well of course  they would take advantage..  if you have never been in litigation   you wouldnt know how much a legal costs,   just to pick up a phone.... its an arm and a leg...

so this is pure gravy..FREE omg..

someone has to stop this  abuse fd?...people just cant be allowed to go around saying what ever they like on a public forum........

Tayla Harris  is a good example if it isnt stopped   it means everyone in the public eye is open to vile humiliation......

I am not for giving free anything to special GROUPS....

from what I read during that yes no vote the 

YES group behaved worse than the NO group...

Everyone was warned that the moment you allow any special interest group a foot in the door - they are not satisfied with that, nor are they satisfied to simply go their own way in peace.  They will always find some new 'grievance' to continue their personal jihad against anyone who disagrees with them.

They learned this from the amazing success of the ratbag feminists in their never-ending demands and use of nonsenses like 'tsunamis' of domestic violence, and 'cultures of rape' and so forth - every one  of which extensions to basic English, with ever-new and more (gasps) inclusive 'definitions of 'violence' and 'rape', was based on the underlying (and undying) principle that women, as 'victims' of society, are always raped and always bashed just by being women.  Even the natural caution of any woman that she should not place herself in harm's way is taken to be a part  of the 'culture of rape'... and is somehow blamed on men as a group, and not simply accepted as normal caution, the same as any sensible man would not walk through Gangland at night.

The result, plain to see, has been endless violence against men by the State (stupid as it is), and thus an actual escalation to a genuine tsunami of violence without reason. 

This approach has succeeded for the primary reason that it takes one at a time and not an entire group - and nobody notices really, given the endless barrage of propaganda, that an entire social group is slowly being eroded and subjugated (a crime against humanity, BTW).

Some day the scales must inevitably tip over - and just like Christchurch - one day there will be a backlash in kind.....

These special interest groups, which are distinct minorities in reality, will always use any advantage gained as a stepping stone for more and more, and they are handed endless FREE opportunity to do so by your very own government, which most emphatically does not apply the same standards both ways, as required by law. This started with the 'domestic violence advocacy service' which permitted any deluded or frankly insane woman to make any complaint against any man at whim, and be funded for it through courts while he  had to pay regardless of the facts and realities, and then play in a game with loaded dice and a stacked deck that ensure there was no chance of vindication regardless of facts (as required by law).

I will refer you all once again to my comments posted last night about 'who is and who is not the supremacist'.....

Certainly hetero male White Australia is not 'supremacist' since it does not seek to control, intimidate or subjugate any special interest group, but actually encourages them to 'gain inclusion'... often using the cash funds of that majority to support this insanity (and I will call it that).

Time to say NO to any further incursions and mean it.... you won't get any NOs under a Shorten government, just more social downhill slide at the behest of his feminist mistresses and his gay and Black masters and mistresses with their unceasing demands.

These groups will just be slavering and rubbing their hands together at the thought of  getting their hands on the controls of government and its endless money.  Mark my words....

John Smith wrote on Apr 7^th, 2019 at 10:32am:


I have a problem with censorship.

censure - critical condemnation ...

censor - to censor ....

Gay marriage

World destruction

We are in the middle watching it happen

cods wrote on Apr 7^th, 2019 at 4:54pm:



whatever he calls it, he needs to clean it up. His mods making crap rules up on a whim, depending on whether or not they like the poster, is not in line with FD views on censorship. Especially when they only apply to some posters and not others. 

cods wrote on Apr 7^th, 2019 at 8:52am:


You got it right there CODS. The YES group was far more obnoxious, spiteful, hostile and poorly behaved than those of the NO. Feels almost like a Con-Job just happened.