Australian Politics Forum - Senate Impeachment Trial

Dnarever

Gold Member

Online

Australian Politics

Posts: 60303
Here
Gender: male

Re: Senate Impeachment Trial
Reply #75 - Dec 7^th, 2019 at 12:33pm

it_is_the_light wrote on Nov 25^th, 2019 at 6:20am:

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/11/theres-no-reason-to-call-me-as-a-witnes...

“There’s No Reason to Call Me as a Witness!” – SCHIFF SQUIRMS When Asked About Testifying Before the US Senate (VIDEO)

by Jim Hoft November 24, 2019 183 Comments

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/wp-content/uploads/schiff-witness-1.jpg

Adam Schiff went on Meet the Press on Sunday morning to discuss his failed week of sham impeachment hearings.

Chuck Todd: You should be a witness. They may want to call you.

Adam Sciff: Well, look. If the Senate wants to call me as a witness, then they pretty much made the decision not to take this process seriously. I’m not a fact witness. I was the chairman of one of the committees doing the investigation. I’m not in the shoes of a special counsel. I don’t work for the Justice Department. All I can relate is what the witnesses said in the deposition and in the open hearings. And that’s no reason to call me as a witness.

Of course, Shifty Schiff omitted that he lied about meeting with the anti-Trump whistleblower Eric Ciaramella before he filed his complaint against President Trump.

So Adam Schiff is a fact witness despite what he tells shameless Chuck Todd.

Schiff On More Public Hearings: 'Don't Foreclose The Possibility' | Meet The Press | NBC News

Quote:

omitted that he lied about meeting with the anti-Trump whistleblower Eric Ciaramella before he filed his complaint against President Trump.

So Adam Schiff is a fact witness despite what he tells shameless Chuck Todd.

The problem here is that we don't really know who the whistle blower is or if Schiff met with him / her.

The whistle blower has no further relevance since each and every word he said has been corroborated by witnesses closer to the facts.

The whistle blower has no relevance any longer the Republicans was to call him out of spite to out him /her and to gain revenge.

What the whistle blower had said has been proven well past the whistle blowers own knowledge.

Back to top

« Last Edit: Dec 7^th, 2019 at 12:43pm by Dnarever »

IP Logged

it_is_the_light

Gold Member

Offline

Christ Light

Posts: 41434
The Pyramid of LIGHT
Gender: male

Re: Senate Impeachment Trial
Reply #76 - Dec 7^th, 2019 at 12:37pm

Dnarever wrote on Dec 7^th, 2019 at 12:33pm:

it_is_the_light wrote on Nov 25^th, 2019 at 6:20am:

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/11/theres-no-reason-to-call-me-as-a-witnes...

“There’s No Reason to Call Me as a Witness!” – SCHIFF SQUIRMS When Asked About Testifying Before the US Senate (VIDEO)

by Jim Hoft November 24, 2019 183 Comments

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/wp-content/uploads/schiff-witness-1.jpg

Adam Schiff went on Meet the Press on Sunday morning to discuss his failed week of sham impeachment hearings.

Chuck Todd: You should be a witness. They may want to call you.

Adam Sciff: Well, look. If the Senate wants to call me as a witness, then they pretty much made the decision not to take this process seriously. I’m not a fact witness. I was the chairman of one of the committees doing the investigation. I’m not in the shoes of a special counsel. I don’t work for the Justice Department. All I can relate is what the witnesses said in the deposition and in the open hearings. And that’s no reason to call me as a witness.

Of course, Shifty Schiff omitted that he lied about meeting with the anti-Trump whistleblower Eric Ciaramella before he filed his complaint against President Trump.

So Adam Schiff is a fact witness despite what he tells shameless Chuck Todd.

Schiff On More Public Hearings: 'Don't Foreclose The Possibility' | Meet The Press | NBC News

Quote:

omitted that he lied about meeting with the anti-Trump whistleblower Eric Ciaramella before he filed his complaint against President Trump.

So Adam Schiff is a fact witness despite what he tells shameless Chuck Todd.

The problem here is that we don't really know who the whistle blower is or if Schiff met with him / her.

The whistle blower has no further relevance since each and every word he said has been corroborated by witnesses closer to the facts.

The whistle blower has no relevance any longer the Republicans was to call him out of spite to out him /her and to gain revenge.

What the whistle blower had said have been proven well past the whistle blowers own knowledge.

thanks for revealing again how ignorant you are puddleduck ..

everyone but you knows who the whistleblower is

Back to top

ॐ May Much LOVE and CHRISTS LIGHT be upon and within us all.... namasté ▲ - : ) ╰დ╮ॐ╭დ╯

IP Logged

Dnarever

Gold Member

Online

Australian Politics

Posts: 60303
Here
Gender: male

Re: Senate Impeachment Trial
Reply #77 - Dec 7^th, 2019 at 12:45pm

it_is_the_light wrote on Dec 7^th, 2019 at 12:37pm:

Dnarever wrote on Dec 7^th, 2019 at 12:33pm:

it_is_the_light wrote on Nov 25^th, 2019 at 6:20am:

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/11/theres-no-reason-to-call-me-as-a-witnes...

“There’s No Reason to Call Me as a Witness!” – SCHIFF SQUIRMS When Asked About Testifying Before the US Senate (VIDEO)

by Jim Hoft November 24, 2019 183 Comments

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/wp-content/uploads/schiff-witness-1.jpg

Adam Schiff went on Meet the Press on Sunday morning to discuss his failed week of sham impeachment hearings.

Chuck Todd: You should be a witness. They may want to call you.

Adam Sciff: Well, look. If the Senate wants to call me as a witness, then they pretty much made the decision not to take this process seriously. I’m not a fact witness. I was the chairman of one of the committees doing the investigation. I’m not in the shoes of a special counsel. I don’t work for the Justice Department. All I can relate is what the witnesses said in the deposition and in the open hearings. And that’s no reason to call me as a witness.

Of course, Shifty Schiff omitted that he lied about meeting with the anti-Trump whistleblower Eric Ciaramella before he filed his complaint against President Trump.

So Adam Schiff is a fact witness despite what he tells shameless Chuck Todd.

Schiff On More Public Hearings: 'Don't Foreclose The Possibility' | Meet The Press | NBC News

Quote:

omitted that he lied about meeting with the anti-Trump whistleblower Eric Ciaramella before he filed his complaint against President Trump.

So Adam Schiff is a fact witness despite what he tells shameless Chuck Todd.

The problem here is that we don't really know who the whistle blower is or if Schiff met with him / her.

The whistle blower has no further relevance since each and every word he said has been corroborated by witnesses closer to the facts.

The whistle blower has no relevance any longer the Republicans was to call him out of spite to out him /her and to gain revenge.

What the whistle blower had said have been proven well past the whistle blowers own knowledge.

thanks for revealing again how ignorant you are puddleduck ..

everyone but you knows who the whistleblower is

We know who one crazy corrupt proven to be dishonest person say's the whistleblower is, that is very different to knowing who the whistleblower is.

Back to top

IP Logged

it_is_the_light

Gold Member

Offline

Christ Light

Posts: 41434
The Pyramid of LIGHT
Gender: male

Re: Senate Impeachment Trial
Reply #78 - Dec 7^th, 2019 at 12:53pm

Dnarever wrote on Dec 7^th, 2019 at 12:45pm:

it_is_the_light wrote on Dec 7^th, 2019 at 12:37pm:

Dnarever wrote on Dec 7^th, 2019 at 12:33pm:

it_is_the_light wrote on Nov 25^th, 2019 at 6:20am:

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/11/theres-no-reason-to-call-me-as-a-witnes...

“There’s No Reason to Call Me as a Witness!” – SCHIFF SQUIRMS When Asked About Testifying Before the US Senate (VIDEO)

by Jim Hoft November 24, 2019 183 Comments

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/wp-content/uploads/schiff-witness-1.jpg

Adam Schiff went on Meet the Press on Sunday morning to discuss his failed week of sham impeachment hearings.

Chuck Todd: You should be a witness. They may want to call you.

Adam Sciff: Well, look. If the Senate wants to call me as a witness, then they pretty much made the decision not to take this process seriously. I’m not a fact witness. I was the chairman of one of the committees doing the investigation. I’m not in the shoes of a special counsel. I don’t work for the Justice Department. All I can relate is what the witnesses said in the deposition and in the open hearings. And that’s no reason to call me as a witness.

Of course, Shifty Schiff omitted that he lied about meeting with the anti-Trump whistleblower Eric Ciaramella before he filed his complaint against President Trump.

So Adam Schiff is a fact witness despite what he tells shameless Chuck Todd.

Schiff On More Public Hearings: 'Don't Foreclose The Possibility' | Meet The Press | NBC News

Quote:

omitted that he lied about meeting with the anti-Trump whistleblower Eric Ciaramella before he filed his complaint against President Trump.

So Adam Schiff is a fact witness despite what he tells shameless Chuck Todd.

The problem here is that we don't really know who the whistle blower is or if Schiff met with him / her.

The whistle blower has no further relevance since each and every word he said has been corroborated by witnesses closer to the facts.

The whistle blower has no relevance any longer the Republicans was to call him out of spite to out him /her and to gain revenge.

What the whistle blower had said have been proven well past the whistle blowers own knowledge.

thanks for revealing again how ignorant you are puddleduck ..

everyone but you knows who the whistleblower is

We know who one crazy corrupt proven to be dishonest person say's the whistleblower is, that is very different to knowing who the whistleblower is.

you obviously did not watch the Schiff Hearings , it was disclosed more than once there

this is how daft you are , yet we are glad you are here

you are the posterchild for the modern clueless Libtard along with sad face

Back to top

ॐ May Much LOVE and CHRISTS LIGHT be upon and within us all.... namasté ▲ - : ) ╰დ╮ॐ╭დ╯

IP Logged

Dnarever

Gold Member

Online

Australian Politics

Posts: 60303
Here
Gender: male

Re: Senate Impeachment Trial
Reply #79 - Dec 7^th, 2019 at 12:54pm

it_is_the_light wrote on Nov 25^th, 2019 at 8:09am:

SerialBrain9 wrote on Nov 25^th, 2019 at 8:00am:

it_is_the_light wrote on Nov 25^th, 2019 at 7:57am:

Trump 'will be trialled' following impeachment hearings

Sky News Australia
138K subscribers
Sky News Contributor Bruce Wolpe says he believes "there will be a trial" for US President Donald Trump following impeachment hearings.
Category
News & Politics

I disagree - Not unless the Democrats are totally insane.

well we both know how insane the Dems are , so likelihood 100 %

which is good because Republicans can call any witnesses they want , including both Bidens and Schiff

I cannot see how either make any difference - neither contributed in any way to Trumps corruption.

The argument that Biden may have done something wrong is no excuse for the President to use $400,000,000.00 of taxpayer money to extort the announcement of an investigation out of the Ukraine's leader.

And what in the hell has anything done by Schiff even remotely relate to Trumps corrupt actions or to excuse Trumps activity?

Back to top

IP Logged

it_is_the_light Gold Member Offline Christ Light Posts: 41434 The Pyramid of LIGHT Gender:	Re: Senate Impeachment Trial Reply #80 - Dec 7^th, 2019 at 5:44pm Graham on Russia probe report: The day of reckoning is here
Back to top	ॐ May Much LOVE and CHRISTS LIGHT be upon and within us all.... namasté ▲ - : ) ╰დ╮ॐ╭დ╯ IP Logged

SerialBrain9 Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 3289	Re: Senate Impeachment Trial Reply #81 - Dec 8^th, 2019 at 6:00am Nancy is praying for the President every night with her heart full of love. Right?
Back to top	From a Place You Will Not See, Comes a Sound You Will Not Hear. . ▄︻デ╦═一━ ……….. IP Logged

Dnarever

Gold Member

Online

Australian Politics

Posts: 60303
Here
Gender: male

Re: Senate Impeachment Trial
Reply #82 - Dec 8^th, 2019 at 6:53am

it_is_the_light wrote on Dec 7^th, 2019 at 12:53pm:

you obviously did not watch the Schiff Hearings , it was disclosed more than once there

this is how daft you are , yet we are glad you are here

you are the posterchild for the modern clueless Libtard along with sad face

Sorry but if that were true then why are the Republicans still desperate to identify who it is ?????

You really cannot have it both ways you know.

Back to top

IP Logged

Dnarever

Gold Member

Online

Australian Politics

Posts: 60303
Here
Gender: male

Re: Senate Impeachment Trial
Reply #83 - Dec 8^th, 2019 at 6:56am

SerialBrain9 wrote on Dec 8^th, 2019 at 6:00am:

Nancy is praying for the President every night with her heart full of love.

Right?

Cheesy

Posting 2 dumbos really only hurts your case you know ?

It would be a good play if your intention was to damage trumps position ?

Yes Nancy does in fact pray for the President. That is a trademark of many American catholics of her generation, they pray for the President - any and every President. They are taught to do that from childhood.

Trump desperately needs people to pray for him much more so than any previous President.

85% of what they had to say was just wrong anyway. They are in denial about their President in denial about gun laws and they even managed to incorrectly define dreamers. Looks like they don't fact check anything that they record and this unprofessional carelessness makes them look and sound stupid, I have no doubt that with a little care they could disseminate their blind bias much better.

What is most notable is their culpable ignorance.

Back to top

« Last Edit: Dec 8^th, 2019 at 7:12am by Dnarever »

IP Logged

it_is_the_light

Gold Member

Offline

Christ Light

Posts: 41434
The Pyramid of LIGHT
Gender: male

Re: Senate Impeachment Trial
Reply #84 - Dec 8^th, 2019 at 7:42am

SerialBrain9 wrote on Dec 8^th, 2019 at 6:00am:

Nancy is praying for the President every night with her heart full of love.

Right?

Cheesy

best thing to do is ignore Puddleduck ..

he is clearly an ignoramus on US political topics so best to focus on the facts

and ignore puddleducks inane responses of " fraid not " and blatant lies

it_is_the_light wrote on Dec 6^th, 2019 at 2:56pm:

Dnarever wrote on Dec 5^th, 2019 at 7:45pm:

All four Legal scholars agreed that Trump should be impeached if he did what he did, even the republicans scholar.

Then the Republican supporting legal scholar argued that because the extortion was unsuccessful there was no crime. (Fail).

Also argued that the obstruction had to go to the courts and be confirmed for obstruction to be possible - deeply flawed argument, the Republicans only argument. But of course making that argument is conceding that Trump is guilty. (Fail)

absolute lie ,

all 4 " legal scholars " are democrat voters .. 3 totally HATE Trump and have written articles since 2017 on impeaching Trump ..total Bias ,

and one of them , Jonathan Turley , did NOT say that at all ..

Jonathan Turley, a George Washington University law professor, cautioned House lawmakers on Dec. 4 against impeaching President Donald Trump. Speaking during the first day of public hearings by the Judiciary Committee in the impeachment inquiry into Trump, Turley said that to impeach Trump based on the current evidence “would be to expose every future president to the same type of inchoate impeachment.” The focus of the Judiciary hearing, which came after the House Intelligence Committee held hearings in late November, is to define the grounds for a presidential impeachment. The impeachment inquiry has revolved around a July 25 phone call in which Trump asked the president of Ukraine to investigate former vice president and 2020 presidential candidate Joe Biden and his son, Hunter.

everyone is actually stupider for reading your posts Jimpuddleduck ,

you are a simple minded liar repeating fake news .. dismissed .

Back to top

« Last Edit: Dec 8^th, 2019 at 8:02am by it_is_the_light »

ॐ May Much LOVE and CHRISTS LIGHT be upon and within us all.... namasté ▲ - : ) ╰დ╮ॐ╭დ╯

IP Logged

it_is_the_light

Gold Member

Offline

Christ Light

Posts: 41434
The Pyramid of LIGHT
Gender: male

Re: Senate Impeachment Trial
Reply #85 - Dec 8^th, 2019 at 9:01am

Dnarever wrote on Dec 7^th, 2019 at 12:33pm:

it_is_the_light wrote on Nov 25^th, 2019 at 6:20am:

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/11/theres-no-reason-to-call-me-as-a-witnes...

“There’s No Reason to Call Me as a Witness!” – SCHIFF SQUIRMS When Asked About Testifying Before the US Senate (VIDEO)

by Jim Hoft November 24, 2019 183 Comments

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/wp-content/uploads/schiff-witness-1.jpg

Adam Schiff went on Meet the Press on Sunday morning to discuss his failed week of sham impeachment hearings.

Chuck Todd: You should be a witness. They may want to call you.

Adam Sciff: Well, look. If the Senate wants to call me as a witness, then they pretty much made the decision not to take this process seriously. I’m not a fact witness. I was the chairman of one of the committees doing the investigation. I’m not in the shoes of a special counsel. I don’t work for the Justice Department. All I can relate is what the witnesses said in the deposition and in the open hearings. And that’s no reason to call me as a witness.

Of course, Shifty Schiff omitted that he lied about meeting with the anti-Trump whistleblower Eric Ciaramella before he filed his complaint against President Trump.

So Adam Schiff is a fact witness despite what he tells shameless Chuck Todd.

Schiff On More Public Hearings: 'Don't Foreclose The Possibility' | Meet The Press | NBC News

Quote:

omitted that he lied about meeting with the anti-Trump whistleblower Eric Ciaramella before he filed his complaint against President Trump.

So Adam Schiff is a fact witness despite what he tells shameless Chuck Todd.

The problem here is that we don't really know who the whistle blower is or if Schiff met with him / her.

The whistle blower has no further relevance since each and every word he said has been corroborated by witnesses closer to the facts.

The whistle blower has no relevance any longer the Republicans was to call him out of spite to out him /her and to gain revenge.

What the whistle blower had said has been proven well past the whistle blowers own knowledge.

again puddleduck ,

you are totally clueless and have no idea what you are talking about which makes you look totally ignorant and incompetent

so stick around because a total fool like you makes Trump look good ..

https://www.dailywire.com/news/alleged-whistleblowers-name-appears-in-transcript...

Alleged Whistleblower’s Name Appears In

https://thefederalist.com/2019/11/10/schiffs-committee-published-name-of-alleged...

Schiff’s Committee Published Name Of Alleged Whistleblower Last Week
NOVEMBER 10, 2019 By Madeline Osburn

https://docs.house.gov/meetings/IG/IG00/CPRT-116-IG00-D008.pdf

Last Wednesday, the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence (HPSCI), chaired by Democratic Rep. Adam Schiff, published the unredacted name of a man alleged to be the so-called whistleblower who helped launch impeachment proceedings against President Donald Trump.

During HPSCI testimony, William Taylor, the charge d’affairs of the U.S. Embassy in Kyiv, Ukraine, was asked by a staff lawyer on the committee whether the name Eric Ciaramella was familiar to him.

“Does a person by the name of Eric Ciaramella ring a bell for you?” asked Steve Castor, a committee staff counsel asked Taylor during a deposition on October 22.

“It doesn’t,” Taylor responded.

“So, to your knowledge, you never had any communications with somebody by that name?”

“Correct,” Taylor said.

The transcript of that exchange, which was not redacted, was published and publicly released by Schiff’s committee last Wednesday.

Back to top

ॐ May Much LOVE and CHRISTS LIGHT be upon and within us all.... namasté ▲ - : ) ╰დ╮ॐ╭დ╯

IP Logged

it_is_the_light Gold Member Offline Christ Light Posts: 41434 The Pyramid of LIGHT Gender:	Re: Senate Impeachment Trial Reply #86 - Dec 10^th, 2019 at 8:41am Graham reacts to IG's report on FBI bias: This is a sad day *@ 3:49 " the Russian Dossier is NOT RELIABLE "* Evidence was NOT included as exculpatory evidence * *@ 18:00 " I do not fault anybody for looking into allegations like this , I do fault them for LYING and misrepresenting to the COURT "*
Back to top	ॐ May Much LOVE and CHRISTS LIGHT be upon and within us all.... namasté ▲ - : ) ╰დ╮ॐ╭დ╯ IP Logged

Sprintcyclist Gold Member Online OzPolitic Posts: 41065 Gender:	Re: Senate Impeachment Trial Reply #87 - Dec 10^th, 2019 at 9:08pm Quote: The two unelected legal bureaucrats testifying today have donated over $140,000 to Democrats including: Hillary Clinton Kamala Harris Cory Booker The DNC The DCCC Barack Obama Doug Jones And Beto O' Rourke Is this really expected to be a fair & unbiased process?
Back to top	Modern Classic Right Wing IP Logged

Sprintcyclist Gold Member Online OzPolitic Posts: 41065 Gender:	Re: Senate Impeachment Trial Reply #88 - Dec 10^th, 2019 at 9:08pm Quote: Facts: Obama’s approval rating at this point in his presidency—46% Trump’s approval rating—52% Despite a nonstop impeachment hoax Despite 96% negative coverage President Trump is still polling better than Barack Obama I wonder why the media won’t report this?
Back to top	Modern Classic Right Wing IP Logged

Richdude

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 8457
NC
Gender: male

Re: Senate Impeachment Trial
Reply #89 - Dec 10^th, 2019 at 11:27pm

Sprintcyclist wrote on Dec 10^th, 2019 at 9:08pm:

Quote:

Facts:

Obama’s approval rating at this point in his presidency—46%

Trump’s approval rating—52%

Despite a nonstop impeachment hoax

Despite 96% negative coverage

President Trump is still polling better than Barack Obama

I wonder why the media won’t report this?

You answered your own question there Sprint! Wink

Back to top

The mediocre mind is incapable of understanding the man who refuses to bow blindly to conventional prejudices and chooses instead to express his opinions courageously and honestly.”

IP Logged