Australian Politics Forum - defending terrorists with misleading statistics

freediver Gold Member Offline www.ozpolitic.com Posts: 51285 At my desk.	Re: defending terrorists with misleading statistics Reply #30 - Dec 30^th, 2018 at 4:24pm Quote: I'm not discussing casualties, Booby. Of course not. That would make it harder for you to mislead people in defence of Islamic terrorists.
Back to top	People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words. IP Logged

Bobby.

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 112899
Melbourne
Gender: male

Re: defending terrorists with misleading statistics
Reply #31 - Dec 30^th, 2018 at 4:24pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 30^th, 2018 at 4:02pm:

Bobby. wrote on Dec 30^th, 2018 at 3:58pm:

Greggy is an Islamic terrorist apologist trying
to downplay the number of mass casualties caused by them.

I'm not discussing casualties, Booby.

I'm discussing the total number of violent terrorist attacks in Europe (specifically in 2017).

And, the 2018 Europol report shows that the vast majority (84%) of violent terrorist attacks carried out in Europe in 2017 had nothing to do with Jihadism.

Do you agree with this, or are you suggesting that the report has been falsified?

I'm curious.

Your curiosity extends to other matters pertaining to your femininity -
not Muslims. Grin

Back to top

IP Logged

Aussie

Gold Member

Offline

OzPolitic

Posts: 39459
Gender: male

Re: defending terrorists with misleading statistics
Reply #32 - Dec 30^th, 2018 at 4:34pm

freediver wrote on Dec 30^th, 2018 at 4:24pm:

Quote:

I'm not discussing casualties, Booby.

Of course not. That would make it harder for you to mislead people in defence of Islamic terrorists.

I could go either way on this. I am assuming Peccarry has not included the number who perished in 9/11 and he has dealt with it as a single event. Well he is literally correct...it was an attack...a co-ordinated one....but still.....one. A very well organised one. So it counts as an attack.

The far more relevant point for me is that 9/11 was spawned in Saudi Arabia, the very Arab pricks whose toes Donald is sucking with billions.

If ever there was any part of Arabia I would attack, it would be the House of Saud.....big time. I would wipe them out in a nano second and let the chips fall.

The Sauds attacked on 9/11...not Islam.

Back to top

IP Logged

freediver Gold Member Offline www.ozpolitic.com Posts: 51285 At my desk.	Re: defending terrorists with misleading statistics Reply #33 - Dec 30^th, 2018 at 5:33pm He has not included the death toll from any terrorist attacks. He is equating 9/11 with attacks in which not a single person died.
Back to top	People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words. IP Logged

Aussie Gold Member Offline OzPolitic Posts: 39459 Gender:	Re: defending terrorists with misleading statistics Reply #34 - Dec 30^th, 2018 at 5:42pm freediver wrote on Dec 30^th, 2018 at 5:33pm: He has not included the death toll from any terrorist attacks. He is equating 9/11 with attacks in which not a single person died. You'll have to explain that. Is it like Shintos attacking Pearl Harbour...and elsewhere in the Pacific?
Back to top	IP Logged

Aussie Gold Member Offline OzPolitic Posts: 39459 Gender:	Re: defending terrorists with misleading statistics Reply #35 - Dec 30^th, 2018 at 5:44pm freediver wrote on Dec 30^th, 2018 at 5:33pm: He has not included the death toll from any terrorist attacks. He is equating 9/11 with attacks in which not a single person died. No comment on the House of Saud, Effendi?
Back to top	IP Logged

freediver Gold Member Offline www.ozpolitic.com Posts: 51285 At my desk.	Re: defending terrorists with misleading statistics Reply #36 - Dec 30^th, 2018 at 5:45pm Read the opening post Aussie.
Back to top	People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words. IP Logged

Aussie

Gold Member

Offline

OzPolitic

Posts: 39459
Gender: male

Re: defending terrorists with misleading statistics
Reply #37 - Dec 30^th, 2018 at 6:09pm

freediver wrote on Dec 30^th, 2018 at 5:45pm:

Read the opening post Aussie.

I'm never too keen to read your quote bombs....in a new Thread you start dredging up posts made by people in other Threads. You congregate them in a new Thread Title taking them out of the context in which they were posted. It is a trademark of yours Effendi.

Quote:

So basically, this is what people who defend Islam now stoop to - defending mass murder as being equivalent to attacks with no deaths or injuries.

Has anyone said that 9/11 was not mass murder? Of course it was...and I place the blame where it lies...right inside the House of Saud. Zero to do with Islam.

Back to top

IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 146000
Gender: male

Re: defending terrorists with misleading statistics
Reply #38 - Dec 30^th, 2018 at 6:24pm

Bobby. wrote on Dec 30^th, 2018 at 4:24pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 30^th, 2018 at 4:02pm:

Bobby. wrote on Dec 30^th, 2018 at 3:58pm:

Greggy is an Islamic terrorist apologist trying
to downplay the number of mass casualties caused by them.

I'm not discussing casualties, Booby.

I'm discussing the total number of violent terrorist attacks in Europe (specifically in 2017).

And, the 2018 Europol report shows that the vast majority (84%) of violent terrorist attacks carried out in Europe in 2017 had nothing to do with Jihadism.

Do you agree with this, or are you suggesting that the report has been falsified?

I'm curious.

Your curiosity extends to other matters pertaining to your femininity -
not Muslims. Grin

The 2018 Europol report shows that the vast majority (84%) of violent terrorist attacks carried out in Europe in 2017 had nothing to do with Jihadism.

Do you agree with this, or are you suggesting that the report has been falsified?

Back to top

IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 146000
Gender: male

Re: defending terrorists with misleading statistics
Reply #39 - Dec 30^th, 2018 at 6:31pm

freediver wrote on Dec 30^th, 2018 at 5:33pm:

He has not included the death toll from any terrorist attacks. He is equating 9/11 with attacks in which not a single person died.

I have not included the death toll from terrorist attacks, because I am not discussing death tolls.

I am discussing the total number of violent terrorist attacks in Europe in 2017.

And, the vast majority of violent terrorist attacks in Europe in 2017 were not carried out by Jihadists.

So, the question is why do you refuse to acknowledge the 84% of violent terrorist attacks that have nothing to do with Jihadism?

Is some terrorism okay with you?

I'm curious.

Back to top

IP Logged

Bobby.

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 112899
Melbourne
Gender: male

Re: defending terrorists with misleading statistics
Reply #40 - Dec 30^th, 2018 at 6:34pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 30^th, 2018 at 6:24pm:

Bobby. wrote on Dec 30^th, 2018 at 4:24pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 30^th, 2018 at 4:02pm:

Bobby. wrote on Dec 30^th, 2018 at 3:58pm:

Greggy is an Islamic terrorist apologist trying
to downplay the number of mass casualties caused by them.

I'm not discussing casualties, Booby.

I'm discussing the total number of violent terrorist attacks in Europe (specifically in 2017).

And, the 2018 Europol report shows that the vast majority (84%) of violent terrorist attacks carried out in Europe in 2017 had nothing to do with Jihadism.

Do you agree with this, or are you suggesting that the report has been falsified?

I'm curious.

Your curiosity extends to other matters pertaining to your femininity -
not Muslims. Grin

The 2018 Europol report shows that the vast majority (84%) of violent terrorist attacks carried out in Europe in 2017 had nothing to do with Jihadism.

Do you agree with this, or are you suggesting that the report has been falsified?

Greggy,
we can all see through your weak argument.
I think you're only trying to bait us to get attention.

Back to top

IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 146000
Gender: male

Re: defending terrorists with misleading statistics
Reply #41 - Dec 30^th, 2018 at 6:35pm

Bobby. wrote on Dec 30^th, 2018 at 6:34pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 30^th, 2018 at 6:24pm:

Bobby. wrote on Dec 30^th, 2018 at 4:24pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 30^th, 2018 at 4:02pm:

Bobby. wrote on Dec 30^th, 2018 at 3:58pm:

Greggy is an Islamic terrorist apologist trying
to downplay the number of mass casualties caused by them.

I'm not discussing casualties, Booby.

I'm discussing the total number of violent terrorist attacks in Europe (specifically in 2017).

And, the 2018 Europol report shows that the vast majority (84%) of violent terrorist attacks carried out in Europe in 2017 had nothing to do with Jihadism.

Do you agree with this, or are you suggesting that the report has been falsified?

I'm curious.

Your curiosity extends to other matters pertaining to your femininity -
not Muslims. Grin

The 2018 Europol report shows that the vast majority (84%) of violent terrorist attacks carried out in Europe in 2017 had nothing to do with Jihadism.

Do you agree with this, or are you suggesting that the report has been falsified?

Greggy,
we can all see through your weak argument.
I think you're only trying to bait us to get attention.

The 2018 Europol report shows that the vast majority (84%) of violent terrorist attacks carried out in Europe in 2017 had nothing to do with Jihadism.

Is that correct, Bobby?

A simple yes or no will suffice.

Back to top

IP Logged

cods

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 88048

Re: defending terrorists with misleading statistics
Reply #42 - Dec 30^th, 2018 at 6:36pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 30^th, 2018 at 6:24pm:

Bobby. wrote on Dec 30^th, 2018 at 4:24pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 30^th, 2018 at 4:02pm:

Bobby. wrote on Dec 30^th, 2018 at 3:58pm:

Greggy is an Islamic terrorist apologist trying
to downplay the number of mass casualties caused by them.

I'm not discussing casualties, Booby.

I'm discussing the total number of violent terrorist attacks in Europe (specifically in 2017).

And, the 2018 Europol report shows that the vast majority (84%) of violent terrorist attacks carried out in Europe in 2017 had nothing to do with Jihadism.

Do you agree with this, or are you suggesting that the report has been falsified?

I'm curious.

Your curiosity extends to other matters pertaining to your femininity -
not Muslims. Grin

The 2018 Europol report shows that the vast majority (84%) of violent terrorist attacks carried out in Europe in 2017 had nothing to do with Jihadism.

Do you agree with this, or are you suggesting that the report has been falsified?

it is hard to ignore stats greg.... but do you stats well us HOW MANY DEATHS each violent group is responsible for.?

to me thats more important than... what and why..

I cant make any sense of any group or person that wants to murder en mass.....

perhaps you have an answer.. you seem to know a lot about stats..

Back to top

IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 146000
Gender: male

Re: defending terrorists with misleading statistics
Reply #43 - Dec 30^th, 2018 at 6:43pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 30^th, 2018 at 6:35pm:

Bobby. wrote on Dec 30^th, 2018 at 6:34pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 30^th, 2018 at 6:24pm:

Bobby. wrote on Dec 30^th, 2018 at 4:24pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 30^th, 2018 at 4:02pm:

Bobby. wrote on Dec 30^th, 2018 at 3:58pm:

Greggy is an Islamic terrorist apologist trying
to downplay the number of mass casualties caused by them.

I'm not discussing casualties, Booby.

I'm discussing the total number of violent terrorist attacks in Europe (specifically in 2017).

And, the 2018 Europol report shows that the vast majority (84%) of violent terrorist attacks carried out in Europe in 2017 had nothing to do with Jihadism.

Do you agree with this, or are you suggesting that the report has been falsified?

I'm curious.

Your curiosity extends to other matters pertaining to your femininity -
not Muslims. Grin

The 2018 Europol report shows that the vast majority (84%) of violent terrorist attacks carried out in Europe in 2017 had nothing to do with Jihadism.

Do you agree with this, or are you suggesting that the report has been falsified?

Greggy,
we can all see through your weak argument.
I think you're only trying to bait us to get attention.

The 2018 Europol report shows that the vast majority (84%) of violent terrorist attacks carried out in Europe in 2017 had nothing to do with Jihadism.

Is that correct, Bobby?

A simple yes or no will suffice.

Bobby: yes or no?

Back to top

IP Logged

rhino Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 17179 Gender:	Re: defending terrorists with misleading statistics Reply #44 - Dec 30^th, 2018 at 6:46pm Gotta watch out for those violent water bomb and paint attacks. That's what we should be concerned about.
Back to top	IP Logged