Australian Politics Forum - defending terrorists with misleading statistics

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 131540
Gender: male

Re: defending terrorists with misleading statistics
Reply #15 - Dec 30^th, 2018 at 11:45am

Mattyfisk wrote on Dec 30^th, 2018 at 11:43am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 15^th, 2018 at 8:48pm:

freediver wrote on Oct 15^th, 2018 at 8:47pm:

This is what it takes to defend Islam.

Waiting for your answer, FD.

Are Europol lying, or are you?

I'm still very curious.

Has FD answered you yet, Greggery?

It usually takes some time.

Not yet.

I'm sure he'll get back to me soon, though.

He's good like that.

Back to top

IP Logged

freediver

Gold Member

Offline

www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 47436
At my desk.

Re: defending terrorists with misleading statistics
Reply #16 - Dec 30^th, 2018 at 11:56am

Europol are absolutely correct when they point out that Muslim terrorists account for nearly all deaths and most of the casualties due to terrorism in the EU.

You are misrepresenting the situation by omitting this fact and equating an attack with no casualties with a mass-casualty attack. Of course, this sort of deception is expected from people who attempt to defend Islam.

Do you see how your cherry-picking of the Europol statistics is misleading?

More apologetics from Greg:

greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 30^th, 2018 at 11:36am:

The body count is extremely high for the Jihadist attacks, and I've never ignored that fact.

Yes you do Greg. You leave it out every time you mislead people with statistics and spineless apologetics, and for the most part you ignore questions put to you about it.

Why are you so desperate to mislead people about Islamic terrorism?

Back to top

I identify as Mail because all I do is SendIT!

IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 131540
Gender: male

Re: defending terrorists with misleading statistics
Reply #17 - Dec 30^th, 2018 at 12:02pm

freediver wrote on Dec 30^th, 2018 at 11:56am:

Europol are absolutely correct when they point out that Muslim terrorists account for nearly all deaths and most of the casualties due to terrorism in the EU.

You are misrepresenting the situation by omitting this fact and equating an attack with no casualties with a mass-casualty attack. Of course, this sort of deception is expected from people who attempt to defend Islam.

Do you see how your cherry-picking of the Europol statistics is misleading?

More apologetics from Greg:

greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 30^th, 2018 at 11:36am:

The body count is extremely high for the Jihadist attacks, and I've never ignored that fact.

Yes you do Greg. You leave it out every time you mislead people with statistics and spineless apologetics, and for the most part you ignore questions put to you about it.

Why are you so desperate to mislead people about Islamic terrorism?

Just to confirm:

84% of all attacks have nothing to do with Jihadism.

Is that correct, FD?

I'm curious.

Back to top

IP Logged

Mattyfisk Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 92345 Gender:	Re: defending terrorists with misleading statistics Reply #18 - Dec 30^th, 2018 at 12:21pm Yes, but I don't think FD believes Europol, Greggery. In another thread, he said they're cowardly PC race traitors who will be hung for high treason in the fullness of time.
Back to top	IP Logged

greggerypeccary Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 131540 Gender:	Re: defending terrorists with misleading statistics Reply #19 - Dec 30^th, 2018 at 12:23pm Mattyfisk wrote on Dec 30^th, 2018 at 12:21pm: Yes, but I don't think FD believes Europol, Greggery. In another thread, he said they're cowardly PC race traitors who will be hung for high treason in the fullness of time. Ah. Did he say anything about graffiti?
Back to top	IP Logged

Mattyfisk

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 92345
Gender: male

Re: defending terrorists with misleading statistics
Reply #20 - Dec 30^th, 2018 at 12:26pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 30^th, 2018 at 12:23pm:

Mattyfisk wrote on Dec 30^th, 2018 at 12:21pm:

Yes, but I don't think FD believes Europol, Greggery. In another thread, he said they're cowardly PC race traitors who will be hung for high treason in the fullness of time.

Ah.

Did he say anything about graffiti?

He did. He said if it glorifies the white race it's not graffiti, it's art. You ask him.

Back to top

IP Logged

Secret Wars

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 3928
Gender: male

Re: defending terrorists with misleading statistics
Reply #21 - Dec 30^th, 2018 at 12:31pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 30^th, 2018 at 12:23pm:

Mattyfisk wrote on Dec 30^th, 2018 at 12:21pm:

Yes, but I don't think FD believes Europol, Greggery. In another thread, he said they're cowardly PC race traitors who will be hung for high treason in the fullness of time.

Ah.

Did he say anything about graffiti?

I am sure it can be mentioned again. Scuttle off and find that FBI report you used, it was all in there.

Or is that report a little inconvenient for you now, an equivalency in choppy choppy murder and grafittee crime to high a hurdle for even an apologist cretin like yourself to leap over?

So that report was dropped. And now you have another one to cherry pick and ignore the inconvenient truths...like a body count.

Back to top

IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 131540
Gender: male

Re: defending terrorists with misleading statistics
Reply #22 - Dec 30^th, 2018 at 12:31pm

Mattyfisk wrote on Dec 30^th, 2018 at 12:26pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 30^th, 2018 at 12:23pm:

Mattyfisk wrote on Dec 30^th, 2018 at 12:21pm:

Yes, but I don't think FD believes Europol, Greggery. In another thread, he said they're cowardly PC race traitors who will be hung for high treason in the fullness of time.

Ah.

Did he say anything about graffiti?

He did. He said if it glorifies the white race it's not graffiti, it's art. You ask him.

Well, FD's always been an art lover.

Back to top

IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 131540
Gender: male

Re: defending terrorists with misleading statistics
Reply #23 - Dec 30^th, 2018 at 12:33pm

Secret Wars wrote on Dec 30^th, 2018 at 12:31pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 30^th, 2018 at 12:23pm:

Mattyfisk wrote on Dec 30^th, 2018 at 12:21pm:

Yes, but I don't think FD believes Europol, Greggery. In another thread, he said they're cowardly PC race traitors who will be hung for high treason in the fullness of time.

Ah.

Did he say anything about graffiti?

I am sure it can be mentioned again. Scuttle off and find that FBI report you used, it was all in there.

Or is that report a little inconvenient for you now, an equivalency in choppy choppy murder and grafittee crime to high a hurdle for even an apologist cretin like yourself to leap over?

So that report was dropped. And now you have another one to cherry pick and ignore the inconvenient truths...like a body count.

This is a Europol report, dear:

https://www.europol.europa.eu/activities-services/main-reports/european-union-te...

It says that 84% of all terrorist attacks in Europe have nothing to do with Jihadism.

It makes no mention of graffiti though.

Wouldn't you agree?

Back to top

IP Logged

Mattyfisk

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 92345
Gender: male

Re: defending terrorists with misleading statistics
Reply #24 - Dec 30^th, 2018 at 12:59pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 30^th, 2018 at 12:33pm:

Secret Wars wrote on Dec 30^th, 2018 at 12:31pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 30^th, 2018 at 12:23pm:

Mattyfisk wrote on Dec 30^th, 2018 at 12:21pm:

Yes, but I don't think FD believes Europol, Greggery. In another thread, he said they're cowardly PC race traitors who will be hung for high treason in the fullness of time.

Ah.

Did he say anything about graffiti?

I am sure it can be mentioned again. Scuttle off and find that FBI report you used, it was all in there.

Or is that report a little inconvenient for you now, an equivalency in choppy choppy murder and grafittee crime to high a hurdle for even an apologist cretin like yourself to leap over?

So that report was dropped. And now you have another one to cherry pick and ignore the inconvenient truths...like a body count.

This is a Europol report, dear:

https://www.europol.europa.eu/activities-services/main-reports/european-union-te...

It says that 84% of all terrorist attacks in Europe have nothing to do with Jihadism.

It makes no mention of graffiti though.

Wouldn't you agree?

It's jaywalking now, can you believe these Islamic apologists?

Back to top

IP Logged

freediver Gold Member Offline www.ozpolitic.com Posts: 47436 At my desk.	Re: defending terrorists with misleading statistics Reply #25 - Dec 30^th, 2018 at 1:41pm So this is what it takes to defend Islam eh?
Back to top	I identify as Mail because all I do is SendIT! IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 131540
Gender: male

Re: defending terrorists with misleading statistics
Reply #26 - Dec 30^th, 2018 at 3:45pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 30^th, 2018 at 12:33pm:

Secret Wars wrote on Dec 30^th, 2018 at 12:31pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 30^th, 2018 at 12:23pm:

Mattyfisk wrote on Dec 30^th, 2018 at 12:21pm:

Yes, but I don't think FD believes Europol, Greggery. In another thread, he said they're cowardly PC race traitors who will be hung for high treason in the fullness of time.

Ah.

Did he say anything about graffiti?

I am sure it can be mentioned again. Scuttle off and find that FBI report you used, it was all in there.

Or is that report a little inconvenient for you now, an equivalency in choppy choppy murder and grafittee crime to high a hurdle for even an apologist cretin like yourself to leap over?

So that report was dropped. And now you have another one to cherry pick and ignore the inconvenient truths...like a body count.

This is a Europol report, dear:

https://www.europol.europa.eu/activities-services/main-reports/european-union-te...

It says that 84% of all terrorist attacks in Europe have nothing to do with Jihadism.

It makes no mention of graffiti though.

Wouldn't you agree?

SW, you there?

Did you find anything in the report about graffiti?

I'm curious.

Back to top

IP Logged

Mattyfisk

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 92345
Gender: male

Re: defending terrorists with misleading statistics
Reply #27 - Dec 30^th, 2018 at 3:51pm

freediver wrote on Dec 30^th, 2018 at 1:41pm:

So this is what it takes to defend Islam eh?

I know. Abu once said that the white race needs to be completely extinguished - after the correct forms are submitted and authorised, of course. You've got this in the Wiki.

Now the apologists are comparing the deaths of billions of decent white people with jaywalking, can you believe it?

Typical.

Back to top

IP Logged

Bobby. Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 95426 Melbourne Gender:	Re: defending terrorists with misleading statistics Reply #28 - Dec 30^th, 2018 at 3:58pm Greggy is an Islamic terrorist apologist trying to downplay the number of mass casualties caused by them.
Back to top	IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 131540
Gender: male

Re: defending terrorists with misleading statistics
Reply #29 - Dec 30^th, 2018 at 4:02pm

Bobby. wrote on Dec 30^th, 2018 at 3:58pm:

Greggy is an Islamic terrorist apologist trying
to downplay the number of mass casualties caused by them.

I'm not discussing casualties, Booby.

I'm discussing the total number of violent terrorist attacks in Europe (specifically in 2017).

And, the 2018 Europol report shows that the vast majority (84%) of violent terrorist attacks carried out in Europe in 2017 had nothing to do with Jihadism.

Do you agree with this, or are you suggesting that the report has been falsified?

I'm curious.

Back to top

IP Logged