|
greggerypeccary
|
Johnnie wrote on Nov 19 th, 2018 at 7:11pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 19 th, 2018 at 7:05pm: Johnnie wrote on Nov 19 th, 2018 at 6:54pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 19 th, 2018 at 6:46pm: Johnnie wrote on Nov 19 th, 2018 at 6:44pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 19 th, 2018 at 6:26pm: Johnnie wrote on Nov 19 th, 2018 at 4:29pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 19 th, 2018 at 4:22pm: Johnnie wrote on Nov 19 th, 2018 at 4:17pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 19 th, 2018 at 4:03pm: Johnnie wrote on Nov 19 th, 2018 at 4:02pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 19 th, 2018 at 3:57pm: Johnnie wrote on Nov 19 th, 2018 at 3:50pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 19 th, 2018 at 3:43pm: Johnnie wrote on Nov 19 th, 2018 at 3:41pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 19 th, 2018 at 1:51pm: Secret Wars wrote on Nov 19 th, 2018 at 1:39pm: To give Gregg the benefit of a doubt that he probably doesn't deserve, he might not be trying to obfuscate, he may have just missed the last part of the first paragraph.  Quote:Australian voters are split on whether to cut the number of migrants coming from Muslim countries, as the Morrison government considers an overhaul of immigration and population rules within weeks.
A special Fairfax-Ipsos survey finds only 14 per cent of voters support an increase in the number of immigrants from Muslim countries while 35 per cent believe the intake should stay the same.
But another 46 per cent believe the intake should be reduced a lot or a little - a position backed by a clear majority of Coalition voters and one third of Labor voters.
https://www.smh.com.au/politics/federal/fairfax-ipsos-poll-australians-split-on-muslim-migration-ahead-of-new-population-policy-20181118-p50gt0.html I didn't need to include it. I said: Quote:Only about 5% seem to be undecided.
14% want an increase, and 35% are happy with the current levels. 5 + 14 + 35 = 54.
Anyone with a basic understanding of maths would know that that leaves 46% who want immigration numbers reduced. I hasten to add that 54 is more than 46. Why would you add that 5. Okay. Add 2.5 51.5 is still more than 46 Or, ignore the 5 49 is still more than 46 lets take that 5 that you conveniently added and add it to the 46 =51 V 49. Why would you add that 5? So we have 15% wanting an increase in Muslims and 46% wanting a decrease by a little or a lot. then there are the middle of the roaders. We have 49% not wanting a reduction in Muslim immigration, and 46% who do. Either way you look at it, 49 is more than 46. Yeah? Of those 35 how many want an increase, nil, ... That's correct. And how many of them want a cut? Nil. And that's what we're talking about - cuts. 49% don't want a cut to Muslim immigration. This is just a simple fact. Of that 49 only 15 want an increase. Of that 46 everyone wants a reduction. The government has acknowledged that the Muslims are on the nose, even if you haven't. We're talking about immigration cuts.
Have a look at the thread title - it's right there. 46% want a cut to Muslim immigration, and 49% do not want a cut to Muslim immigration. Fact. 49% is more than 46%. Fact. Are you bad at maths, or English? Or both, maybe. I'm off this merry go round, read my previous response. I'm also satisfied for the present that the floodgates have been addressed and Muslim immigration will be in turn curtailed, the tide is obviously turning in regards to Muslim immigration, thank god, with every Muslim attack the anti Muslim immigration sentiment grows, the government will have to address this soon, I can't see terrorist attacks decreasing with an increase in Muslims,, can you Greg. I can't see them decreasing while we have non-Muslims in the country, that's for sure. As you know, the majority of terrorist attacks in this country (and Europe, and the USA) are carried out by non-Muslims. How many terrorist attacks in this country and around the world have been done in the name of religion and what religion. The majority of terrorist attacks in this country (and Europe, and the USA) have been carried out by non-Muslims. This is not my opinion - it's an indisputable fact. Almost all terrorist attacks in the name of religion are perpetrated by Muslims, Its Muslims V the rest in regards to terror attacks. Time to step off this merry go round as well. Why are you restricting it to just religious terrorism? If you want to do that, why not restrict it to just Islam. If you want to say that the majority of Islamic terrorist attacks are carried out by Muslims, I'll agree with you. However, I'm talking about all terrorist attacks - because I unconditionally and unreservedly condemn all terrorism (something no -one else in this forum has been willing to do). And, the fact of the matter is this: the majority of terrorist attacks in this country (and Europe, and the USA) have been carried out by non-Muslims.
|
Forum
Pages: 
