Its not difficult to find the figures on Muzlum atrocities in Europe. But like I said, Greg has nothing remotely comparable to the blood lust of Islam. Not even the IRA, at their most vindictive, came close.

Here is a reference to some of Islam's handy work in Europe.

https://www.dw.com/en/madrid-to-manchester-to-barcelona-a-chronology-of-terror-i...

issuevoter wrote on Oct 1^st, 2018 at 6:07pm:


"I meant hardly any".

"I meant controlled by".

"I meant deaths".

"I meant a different category of terrorism".

"I meant currently".

"I meant blood lust".

https://i.imgur.com/oWUuoMf.gif

freediver wrote on Oct 1^st, 2018 at 12:42pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Oct 1^st, 2018 at 12:25pm:


FD, are you happy with the board you created for spineless squirmers like Homo and the old boy? I remember all your rules for debate, concentrating on facts and discussing the truth, not trying to score dumb points that don't even win an argument, just stall.

Greggery has categorically proven that European terrorism is overwhealmingly non-Muslim.

Secret and myself have uncovered the fact that, when it all adds up, the Muslim attacks have caused the most death.

I have pointed to the argument that white nationalist terrorism is on the rise. I argue that local hate crimes are not counted by the EU as acts of terror, but are equally deadly. My argument is that these hate groups are the biggest threat to our peace since Nazism.

You have avoided all participation in the argument. If it wasn't for Greggery, the old boy and myself, we'd have no statistics to discuss. We'd be left with Homo's tit for tat bullsht and your dumb questions.

So I'm curious. Is this the sort of debate you now stand for? Why have you given up your old standards since joining the white supremacists? Can't you discuss facts AND have extremist beliefs?

Cheers.

issuevoter wrote on Oct 1^st, 2018 at 6:07pm:


How do you find a plot to blow up a refugee centre, Issue? Just one of the majority white-nationalist hack jobs in Europe.

Do you think they were just targeting Muslims, or did they have a different goal in mind?

FD won't answer this, but do you think it might have something to do with being tinted?

Karnal wrote on Oct 1^st, 2018 at 1:01pm:


Sadly, what you describe as 'right nationalism' is developing largely as a direct result of the attacks by 'outsider' groups invited into Europe to find peace and safety...

'local hate crimes'?? What does that mean?  Are Muslim attacks not 'hate crimes'?  How often is a citizen of a nation a Muslim responsible for an attack, but not described as a Muslim fanatic?

The facts are that in the last few years, Muslim attacks have created the most casualties and are directed at causing as much death and injury as possible - whereas your 'right national' groups generally hold demos and protests.... often against the invasion by groups of non-assimilable outliers who hate their new life so much they want to destroy it.

List for me the other than Muslim attacks - and I mean attacks and not just a nasty phone call or a hostile letter from the IRA - that have killed and injured people in Europe..... list for me the date, the number killed and so forth - then list for me the Muslim attacks.

Playing silly verbal games with statistics of people's lives is not a joke... just you and Greg try stating the simple truth, and stop playing with yourselves.

Karnal wrote on Oct 1^st, 2018 at 6:14pm:


OK Give us the stats, and compare them to the atrocity numbers committed by your people.

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 1^st, 2018 at 8:25pm:



All the terror attacks I know about are from Muslims.