Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 ... 10 11 12 13 14 ... 16
Send Topic Print
The pandering to Muslims is pathetic. (Read 17489 times)
polite_gandalf
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 20023
Canberra
Gender: male
Re: The pandering to Muslims is pathetic.
Reply #165 - Sep 16th, 2017 at 9:12am
 
freediver wrote on Sep 16th, 2017 at 8:57am:
I think the broad support for pedophilia among Muslims and the actual pedophilia that is rampant in traditional Muslim countries is far more offensive than the cartoon that highlights the problem.


Agreed.

Doesn't mean the cartoon is not offensive though. And I disagree the cartoon in  question was published as some public awareness message. I think the artist sat down and thought "what is the most offensive thing I could conjur up to spite muslims"? And thats what he came up with.

But of course its legitimate and he has the right to do it.
Back to top
 

A resident Islam critic who claims to represent western values said:
Quote:
Outlawing the enemy's uniform - hijab, islamic beard - is not depriving one's own people of their freedoms.
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Online


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 47536
At my desk.
Re: The pandering to Muslims is pathetic.
Reply #166 - Sep 16th, 2017 at 9:22am
 
Quote:
And I disagree the cartoon in  question was published as some public awareness message. I think the artist sat down and thought "what is the most offensive thing I could conjur up to spite muslims"? And thats what he came up with.


It's offensive because it's true.

And you are creating a false dichotomy.

Quote:
Yes FD, I am offended by cartoons depicting child pornography. Its probably illegal to publish them here too.


You didn't even realise it was until Aussie told you. Have you been posting links to child pornography on my website Gandalf? It sounds to me like you are seeking a way to confect outrage. You want to be a victim.
Back to top
 

I identify as Mail because all I do is SendIT!
WWW  
IP Logged
 
polite_gandalf
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 20023
Canberra
Gender: male
Re: The pandering to Muslims is pathetic.
Reply #167 - Sep 16th, 2017 at 9:54am
 
freediver wrote on Sep 16th, 2017 at 9:22am:
And you are creating a false dichotomy.


How so?

Can you conceive of any cartoon you might possibly be offended by FD? Or will you always simply shrug them off with "its just a cartoon FFS"?

Do you really think the author of the child pornography cartoon felt it was his civic duty to raise awareness about pedophilia in the muslim world - or do you think he/she simply aimed to be the most offensive as he possibly could be just to spite muslims?

Back to top
 

A resident Islam critic who claims to represent western values said:
Quote:
Outlawing the enemy's uniform - hijab, islamic beard - is not depriving one's own people of their freedoms.
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Online


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 47536
At my desk.
Re: The pandering to Muslims is pathetic.
Reply #168 - Sep 16th, 2017 at 9:57am
 
Jut because someone seeks to offend does not mean they are not also seeking to make an important social commentary. This is just your attempt to make it exclusively about Muslims being victims.
Back to top
 

I identify as Mail because all I do is SendIT!
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Secret Wars
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 3928
Gender: male
Re: The pandering to Muslims is pathetic.
Reply #169 - Sep 16th, 2017 at 3:20pm
 
polite_gandalf wrote on Sep 15th, 2017 at 5:04pm:
freediver wrote on Sep 15th, 2017 at 5:01pm:
I doubt anyone does it purely to cause offense. At least, not anyone who can hold down a job in the publishing industry.


So they self censor?


You would be mad not to.  Upset cultists and those buggerers will kill you.  Cultist leaders will declare a death sentence and then you will be forever looking over your shoulder and employing security details. 

If people are not already self censoring for fear of cultist violence I will be very surprised.  I posed that statement as open ended cos I know apologists for Islam will be like minnows to berley demanding a negative to be proven.

It is too much to ask for them to engage their own faculties of reason to deduct the deadly negative implications of upsetting cultists.  Roll Eyes


Back to top
« Last Edit: Sep 16th, 2017 at 4:00pm by Secret Wars »  
 
IP Logged
 
polite_gandalf
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 20023
Canberra
Gender: male
Re: The pandering to Muslims is pathetic.
Reply #170 - Sep 16th, 2017 at 5:58pm
 
freediver wrote on Sep 16th, 2017 at 9:57am:
Jut because someone seeks to offend does not mean they are not also seeking to make an important social commentary. This is just your attempt to make it exclusively about Muslims being victims.


This is my attempt to properly understand your "its just a cartoon FFS" comment.

Once again, can you conceive of any cartoon you might possibly be offended by? Or will you always simply shrug them off with "its just a cartoon FFS"? My personal opinion is that something as vulgar as a depiction of a dirty old man raping a little girl (regardless of who it is meant to be) is more than "just a cartoon". And yes, it absolutely is offensive - and no thats not gandalf playing the victim, thats gandalf reacting as most people would I would say.
Back to top
 

A resident Islam critic who claims to represent western values said:
Quote:
Outlawing the enemy's uniform - hijab, islamic beard - is not depriving one's own people of their freedoms.
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Online


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 47536
At my desk.
Re: The pandering to Muslims is pathetic.
Reply #171 - Sep 17th, 2017 at 10:49am
 
Quote:
This is my attempt to properly understand your "its just a cartoon FFS" comment.


That's what it is Gandalf. Are you actually offended or not?

Quote:
Once again, can you conceive of any cartoon you might possibly be offended by?


Not right now. Feel free to have a go.

Quote:
My personal opinion is that something as vulgar as a depiction of a dirty old man raping a little girl (regardless of who it is meant to be) is more than "just a cartoon".


Would you say that satire is a more accurate description?

Quote:
And yes, it absolutely is offensive - and no thats not gandalf playing the victim, thats gandalf reacting as most people would I would sa


Are you offended, or just claiming victimhood on behalf of your religion?
Back to top
 

I identify as Mail because all I do is SendIT!
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Mattyfisk
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 92459
Gender: male
Re: The pandering to Muslims is pathetic.
Reply #172 - Sep 17th, 2017 at 7:14pm
 
Looks like FD won't say.

FD, do you uphold the use of evasion in your campaign against the Muselman? Are you a jellyfish?

A simple yes or no will suffice.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
polite_gandalf
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 20023
Canberra
Gender: male
Re: The pandering to Muslims is pathetic.
Reply #173 - Sep 17th, 2017 at 8:00pm
 
freediver wrote on Sep 17th, 2017 at 10:49am:
Are you offended, or just claiming victimhood on behalf of your religion?


I thought I just explained that the offense of that cartoon is completely separate from Islam or my religious identity. That should actually go without saying. You apparently don't find drawings of little girls being viciously raped by dirty old men offensive (or so you claim). That I think would put you on the fringe of society.
Back to top
 

A resident Islam critic who claims to represent western values said:
Quote:
Outlawing the enemy's uniform - hijab, islamic beard - is not depriving one's own people of their freedoms.
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Online


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 47536
At my desk.
Re: The pandering to Muslims is pathetic.
Reply #174 - Sep 17th, 2017 at 8:10pm
 
So why won't you say whether you are personally offended?
Back to top
 

I identify as Mail because all I do is SendIT!
WWW  
IP Logged
 
sir prince duke alevine
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 23619
Gender: male
Re: The pandering to Muslims is pathetic.
Reply #175 - Sep 18th, 2017 at 9:27pm
 
Mattyfisk wrote on Sep 15th, 2017 at 3:07am:
sir prince duke alevine wrote on Sep 14th, 2017 at 9:21pm:
Mattyfisk wrote on Sep 13th, 2017 at 11:29pm:
sir prince duke alevine wrote on Sep 13th, 2017 at 8:47pm:
Mattyfisk wrote on Sep 13th, 2017 at 8:42pm:
Hillary's campaign motto was "when they go low, we go high".

She lost.

Yes, because everyone was too busy getting offended by trump rather than countering his incredibly simplistic arguments.

And also because once again young people chose beer and sex over voting.


Or, you could say, people wanted someone who tells it like it is, not even caring that he was telling porkies all along, not even caring that the articles they referenced were, for the most part, propaganda, much of it funded and disseminated by Russian agents and bot sites.

We tried to counter it. We attempted to move the debate onto economic policies and legal/constitutional issues. This failed. Those we spoke with here just wanted a whinger in power, an "anti-Establishment" billionaire, an elitist "man of the people", an "authentic" reality TV star. They didn't care about the policies, they just wanted to lock Hillary up and cheer on hyperbole about walls and the tinted races and making Amerika great again when they're not even American, just white.

Ultimately, they want a carnival sideshow, not better jobs or communities or opportunities for their kids. They want to attack someone - anyone. They want revenge, but they can never articulate what they want revenge for. Inequality? Wage stagnation? Urban growth? Social change? You can't even unpack these things without getting howled down. Statistics? Forget about it.

I'm genuinely curious about this, I don't have any answers. How do you counter the sort of lies and spin that's often so transparent people don't even mind if it's spin, they just want to keep the spectacle going. Freud argued that dreams serve the purpose of keeping us asleep - an unconscious, biological mechanism. Pointing out the lies or flaws in the spin doesn't do a thing. People don't wake up, they just run off to another thread to keep the dream going.

How do you counter this?



You honestly think racism won trump the White House? Put yourself into the shoes of a sole family provider, who's spent the last 20+ years only knowing the assembly line, and that job has now been taken away and moved to China.  And all the establishment politicians do is say, "but it's good for the economy."  As that worker, who would you vote for: the establishment politician who simply repeats the same pretend care and slogans, and does nothing about it, or the other guy? It was an election where the establishment lost. But not because the voters are rascist, but because the establishment has failed time and again and the people who can no longer provide for their families have simply had enough. And how do we know it's not about rascism? Because of the majority outrage on the Muslim ban, And the dreamers rescinding. And the majority opposition to his Charlottesville statements.  And the fact no one actually cares that the wall won't be built.   You're confusing the reasons, karnal, for why trump won.  Rest assured, rascism had very little to do with it.


Yes, Alevine, I do say that. People took their fears about social change out on Muslims, Mexicans,  blacks, and for some inexplicable reason, Hillary Clinton.

Ditch the witch, eh?

They surveyed Trump voters in the states that went his way and found something interesting. These voters largely worked in service jobs, and were doing alright financially.

The Mid Western rust belt states nearly all vote Republican anyway. The election was won by older, whiter, and less educated people with jobs, houses and two cars.

These are people who fear social change. They want to keep their guns. They believe the Fox News/tabloid hype about urban crime and the tinted races, but have never actually experienced this first hand. Like many here, they'd probably scoff if you told them violent crime is at an all time low. These are comfortable, reasonably affluent, middle class people.

Look at Florida. Who could have ever imagined Trump would win the votes of largely Jewish retirees? But he did, even if they hate him now.


I think you need to look at the data you're using for your argument, karnal. 70% of jewish voters in Florida voted for Hillary.  And the urban areas of middle class America voted Hillary.  Trump received the rural votes, the industrial votes, the votes where people's jobs have been lost and for many years no politician has been able to provide a solution. I know it's always convenient for regressives to think it's about racism, or about sexism, or some other ism, because you know, then you can do the whole victim blaming thing you're really good at. But the reality is that the 'isms' didn't have as much to do with it as you're playing on.  Again the reason why no one really cares the wall, and why Trump's actual CORE base is relatively small.
Back to top
 

Disclaimer for Mothra per POST so it is forever acknowledged: Saying 'Islam' or 'Muslims' doesn't mean ALL muslims. This does not target individual muslims who's opinion I am not aware of.
 
IP Logged
 
sir prince duke alevine
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 23619
Gender: male
Re: The pandering to Muslims is pathetic.
Reply #176 - Sep 18th, 2017 at 9:31pm
 
polite_gandalf wrote on Sep 15th, 2017 at 8:26am:
sir prince duke alevine wrote on Sep 14th, 2017 at 9:30pm:
The point in making, which you choose not to argue but rather the words I'm using,is that no one really has any moral obligations to consider whether someone might get offended by their work.  They publish because they have a right to publish. It's really as simple as that. No one should be held to some moral obligation to think about poor Gandalf, who will get offended by a cartoon, simply because it depicts Mohammed.


Publishers absolutely should be held to some moral obligation to consider who they might offend. Thats just perverse alevine. Are you saying that if someone publishes something some people find offensive, they should not be subjected to criticism from that group for the offense caused? Again, usual disclaimer - I am not talking about censorship or reacting with violence. Acknowledging people's right to publish doesn't mean I have to support or agree with what they publish, or worse stay silent about something I object to. I absolutely reserve the right to criticise and mock and ridicule anyone who publishes something I take exception to - and being subjected to such criticism, mocking and ridicule is part and parcel of being a publisher.

Being subjected to criticism and having a moral obligation are not the same thing. Publishers have a obligation to drive debate, to offer counter views on issues, to ensure articles are based on facts, etc. But they don't have a moral obligation to consider whether Gandalf finds it offensive to draw his prophet.

And I never said you can't be critical, or ridicule something. I never said you have to agree with the cartoons and the messages they depict. Of course you can ridicule. Of course you should be critical of issues you don't agree with. Just make sure your criticism is based on logical reasoning and not just because some book tries to maintain an aristocracy within Islam where apparently some guy is deemed so important and worthy that no one can draw him.  And if you base it on the latter than expect ridicule. Because let's face it, in my opinion, it's rather foolish to get offended over a cartoon of a guy.
Back to top
 

Disclaimer for Mothra per POST so it is forever acknowledged: Saying 'Islam' or 'Muslims' doesn't mean ALL muslims. This does not target individual muslims who's opinion I am not aware of.
 
IP Logged
 
sir prince duke alevine
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 23619
Gender: male
Re: The pandering to Muslims is pathetic.
Reply #177 - Sep 18th, 2017 at 9:36pm
 
polite_gandalf wrote on Sep 15th, 2017 at 1:05pm:
freediver wrote on Sep 15th, 2017 at 11:22am:
Does this actually upset you Gandalf, or are you just standing up for the terrorists?


Does what upset me? Your little poster? No, and the point is that cartoon is not even designed to offend muslims - its actually making a point about the importance of free speech. I actually like the pencil breaking one. Notice how you didn't choose some of the other Muhammad cartoons like the one of him naked with his butt in the air. I like to think you didn't choose that one because you see how pointless it is just to offend for the sake of offending. And I agree that muslims need to learn that offensive cartoons are a legitimate form of protest, and they should accept people's right to publish them. But I hope you in turn agree that publishing material for no other purpose than to offend for the sake of offending, while legitimate and within your rights, is counter-productive and should not be encouraged.

I'm still waiting to see one example from you of a cartoon that offends for the sake of offending.
Back to top
 

Disclaimer for Mothra per POST so it is forever acknowledged: Saying 'Islam' or 'Muslims' doesn't mean ALL muslims. This does not target individual muslims who's opinion I am not aware of.
 
IP Logged
 
sir prince duke alevine
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 23619
Gender: male
Re: The pandering to Muslims is pathetic.
Reply #178 - Sep 18th, 2017 at 9:50pm
 
polite_gandalf wrote on Sep 15th, 2017 at 5:13pm:
blimey FD, why do you get hung up on such irrelevancies? Is it so inconceivable that such a cartoon exists?

Can you think of a reason why this might have been published other than offending for offence's sake?

https://therionorteline.files.wordpress.com/2012/09/charlie-hebdo-naked-mohamed....

Or this one - its just oozing with deep insights right?

https://oxyuranusscutellatus.files.wordpress.com/2009/02/cartoon-gregorius-neksc...

Sure - first one is in response to the movie that made the middle east froth at the mouth, and was a stand against being censored.  Charlie Hebdo made the point that they make caricatures of everyone, and they don't stand down simply because someone may find it provocative.  And in light of the craziness that engulfed the Middle East as a result of a movie that they didn't like, I'd say GOOD ON CHARLIE HEBDO for reminding us HOW FOOLISH it is to get ANGRY and VIOLENT over SPEECH.

The second one depicts the cartoonist's opinion of the ongoing problems in the Middle East around womens rights, rape, child marriage, peadophilia, etc, which critics of Islam claim have a basis from Islamic teachings, either ahadith or the koran.  Is the cartoon crude? Yes. Is rape ever nice? no.

Neither are offensive to me. Both serve a very strong purpose to me.

Any more?
Back to top
 

Disclaimer for Mothra per POST so it is forever acknowledged: Saying 'Islam' or 'Muslims' doesn't mean ALL muslims. This does not target individual muslims who's opinion I am not aware of.
 
IP Logged
 
sir prince duke alevine
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 23619
Gender: male
Re: The pandering to Muslims is pathetic.
Reply #179 - Sep 18th, 2017 at 9:55pm
 
polite_gandalf wrote on Sep 17th, 2017 at 8:00pm:
freediver wrote on Sep 17th, 2017 at 10:49am:
Are you offended, or just claiming victimhood on behalf of your religion?


I thought I just explained that the offense of that cartoon is completely separate from Islam or my religious identity. That should actually go without saying. You apparently don't find drawings of little girls being viciously raped by dirty old men offensive (or so you claim). That I think would put you on the fringe of society.

On the fringe of society? So are you suggesting that because an act in itself can never be represented in a 'nice way' then we just shouldn't ever depict it via a drawing, in the hope of showing people just how vile the act it? I'd say anyone who gets offended by the cartoon is missing the point entirely, and is on the fringe of society. Not the other way around.
Back to top
 

Disclaimer for Mothra per POST so it is forever acknowledged: Saying 'Islam' or 'Muslims' doesn't mean ALL muslims. This does not target individual muslims who's opinion I am not aware of.
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 ... 10 11 12 13 14 ... 16
Send Topic Print