Australian Politics Forum - 2GW windpower offshore of Scotland

Jovial Monk Gold Member Offline Dogs not cats! Posts: 51474 Gender:	Re: 2GW windpower offshore of Scotland Reply #105 - Aug 22^nd, 2017 at 6:26pm Nope, bet you knew of the final report, Cpl Lees.
Back to top	OzPolitic needs a >real< Environment MRB now! OzPolitic needs a >real< Food MRB now! OzPolitic needs a >real< Health MRB now! OzPolitic needs a >real< Economics MRB now! Topics in the right MRB! IP Logged

lee Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 21703 Gender:	Re: 2GW windpower offshore of Scotland Reply #106 - Aug 22^nd, 2017 at 6:29pm Jovial Monk wrote on Aug 22^nd, 2017 at 6:26pm: Nope, bet you knew of the final report, Cpl Lees. As I said in my amended post - You are so good at applying labels.
Back to top	IP Logged

Jovial Monk Gold Member Offline Dogs not cats! Posts: 51474 Gender:	Re: 2GW windpower offshore of Scotland Reply #107 - Aug 22^nd, 2017 at 6:30pm You have lied before.
Back to top	OzPolitic needs a >real< Environment MRB now! OzPolitic needs a >real< Food MRB now! OzPolitic needs a >real< Health MRB now! OzPolitic needs a >real< Economics MRB now! Topics in the right MRB! IP Logged

lee Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 21703 Gender:	Re: 2GW windpower offshore of Scotland Reply #108 - Aug 22^nd, 2017 at 6:32pm Jovial Monk wrote on Aug 22^nd, 2017 at 6:30pm: You have lied before. Of course the dog has eaten your homework.
Back to top	IP Logged

lee Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 21703 Gender:	Re: 2GW windpower offshore of Scotland Reply #109 - Aug 22^nd, 2017 at 6:35pm And you of course merely embroider the truth, because this is merely a blog and therefore truthfulness is not necessary.
Back to top	IP Logged

Jovial Monk Gold Member Offline Dogs not cats! Posts: 51474 Gender:	Re: 2GW windpower offshore of Scotland Reply #110 - Aug 22^nd, 2017 at 6:36pm You outright lie.
Back to top	OzPolitic needs a >real< Environment MRB now! OzPolitic needs a >real< Food MRB now! OzPolitic needs a >real< Health MRB now! OzPolitic needs a >real< Economics MRB now! Topics in the right MRB! IP Logged

lee Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 21703 Gender:	Re: 2GW windpower offshore of Scotland Reply #111 - Aug 22^nd, 2017 at 6:55pm Jovial Monk wrote on Aug 22^nd, 2017 at 6:36pm: You outright lie. Oh you mean like when you modified "Why is climate science so resilient?" twice in 5 minutes and claimed it was because you had written "to be cont later"? Where you removed the word "consensus" from the posts and changed it to "consilience"?
Back to top	IP Logged

Jovial Monk Gold Member Offline Dogs not cats! Posts: 51474 Gender:	Re: 2GW windpower offshore of Scotland Reply #112 - Aug 22^nd, 2017 at 8:14pm WTF. To be cont’d—and I did? Did you look up the word “consilience?” No—you just lie.
Back to top	OzPolitic needs a >real< Environment MRB now! OzPolitic needs a >real< Food MRB now! OzPolitic needs a >real< Health MRB now! OzPolitic needs a >real< Economics MRB now! Topics in the right MRB! IP Logged

lee

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 21703
Gender: male

Re: 2GW windpower offshore of Scotland
Reply #113 - Aug 22^nd, 2017 at 8:33pm

Jovial Monk wrote on Aug 22^nd, 2017 at 8:14pm:

To be cont’d—and I did?

Yes. Which one of your edits was it. The first one or the second one. Wink

Jovial Monk wrote on Aug 22^nd, 2017 at 8:14pm:

Did you look up the word “consilience?”

The word consilience was there. However originally you had consensus, it was in the title. It was such a small change. Why did you need to -

a. change it?
b. Lie about it?

Back to top

IP Logged

Jovial Monk Gold Member Offline Dogs not cats! Posts: 51474 Gender:	Re: 2GW windpower offshore of Scotland Reply #114 - Aug 22^nd, 2017 at 10:06pm Not only do you lie you act to destroy any worthwhile discussion of environmental matters.
Back to top	OzPolitic needs a >real< Environment MRB now! OzPolitic needs a >real< Food MRB now! OzPolitic needs a >real< Health MRB now! OzPolitic needs a >real< Economics MRB now! Topics in the right MRB! IP Logged

lee Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 21703 Gender:	Re: 2GW windpower offshore of Scotland Reply #115 - Aug 22^nd, 2017 at 10:30pm Jovial Monk wrote on Aug 22^nd, 2017 at 10:06pm: Not only do you lie you act to destroy any worthwhile discussion of environmental matters. And truth is your middle name. You are such a fabulist. The truth is not in you.
Back to top	IP Logged

Jovial Monk Gold Member Offline Dogs not cats! Posts: 51474 Gender:	Re: 2GW windpower offshore of Scotland Reply #116 - Aug 22^nd, 2017 at 11:27pm I can understand why you are scared shitless by AGW but why spoil non–AGW threads? And yes, it is fright, that is why the lies and the senseless babbling when you can’t think of a way out of agreeing with AGW theory. Trying to stop people reading this board?
Back to top	OzPolitic needs a >real< Environment MRB now! OzPolitic needs a >real< Food MRB now! OzPolitic needs a >real< Health MRB now! OzPolitic needs a >real< Economics MRB now! Topics in the right MRB! IP Logged

Jovial Monk

Gold Member

Offline

Dogs not cats!

Posts: 51474
Gender: male

Re: 2GW windpower offshore of Scotland
Reply #117 - Aug 22^nd, 2017 at 11:46pm

Quote:

which had surrounded the Neart na Gaoithe offshore wind farm. The UK’s Royal Society for the Protection of Birds (RSPB) has been trying valiantly to prevent the construction of as much as 2.3 gigawatts (GW) worth of offshore wind off the coast of Scotland, due to concerns over the impact on migratory seabirds. In July of 2016, a judge in the Outer Court of Session in Scotland revoked consent for four separate wind farms — the 600-megawatt (MW) Inch Cape Offshore wind farm, the 450 MW Neart Na Gaoithe offshore wind farm, and the 525 MW (each) Seagreen Alpha and Bravo projects. This May, however, the Inner House at the Court of Session in Edinburgh, Scotland, overturned the July revocation. . . .

“It will create more than 500 direct jobs during construction and over 100 direct permanent jobs once operational. £540 million will be directly invested in Scotland during the construction phase with a further £610m during the operational phase.”

https://cleantechnica.com/2017/07/21/go-ahead-given-450-mw-neart-na-gaoithe-offs...

Wish we could do something like that! In Backstairs Passage between Kangaroo Is and the mainland would be a great place. Jobs and investment, clean power.

Back to top

OzPolitic needs a >real< Environment MRB now!
OzPolitic needs a >real< Food MRB now!
OzPolitic needs a >real< Health MRB now!
OzPolitic needs a >real< Economics MRB now!

Topics in the right MRB!

IP Logged

lee Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 21703 Gender:	Re: 2GW windpower offshore of Scotland Reply #118 - Aug 23^rd, 2017 at 11:35am Jovial Monk wrote on Aug 22^nd, 2017 at 11:27pm: Trying to stop people reading this board? Trying to give a balanced opinion. But you keep bringing your stupid posts "to the front", in an attempt to deny any thing that disagrees with your meme.
Back to top	IP Logged

Jovial Monk Gold Member Offline Dogs not cats! Posts: 51474 Gender:	Re: 2GW windpower offshore of Scotland Reply #119 - Aug 23^rd, 2017 at 11:48am No, you contribute little that is useful. You post to cover up and denigrate papers others post about, that seems to be your mission here, cover up and deter others from reading and contributing here. What a proud mission, dragging your crappy crappy bum across threads to derail discussion.
Back to top	« Last Edit: Aug 23^rd, 2017 at 11:59am by Jovial Monk » OzPolitic needs a >real< Environment MRB now! OzPolitic needs a >real< Food MRB now! OzPolitic needs a >real< Health MRB now! OzPolitic needs a >real< Economics MRB now! Topics in the right MRB! IP Logged