thegreatdivide
Gold Member
Online
Australian Politics<br />
Posts: 14329
Gender: 
|
Political chaos courtesy of the Neoclassical 'balanced government budget' delusion: https://thenextrecession.wordpress.com/2025/11/26/uk-the-make-or-break-budget/UK: the ‘make or break’ budgetThe UK had an apparently important financial event today. The Labour government’s finance minister (called the Chancellor of the Exchequer, a feudal royal term), Rachel Reeves presented the government’ s tax and spending measures for the year (and years ahead).
It was billed as a ‘make or break’ budget for the Labour government which is languishing badly in the opinion polls – its share of support has halved from an already low election result of 34% in July 2024 when Labour won a landslide of seats. The anti-immigration, pro-Brexit Reform party is now polling near 35%, with the Conservative party also down in the teens.
The Labour government’s 18 months in office has been nothing short of disastrous. First, it launched a series of vicious cuts in welfare spending: dropping the annual winter fuel allowance for pensioners just at a time when energy prices reached an all-time high. Then it announced cuts in benefits for disabled people. And just so another section of vulnerable Britons were not missed, it announced the maintenance of the ‘cap’ on child benefits to families with no more than two children. This meant that any family with more than two kids was badly hit. There are already 4.3m children officially in poverty in the UK and the cap would drive that poverty level to new heights.
PM Starmer and Reeves were wedded to the idea that the government had to fill a ‘fiscal black hole’, namely running an annual deficit of spending over revenue that would drive up the public sector debt, already 100% of GDP.
To stop that rising, the ‘black hole’ had to be filled with tax rises and spending cuts, so that holders of government bonds (banks, pension funds, insurance companies, foreign investors etc) would not sell bonds and/or demand higher interest to buy them. The last government that intended to raise spending and finance it by ‘printing’ money (by the Bank of England) was the ill-fated and very short reign of Conservative PM Liz Truss. The bond market sold off and the pound slumped. Truss and her Chancellor were ousted by their own party within days.
On gaining office, Reeves and Starmer assured the ‘bond vigilantes’ (as the City of London is often called) that Labour would not be spendthrift but instead would close the ‘fiscal gap’ and keep public debt under control. And they did what would appeal to the vigilantes the most: austerity for the poor and subsidies and deregulation for the rich. This was a political disaster and under pressure from their own MPs, the Labour leaders have rowed back on all those cuts. This November budget finished that 180 degree turn by announcing the end of child benefit cap.
However, the problem remained that the government still thought it needed to meet the bond market’s demands. How to fill the ‘fiscal hole’? The trouble is that this hole is imaginary – it’s in the minds of the government and the financial sector; and it varies in size depending on how fast the British economy is growing. The faster it grows, the more tax revenues rise and spending falls on welfare and unemployment benefits.; and so the hole gets smaller. But here’s the rub. The UK economy is stagnating, more or less, in real terms, the only growth is in nominal GDP, in other words, in price inflation. The UK has the highest inflation rate among the top G7 economies. As a result, money lenders have kept their interest rates high in order to maintain their real gains and so small companies and household mortgage holders are suffering badly.
The body that oversees the credibility of government tax and spending measures, the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR), has finally recognised that the UK economy is crawling along. Having previously optimistically forecast an economic growth rate that was never achieved, the OBR has now reduced its forecast for real GDP growth from 1.8% a year to 1.5% for the next few years. If those new forecasts were right, it would mean that government would not get enough tax revenues to match spending.
But it was not true that welfare spending was ‘out of control’. Welfare spending has held roughly steady as a share of the economy since 2007. Total welfare spending in Britain in 2025-26 is estimated to be 10.8 per cent of GDP. That’s just 0.8 per cent of GDP higher than in 2007-08, and spending has actually fallen fallen by 1.2 per cent of GDP since 2012-13. Nevertheless, big business and the financial sector still demand welfare cuts and oppose tax rises – at least for the rich.
So what has Reeves done? In order to ‘fill the fiscal hole’ to keep government debt from rising, she has not raised taxes on the rich; she has not raised the tax rate for the richest earners; she has not introduced a wealth tax on the super-rich. Instead, she has raised a ‘stealth tax’ on average earners which she admits will “hurt working people. I won’t pretend otherwise.” So the tax burden as a share of national GDP will reach an all-time high by the end of the Labour government’s term of office in 2029 (if it lasts that long).Re the underlined: none of that nonsense would happen under MMT; the "printing money" by the BoE would be replaced with free money "printed" by Treasury, no bonds involved.
|
Forum
Pages: 
