Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 ... 5 6 7 8 9 ... 11
Send Topic Print
Nukes (Read 9448 times)
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 52755
Gender: male
Re: Nukes
Reply #90 - Jan 26th, 2019 at 2:43pm
 
polite_gandalf wrote on Jan 24th, 2019 at 7:43pm:
Frank wrote on Jan 24th, 2019 at 6:24pm:
So they want the bomb and when Israel says it's not a good idea, Iran treats that as sabre rattling??  The ONLY country in that sea of Islamic fanaticism that could be wiped out by a single nuclear bomb is Israel. Not liking the prospect and push by Iran it is now sabre rattling. Very Musulman of you.


This is satire yes? It must be, for it would be impossible for you to not know that there is only one nuclear powered country in the region, and who it is.


Quote:
What I find to be a consistent trait in all your arguments and positions is a deep-seated and reflexive dishonesty and propaganda BS. You can never take a step back from your conversion to Islam and the binds it has put on you. You have retained a critical eye for everything but Islam. When it comes to Islam you speak as if you have never had a Western education, never had any critical faculties. Because you cannot be critical of Islam, you are critical of EVERYONE else involved in any and all the affairs that touch on Islam. It's so obvious to everyone, probably you included. You are living a lie.

You make no mention of Hezbollah and all the other terrorists that Iran is financing and supporting, you make no mention of its hand in the Syrian civil war, in international terrorism. You always slant, dishonestly. It's very Muslim. 


What I find to be a consistent trait in all your rantings (they can hardly be passed as 'arguments') is a singular refusal to engage in any of the actual detail of an opposing argument and simply use it as an excuse to do rattle off your same standard templated 'never ever' rant, that you apply in every situation - no matter how off point it is.

Case in point - I specifically mentioned Hezbollah in specific reference to a calculated strategy by Iran to maintain a continuous zone of influence from Iran to the Israeli border - one of the insurance policies Iran takes out against the very real existential threat posed by the only nuclear armed country in the region.

And I must say that my so called "reflexive dishonesty and propaganda BS" is nothing really out of sync with what mainstream media and commentators are saying all the time. It may shock you to know that most people don't see Iran and other 'enemies' of Israel as frothing-at-the-mouth zealots hell-bent on some twisted Allah-ordained jihad to wipe the jews from the planet. That would in fact be considered extreme and irrational. And yet thats exactly the scenario you and others here actually think is a reasonable assessment of the reality. And you have the spunk to portray me as the "blind" irrational one, incapable of critical thinking. What a joke!



https://www.timesofisrael.com/top-iranian-general-vows-to-wipe-out-annihilate-is...


https://m.jpost.com/Middle-East/Iran-News/Iran-continues-to-call-for-Israels-des...

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2012/aug/17/iran-israel-zionist-insult-humanit...


https://www.theguardian.com/world/2012/aug/17/iran-israel-zionist-insult-humanit...

Back to top
 

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
Brian Ross
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Representative of me

Posts: 44683
Re: Nukes
Reply #91 - Jan 26th, 2019 at 6:28pm
 
Frank wrote on Jan 26th, 2019 at 2:43pm:
polite_gandalf wrote on Jan 24th, 2019 at 7:43pm:
Frank wrote on Jan 24th, 2019 at 6:24pm:
So they want the bomb and when Israel says it's not a good idea, Iran treats that as sabre rattling??  The ONLY country in that sea of Islamic fanaticism that could be wiped out by a single nuclear bomb is Israel. Not liking the prospect and push by Iran it is now sabre rattling. Very Musulman of you.


This is satire yes? It must be, for it would be impossible for you to not know that there is only one nuclear powered country in the region, and who it is.


Quote:
What I find to be a consistent trait in all your arguments and positions is a deep-seated and reflexive dishonesty and propaganda BS. You can never take a step back from your conversion to Islam and the binds it has put on you. You have retained a critical eye for everything but Islam. When it comes to Islam you speak as if you have never had a Western education, never had any critical faculties. Because you cannot be critical of Islam, you are critical of EVERYONE else involved in any and all the affairs that touch on Islam. It's so obvious to everyone, probably you included. You are living a lie.

You make no mention of Hezbollah and all the other terrorists that Iran is financing and supporting, you make no mention of its hand in the Syrian civil war, in international terrorism. You always slant, dishonestly. It's very Muslim. 


What I find to be a consistent trait in all your rantings (they can hardly be passed as 'arguments') is a singular refusal to engage in any of the actual detail of an opposing argument and simply use it as an excuse to do rattle off your same standard templated 'never ever' rant, that you apply in every situation - no matter how off point it is.

Case in point - I specifically mentioned Hezbollah in specific reference to a calculated strategy by Iran to maintain a continuous zone of influence from Iran to the Israeli border - one of the insurance policies Iran takes out against the very real existential threat posed by the only nuclear armed country in the region.

And I must say that my so called "reflexive dishonesty and propaganda BS" is nothing really out of sync with what mainstream media and commentators are saying all the time. It may shock you to know that most people don't see Iran and other 'enemies' of Israel as frothing-at-the-mouth zealots hell-bent on some twisted Allah-ordained jihad to wipe the jews from the planet. That would in fact be considered extreme and irrational. And yet thats exactly the scenario you and others here actually think is a reasonable assessment of the reality. And you have the spunk to portray me as the "blind" irrational one, incapable of critical thinking. What a joke!



https://www.timesofisrael.com/top-iranian-general-vows-to-wipe-out-annihilate-is...


https://m.jpost.com/Middle-East/Iran-News/Iran-continues-to-call-for-Israels-des...

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2012/aug/17/iran-israel-zionist-insult-humanit...


https://www.theguardian.com/world/2012/aug/17/iran-israel-zionist-insult-humanit...



Did the Iranian President really say Israel should be ‘wiped off the map’?

Experts confirm that Iran's president did not call for Israel to be 'wiped off the map

Israeli Minister Agrees Ahmadinejad Never Said Israel ‘Must Be Wiped Off the Map’

President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad never said that Israel should be "wiped off the map."

Roll Eyes

Netanyahu says Israel would hit Iran to ensure its own survival

Will Israel Really Strike Iran?

The attack on Iran that wasn’t: Ehud Barak’s autobiography

Roll Eyes Roll Eyes

Back to top
« Last Edit: Jan 26th, 2019 at 6:35pm by Brian Ross »  

It seems that I have upset a Moderator and are forbidden from using memes. So much for Freedom of Speech. Tsk, tsk, tsk...   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 52755
Gender: male
Re: Nukes
Reply #92 - Jan 26th, 2019 at 6:47pm
 
Brian Ross wrote on Jan 26th, 2019 at 6:28pm:
Frank wrote on Jan 26th, 2019 at 2:43pm:
polite_gandalf wrote on Jan 24th, 2019 at 7:43pm:
Frank wrote on Jan 24th, 2019 at 6:24pm:
So they want the bomb and when Israel says it's not a good idea, Iran treats that as sabre rattling??  The ONLY country in that sea of Islamic fanaticism that could be wiped out by a single nuclear bomb is Israel. Not liking the prospect and push by Iran it is now sabre rattling. Very Musulman of you.


This is satire yes? It must be, for it would be impossible for you to not know that there is only one nuclear powered country in the region, and who it is.


Quote:
What I find to be a consistent trait in all your arguments and positions is a deep-seated and reflexive dishonesty and propaganda BS. You can never take a step back from your conversion to Islam and the binds it has put on you. You have retained a critical eye for everything but Islam. When it comes to Islam you speak as if you have never had a Western education, never had any critical faculties. Because you cannot be critical of Islam, you are critical of EVERYONE else involved in any and all the affairs that touch on Islam. It's so obvious to everyone, probably you included. You are living a lie.

You make no mention of Hezbollah and all the other terrorists that Iran is financing and supporting, you make no mention of its hand in the Syrian civil war, in international terrorism. You always slant, dishonestly. It's very Muslim. 


What I find to be a consistent trait in all your rantings (they can hardly be passed as 'arguments') is a singular refusal to engage in any of the actual detail of an opposing argument and simply use it as an excuse to do rattle off your same standard templated 'never ever' rant, that you apply in every situation - no matter how off point it is.

Case in point - I specifically mentioned Hezbollah in specific reference to a calculated strategy by Iran to maintain a continuous zone of influence from Iran to the Israeli border - one of the insurance policies Iran takes out against the very real existential threat posed by the only nuclear armed country in the region.

And I must say that my so called "reflexive dishonesty and propaganda BS" is nothing really out of sync with what mainstream media and commentators are saying all the time. It may shock you to know that most people don't see Iran and other 'enemies' of Israel as frothing-at-the-mouth zealots hell-bent on some twisted Allah-ordained jihad to wipe the jews from the planet. That would in fact be considered extreme and irrational. And yet thats exactly the scenario you and others here actually think is a reasonable assessment of the reality. And you have the spunk to portray me as the "blind" irrational one, incapable of critical thinking. What a joke!



https://www.timesofisrael.com/top-iranian-general-vows-to-wipe-out-annihilate-is...


https://m.jpost.com/Middle-East/Iran-News/Iran-continues-to-call-for-Israels-des...

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2012/aug/17/iran-israel-zionist-insult-humanit...


https://www.theguardian.com/world/2012/aug/17/iran-israel-zionist-insult-humanit...



Did the Iranian President really say Israel should be ‘wiped off the map’?

Experts confirm that Iran's president did not call for Israel to be 'wiped off the map

Israeli Minister Agrees Ahmadinejad Never Said Israel ‘Must Be Wiped Off the Map’

President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad never said that Israel should be "wiped off the map."

Roll Eyes

Netanyahu says Israel would hit Iran to ensure its own survival

Will Israel Really Strike Iran?

The attack on Iran that wasn’t: Ehud Barak’s autobiography

Roll Eyes Roll Eyes



So you are disputing the 'wipe off the map' when in Persian it may have been 'disappear or vanish'. And whether it was Ahmadinnerjacket or an ayatollah or a general.
A top Iranian general has said Iran will annihilate Israel, boasted that Iran could easily defeat Saudi Arabia, and threatened to overrun American military bases in the Middle East.

Israel wants to defend itself in the face of Muslim aggression - especially Persian. It threatens NOBODY with a first strike while a first trike is all Iran is ever talking about.  If the Muslims left Israel alone, there would be peace. Bwian, you don't have to eagerly pretend that you are stupider than you are.
Back to top
« Last Edit: Jan 26th, 2019 at 6:52pm by Frank »  

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
Brian Ross
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Representative of me

Posts: 44683
Re: Nukes
Reply #93 - Jan 27th, 2019 at 4:25pm
 
Frank wrote on Jan 26th, 2019 at 6:47pm:
So you are disputing the 'wipe off the map' when in Persian it may have been 'disappear or vanish'. And whether it was Ahmadinnerjacket or an ayatollah or a general.
A top Iranian general has said Iran will annihilate Israel, boasted that Iran could easily defeat Saudi Arabia, and threatened to overrun American military bases in the Middle East.


The words have different meanings, Soren.  The Israelis lied about what the Iranian President said.   People say things for their home audience which are never meant to be heard by foreigners.  One only has to read the bullshit that you spout continually against your fellow Australians.    Roll Eyes

Quote:
Israel wants to defend itself in the face of Muslim aggression - especially Persian. It threatens NOBODY with a first strike while a first trike is all Iran is ever talking about.  If the Muslims left Israel alone, there would be peace. Bwian, you don't have to eagerly pretend that you are stupider than you are.


Everybody wants to defend themselves.  What makes Israel more right than Iran?  Nothing.  They are both led by crazy men.  QED.    Roll Eyes Roll Eyes

Back to top
 

It seems that I have upset a Moderator and are forbidden from using memes. So much for Freedom of Speech. Tsk, tsk, tsk...   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 52755
Gender: male
Re: Nukes
Reply #94 - Jan 27th, 2019 at 4:58pm
 
Brian Ross wrote on Jan 27th, 2019 at 4:25pm:
Frank wrote on Jan 26th, 2019 at 6:47pm:
So you are disputing the 'wipe off the map' when in Persian it may have been 'disappear or vanish'. And whether it was Ahmadinnerjacket or an ayatollah or a general.
A top Iranian general has said Iran will annihilate Israel, boasted that Iran could easily defeat Saudi Arabia, and threatened to overrun American military bases in the Middle East.


The words have different meanings, Soren.  The Israelis lied about what the Iranian President said.   People say things for their home audience which are never meant to be heard by foreigners.  One only has to read the bullshit that you spout continually against your fellow Australians.    Roll Eyes

Quote:
Israel wants to defend itself in the face of Muslim aggression - especially Persian. It threatens NOBODY with a first strike while a first trike is all Iran is ever talking about.  If the Muslims left Israel alone, there would be peace. Bwian, you don't have to eagerly pretend that you are stupider than you are.


Everybody wants to defend themselves.  What makes Israel more right than Iran?  Nothing.  They are both led by crazy men.  QED.    Roll Eyes Roll Eyes


FD, another one for the spineless, squishy worm of an apologist for Islamic aggression thread.


It has never been Israeli policy to annihilate or wipe off the map any regime. Israel does not threaten, never has, ANY country and has no demands on anyone - other than desist from attacking it.

It has been a standing policy for Iran and its clients like hezb'Allah (Islam, geddit?) to annihilate and wipe Israel off from the map.

Blind and stupid as you are, even you can see the difference.

But you will argue, blindly and stupidly, that you don't actually see the difference. That's the Bwian in you. The eye-wateringly idiotic little 'oh-yeah, says who?' Bwian in you.



Back to top
 

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
Brian Ross
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Representative of me

Posts: 44683
Re: Nukes
Reply #95 - Jan 27th, 2019 at 7:16pm
 
Frank wrote on Jan 27th, 2019 at 4:58pm:
Brian Ross wrote on Jan 27th, 2019 at 4:25pm:
Frank wrote on Jan 26th, 2019 at 6:47pm:
So you are disputing the 'wipe off the map' when in Persian it may have been 'disappear or vanish'. And whether it was Ahmadinnerjacket or an ayatollah or a general.
A top Iranian general has said Iran will annihilate Israel, boasted that Iran could easily defeat Saudi Arabia, and threatened to overrun American military bases in the Middle East.


The words have different meanings, Soren.  The Israelis lied about what the Iranian President said.   People say things for their home audience which are never meant to be heard by foreigners.  One only has to read the bullshit that you spout continually against your fellow Australians.    Roll Eyes

Quote:
Israel wants to defend itself in the face of Muslim aggression - especially Persian. It threatens NOBODY with a first strike while a first trike is all Iran is ever talking about.  If the Muslims left Israel alone, there would be peace. Bwian, you don't have to eagerly pretend that you are stupider than you are.


Everybody wants to defend themselves.  What makes Israel more right than Iran?  Nothing.  They are both led by crazy men.  QED.    Roll Eyes Roll Eyes


FD, another one for the spineless, squishy worm of an apologist for Islamic aggression thread.


It has never been Israeli policy to annihilate or wipe off the map any regime. Israel does not threaten, never has, ANY country and has no demands on anyone - other than desist from attacking it.

It has been a standing policy for Iran and its clients like hezb'Allah (Islam, geddit?) to annihilate and wipe Israel off from the map.

Blind and stupid as you are, even you can see the difference.

But you will argue, blindly and stupidly, that you don't actually see the difference. That's the Bwian in you. The eye-wateringly idiotic little 'oh-yeah, says who?' Bwian in you.


Never threatened?  Really, Soren?  Oh, dearie, dearie, me.

Netanyahu says Israel would hit Iran to ensure its own survival

Will Israel Really Strike Iran?

The attack on Iran that wasn’t: Ehud Barak’s autobiography

Roll Eyes Roll Eyes  Roll Eyes
Back to top
 

It seems that I have upset a Moderator and are forbidden from using memes. So much for Freedom of Speech. Tsk, tsk, tsk...   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 52755
Gender: male
Re: Nukes
Reply #96 - Jan 27th, 2019 at 7:31pm
 
Brian Ross wrote on Jan 27th, 2019 at 7:16pm:
Frank wrote on Jan 27th, 2019 at 4:58pm:
Brian Ross wrote on Jan 27th, 2019 at 4:25pm:
Frank wrote on Jan 26th, 2019 at 6:47pm:
So you are disputing the 'wipe off the map' when in Persian it may have been 'disappear or vanish'. And whether it was Ahmadinnerjacket or an ayatollah or a general.
A top Iranian general has said Iran will annihilate Israel, boasted that Iran could easily defeat Saudi Arabia, and threatened to overrun American military bases in the Middle East.


The words have different meanings, Soren.  The Israelis lied about what the Iranian President said.   People say things for their home audience which are never meant to be heard by foreigners.  One only has to read the bullshit that you spout continually against your fellow Australians.    Roll Eyes

Quote:
Israel wants to defend itself in the face of Muslim aggression - especially Persian. It threatens NOBODY with a first strike while a first trike is all Iran is ever talking about.  If the Muslims left Israel alone, there would be peace. Bwian, you don't have to eagerly pretend that you are stupider than you are.


Everybody wants to defend themselves.  What makes Israel more right than Iran?  Nothing.  They are both led by crazy men.  QED.    Roll Eyes Roll Eyes


FD, another one for the spineless, squishy worm of an apologist for Islamic aggression thread.


It has never been Israeli policy to annihilate or wipe off the map any regime. Israel does not threaten, never has, ANY country and has no demands on anyone - other than desist from attacking it.

It has been a standing policy for Iran and its clients like hezb'Allah (Islam, geddit?) to annihilate and wipe Israel off from the map.

Blind and stupid as you are, even you can see the difference.

But you will argue, blindly and stupidly, that you don't actually see the difference. That's the Bwian in you. The eye-wateringly idiotic little 'oh-yeah, says who?' Bwian in you.


Never threatened?  Really, Soren?  Oh, dearie, dearie, me.

Netanyahu says Israel would hit Iran to ensure its own survival

Will Israel Really Strike Iran?

The attack on Iran that wasn’t: Ehud Barak’s autobiography

Roll Eyes Roll Eyes  Roll Eyes



The subtitle of that headline?

We do what is necessary to protect the state of Israel against the Iranian regime that openly calls for the annihilation of the Jewish state,’ PM says





Back to top
« Last Edit: Jan 28th, 2019 at 9:17am by Frank »  

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
Brian Ross
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Representative of me

Posts: 44683
Re: Nukes
Reply #97 - Jan 28th, 2019 at 10:09am
 
Frank wrote on Jan 27th, 2019 at 7:31pm:
Brian Ross wrote on Jan 27th, 2019 at 7:16pm:
Frank wrote on Jan 27th, 2019 at 4:58pm:
Brian Ross wrote on Jan 27th, 2019 at 4:25pm:
Frank wrote on Jan 26th, 2019 at 6:47pm:
So you are disputing the 'wipe off the map' when in Persian it may have been 'disappear or vanish'. And whether it was Ahmadinnerjacket or an ayatollah or a general.
A top Iranian general has said Iran will annihilate Israel, boasted that Iran could easily defeat Saudi Arabia, and threatened to overrun American military bases in the Middle East.


The words have different meanings, Soren.  The Israelis lied about what the Iranian President said.   People say things for their home audience which are never meant to be heard by foreigners.  One only has to read the bullshit that you spout continually against your fellow Australians.    Roll Eyes

Quote:
Israel wants to defend itself in the face of Muslim aggression - especially Persian. It threatens NOBODY with a first strike while a first trike is all Iran is ever talking about.  If the Muslims left Israel alone, there would be peace. Bwian, you don't have to eagerly pretend that you are stupider than you are.


Everybody wants to defend themselves.  What makes Israel more right than Iran?  Nothing.  They are both led by crazy men.  QED.    Roll Eyes Roll Eyes


FD, another one for the spineless, squishy worm of an apologist for Islamic aggression thread.


It has never been Israeli policy to annihilate or wipe off the map any regime. Israel does not threaten, never has, ANY country and has no demands on anyone - other than desist from attacking it.

It has been a standing policy for Iran and its clients like hezb'Allah (Islam, geddit?) to annihilate and wipe Israel off from the map.

Blind and stupid as you are, even you can see the difference.

But you will argue, blindly and stupidly, that you don't actually see the difference. That's the Bwian in you. The eye-wateringly idiotic little 'oh-yeah, says who?' Bwian in you.


Never threatened?  Really, Soren?  Oh, dearie, dearie, me.

Netanyahu says Israel would hit Iran to ensure its own survival

Will Israel Really Strike Iran?

The attack on Iran that wasn’t: Ehud Barak’s autobiography

Roll Eyes Roll Eyes  Roll Eyes


The subtitle of that headline?

We do what is necessary to protect the state of Israel against the Iranian regime that openly calls for the annihilation of the Jewish state,’ PM says


Oh, dearie, dearie, me.  Who was contemplating attacking whom, first, Soren?  Iran or Israel?   I think you'll find it was Israel.   Again, I make the point that what is said in public is usually meant for a person's domestic audience rather than a foreign one.   You make the most outlandish statemens against Islam in general, Soren.  Is that meant for Muslims around the world to read or for Australians to read?  Mmmmm?    Roll Eyes

You are though, attempting to shift the goalposts again, aren't you, Soren?  You made the claim that Israel:

Quote:
It has never been Israeli policy to annihilate or wipe off the map any regime. Israel does not threaten, never has, ANY country and has no demands on anyone - other than desist from attacking it.


I have proved you wrong, again.  Again you've been tripped up by reality, Soren.  Tsk, tsk, run along back to the little kiddies' playground it is where you and your childish mates belong.   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
Back to top
 

It seems that I have upset a Moderator and are forbidden from using memes. So much for Freedom of Speech. Tsk, tsk, tsk...   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Bobby.
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 112722
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: Nukes
Reply #98 - Jan 28th, 2019 at 11:26am
 
Should the Jews be disarmed?


Samson Option


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samson_Option

In 2003, a military historian, Martin van Creveld, thought that the Al-Aqsa Intifada then in progress threatened Israel's existence.[31] Van Creveld was quoted in David Hirst's The Gun and the Olive Branch (2003) as saying:

    We possess several hundred atomic warheads and rockets and can launch them at targets in all directions, perhaps even at Rome. Most European capitals are targets for our air force.

Let me quote General Moshe Dayan:

'Israel must be like a mad dog, too dangerous to bother.' I consider it all hopeless at this point. We shall have to try to prevent things from coming to that, if at all possible. Our armed forces, however, are not the thirtieth strongest in the world, but rather the second or third. We have the capability to take the world down with us. And I can assure you that that will happen before Israel goes under.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 52755
Gender: male
Re: Nukes
Reply #99 - Jan 28th, 2019 at 12:13pm
 
Brian Ross wrote on Jan 28th, 2019 at 10:09am:
Frank wrote on Jan 27th, 2019 at 7:31pm:
The subtitle of that headline?

We do what is necessary to protect the state of Israel against the Iranian regime that openly calls for the annihilation of the Jewish state,’ PM says


Oh, dearie, dearie, me.  Who was contemplating attacking whom, first, Soren?  Iran or Israel?   I think you'll find it was Israel.   Again, I make the point that what is said in public is usually meant for a person's domestic audience rather than a foreign one.   You make the most outlandish statemens against Islam in general, Soren.  Is that meant for Muslims around the world to read or for Australians to read?  Mmmmm?    Roll Eyes

You are though, attempting to shift the goalposts again, aren't you, Soren?  You made the claim that Israel:

Quote:
It has never been Israeli policy to annihilate or wipe off the map any regime. Israel does not threaten, never has, ANY country and has no demands on anyone - other than desist from attacking it.


I have proved you wrong, again.  Again you've been tripped up by reality, Soren.  Tsk, tsk, run along back to the little kiddies' playground it is where you and your childish mates belong.   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes


IRAN has been very vocal about attacking Israel FIRST, cockwomble. Israel's RESPONSE to Iranian threats of annihilation has been to threaten to attack Iran's nuclear facilities. 

So you can whistle in the dark all you like, Bwian, about how stupid you are and how much you enjoy living in your unnmoored alternativbe reality.

Your idiotic wheeze about domestic audiences is as facile and ridiculous as the rest of your lies and distortions.


Quote:
You make the most outlandish statemens against Islam in general, Soren.  Is that meant for Muslims around the world to read or for Australians to read?  Mmmmm?    Roll Eyes

Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin

Muslims around the world are welcome to them. I am not a spineless, squishy hypocrite and liar like you, Bwian.

Back to top
 

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
Brian Ross
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Representative of me

Posts: 44683
Re: Nukes
Reply #100 - Jan 28th, 2019 at 2:52pm
 
Frank wrote on Jan 28th, 2019 at 12:13pm:
Brian Ross wrote on Jan 28th, 2019 at 10:09am:
Frank wrote on Jan 27th, 2019 at 7:31pm:
The subtitle of that headline?

We do what is necessary to protect the state of Israel against the Iranian regime that openly calls for the annihilation of the Jewish state,’ PM says


Oh, dearie, dearie, me.  Who was contemplating attacking whom, first, Soren?  Iran or Israel?   I think you'll find it was Israel.   Again, I make the point that what is said in public is usually meant for a person's domestic audience rather than a foreign one.   You make the most outlandish statemens against Islam in general, Soren.  Is that meant for Muslims around the world to read or for Australians to read?  Mmmmm?    Roll Eyes

You are though, attempting to shift the goalposts again, aren't you, Soren?  You made the claim that Israel:

Quote:
It has never been Israeli policy to annihilate or wipe off the map any regime. Israel does not threaten, never has, ANY country and has no demands on anyone - other than desist from attacking it.


I have proved you wrong, again.  Again you've been tripped up by reality, Soren.  Tsk, tsk, run along back to the little kiddies' playground it is where you and your childish mates belong.   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes


IRAN has been very vocal about attacking Israel FIRST, cockwomble. Israel's RESPONSE to Iranian threats of annihilation has been to threaten to attack Iran's nuclear facilities.


Interestingly, the first mention I can find about Israel being "destroyed" by an Iranian official was in 2012 when

  Quote:
In a May 2012 speech to a defense gathering in Tehran, Iran's Military Chief of Staff declared: "The Iranian nation is standing for its cause and that is the full annihilation of Israel."

[[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iran%E2%80%93Israel_relations#Iran_threatening_Israel]Source[/url]]

While the first mention I can find of Israel threatening Iran was in 2007 when:

Quote:
From the moment he entered Ehud Olmert’s government, Barak writes that he ordered Chief of Staff Gabi Ashkenazi to prepare a plan for a “surgical strike” to destroy most of Iran’s nuclear facilities. When Barak understood that Israel did not have the capability for such an attack (it lacked of midair refueling aircraft and the necessary bunker busting bombs), he writes, “I was determined to do all I could to change that.”

[Source]

"Never ever," hey, Soren?   Oh, dearie, dearie, me, tripped up by reality yet again.    Roll Eyes Roll Eyes

Quote:
So you can whistle in the dark all you like, Bwian, about how stupid you are and how much you enjoy living in your unnmoored alternativbe reality.

Your idiotic wheeze about domestic audiences is as facile and ridiculous as the rest of your lies and distortions.

Oh, dearie, dearie, me.  Admitting defeat again, Soren?   Tsk, tsk, run along back to the little kiddies' playground where you belong, OK?    Roll Eyes

Quote:
[quote]You make the most outlandish statements against Islam in general, Soren.  Is that meant for Muslims around the world to read or for Australians to read?  Mmmmm?    Roll Eyes

Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin

Muslims around the world are welcome to them. I am not a spineless, squishy hypocrite and liar like you, Bwian.


I am sure they read them with interest, Soren.   I wonder how the Islamists use them in their propaganda, hey?    Roll Eyes Roll Eyes

Back to top
 

It seems that I have upset a Moderator and are forbidden from using memes. So much for Freedom of Speech. Tsk, tsk, tsk...   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Bobby.
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 112722
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: Nukes
Reply #101 - Jan 28th, 2019 at 4:06pm
 
dear Brian,
don't ignore the Jews and their Samson Option.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Brian Ross
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Representative of me

Posts: 44683
Re: Nukes
Reply #102 - Jan 28th, 2019 at 9:59pm
 
Bobby. wrote on Jan 28th, 2019 at 4:06pm:
dear Brian,
don't ignore the Jews and their Samson Option.


Who suggested I ignore it, Bobby?  I am sure that Egypt, Jordan, Lebanon are well aware of it.  The Iranians OTOH don't seem to care about it, despite being particularly vulnerable to a nuclear strike scenario...    Roll Eyes
Back to top
 

It seems that I have upset a Moderator and are forbidden from using memes. So much for Freedom of Speech. Tsk, tsk, tsk...   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 52755
Gender: male
Re: Nukes
Reply #103 - Jan 29th, 2019 at 8:02am
 
Brian Ross wrote on Jan 28th, 2019 at 2:52pm:
Interestingly, the first mention I can find about Israel being "destroyed" by an Iranian official was in 2012






It's not interesting, Bwian. It just shows once again that you are a useless, snivelling cockwomble.


Iran leader urges destruction of 'cancerous' Israel
December 15, 2000
Web posted at: 6:33 AM EST (1133 GMT)

TEHRAN, Iran (Reuters) -- Iran's supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei called on Friday for the destruction of Israel, describing it as a "cancerous tumor" in the Middle East.

"Iran's stance has always been clear on this ugly phenomenon (Israel). We have repeatedly said that this cancerous tumor of a state should be removed from the region," Khamenei told thousands of Muslim worshippers in Tehran.

"The Palestinian issue is not an internal Israeli matter. It involves the interests of the whole Islamic world, including Iran. All should strive to return that piece of land to Islamic hands."
Back to top
 

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
Brian Ross
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Representative of me

Posts: 44683
Re: Nukes
Reply #104 - Jan 29th, 2019 at 8:49pm
 
Frank wrote on Jan 29th, 2019 at 8:02am:
Brian Ross wrote on Jan 28th, 2019 at 2:52pm:
Interestingly, the first mention I can find about Israel being "destroyed" by an Iranian official was in 2012


It's not interesting, Bwian. It just shows once again that you are a useless, snivelling cockwomble.

Iran leader urges destruction of 'cancerous' Israel
December 15, 2000
Web posted at: 6:33 AM EST (1133 GMT)

TEHRAN, Iran (Reuters) -- Iran's supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei called on Friday for the destruction of Israel, describing it as a "cancerous tumor" in the Middle East.

"Iran's stance has always been clear on this ugly phenomenon (Israel). We have repeatedly said that this cancerous tumor of a state should be removed from the region," Khamenei told thousands of Muslim worshippers in Tehran.

"The Palestinian issue is not an internal Israeli matter. It involves the interests of the whole Islamic world, including Iran. All should strive to return that piece of land to Islamic hands."


So you found an earlier one.  As a counter to that, how about:

Quote:
The Iranian foreign minister, Mohammad Javad Zarif, wants Jews to know that he, and the country he represents, are their friends. In an interview with Ann Curry, he accused the Israeli prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, of intentionally misreading Jewish scripture in order to make the case that Iran is malevolently predisposed toward Jews: “If you read the Book of Esther, you will see that it was the Iranian king who saved the Jews," Zarif said. "If you read the Old Testament, you will see that it was an Iranian king who saved the Jews from Babylon. Esther has a town in Iran where our Jewish population, which is the largest in the Middle East, visits on a regular basis.”

It is true that, at different times, and in different ways, Persia has been a friend of the Jews. Cyrus the Great (the Iranian king mentioned by Zarif in the interview) restored the Jews to their homeland in the Land of Israel after their Babylonian exile. President Harry Truman, who recognized the state of Israel in 1948, 11 minutes after it was reborn, later proclaimed proudly, "I am Cyrus." 

There is dark humor (or a lack of self-awareness) in Zarif's citation of Cyrus as proof of Iranian philo-Semitism, because today's Iranian leadership does not recognize Jewish sovereignty in Israel, as Cyrus once did, but instead seeks the annihilation of the Jewish state.

I am in favor of a negotiated agreement that will keep Iran at least a year away from a nuclear weapon in part because, in the post-Holocaust era, it is crucially important to keep such weapons out of the hands of those who promise to do Jews real harm. As I've written, it is not likely that Iran would launch a preemptive nuclear attack on Israel, but it would almost certainly redouble, under the protection of a nuclear umbrella, its work toward Israel's eradication, with disastrous consequences. (We'll have the argument over whether the agreement now taking shape is the best possible deal in another post. Suffice it to say that the parameters of the current, still-unfinished deal are cause for some worry.)

[Source]

Like many Jews, he sees the eliminate of Israel as a nation-state as equivalent to the genocide of the Jews, when there really isn't any evidence of that, Soren.  To him and you, it seems Israel == Jews, when in reality it doesn't.   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes

Back to top
 

It seems that I have upset a Moderator and are forbidden from using memes. So much for Freedom of Speech. Tsk, tsk, tsk...   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 ... 5 6 7 8 9 ... 11
Send Topic Print