cods wrote on Mar 6
th, 2019 at 9:57am:
greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 6
th, 2019 at 9:43am:
questions questions...too many of them in my case.
WAY too many.
Such as: why would a guilty man return to Australia to face the charges, when there was no legal obligation for him to do so?
I can't think of a reasonable answer to that question.
How about: why would an innocent man return to Australia to face the charges, when there was no legal obligation for him to do so?
Possible answer: to clear his name.
not sure he had the best defence...
if we are seeing huge problems surely the legals will as well...
One possibility is
complacency (a complacent person is very pleased with themselves or feels that they do not need to do anything about a situation, even though the situation may be uncertain or dangerous).
Hypothetical:
Why did he return to Australia?
Because he knew damn well he was innocent, and there was no way he could be wrongfully convicted based on the testimony of just one person.
Thus, he didn't put too much effort into organising his legal team.
Everyone would see that the charges were ridiculous, and therefore he wouldn't need the best lawyers in town to sort out this silly mess.
_____________________________________
I'm not saying that's how it went down, but it's a possibility.
A mixture of complacency and naivety, perhaps.