Jovial Monk wrote on Jul 26
th, 2017 at 10:19am:
Sea level rise (SLR) on the east coast of the US has been measured:
Quote:Here, we present evidence of recently accelerated SLR in a unique 1,000-km-long hotspot on the highly populated NorthAmerican Atlantic coast north of Cape Hatteras and show that it is consistent with a modelled fingerprint of dynamic SLR. Between 1950–1979 and 1980–2009, SLR rate increases in this northeast hotspot were ∼3–4 times higher than the global average. Modelled dynamic plus steric SLR by 2100at New York City ranges with Intergovernmental Panel onClimate Change scenario from 36 to 51 cm (ref. 3); lower emission scenarios project 24–36 cm (ref. 7). Extrapolations from data herein range from 20 to 29 cm. SLR superimposed on storm surge, wave run-up and set-up will increase the vulnerability of coastal cities to flooding, and beaches andwetlands to deterioration.
http://www.nature.com/nclimate/journal/v2/n12/full/nclimate1597.htmlWill post more info later.
A note on storm surges. Ignoramuses will say “Oh, a 10cm sea level rise is nothing to worry about” right, roach?
But then we get a storm surge at peak tides and that extra 10cm of sea level rise means more sea defences are breached and floods reach much further inland.
Just like a bit more warming is going to cause failures of the three main food grain crops, wheat, maize and rice.
From your linked article. the bit before the bit YOU posted....
Quote:Climate warming does not force sea-level rise (SLR) at the same rate everywhere. Rather, there are spatial variations of SLR superimposed on a global average rise. These variations are forced by dynamic processe arising from circulation and variations in temperature and/or salinity, and by static equilibrium processes, arising from mass redistributions changing gravity and the Earth’s rotation and shape. These sea-level variations form unique spatial patterns, yet there are very few observations verifying predicted patterns or fingerprints
Oh look at that it agrees with everything I said earlier.
Told you you should read what I post.

But what would I know eh, I'm a what? According to you monk, an "Ignoramus"... gee, what the hell does that make YOU then

Oh and Monk, I'm still looking for that measurement you claimed.

could it bet there is no actual measurement in the article as you stated?