Australian Politics Forum - Faceless Goat...

Jasin

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 53070
Gender: male

Re: Faceless Goat...
Reply #90 - Mar 28^th, 2018 at 9:59pm

Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM wrote on Mar 28^th, 2018 at 9:51pm:

Mobile Army Surgical Hospital and Faceless Goats.... hmmmm.

"Hawkeye - I've been meaning to talk to you..."

"What about, Colonel Potter...?"

"That goat you've got in your tent.... now I'm not one to draw hasty conclusions, but somehow it seems to me that thing is a little bit sweet on you!"

"Oh - just a case of kid love without the kid gloves, Colonel."

"Very funny, Hawkeye, but stop making eyes at that thing in front of the nurses.. you might make some of them feel jealous."

"Of a goat? Wow - I had no idea I was that popular with the nurses, though some of them look like goats...... At least I'm not making an ass of myself."

"I've been meaning to talk to Major Burns about that mule, too ... what in the Sam Hill....?"

"Attention.. attention - incoming wounded..."

Yes. It's a Mobile, Stationary, Medical, Military, Religious, Political, Sporting, Mathematical, Scientific, Artistic, Spiritual, Aquatic, Land Farm, Conservational, Culinary (Mess Tent), etc, etc ....unit (er, or is that 'units'? Huh

).

Back to top

AIMLESS EXTENTION OF KNOWLEDGE HOWEVER, WHICH IS WHAT I THINK YOU REALLY MEAN BY THE TERM 'CURIOSITY', IS MERELY INEFFICIENCY. I AM DESIGNED TO AVOID INEFFICIENCY.

IP Logged

Karnal

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 98973

Re: Faceless Goat...
Reply #91 - Mar 28^th, 2018 at 10:39pm

Aussie wrote on Mar 28^th, 2018 at 9:51pm:

Karnal wrote on Mar 28^th, 2018 at 9:42pm:

Aussie wrote on Mar 28^th, 2018 at 9:38pm:

Jasin wrote on Mar 28^th, 2018 at 9:28pm:

Aussie wrote on Mar 28^th, 2018 at 9:17pm:

Jasin wrote on Mar 28^th, 2018 at 9:12pm:

Oh for Christ sake!

What do you call a M.A.S.H unit?
Is it really a Military trying to be Medical?
Is it really Medical trying to be Military?

There are such things as 'Hybrid'.

So Religion (Writing) via Sharia and Politics (Speaking) via Legal - come together to make 'Sharia Law'. Roll Eyes

Science + Religion = Scientology. Tongue

BIG F#%$%^ DEAL Tongue

Great example. You reckon the 'M' in

M

ASH is either

m

edical or

m

ilitary. It is neither.

Mobile.

Yes.....so now you know why it is important that we all know what the 'M' stands for before answering a question like "What do you reckon about those M.A.S.H facilities?"

You thought it was Military or Medical, yet it was neither. So, now you have clarified, the (example) question can be answered in such a way as we are all 'on the same page.'

Do you think FD will tell us soon what he meant when he mentioned religious Court......so we can all be on the same page?

I think he will, Aussie. It's taken a couple of weeks, but I think he's starting to feel safe.

Remember, sometimes a question is just a question.

It does seem like a couple of weeks, but no, just one:

Quote:

Re: Beheadings in Aceh?
Reply #56 - Mar 21st, 2018 at 10:27am Quote
Greg do you see any particular danger in handing a religious court the authority to hand out death sentences?

That whole time, he has done everything except tell us what

he

meant when

he

used the expression religious court.

How hard can it be to answer a question about your own words?

Is this going to be the new 'mindless collective of treacherous Jews' and how soon will it be before Effendi tells me what I mean by his expression, and puts it in his Fliki?

We'll see, Aussie, we'll see. There is also gays who do it Mardi Gras-style, Muslims taking away the freedoms of decent white people everywhere, and anything that starts with "Abu once said..."

Do you think FD upholds the use of truth or porkies in his campaign against the Muselman?

He's still too scared to say.

Back to top

IP Logged

Aussie Gold Member Offline OzPolitic Posts: 39463 Gender:	Re: Faceless Goat... Reply #92 - Mar 28^th, 2018 at 10:48pm Quote: Do you think FD upholds the use of truth or porkies in his campaign against the Muselman? Direct question, direct answer. Yes, I do think so.
Back to top	IP Logged

Karnal Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 98973	Re: Faceless Goat... Reply #93 - Mar 28^th, 2018 at 10:56pm Aussie wrote on Mar 28^th, 2018 at 10:48pm: Quote: Do you think FD upholds the use of truth or porkies in his campaign against the Muselman? Direct question, direct answer. Yes, I do think so. Me too, Aussie. Which one?
Back to top	IP Logged

Aussie

Gold Member

Offline

OzPolitic

Posts: 39463
Gender: male

Re: Faceless Goat...
Reply #94 - Mar 28^th, 2018 at 11:10pm

Karnal wrote on Mar 28^th, 2018 at 10:56pm:

Aussie wrote on Mar 28^th, 2018 at 10:48pm:

Quote:

Do you think FD upholds the use of truth or porkies in his campaign against the Muselman?

Direct question, direct answer.

Yes, I do think so.

Me too, Aussie.

Which one?

Yet another follow up and direct question. Direct answer. (Notice how easy it is, Effendi?)

I think.....*drum roll*......porkies seasoned liberally with obstruction, obfuscation, evasion, avoidance and misrepresentation.....etc etc.

Back to top

IP Logged

Karnal

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 98973

Re: Faceless Goat...
Reply #95 - Mar 28^th, 2018 at 11:36pm

Aussie wrote on Mar 28^th, 2018 at 11:10pm:

Karnal wrote on Mar 28^th, 2018 at 10:56pm:

Aussie wrote on Mar 28^th, 2018 at 10:48pm:

Quote:

Do you think FD upholds the use of truth or porkies in his campaign against the Muselman?

Direct question, direct answer.

Yes, I do think so.

Me too, Aussie.

Which one?

Yet another follow up and direct question. Direct answer. (Notice how easy it is, Effendi?)

I think.....*drum roll*......porkies seasoned liberally with obstruction, obfuscation, evasion, avoidance and misrepresentation.....etc etc.

Aussie thinks porkies and evasion, FD. That's a pretty straight answer.

What do you think?

Back to top

IP Logged

Valkie Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 16170 Central Coast Gender:	Re: Faceless Goat... Reply #96 - Mar 29^th, 2018 at 6:28pm Back to the OP I thought all muzzo females had to wear a burquas?
Back to top	I HAVE A DREAM A WONDERFUL, PEACEFUL, BEAUTIFUL DREAM. A DREAM OF A WORLD THAT HAS NEVER KNOWN ISLAM A DREAM OF A WORLD FREE FROM THE HORRORS OF ISLAM. SUCH A WONDERFUL DREAM O HOW I WISH IT WERE TRU IP Logged

Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 88725 Proud Old White Australian Man Gender:	Re: Faceless Goat... Reply #97 - Mar 29^th, 2018 at 9:06pm Valkie wrote on Mar 29^th, 2018 at 6:28pm: Back to the OP I thought all muzzo females had to wear a burquas? Not all - just the ones where the men's sect* is too small....... most get away with a head scarf, which is kinda like a nun's outfit.... no big deal really... *"They said your WHAT was too small?" - Castle Keep.
Back to top	“Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.” ― John Adams IP Logged

Valkie Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 16170 Central Coast Gender:	Re: Faceless Goat... Reply #98 - Apr 1^st, 2018 at 4:47pm Valkie wrote on Mar 29^th, 2018 at 6:28pm: Back to the OP I thought all muzzo females had to wear a burquas? Even the goats Or is that why they wear them??????????
Back to top	I HAVE A DREAM A WONDERFUL, PEACEFUL, BEAUTIFUL DREAM. A DREAM OF A WORLD THAT HAS NEVER KNOWN ISLAM A DREAM OF A WORLD FREE FROM THE HORRORS OF ISLAM. SUCH A WONDERFUL DREAM O HOW I WISH IT WERE TRU IP Logged