Dirty Paki Khunt wrote on Apr 6
th, 2019 at 8:20pm:
Grappler Racist Filth wrote on Apr 6
th, 2019 at 8:02pm:
Dirty Paki Khunt wrote on Apr 6
th, 2019 at 7:35pm:
Jasin wrote on Apr 6
th, 2019 at 6:10pm:
Is it just me or are Vegans becoming more violent in their manners, approach and opinions???

Today I was verbally assaulted because they overheard me talking to someone about how yummy Kangaroo was and how it was a high quality meat. The Vegan group were literally spitting at me and things almost got physical and 'no' I didn't start that either. Bystanders had to intervene to cool things down and the police turned up in 7 mins. I was asked if I wanted to press assault charges - but I let it slide. I was shaken, but not stirred. I just thought - what a bunch of psychotic nutters!
I've been saying this for years, JaSin. The white supremacists aren't the problem, it's the vegans and animal righters who carry out the most terror attacks.
It's a well-known fact, look it up.
Can you count these 'white supremacists' on the fingers of one hand?
If so - NAME THEM!
What a blown-up nonsense this 'white supremacist' thing is in reality.
Not according to the FBI. Not according to Europol. Not according to New Zealand either.
Typical leftards. We all know it's the vegans, it's just a fact.
Ah - so now it's an international thing, this 'white supremacist movement'? Not just enough to look at our locals, then? We must perforce look at worldwide events, and then seek to differentiate between what are facilely labeled 'white supremacists' - often meaning anyone who disagrees with a silly demand from any tinted (such as Invasion Day **rolls eyes**), and genuine White Supremacists who seek to control all others?
What have 'United States 'white supremacists' - as so loosely defined - to do with Australia?
All right- I'll make it easy for you - NAME these AUSTRALIAN 'white spremacists' and then tell us how you arrive at the conclusion that they are indeed 'supremacists' in any way.....
Let's start with a definition of a supremacists, shall we? I'm sure that will give us all plenty of arguing room....
Here ya go:-
"Supremacism is an ideology which holds that a particular class of people is superior to others, and that it should dominate, control, and subjugate others, or is entitled to do so.[1] The supposed superior class of people can be an age, race (classification of human beings) species, ethnicity, religion, gender (social construct), sexuality, language, social class, ideology, nation, or culture, or any other part of a population. "Now - what was our dear old JaSin doing to those vegans that made HIM the supremacist in this case? Did he seek to dominate, control or subjugate them...... or did they seek to do that to him?
Did those who objected to the nonsense about Invasion day seek to dominate, control or subjugate those who were demanding it... or was it the other way around?
Same with gay issues.. same with women's 'issues'... who exactly, by that standard of behaviour - is the supremacist?
What about some Muslims? Anyone seeking to dominate, control or subjugate them ... or are they the ones threatening beheadings etc for those who won't agree 100% with them?