Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 ... 7 8 9 10 11 ... 14
Send Topic Print
Another Family Annihilator? (Read 10457 times)
rhino
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 17179
Gender: male
Re: Another Family Annihilator?
Reply #120 - Feb 20th, 2020 at 5:55pm
 
aquascoot wrote on Feb 20th, 2020 at 2:40pm:
The_Barnacle wrote on Feb 20th, 2020 at 2:25pm:
aquascoot wrote on Feb 20th, 2020 at 2:11pm:
i see where you are coming from but what really needs to happen is that people need to be educated on the potential for evil that dwells in everyone.


That is correct and that is something that most people on the Right don't understand.
They have this naive binary notion that there are only "goodies" and "badies". That is why they defend gun ownership when in fact, the more people that own guns, the greater the risk of being killed by one. There is evil that dwells in everyone.


strawman arguement.

had this guy had access to a gun he may have used it.
i'm not sure being incinerated was a nicer option.

but the holocaust was done with posion gas.
rwanda with machetes.

why concentrate on guns.

again, you naively think if we got rid of all the guns we could manifest the rainbow filled, dolphin filled, pink unicorn filled utopia.
probably not
Both of those incorporated the dehumanisation of those groups so as to enable average people to slaughter them. We did the same to the Germans and Japanese in WW2, also the Viet Cong. If you dehumanise people then its far easier to tell someone to kill them. Not everyone has a "dark side", we know this because despite military advances in training there are still some people that can not be taught or forced to point a gun at another human being and pull the trigger, they just wont or cant do it, its not in their nature. Its estimated that over half of combatants in  the American Civil war actually shot to miss, they got this up to around 70 percent in Vietnam. T his is a far more complicated issues than "good vs evil" .
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Bias_2012
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 10766
Gender: male
Re: Another Family Annihilator?
Reply #121 - Feb 20th, 2020 at 5:58pm
 
aquascoot wrote on Feb 20th, 2020 at 4:28pm:
Bias_2012 wrote on Feb 20th, 2020 at 4:13pm:
aquascoot wrote on Feb 20th, 2020 at 3:51pm:
are you acknowldeging humans have an inherent dark side.

if so, what should be done about that,



It can only be suppressed .... by fear

However, some people don't fear suicide .... after they've committed murder ... and therein lies the problem with murder suicides



it can be suppressed by fear....this is true.
many lefties on here would , if they could,would like to get , say, donald trump on the ground and give him a good kicking,
dont say they dont fantasise about it.
they would never do it, they tell themselves they are 'good people"
but the truth is they would like to but are just too afraid to do it.

but thats quite dysfunctional.

most societies had rights of initiation where you men were treated quite brutally and forced to confront and incorporate their shadow and the shadows of other men


where is that narrative nowdays.

young men who are violent can be taught  (and should be taught)to incorporate that drive and harness it into a competitive spirit, to control it.

but thats not what they are taught.

there is no narrative teaching people about their dark side, their anger, their sexual urges.

there is no incorporation.

just suppression.


is it any wonder then that this guy behaved like an out of control toddler having a tantrum when he doesnt have things "go his way"

a toddler might hold his breath til he turns blue....a toddler " suicide attempt" perhaps.

but if that toddler is educated by leftie luvvie (rainbows and unicorns) idealogues, he still has that explosive anger within him. and he has not learnt to incorporate it . he is still wandering the earth as a father and husband but with the emotional maturity of a toddler


Not just violent young men but all young men should be instructed how to control negative urges and how to turn anger into calm positive resolution
Back to top
« Last Edit: Feb 20th, 2020 at 11:25pm by Bias_2012 »  

Our Lives Are Governed By The Feast & Famine Variable
 
IP Logged
 
mothra
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 36239
Gender: female
Re: Another Family Annihilator?
Reply #122 - Feb 20th, 2020 at 6:14pm
 
aquascoot wrote on Feb 20th, 2020 at 5:53pm:
mothra wrote on Feb 20th, 2020 at 4:58pm:
aquascoot wrote on Feb 20th, 2020 at 3:51pm:
mothra wrote on Feb 20th, 2020 at 3:21pm:
aquascoot wrote on Feb 20th, 2020 at 3:13pm:
mothra wrote on Feb 20th, 2020 at 3:00pm:
aquascoot wrote on Feb 20th, 2020 at 2:40pm:
The_Barnacle wrote on Feb 20th, 2020 at 2:25pm:
aquascoot wrote on Feb 20th, 2020 at 2:11pm:
i see where you are coming from but what really needs to happen is that people need to be educated on the potential for evil that dwells in everyone.


That is correct and that is something that most people on the Right don't understand.
They have this naive binary notion that there are only "goodies" and "badies". That is why they defend gun ownership when in fact, the more people that own guns, the greater the risk of being killed by one. There is evil that dwells in everyone.


strawman arguement.

had this guy had access to a gun he may have used it.
i'm not sure being incinerated was a nicer option.

but the holocaust was done with posion gas.
rwanda with machetes.

why concentrate on guns.

again, you naively think if we got rid of all the guns we could manifest the rainbow filled, dolphin filled, pink unicorn filled utopia.
probably not




The argument is simple. Try to focus.

If you are arguing that everyone has the beast in them ... why would you want everyone armed?



try to focus.

if i'm arguing everyone has a dark side they need to ackowledge and incorporate.....why would i want people to look for an excuse (like blaming guns) for what is  deep personal psychological work .



Nobody is blaming guns.

We're blaming human's inherent dark side.

Why are you avoiding the question?



are you acknowldeging humans have an inherent dark side.

if so, what should be done about that,



Hey, this is your party. Why won't you answer the question? Is it because you've been cornered?



I think it's because you've been cornered.


i've been cornered by your question about guns?


i'll have to check out the story again and see where guns came into it so i can see how you cornered me with your sharp intellect. Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy


It wasn't me, it was Barny.

And you've been running from it ever since. Hilariously.

But interesting you should need to read back to remember what the question you're dodging us, while you continue to dodge it.

Probably a good time to remind the readers that you don't rate intelligence.
Back to top
 

If you can't be a good example, you have to be a horrible warning.
 
IP Logged
 
chimera
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 13182
Armidale
Gender: male
Re: Another Family Annihilator?
Reply #123 - Feb 20th, 2020 at 6:26pm
 
Bias
"All young men." You're in a bad way mate. Why is that?

Rhino
There was an interesting fear in the trenches when men went over the top for fear of others' opinion about them if they did not go. It's probably linked to mob violence where the surrounding people urge them to join in , peer pressure.  The unnatural act of killing tormented many after their wars.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
aquascoot
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 36742
Gender: male
Re: Another Family Annihilator?
Reply #124 - Feb 20th, 2020 at 6:26pm
 
rhino wrote on Feb 20th, 2020 at 5:55pm:
aquascoot wrote on Feb 20th, 2020 at 2:40pm:
The_Barnacle wrote on Feb 20th, 2020 at 2:25pm:
aquascoot wrote on Feb 20th, 2020 at 2:11pm:
i see where you are coming from but what really needs to happen is that people need to be educated on the potential for evil that dwells in everyone.


That is correct and that is something that most people on the Right don't understand.
They have this naive binary notion that there are only "goodies" and "badies". That is why they defend gun ownership when in fact, the more people that own guns, the greater the risk of being killed by one. There is evil that dwells in everyone.


strawman arguement.

had this guy had access to a gun he may have used it.
i'm not sure being incinerated was a nicer option.

but the holocaust was done with posion gas.
rwanda with machetes.

why concentrate on guns.

again, you naively think if we got rid of all the guns we could manifest the rainbow filled, dolphin filled, pink unicorn filled utopia.
probably not
Both of those incorporated the dehumanisation of those groups so as to enable average people to slaughter them. We did the same to the Germans and Japanese in WW2, also the Viet Cong. If you dehumanise people then its far easier to tell someone to kill them. Not everyone has a "dark side", we know this because despite military advances in training there are still some people that can not be taught or forced to point a gun at another human being and pull the trigger, they just wont or cant do it, its not in their nature. Its estimated that over half of combatants in  the American Civil war actually shot to miss, they got this up to around 70 percent in Vietnam. T his is a far more complicated issues than "good vs evil" .



fair enough point rhino.

if you were to watch the media on this, i am sure it is full of people saying "they cannot understand this".
i think the only way to understand it is from the idea that humans are partly composed of evil and there are no limits to that.
the germans , in 1940, were at the pinnacle of cultural development.
yet they were able to go and shoot pregnant jews in the back of the head.
it was worse then that.
they were able to unload jews for gassing and before they gassed them they would make them carry 100 lb bags of salt from one side of the camp to the other and back again, just to show they could always make an evil act a little bit more evil.

young people are not taught about that at school.
very few would have ever heard of auschwitz, pol pot or the gulags.

i suppose the authorities think it keeps them safer not to know that "thats what people can be like" and that "thats what YOU can be like".

because if you were alive in nazi germany in 1940 you MIGHT be a saint who rescued jews.
but probably not.
you probably would have joined in or at least condoned it by refusing to look at it

i suppose they dont want to upset the kiddies with this sort of confronting history (which was certainly far worse then anything james cook or arthur phillip ever did)
but that just keeps the kiddies naive and if you are naive and you confront something truly evil (and you probably will), then you get PTSD and thats not good
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
rhino
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 17179
Gender: male
Re: Another Family Annihilator?
Reply #125 - Feb 20th, 2020 at 6:30pm
 
chimera wrote on Feb 20th, 2020 at 6:26pm:
Bias
"All young men." You're in a bad way mate. Why is that?

Rhino
There was an interesting fear in the trenches when men went over the top for fear of others' opinion about them if they did not go. It's probably linked to mob violence where the surrounding people urge them to join in , peer pressure.  The unnatural act of killing tormented many after their wars.
Of course, most people are followers not leaders.  Most people will go along with something they think is wrong if the group they are in are doing it. Doesnt mean they are inherently evil.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
rhino
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 17179
Gender: male
Re: Another Family Annihilator?
Reply #126 - Feb 20th, 2020 at 6:35pm
 
aquascoot wrote on Feb 20th, 2020 at 6:26pm:
rhino wrote on Feb 20th, 2020 at 5:55pm:
aquascoot wrote on Feb 20th, 2020 at 2:40pm:
The_Barnacle wrote on Feb 20th, 2020 at 2:25pm:
aquascoot wrote on Feb 20th, 2020 at 2:11pm:
i see where you are coming from but what really needs to happen is that people need to be educated on the potential for evil that dwells in everyone.


That is correct and that is something that most people on the Right don't understand.
They have this naive binary notion that there are only "goodies" and "badies". That is why they defend gun ownership when in fact, the more people that own guns, the greater the risk of being killed by one. There is evil that dwells in everyone.


strawman arguement.

had this guy had access to a gun he may have used it.
i'm not sure being incinerated was a nicer option.

but the holocaust was done with posion gas.
rwanda with machetes.

why concentrate on guns.

again, you naively think if we got rid of all the guns we could manifest the rainbow filled, dolphin filled, pink unicorn filled utopia.
probably not
Both of those incorporated the dehumanisation of those groups so as to enable average people to slaughter them. We did the same to the Germans and Japanese in WW2, also the Viet Cong. If you dehumanise people then its far easier to tell someone to kill them. Not everyone has a "dark side", we know this because despite military advances in training there are still some people that can not be taught or forced to point a gun at another human being and pull the trigger, they just wont or cant do it, its not in their nature. Its estimated that over half of combatants in  the American Civil war actually shot to miss, they got this up to around 70 percent in Vietnam. T his is a far more complicated issues than "good vs evil" .



fair enough point rhino.

if you were to watch the media on this, i am sure it is full of people saying "they cannot understand this".
i think the only way to understand it is from the idea that humans are partly composed of evil and there are no limits to that.
the germans , in 1940, were at the pinnacle of cultural development.
yet they were able to go and shoot pregnant jews in the back of the head.
it was worse then that.
they were able to unload jews for gassing and before they gassed them they would make them carry 100 lb bags of salt from one side of the camp to the other and back again, just to show they could always make an evil act a little bit more evil.

young people are not taught about that at school.
very few would have ever heard of auschwitz, pol pot or the gulags.

i suppose the authorities think it keeps them safer not to know that "thats what people can be like" and that "thats what YOU can be like".

because if you were alive in nazi germany in 1940 you MIGHT be a saint who rescued jews.
but probably not.
you probably would have joined in or at least condoned it by refusing to look at it

i
Thats the point I am making, most of those Germans if given an individual choice would not have shot pregnant Jews in the back of the head. And people who refuse to look at it, they arent inherently evil either.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
aquascoot
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 36742
Gender: male
Re: Another Family Annihilator?
Reply #127 - Feb 20th, 2020 at 6:37pm
 
mothra wrote on Feb 20th, 2020 at 6:14pm:
aquascoot wrote on Feb 20th, 2020 at 5:53pm:
mothra wrote on Feb 20th, 2020 at 4:58pm:
aquascoot wrote on Feb 20th, 2020 at 3:51pm:
mothra wrote on Feb 20th, 2020 at 3:21pm:
aquascoot wrote on Feb 20th, 2020 at 3:13pm:
mothra wrote on Feb 20th, 2020 at 3:00pm:
aquascoot wrote on Feb 20th, 2020 at 2:40pm:
The_Barnacle wrote on Feb 20th, 2020 at 2:25pm:
aquascoot wrote on Feb 20th, 2020 at 2:11pm:
i see where you are coming from but what really needs to happen is that people need to be educated on the potential for evil that dwells in everyone.


That is correct and that is something that most people on the Right don't understand.
They have this naive binary notion that there are only "goodies" and "badies". That is why they defend gun ownership when in fact, the more people that own guns, the greater the risk of being killed by one. There is evil that dwells in everyone.


strawman arguement.

had this guy had access to a gun he may have used it.
i'm not sure being incinerated was a nicer option.

but the holocaust was done with posion gas.
rwanda with machetes.

why concentrate on guns.

again, you naively think if we got rid of all the guns we could manifest the rainbow filled, dolphin filled, pink unicorn filled utopia.
probably not




The argument is simple. Try to focus.

If you are arguing that everyone has the beast in them ... why would you want everyone armed?



try to focus.

if i'm arguing everyone has a dark side they need to ackowledge and incorporate.....why would i want people to look for an excuse (like blaming guns) for what is  deep personal psychological work .



Nobody is blaming guns.

We're blaming human's inherent dark side.

Why are you avoiding the question?



are you acknowldeging humans have an inherent dark side.

if so, what should be done about that,



Hey, this is your party. Why won't you answer the question? Is it because you've been cornered?



I think it's because you've been cornered.


i've been cornered by your question about guns?


i'll have to check out the story again and see where guns came into it so i can see how you cornered me with your sharp intellect. Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy


It wasn't me, it was Barny.

And you've been running from it ever since. Hilariously.

But interesting you should need to read back to remember what the question you're dodging us, while you continue to dodge it.

Probably a good time to remind the readers that you don't rate intelligence.



you truly are naive.
watch out your kids dont get ptsd.

with regards guns , i would say the same thing with regards martial arts training.

it is good to train with weapons and to train with martial arts.

does that mean you can do more damage

damn straight.

but the biblical meaning of "blessed are the meek" is interesting .
the "meek" were actually highly trained bodygaurds who "were capable of great mayhem but CHOSE to keep their weapons sheathed."

and thats a better model for young men.

train them to be capable of great mayhem but to incorporate that mayhem and take pride in "keeping their weapons sheathed".

i would have no problem whatsoever with young men owning rifles and learning violent fighting techniques. (young swiss men have very high rates of rifle ownership, mountaineering, cross country skiing...manly pursuits)

i think it would break them free of resentful childish tantrums like this guy had and teach them responsibility
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
chimera
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 13182
Armidale
Gender: male
Re: Another Family Annihilator?
Reply #128 - Feb 20th, 2020 at 6:44pm
 
aquascoot wrote on Feb 20th, 2020 at 6:26pm:
they were able to unload jews for gassing and before they gassed them they would make them carry 100 lb bags of salt 


But not their own kids. Goebbels killed his in 1945 , some Germans suicided but most didn't.  We don't copy family murder just because of thinking about it , an evil thought.  Ancestors didn't . So it must be off the scale to kill our kids and into insanity such as drug insanity.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Captain Caveman
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 6211
Gender: male
Re: Another Family Annihilator?
Reply #129 - Feb 20th, 2020 at 9:20pm
 
Was this mongrel an ice head?

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
0ktema
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 674
Re: Another Family Annihilator?
Reply #130 - Feb 20th, 2020 at 9:25pm
 
Captain Caveman wrote on Feb 20th, 2020 at 9:20pm:
Was this mongrel an ice head?



It's possible, so is steroid abuse. There's also a chance that (CTE) could have been a factor.

Hopefully at autopsy the Perp will be checked for any signs of Repetitive Traumatic Brain Injury / Chronic Traumatic Encephalopathy (CTE) stemming from his football career.

Back to top
« Last Edit: Feb 20th, 2020 at 10:47pm by 0ktema »  


"We Are Consciousness Itself"
- Adi Da Samraj
 
IP Logged
 
Bias_2012
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 10766
Gender: male
Re: Another Family Annihilator?
Reply #131 - Feb 21st, 2020 at 12:18am
 
Not sure he was on drugs unless he was taking something for depression. There was a custody battle over the children

His wife used to beat him at Crossfit, whatever that is. He was probably a sore loser

He was saying weird things on facebook ...

On December 30, Mr Baxter shared a photo with his three children captioned “Goodnight my beautiful babies. Daddy loves you all very much. I miss you all.”

Two days later, on January 1, he captioned a photo: “Goodnight ratbags always in my heart
.”


He somehow tracked her phone with an app, and he ambushed her and the kids at her parents place
Back to top
« Last Edit: Feb 21st, 2020 at 7:02am by Bias_2012 »  

Our Lives Are Governed By The Feast & Famine Variable
 
IP Logged
 
PZ547
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 9282
Gender: male
Re: Another Family Annihilator?
Reply #132 - Feb 21st, 2020 at 3:37am
 
Captain Caveman wrote on Feb 20th, 2020 at 9:20pm:
Was this mongrel an ice head?



Possibly.  Whether or not that would be revealed after investigation ….

if he were, it would throw additional light on the 'gym' culture and drugs, particularly steroids.  Not sure authorities would like to go that road

More likely he was a narcissist, based on his in-laws reported comments.  It's reported they've said he was controlling and basically attempted to isolate his wife, which is classic narcissistic behaviour.  Verbal and physical bullying and intimidation.  And jealousy.  Jealousy is one of the root characteristics of narcissism.  Her family reportedly stated he was jealous of her sporting ability and I think CrossFit is what she is said to have beaten him at.  If he was bulked via steroids, his physical size wouldn't automatically translate to fitness, whereas despite three pregnancies, she looked extremely fit and strong

basically, he's a kid who grew tall and big and whether by inclination or early environmental influence, that translated years ago to 'masculinity' and approval.  But he was getting older and doesn't sound as if he'd ever had anything to commend him other than physical size.  With age comes physical deterioration regardless of diet or exercise.  It happens across the board in the natural and human world.  The old lion is eventually beaten just as are ageing human big-men.  It takes maturity (which is supposed to come with advancing age) to accept that.  Some cannot, be they men or women.  And if all they've really had is physical size/attractiveness, some turn to various drugs or to plastic surgery.  It's a no-win battle

Anyone who hasn't lived in a cave will be familiar with the dynamic and would suppose that if he hadn't burned his family to death, he would have extended his attempts to control and intimidate to his children. For instance he may well have attempted to 'run' (read 'ruin') their opportunities and lives by dictating where they could go, with whom they could associate, which studies they could undertake, which sports they should become involved in, which relationships they were 'allowed', etc.

In time, had they all lived, his son may have grown larger, stronger and eventually have put the old man on the ground after years of being bullied and being forced to watch his father bully and control his mother and sisters

Men like the family-killer in question are destroyers of all they envy, and generally they envy everyone.  They forget, or try to, that time moves on relentlessly.  They choose to forget that children get older and as they do so, their memories and sense of injustice burn.  This is why so many paedophiles are brought undone in the end, either in court or less discussed rough-justice.  And here in Australia there have been cases of forced-to-obedience sons who've turned finally, and killed or bashed their male parent.  Law of the jungle

The family-killer in question was low on resources.  Size and looks and most likely predominantly male-approval were what he'd relied upon.  Sounds as if he possessed few coping abilities to cater for changing times and age.  His golden-years had flown.  He could have chosen to down-scale his dreeeems and fantasies if he'd been another man … could have learned a trade or mowed lawns to prepare for advancing age, but narcissists almost never accept reality other than to predate and parasite on others until the bottom drops out

The petrol-killer was a low-grade show-pony and that's reflected in the way he chose to tell the world to get effed at the end.  Nasty world hadn't given him what he believed he was entitled to. Everyone, including his wife and kids, in-laws, etc., had to be punished by Big Punisher the Petrol Killer.  He'd finally make the headlines.  And all the goons who swallow steroids and spend their lives worshipping 'big' masculine physicality would be awed by the drama of his exit.  A flame-bomb family massacre would be his 'manifesto', seeing he couldn't achieve real life success

In other news, a West Australian ex-politician is heading to court, charged with multiple counts of family violence with another wife-victim, in addition to his professional misconduct/failure

And on the same page is a woman recounting how her mother was murdered by yet another narcissist predatory killer

A middle-aged, crippled woman was jailed for a lengthy term, years ago, for the murder of her husband.  Wheelchair bound, she'd beaten her husband to death one night with a hammer.  She'd been rendered wheelchair bound after being thrown out of a moving vehicle by the same husband as his most visible act of violence after years of same.  Once she was wheelchair bound, he took to stripping her naked, drenching her with water (in winter) and leaving her on the floor all night, punctuated by kicks and floggings if she whimpered too loudly.  Finally, she broke and killed him.  Sent to prison, which must have been a luxury spa compared to the life she'd led

Such is life and will remain so.  The family annihilation currently in the news is just the tip of the iceberg.  Less dramatic crimes are committed daily in, for example, age and care homes where the elderly who may have managed to avoid physical and mental torture during their younger years are nevertheless subjected to it when they're at their most vulnerable since infancy. Sexually & mentally tortured school kids are still coming forth




Back to top
 

All my comments, posts & opinions are to be regarded as satire & humour
 
IP Logged
 
PZ547
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 9282
Gender: male
Re: Another Family Annihilator?
Reply #133 - Feb 21st, 2020 at 4:39am
 
Quote:
We need to look at every piece of information and, to put it bluntly, there are probably people out there in the community that are deciding which side, so to speak, to take in this investigation,' he said.

'Is this an issue of a woman suffering significant domestic violence, and her and her children perishing at the hands of the husband?

'Or is it an instance of a husband being driven too far by issues that he's suffered by certain circumstances into committing acts of this form?'


quote:  Queensland Police Detective Inspector Thompson
LINK

Time Inspector Thompson was demoted and either dismissed entirely, or sent for intensive retraining followed by traffic duties for the rest of his career, imo


No amount of enquiries and taxpayer funded domestic violence initiatives will have a prayer of reeducating those most in need of it as long as there are people dinosaurs with the mindset of Inspector Thompson

the inspector is copping a hiding on social media and soon, media editorials … and so he should
Back to top
 

All my comments, posts & opinions are to be regarded as satire & humour
 
IP Logged
 
Pedro Curevo
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 500
Nth Coast NSW
Gender: male
Re: Another Family Annihilator?
Reply #134 - Feb 21st, 2020 at 6:14am
 
Suspect Rowan Baxter may have been on ice....then people are becoming more violent whether ice a factor or not...traumatic to see images of the kids and mum in happier times.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 ... 7 8 9 10 11 ... 14
Send Topic Print