Let me see.

I can make a completely ludricious claim, say........white people are more intellegent than tinted.

Now, based on bwyannnmnnn's logic, it's not up to me to actually prove that statement.
It's up to any detractors to prove otherwise.

There are many documented statements to that effect from the 15th, 16th and 17th century.
They also measured the skulls of white and black people and came to the conclusion that blacks have smaller brains.

I might add, at this point, that these people had no scientific premise on which to base their statements, but that is an irrelevancy as these were statements made by people who reported their findings.
But I can put forward the evidence that white societies are more advanced than black societies.

So I now have a statement, not verified, not proven and not scientifically endorsed.
But I put it forward as a fact.
And to dispute it makes you a racist as you are obviously anti-white.

This is exactly how Pascoe has put forward his argument.

So it's up to you to disprove my statement that whites are more intellegent than blacks.
Not me to prove my statement.

GO FOR IT BUDDY

Jasin wrote on Apr 18^th, 2020 at 12:03pm:


I don't think so. I think he knows his ancestral claims improve his book sales. Would that change your opinion of him as a man if that were true?

Jasin wrote on Apr 18^th, 2020 at 10:44am:


Kooris are also from NSW.

Murris are QLD & Nthn NSW.

Pascoe is a white man ... not Aboriginal of any description.

Valkie wrote on Apr 18^th, 2020 at 8:09pm:


Yes you can. Let's say White people are intelligent at Politics. Black people are intelligent to Land Care, it was a Black woman who came up with the idea of National Parks helping get America out of it's economic depression. Red people are intelligent at Flying, Grey people intelligent at Science, Yellow people intelligent at being Citi-Zens. Etc, etc.
But who's to say a Black person can't be intelligent in a Blue or White 'industry', like Medicine and Politics. Or even fading to Grey with Music?

 

Jasin wrote on Apr 18^th, 2020 at 11:03am:


Bullshit - he sought affiliation with their specific group and they said (wait for it)... no evidence.  It's not like some Rabbitoh local hero being an Uncle Tom by playing for another club.

Looks to me that the Elders in those groups saw through this puerile attempt at some credibility and merit by association.  Not dat 'Boriginal way dere, Bro - Noble Blackfullah..  they might have lower average IQ and be very backward intellectually - but that doesn't make them stupid.

Many journals have shown they have lower IQs and are intellectually backward... plenty of that evidence around, Bro... and once you accept that without question, it's easy to slot their civilisation into its rightful place. 

Grappler Racist Filth wrote on Apr 19^th, 2020 at 11:10am:


I think you have the 'Secret' knowledge that the Elders keep from Pascoe, as they do for many others - with the 'rejection' thing against Pascoe a bit confused. You could do a Joseph Cambell work on Aboriginal culture and the Elders still won't tell everything of Lore even at the cost of it 'dying' away with them - to be forgotten. They are as Solid as a Rock. That is the rejection that every outsider has faced, when trying to penetrate the Culture for a book, movie or just knowledge. It is a 'fear' of us, that keeps them reluctant to trust us.

Could you blame them? A Victorian tribe did everything 'culturally' to please the Whites and lived up to all standards of cultural assimilation. But they were betrayed in the end because they were not 'white'.

Trust.

Still nothing to explain the quotes that Pascoe made from early explorers/settlers diaries and journals.  Just continued character assassination.  Oh, dearie, dearie, me.  Looks like Pascoe's critics are getting desperate. 

Mr Hammer wrote on Apr 27^th, 2020 at 5:36pm:



come come hammer! what would dearie me bri  have to whinge about