Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Poll closed Poll
Question: Should Australia consider changing to nuclear energy generation?
*** This poll has now closed ***


No—too much danger    
  4 (80.0%)
Yes—AGW, baseload power    
  1 (20.0%)
Don’t know    
  0 (0.0%)




Total votes: 5
« Created by: Jovial Monk on: Jul 25th, 2017 at 10:42am »

Pages: 1 ... 14 15 16 
Send Topic Print
Should we switch to nuclear power generation? (Read 15328 times)
Bobby.
Moderator
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 122130
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: Should we switch to nuclear power generation?
Reply #225 - Aug 8th, 2017 at 7:54pm
 
Jovial Monk wrote on Aug 8th, 2017 at 7:52pm:
Do you believe the Niburu nonsense?

HM have you given to Dubyne?


Troll
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Bobby.
Moderator
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 122130
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: Should we switch to nuclear power generation?
Reply #226 - Aug 8th, 2017 at 7:54pm
 
Jovial Monk wrote on Aug 8th, 2017 at 5:02pm:
Better than a coal fired generator Booby. We have to stop emitting CO2.



Jovial,
70 atmospheres of pressure is very dangerous.

You know something -
I never heard about those extreme pressures until I did a bit of study on it.
It's not something they tell you on TV shows.

Everyone of those nuclear reactors is like a bomb ready to explode.
It's a pressure cooker - that's cooking up Uranium fuel rods that
have to be expertly controlled so that the whole thing
doesn't melt down & explode.

If the cooling fails as at Chernobyl & Fukushima - there's a meltdown
& a gigantic explosion from all that pressure sends
radioactive clouds of material all around the Earth.

Uranium reactors should never have been made after Thorium was proven by 1969 in the USA.

Thorium is a proven technology & it's safe -
no pressure - it's walk away safe even if the worst happens.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Jovial Monk
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Dogs not cats!

Posts: 51474
Gender: male
Re: Should we switch to nuclear power generation?
Reply #227 - Aug 8th, 2017 at 7:58pm
 
It isn’t, stop acting like a 95 yo virgin on her wedding night.

The high pressure is in the steam turbine not the bloody reactor.

We need to cut out CO2 emissions, even you agree to that despite your idiotic ice age crap.

We could start with a modular reactor that would let us learn and switch to thorium when and if that becomes possible.
Back to top
 

OzPolitic needs a >real< Environment MRB now!
OzPolitic needs a >real< Food MRB now!
OzPolitic needs a >real< Health MRB now!
OzPolitic needs a >real< Economics MRB now!

Topics in the right MRB!
 
IP Logged
 
Bobby.
Moderator
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 122130
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: Should we switch to nuclear power generation?
Reply #228 - Aug 8th, 2017 at 8:03pm
 
Jovial,
read if you can?


Today, reactors derived from designs originally developed for propelling submarines and large naval ships generate about 85% of the world's nuclear electricity. The main design is the pressurised water reactor (PWR) which has water at over 300°C under pressure in its primary cooling/heat transfer circuit, and generates steam in a secondary circuit. The less numerous boiling water reactor (BWR) makes steam in the primary circuit above the reactor core, at similar temperatures and pressure. Both types use water as both coolant and moderator, to slow neutrons. Since water normally boils at 100°C, they have robust steel pressure vessels or tubes to enable the higher operating temperature. (Another type uses heavy water, with deuterium atoms, as moderator. Hence the term ‘light water’ is used to differentiate.)


http://www.world-nuclear.org/information-library/nuclear-fuel-cycle/nuclear-powe...
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Jovial Monk
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Dogs not cats!

Posts: 51474
Gender: male
Re: Should we switch to nuclear power generation?
Reply #229 - Aug 8th, 2017 at 8:05pm
 
OK, finally you post something worth reading. I will read your link.

In the meantime:

HM have you paid to that lying charlatan Dubyne?

Do you believe the Niburu nonsense as well as the ice age nonsense?
Back to top
 

OzPolitic needs a >real< Environment MRB now!
OzPolitic needs a >real< Food MRB now!
OzPolitic needs a >real< Health MRB now!
OzPolitic needs a >real< Economics MRB now!

Topics in the right MRB!
 
IP Logged
 
Bobby.
Moderator
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 122130
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: Should we switch to nuclear power generation?
Reply #230 - Aug 8th, 2017 at 8:05pm
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pressurized_water_reactor

Coolant

Light water is used as the primary coolant in a PWR. Water enters through the bottom of the reactor's core at about 548 K (275 °C; 527 °F) and is heated as it flows upwards through the reactor core to a temperature of about 588 K (315 °C; 599 °F). The water remains liquid despite the high temperature due to the high pressure in the primary coolant loop, usually around 155 bar (15.5 MPa 153 atm, 2,250 psi). In water, the critical point occurs at around 647 K (374 °C; 705 °F) and 22.064 MPa (3200 psi or 218 atm).[7]
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Jovial Monk
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Dogs not cats!

Posts: 51474
Gender: male
Re: Should we switch to nuclear power generation?
Reply #231 - Aug 8th, 2017 at 8:24pm
 
So?

Apart from Chernobyl and Fukushima, both old tech, both due to special circumstances, there has hardly been any trouble from nuclear energy.

It has a place in our energy mix.

Since you won’t answer my questions I assume you have given snake oil salesman Dubyne a fair bit of your money. Crazy!
Back to top
 

OzPolitic needs a >real< Environment MRB now!
OzPolitic needs a >real< Food MRB now!
OzPolitic needs a >real< Health MRB now!
OzPolitic needs a >real< Economics MRB now!

Topics in the right MRB!
 
IP Logged
 
Bobby.
Moderator
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 122130
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: Should we switch to nuclear power generation?
Reply #232 - Aug 8th, 2017 at 8:26pm
 

Jovial is like an empty kettle that makes the most noise.

He didn't even know that nuclear reactors work at high pressure
yet he started a thread on nuclear power.

What else doesn't he know?

Neutron embrittlement?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 ... 14 15 16 
Send Topic Print