|
Mattyfisk
|
Frank wrote on Jun 23 rd, 2021 at 2:58pm: Mattyfisk wrote on Jun 23 rd, 2021 at 2:18pm: Frank wrote on Jun 23 rd, 2021 at 12:17am: Mattyfisk wrote on Jun 23 rd, 2021 at 12:04am: Frank wrote on Jun 22 nd, 2021 at 11:20pm: Mattyfisk wrote on Jun 22 nd, 2021 at 11:07pm: Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Jun 22 nd, 2021 at 9:04pm: Mattyfisk wrote on Jun 22 nd, 2021 at 7:10pm: Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Jun 22 nd, 2021 at 6:57pm: Mattyfisk wrote on Jun 22 nd, 2021 at 12:29pm: Grappler Truth Teller Feller wrote on Jun 22 nd, 2021 at 8:37am: https://theconversation.com/friday-essay-how-our-new-archaeological-research-inv..."In partnership with the Mithaka Aboriginal Corporation, who occupy the Channel Country in Central Australia, we have begun investigating Aboriginal settlement sites, pit dwelling huts (known as gunyahs) and quarries."
"......over 140 quarry sites, where rock was excavated to produce seed grinding stones."
"The Channel Country spreads across the Lake Eyre Basin, found in parts of Queensland, Northern Territory and South Australia. It is the world’s last unregulated desert channel system (meaning there has been no intensive irrigation or damming)" Anyway - read it for yourselves and think about it... Seed grinding stones? That's a mill. Oh-er, no? Clearly NO. And it's hardly 'quarrying' either - that's another one of those 'promoted' or Pascoe words... they dug for suitable stones... they didn't quarry... https://media.australian.museum/media/dd/images/Some_image.width-1600.791a171.jp... Been here 50,000 years, dear. Have you got evidence of any, er, sticks? Archaeological stones may break the bones of contention, but sticks will never matter.... primitive grinding stones are no proof of very much of anything except certain basic skills. Now a proper grinding mill - that's an advance... What part of grindstones do you confuse with mills? ONLY 50,000 years? What happened to 60,000, then 80,000, then 100,000? Who gives a damn anyway - you're no Aborigine and you live here now.. cunning no? Cunning? I live here now through a fluke of history. Read your Hegel, or Marx, or Heidegger. It makes me as superior as Yehovah's chosen people over Richard the Third's. Or Genghis Khan's - or silly old Moh's. Hegel on Man's Stool, innit. Anal K is showing University of Bologna envy. Once Were Pakistanis. But now ve are reading ze Germans. Ze mysteries of a man's (may I call you a man?) soul. Your particular Sickness onto Death as some non-German said a little while ago, no? Zere, zere, wee pakistani person, don't be anxious. Superior weltgeist, innit. Every alt jungend deserves fruit, no? Have two, ja? Oh, yes, eat all ze bananas. As Beckett said, it doeasnt matter who eats ze bananas, what matters is that bananas are eaten. (I am quoting from ze memory, you understand). Mick Fouckalld, your hero, made much of it. Made him look like the idiot he proved to be at the end. Save yourself, wee pakistani arsefancier, save yourself. Yes, dear boy, they do say that. I believe, however, Foucault was talking about cock. You? That's your special subject so you'd know. No no, you distinctly raised the subject yourself, but that's okay.
|
Forum
Pages: 
