Just kidding! This has never happened because the proponents of alternative theories on why the climate is changing which don't involve AGW are either unqualified scammers who know they will get their ass handed to them if they debate someone outside the idiot sphere echo chamber, or qualified researchers who know their theories lack the evidence to stand as credible alternate explanations.

@ Reply #3,

Good post/reasoned response, to 'argument' in OP, Frank.

"NASA climate scientist Gavin Schmidt refused to debate Roy Spencer, a skeptic climatologist at the University of Alabama-Huntsville, on Fox Business in 2013. Schmidt came on the show, but would not appear on TV simultaneously with Spencer."

https://dailycaller.com/2018/08/27/climate-alarmists-global-warming/

Pho Huc wrote on Dec 27^th, 2019 at 10:31pm:



You mean unlike CO2 theory.

Im guessing most of the skeptics here ain't raking it in (despite their enlightened world views) But im happy to go 40-50k in the tin if anyone wants to stand behind their opinions. If your only happy talking hunnies, thats fine. But I bet people who talk big don't have the confidence to actually put some skin in the game.

Frank wrote on Dec 27^th, 2019 at 10:44pm:


PM sent.

lee wrote on Dec 27^th, 2019 at 10:30pm:


Spencer is an advisor to the Cornwall Alliance, formerly the Interfaith Steward Alliance (ISA), an evangelical Christian group that claims environmentalism is “one of the greatest threats to society and the church today.” He has done work with other religious groups denying climate change including the Evangelical Climate Initiative. [2], [3], [4]

According to “Global Warming 101,” a section of Spencer's website, “the extra carbon dioxide we pump into the atmosphere is not enough to cause the observed warming in the last 100 years.” [5]

Pho Huc wrote on Dec 27^th, 2019 at 9:33pm:






https://www.thegwpf.com/media-ignores-michael-manns-court-loss-it-doesnt-fit-the...

Medieval warm period warmer than today.

Dahl_Jensen et al 1998
Wagner & Melles 2001
Kaplan et al 2002
Jiang et al 2002
Moore et al 2001
Grudd et al 2002
Seppa & Birks 2002
Dansgaard et al 1975
Korhola et al 2000
Naurzbaev et al 2002
Vaganov et el 1996
Briffa et al 1998
Scweingruber & Briffa 1996
Knudsen et al 2004
Grinsted et al 2006
Besonen et al 2008
Wagner et al 2008
Vare et al 2009
Norgaard-Pedersen & Mikkelsen 2009
Andresen et al 2004
Vinther et al 2010
Kobashi et al 2010
Kobashi et al 2008
Stuiver et al 1995
Dansgaard et al 1975
Jenings & Weiner 1996
Johnsen et al 2001
Vinther et al 2010
Larsen et al 2011
Hill et al 2001
Joynt & Wolfe 2001
Hantemirov & Shiyatov 2002
Andersson et al 2003
Helama et al 2005
Mazepa 2005
Weckstrom et al 2006
Jiang et al 2007
Zabenski & Gajewski 2007
Grudd 2008
Justwan et al 2008
Scire et al 2008
Axford et al 2009
Bjune et al 2009
Cook et al 2009
Fortin & Gajewski 2010
Buntgen et al 2011
Divine et al 2011
Ran et al 2011
Velle et al 2011
D’Andrea et al 2012
Esper et al 2012

Ajax wrote on Dec 28^th, 2019 at 7:53am:


ahhaahhaaaaaa!

An isight into the mind of a climate denier!!!  Where he gets his science from!!!

Michael Manns hockey stick is bullshit......!!!

Courts threw it out as a sham and ordered him to pay costs.

Once upon a time you used to pull it up show us how we have warmed didn't you.

Kiss the hockey stick good bye....numb nuts.........

What a pack of lying kkunts they are.  They should be put in prison for fraud.

People like you should be in jail for spreading fear and bullshit amongst the sheeple.

You should be JAILED...............!!

Warming by the end of this century

IPCC computer models  in 1990 projected warming………................+2.78° C / end of this Century

Observations of nature the last 29 years suggest a warming of........+1.07° C / end of this Century

random wrote on Dec 28^th, 2019 at 8:55am:


Temperature has been increasing since the little ice age.

When the Earth warms natural sinks degas more CO2 into the atmosphere.

The increase in atmospheric CO2 falls more in line with natural sinks degassing rather than what man is emitting.

Mans emissions are a very small percentage of the natural CO2, so small they wouldn't even register in the error margin.

Back to the drawing board numb nuts.

random wrote on Dec 28^th, 2019 at 6:13am:


Is that why the models are wrong?

lee wrote on Dec 28^th, 2019 at 11:27am:


The foundation of science is the quality of the messenger.  But shills ignore that and distribute lies from offices rented from Exxon.

lee wrote on Dec 28^th, 2019 at 3:25pm:


Not the last time I checked, not what they taught me at school.  But lying shill kunntts want people to believe shiny messages from lie factories setup in dingy offices paid for by Exxon.  Like you do.

Doesn't matter, when the poo really hits the fan, shills like you will be rounded up, charged and imprisoned for crimes against humanity.

lee wrote on Dec 28^th, 2019 at 3:50pm:



Climate denial will be a crime soon, the moves are already starting.  They will sacrifice the slaves and the sponsors will get off free.

I really thought there would be at least one qualified atmospheric scientist somewhere who was debating  another climate scientist trying to say AGW wasn't the best explanation. Its just trolls Lee and Ajax though. I guess there truly is no scientific debate on this issue. Its just dickheads on the internet who have no lives that think AGW is a scam.