argument with the Feds,  with their greed-based no reservation policy  for Gladstone gas exports. 


And a Labor Government to boot. But it was the feds fault Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 57459
Gender: male
Re: The fallacy of the Greens
Reply #140 - Jun 17th, 2022 at 10:28am
 
Environmentalists and their allies in big business have argued that batteries solve this problem. Battery technology has come a long way, with “mega-batteries” able to store and release power when the wind doesn’t blow and the sun doesn’t shine. Indeed, South Australia is home to one of the biggest lithium batteries in the world, with installation of more big batteries planned for more states and territories.

Yet to build these mega-batteries we need more mining, which in turn releases more carbon dioxide into the atmosphere. Batteries for electric cars and renewable energy storage are made out of copper, zinc, aluminium and lithium. According to a report by the ABC, “a wind turbine needs four times more minerals than a coal-fired power station to generate the same amount of electricity”. The irony is that we will need to increase our carbon emissions to reduce them.

And not only does mining produce large amounts of carbon dioxide but mines also can leak toxic materials into waterways. Mines often are opposed by environmental groups for this reason. It can take years for new mines to be approved because of Australia’s high standards of environmental protection regulation.

To complicate things further, the trend in the corporate world is to avoid investment in mining because of environmental, social and governance considerations.

The result is that demand for the minerals that go into batteries is going up while supply is going down, leading to what some analysts have called “greenflation”.
...

The experience of Germany demonstrates the impact that renewables can have on electricity markets. A 2019 report produced by Deloitte on the German electricity market says newer, more modern coal-fired plants are able to meet the “flexibility challenge” posed by renewables, but older plants cannot.

Despite having the highest share of cheap renewable energy from wind and solar, Germany has the highest electricity prices in Europe. Fossil fuels are locked in as backup power, which has led Germany to become dependent on imported gas from Russia. This is despite spending $743bn on its energy transition.

Some countries, such as France, Sweden and Iceland, do get most of their electricity from low-carbon dioxide sources. But these low-CO2 sources are not wind and solar, which make up only 2 per cent and 1 per cent of global total energy production, they are hydropower and nuclear.
Energy Minister Chris Bowen recently described the case for nuclear energy as “a complete joke” and moratoriums on gas exploration and extraction remain in place across the country. West Australian Premier Mark McGowan has announced that his state will shut two coal-fired power plants. In addition to the two plants in WA, the Liddell power plant in NSW is scheduled to close next year and Yallourn power station in Victoria is set to shut in 2028.

When the Hazelwood coal-fired plant in Victoria closed in 2017, the closure resulted in higher energy prices that lasted for years. The Australian Energy Regulator reported that in 2018 the closure of Hazelwood led to average electricity spot prices that were 85 per cent higher than the previous year in Victoria, 63 per cent higher in NSW, 53 per cent in Queensland and 32 per cent higher in SA.
...
From watching the European experience, we know baseload power can come only from coal, gas or nuclear energy. If our leaders do not manage this situation carefully and learn from other nations, Australians may have to prepare for an energy crisis that never ends.
Clare Lehman

We should build more hydro power stations and replace old coal/gas fired stations with modern ones. Also a couple of latest tech small nuclear power stations. Tiny S Korea has 24 (and massive manufacturing sector), Belgium 7, Sweden 6 (again, massive manufacturing sector).

Australia is 26 million people on an amazingly energy and resource rich CONTINENT with sky high energy prices and no real high tech, high skill industry.  Exporting Iron ore, coal/gas and education to Asia is not a smart, long-term plan, it is, rather, turning Australia into an Asian dependency.





Back to top
 

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
FutureTheLeftWant
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 6625
Gender: male
Re: The fallacy of the Greens
Reply #141 - Jun 17th, 2022 at 10:35am
 
Frank wrote on Jun 17th, 2022 at 10:28am:
Australia is 26 million people on an amazingly energy and resource rich CONTINENT with sky high energy prices and no real high tech, high skill industry.  Exporting Iron ore, coal/gas and education to Asia is not a smart, long-term plan, it is, rather, turning Australia into an Asian dependency.


Agreed.  We should be making a fortune out of renewables, we are better positioned than most to do it
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
lee
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 20250
Gender: male
Re: The fallacy of the Greens
Reply #142 - Jun 17th, 2022 at 12:20pm
 
FutureTheLeftWant wrote on Jun 17th, 2022 at 10:35am:
We should be making a fortune out of renewables, we are better positioned than most to do it


Another one who doesn't understand that renewables are weather dependent.

So where would we make the fortune? Solar panels? No - you need reliable energy supply for semiconductors.

Wind Turbines? No - you need reliable energy supply  for steel, copper, aluminium etc.

Lithium batteries? No - you need reliable energy supply again.

Reliable energy that China has in spades.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
FutureTheLeftWant
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 6625
Gender: male
Re: The fallacy of the Greens
Reply #143 - Jun 17th, 2022 at 12:28pm
 
lee wrote on Jun 17th, 2022 at 12:20pm:
FutureTheLeftWant wrote on Jun 17th, 2022 at 10:35am:
We should be making a fortune out of renewables, we are better positioned than most to do it


Another one who doesn't understand that renewables are weather dependent.

So where would we make the fortune? Solar panels? No - you need reliable energy supply for semiconductors.

Wind Turbines? No - you need reliable energy supply  for steel, copper, aluminium etc.

Lithium batteries? No - you need reliable energy supply again.

Reliable energy that China has in spades.


You seem mentally ill.  Would we use coal in the early stages to make things?  Sure.  So what?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 57459
Gender: male
Re: The fallacy of the Greens
Reply #144 - Jun 17th, 2022 at 12:51pm
 
FutureTheLeftWant wrote on Jun 17th, 2022 at 12:28pm:
lee wrote on Jun 17th, 2022 at 12:20pm:
FutureTheLeftWant wrote on Jun 17th, 2022 at 10:35am:
We should be making a fortune out of renewables, we are better positioned than most to do it


Another one who doesn't understand that renewables are weather dependent.

So where would we make the fortune? Solar panels? No - you need reliable energy supply for semiconductors.

Wind Turbines? No - you need reliable energy supply  for steel, copper, aluminium etc.

Lithium batteries? No - you need reliable energy supply again.

Reliable energy that China has in spades.


You seem mentally ill.  Would we use coal in the early stages to make things?  Sure.  So what?



Billy's talking to you, Yappy mong -  and so say all of us:



Geddit?
Back to top
 

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
lee
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 20250
Gender: male
Re: The fallacy of the Greens
Reply #145 - Jun 17th, 2022 at 1:12pm
 
FutureTheLeftWant wrote on Jun 17th, 2022 at 12:28pm:
Would we use coal in the early stages to make things?  Sure.  So what?


Seeing as Albo wants to decrease our emissions by 43% in 8 years you tell us.

WA closing Coal by 2030.  Just how soon would we run out of the "early stages"? Wink

https://ourworldindata.org/energy-mix

...
Renewables aren't even keeping up with our increased energy use. Roll Eyes

OurWorldinData tells us that the global primary energy consumed in 2019 is provided by oil (33.8%), natural gas (24.7%), coal (27.6%), traditional biomass (7%), hydroelectric (2.7%), nuclear (1.8%), wind (0.9%), modern biofuels (0.7%), and 0.8% solar plus other renewables.

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Jasin
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 56348
Gender: male
Re: The fallacy of the Greens
Reply #146 - Jun 17th, 2022 at 3:45pm
 
FutureTheLeftWant wrote on Jun 17th, 2022 at 12:28pm:
lee wrote on Jun 17th, 2022 at 12:20pm:
FutureTheLeftWant wrote on Jun 17th, 2022 at 10:35am:
We should be making a fortune out of renewables, we are better positioned than most to do it


Another one who doesn't understand that renewables are weather dependent.

So where would we make the fortune? Solar panels? No - you need reliable energy supply for semiconductors.

Wind Turbines? No - you need reliable energy supply  for steel, copper, aluminium etc.

Lithium batteries? No - you need reliable energy supply again.

Reliable energy that China has in spades.


You seem mentally ill.  Would we use coal in the early stages to make things?  Sure.  So what?

F*uck off!

Grin
Back to top
 

AIMLESS EXTENTION OF KNOWLEDGE HOWEVER, WHICH IS WHAT I THINK YOU REALLY MEAN BY THE TERM 'CURIOSITY', IS MERELY INEFFICIENCY. I AM DESIGNED TO AVOID INEFFICIENCY.
 
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 57459
Gender: male
Re: The fallacy of the Greens
Reply #147 - Jun 17th, 2022 at 4:49pm
 
lee wrote on Jun 17th, 2022 at 1:12pm:
FutureTheLeftWant wrote on Jun 17th, 2022 at 12:28pm:
Would we use coal in the early stages to make things?  Sure.  So what?


Seeing as Albo wants to decrease our emissions by 43% in 8 years you tell us.

WA closing Coal by 2030.  Just how soon would we run out of the "early stages"? Wink

https://ourworldindata.org/energy-mix

https://ourworldindata.org/uploads/2020/08/Global-primary-energy-by-source-800x3...
Renewables aren't even keeping up with our increased energy use. Roll Eyes

OurWorldinData tells us that the global primary energy consumed in 2019 is provided by oil (33.8%), natural gas (24.7%), coal (27.6%), traditional biomass (7%), hydroelectric (2.7%), nuclear (1.8%), wind (0.9%), modern biofuels (0.7%), and 0.8% solar plus other renewables.




"Decarbonising the economy" and net zero are deluded fantasies by people who have no idea of how things are made and how the making of things is powered. They are fantasies both nationally and globally.

It would actually be a HUGE step if Africa, India, China were put on high quality coal and gas for their power generation, with some form of carbon capture (not least re-forestation).

But the delivery of electricity would require infrastructure - nonexistent in sub saharan Africa where three quarters of the population has no access to electricity and burn biomass - wood, dung - or cheap coal or oil.
Back to top
 

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
lee
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 20250
Gender: male
Re: The fallacy of the Greens
Reply #148 - Jun 18th, 2022 at 4:04pm
 
Is Obama  all for green energy?

"Former President Barack Obama has ordered three massive propane tanks for his Martha’s Vineyard property as energy prices nationwide continue to surge.

The office of the select board of Edgartown, Massachusetts, told The Daily Caller News Foundation that an application for an “underground propane installment was approved at the 79 Turkeyland Cove Road address,” the location of a property owned by former President Barack Obama. The tanks are to be used for “residential purposes,” the office told TheDCNF, and have a total capacity approved of “2,500 gallons which was broken into two 1,000 gallon tanks and one 500 gallon tank.” "

https://dailycaller.com/2022/06/15/gas-former-president-obama-propane-tank-marth...

And others for those who don't like the Daily Caller. Wink
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
thegreatdivide
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics<br
/>

Posts: 15248
Gender: male
Re: The fallacy of the Greens
Reply #149 - Jun 18th, 2022 at 10:29pm
 
lee wrote on Jun 16th, 2022 at 7:58pm:
thegreatdivide wrote on Jun 16th, 2022 at 6:52pm:
Circumstances were different in WA.

okay.

thegreatdivide wrote on Jun 16th, 2022 at 6:52pm:
Development of the Gladstone gas export terminals and contracts  happened after WA had set its reserve policy, and the fossil companies won the argument with the Feds,  with their greed-based no reservation policy  for Gladstone gas exports. 


And a Labor Government to boot. But it was the feds fault Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin


Of course, they gave the go ahead.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 ... 8 9 10 11 12 ... 43
Send Topic Print