Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Poll closed Poll
Question: Should Australia consider changing to nuclear energy generation?
*** This poll has now closed ***


No—too much danger    
  4 (80.0%)
Yes—AGW, baseload power    
  1 (20.0%)
Don’t know    
  0 (0.0%)




Total votes: 5
« Created by: Jovial Monk on: Jul 25th, 2017 at 10:42am »

Pages: 1 ... 5 6 7 8 9 ... 16
Send Topic Print
Should we switch to nuclear power generation? (Read 15325 times)
Bobby.
Moderator
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 122130
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: Should we switch to nuclear power generation?
Reply #90 - Jul 24th, 2017 at 9:41pm
 
Jovial,
have you got any idea of how much pressure is inside a nuclear reactor?
To me it's like a pressure cooker bomb ready to explode when neutron embrittlement causes the metal to break.


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pressurized_water_reactor
Quote:
Light water is used as the primary coolant in a PWR. Water enters through the bottom of the reactor's core at about 548 K (275 °C; 527 °F) and is heated as it flows upwards through the reactor core to a temperature of about 588 K (315 °C; 599 °F). The water remains liquid despite the high temperature due to the high pressure in the primary coolant loop, usually around 155 bar (15.5 MPa 153 atm, 2,250 psi). In water, the critical point occurs at around 647 K (374 °C; 705 °F) and 22.064 MPa (3200 psi or 218 atm).[7]
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
John Smith
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 78311
Gender: male
Re: Should we switch to nuclear power generation?
Reply #91 - Jul 24th, 2017 at 9:41pm
 
Jovial Monk wrote on Jul 24th, 2017 at 9:33pm:
Waste can be treated with the CSIRO Sincrete process then deeply buried. Can’t see why costs would be prohibitive.


Building a sophisticated underground nuclear waste storage facility could cost up to $33 billion
.........
The total capital cost of constructing, decommissioning and then closing the facilities at the end of the 120-year life has been estimated at $41 billion




http://www.smh.com.au/business/underground-nuclear-waste-facility-could-cost-33-...
Back to top
 

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.
 
IP Logged
 
Jovial Monk
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Dogs not cats!

Posts: 51474
Gender: male
Re: Should we switch to nuclear power generation?
Reply #92 - Jul 24th, 2017 at 9:43pm
 
We already have the space underground in Broken Hill, Mt Painter etc. The waste depository can also handle the waste from more than one nuke reactor.
Back to top
 

OzPolitic needs a >real< Environment MRB now!
OzPolitic needs a >real< Food MRB now!
OzPolitic needs a >real< Health MRB now!
OzPolitic needs a >real< Economics MRB now!

Topics in the right MRB!
 
IP Logged
 
Gordon
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 21970
Gordon
Gender: male
Re: Should we switch to nuclear power generation?
Reply #93 - Jul 24th, 2017 at 9:48pm
 
John Smith wrote on Jul 24th, 2017 at 9:29pm:
Gordon wrote on Jul 24th, 2017 at 8:54pm:
John Smith wrote on Jul 24th, 2017 at 8:46pm:
Jovial Monk wrote on Jul 24th, 2017 at 8:36pm:
Nuclear has risks. So does coal fired power generation.


ohhh please. You want to try to compare the two?

What happens if Lucas heights were to leaks compared to a coal powered generator?


The new generation of nucs are very very safe.


How safe will the be when Kim jung Ill drops a missile on one?  Or an earthquake tears one apart? And you have to store the waste for 100 000 yrs.


You don't think technology will advance enough in 100000 years, let alone 100 to deal with it?
Back to top
 

IBI
 
IP Logged
 
Jovial Monk
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Dogs not cats!

Posts: 51474
Gender: male
Re: Should we switch to nuclear power generation?
Reply #94 - Jul 24th, 2017 at 9:52pm
 
And we don’t have to build it over a fault as I said. We would make bloody sure we don’t!
Back to top
 

OzPolitic needs a >real< Environment MRB now!
OzPolitic needs a >real< Food MRB now!
OzPolitic needs a >real< Health MRB now!
OzPolitic needs a >real< Economics MRB now!

Topics in the right MRB!
 
IP Logged
 
Gordon
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 21970
Gordon
Gender: male
Re: Should we switch to nuclear power generation?
Reply #95 - Jul 24th, 2017 at 9:57pm
 
I see nukes as an interim technology until fission is working Smiley
Back to top
 

IBI
 
IP Logged
 
Bobby.
Moderator
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 122130
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: Should we switch to nuclear power generation?
Reply #96 - Jul 24th, 2017 at 9:57pm
 
Quote:
And you have to store the waste for 100 000 yrs.


Try 100 million years.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Jovial Monk
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Dogs not cats!

Posts: 51474
Gender: male
Re: Should we switch to nuclear power generation?
Reply #97 - Jul 24th, 2017 at 10:00pm
 
No, Booby, not that long, not even plutonium.
Back to top
 

OzPolitic needs a >real< Environment MRB now!
OzPolitic needs a >real< Food MRB now!
OzPolitic needs a >real< Health MRB now!
OzPolitic needs a >real< Economics MRB now!

Topics in the right MRB!
 
IP Logged
 
Gordon
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 21970
Gordon
Gender: male
Re: Should we switch to nuclear power generation?
Reply #98 - Jul 24th, 2017 at 10:03pm
 
Bobby. wrote on Jul 24th, 2017 at 9:57pm:
Quote:
And you have to store the waste for 100 000 yrs.


Try 100 million years.


The earth will have been converted to Islam by then so hopefully there's a huge nuclear disaster to wipe them all out.
Back to top
 

IBI
 
IP Logged
 
rhino
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 17179
Gender: male
Re: Should we switch to nuclear power generation?
Reply #99 - Jul 24th, 2017 at 10:08pm
 
Jovial Monk wrote on Jul 24th, 2017 at 10:00pm:
No, Booby, not that long, not even plutonium.
Whew, we only have to store it for 100,000 years then.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Jovial Monk
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Dogs not cats!

Posts: 51474
Gender: male
Re: Should we switch to nuclear power generation?
Reply #100 - Jul 24th, 2017 at 10:09pm
 
Which can be done, safely, in the craton part of Australia.

Staying with coal will just keep emitting CO2.
Back to top
 

OzPolitic needs a >real< Environment MRB now!
OzPolitic needs a >real< Food MRB now!
OzPolitic needs a >real< Health MRB now!
OzPolitic needs a >real< Economics MRB now!

Topics in the right MRB!
 
IP Logged
 
Bobby.
Moderator
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 122130
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: Should we switch to nuclear power generation?
Reply #101 - Jul 24th, 2017 at 10:10pm
 
Jovial Monk wrote on Jul 24th, 2017 at 10:00pm:
No, Booby, not that long, not even plutonium.



The half-life of uranium 238 is of 4.5 billion years,
while uranium 235 has a half-life of 'only' 700 million years.

Pu-239 has a half-life of 24,100 years and Pu-241's half-life is 14.4 years.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Jovial Monk
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Dogs not cats!

Posts: 51474
Gender: male
Re: Should we switch to nuclear power generation?
Reply #102 - Jul 24th, 2017 at 10:11pm
 
Once it is buried safely it does not matter.
Back to top
 

OzPolitic needs a >real< Environment MRB now!
OzPolitic needs a >real< Food MRB now!
OzPolitic needs a >real< Health MRB now!
OzPolitic needs a >real< Economics MRB now!

Topics in the right MRB!
 
IP Logged
 
rhino
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 17179
Gender: male
Re: Should we switch to nuclear power generation?
Reply #103 - Jul 24th, 2017 at 10:15pm
 
Jovial Monk wrote on Jul 24th, 2017 at 10:09pm:
Which can be done, safely, in the craton part of Australia.

Staying with coal will just keep emitting CO2.
Theres no need to use coal, Australia has some of the biggest gas reserves in the world with significant infrastructure in place to extract that gas. We also have huge untapped resources of solar energy. This is a no brainer , going nuclear would be plain stupid.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Jovial Monk
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Dogs not cats!

Posts: 51474
Gender: male
Re: Should we switch to nuclear power generation?
Reply #104 - Jul 24th, 2017 at 10:17pm
 
Gordon wrote on Jul 24th, 2017 at 9:57pm:
I see nukes as an interim technology until fission is working Smiley

I think you mean “fusion”
Back to top
 

OzPolitic needs a >real< Environment MRB now!
OzPolitic needs a >real< Food MRB now!
OzPolitic needs a >real< Health MRB now!
OzPolitic needs a >real< Economics MRB now!

Topics in the right MRB!
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 ... 5 6 7 8 9 ... 16
Send Topic Print