Bobby. wrote on Mar 29^th, 2021 at 8:59am:


Exactly.

That's all we've been trying to say.

You believe a certain hypothesis because it comforts you.  The idea this was man-made means that there is someone to blame and for some, they think that justifies their racism in this case.  You've seen it all over the forums here and in the real world, we don't need to talk about that here. 

BUt the problem is, as you've said, there is no evidence to confirm it.

Not yet anyway.

I think we need to prepare for both of the leading theories to be real.  Either it came from the wet markets meaning there needs to be reform in these areas, or it came from a Lab in which case more scrutiny around that sort of research, safety standards etc.

Until we know the truth, we need to think that all the theories are true, within reason of course, so we can take whatever measures possible to prevent this from happening again.

So now you've leapt from, escaped a lab, to being a bioweapon?

This is why evidence is important.

Bobby. wrote on Mar 30^th, 2021 at 2:03pm:




Because otherwise this stuff gets out and infects people.

Bobby. wrote on Mar 30^th, 2021 at 4:31pm:



Research into animal disease in Geelong

The bastards -
the whole lot of them should be hanged:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/what-if-the-former-cdc-director-is-right...

April 2, 2021 at 9:43 a.m




Then, on Tuesday, World Health Organization Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus rebuked the findings of the WHO’s own joint study with Chinese scientists into the origins and explicitly called for more investigation into the lab-accident theory. The United States and 13 other countries also issued a joint statement calling for a “transparent and independent analysis and evaluation, free from interference and undue influence.”

Richard H. Ebright, a Rutgers University microbiologist and biosafety expert, told me we must begin a difficult, uncomfortable conversation about this investigation’s scope and the vast implications if the theory is true. He said the entire genre of research Redfield was referring to, known as

(in which viruses are captured from the wild and developed in lab settings to make them more dangerous), needs to be thoroughly reexamined.

“The very fact that it could have been of laboratory origin, even if that cannot be substantiated, means we need to understand that there is risk in this research that may have triggered the current pandemic and surely could trigger a future pandemic,” he said.

277,042 views
•Apr 4, 2021




The theory the virus came from a leak from the Wuhan Institute of Virology was deemed to be unlikely by the report.

Mr Metzl told Sky News the WHO did not conduct this investigation, but it was a “joint study of an independent advisory committee” to the World Health Organisation and their “Chinese counterparts”.

He said the investigation was not “capable of examining all the hypotheses” and therefore it cannot be viewed as authoritative.

“The core point is that any examination of the origins of the pandemic needs to thoroughly examine all of the possible origin hypotheses,” Mr Metzl said.

“It cannot be credible to say we’re only going to look at zoonotic jump and cold chain, and we won’t even lift a finger to examine the lab leak hypothesis.

“This entire joint team study, in my view, is not credible or valid because they examined some hypotheses and not others, and then had the temerity to rank the likelihood of the different hypotheses”.

Mr Metzl said the circumstantial evidence to support the lab leak theory is “overwhelming” including how the horseshoe bat – which was identified as the genetic source of the SARS-CoV-2 virus – lives in southern China.

“Wuhan is well beyond their range, Wuhan doesn’t have horseshoe bats,” he said.

“What Wuhan does have is China’s only level-four virology institute with the world’s largest collection of bat coronaviruses.

“I can’t say for sure that SARS-CoV-2 began with an accidental lab leak, but the circumstantial evidence is overwhelming.

“On top of that from day one, China began a massive coverup that involved destroying samples, hiding data bases and other records, and imprisoning journalists.”

Gravitas: Wuhan virus made in lab?

Chinese virologist has 'proof'

382,841 views
•Sep 15, 2020

We need also to ask why the Western media are ignoring this possibility.