freediver wrote on May 18
th, 2021 at 5:56pm:
Also, the claim is not baseless. The fact that Muhammad committed genocide is a pretty sound base.
Oh, this fails on so many levels FD. If only you could comprehend it.
You logical flow goes like this:
- muslims must support everything the Prophet did (fair enough)
- I say Prophet did x
- Therefore all muslims support x
It doesn't give any consideration to what muslims themselves believe about what the Prophet did or didn't do - only what you think.
For example, even if you can say that what Muhammad did according to a single biography (executed some hundreds of men after convicting them of breaking a treaty) is genocide - still a massive reach, but lets run with it anyway, I have cited for you research by muslims arguing that this massacre never occurred. You can say the research is bullshit, but you cannot argue with a straight face that not a single muslim believes it. In which case there is no reason to keep insisting such muslims support genocide - purely based on your logical flow that they would support it because Muhammad did it.
Then of course there's the fact you completely disregard muslims who are not bound by your logical flow - ie muslims who accept that while Muhammad was a Prophet, he was still fallible, and susceptible to behaviour they would not themselves support.
But of course none of this is really the point. The point is, your claim is bullshit from the start - because you simply have no way of knowing that every single muslim around the world, man, woman and child would support such a thing. And yet you state it as fact. All pointed out to you before - after which we saw your excruciating gymnastics of trying to simultaneously claim its "true" while also possibly wrong. But I'm not going through that bullshit again.