Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 2 3 
Send Topic Print
Lieberman for FBI? (Read 1502 times)
bogarde73
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Anti-Global & Contra Mundum

Posts: 18443
Gender: male
Lieberman for FBI?
May 22nd, 2017 at 7:02am
 
Just like the pathetic ALP in this country, the Democrats have no time for an ex party figure who has EVER dared to question the party line on anything.
So moderate Jo Lieberman was against some if the radical Mohammed Obama's policies. So he favoured McCain over Obama when he was an independent.

Now they won't have a bar of him as FBI Director. They use the excuse that he's not a law enforcement professional. You have to be a specialist to be a CEO?No, you just have to be a seasoned, experienced person of sound judgement.

The only flaw I can see with Lieberman is in ever getting involved in that ratbag party as it now is.
Back to top
 

Know the enemies of a civil society by their public behaviour, by their fraudulent claim to be liberal-progressive, by their propensity to lie and, above all, by their attachment to authoritarianism.
 
IP Logged
 
Prime Minister for Canyons
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 26906
Canberra
Gender: male
Re: Lieberman for FBI?
Reply #1 - May 22nd, 2017 at 7:39am
 
bogarde73 wrote on May 22nd, 2017 at 7:02am:
Mohammed Obama's



WHo?
Back to top
 

In a time of universal deceit — telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

No evidence whatsoever it can be attributed to George Orwell or Eric Arthur Blair (in fact the same guy)
 
IP Logged
 
Big Donger
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 102389
Re: Lieberman for FBI?
Reply #2 - May 22nd, 2017 at 12:53pm
 
Lieberman has never worked for the cops in his life. The FBI Director is a career posting, not some political reward. The Justice Department merely signs off on it.

What's Trump trying to do? Fill the swamp?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
...
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 23673
WA
Gender: male
Re: Lieberman for FBI?
Reply #3 - May 22nd, 2017 at 1:18pm
 
I wouldnt hire anyone named lieberman for such an important post. 

Seems his loyalties lie elsewhere...to another tribe, if you will.
Back to top
 

In the fullness of time...
 
IP Logged
 
longweekend58
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male
Re: Lieberman for FBI?
Reply #4 - May 22nd, 2017 at 1:21pm
 
even republicans are saying that in this current environment, the next FBI director should not have ANY political affiliations. Which is of course why Trump will try and get Jared Kushner in or perhaps Steve Bannon or another one of his kids or sychophants. Trump does not learn.
Back to top
 

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."
 
IP Logged
 
...
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 23673
WA
Gender: male
Re: Lieberman for FBI?
Reply #5 - May 22nd, 2017 at 1:30pm
 
longweekend58 wrote on May 22nd, 2017 at 1:21pm:
even republicans are saying that in this current environment, the next FBI director should not have ANY political affiliations. Which is of course why Trump will try and get Jared Kushner in or perhaps Steve Bannon or another one of his kids or sychophants. Trump does not learn.


Speaking of not learning, youre still making up rubbish like the above, and you still owe me an apology.
Back to top
 

In the fullness of time...
 
IP Logged
 
Big Donger
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 102389
Re: Lieberman for FBI?
Reply #6 - May 22nd, 2017 at 1:31pm
 
... wrote on May 22nd, 2017 at 1:18pm:
I wouldnt hire anyone named lieberman for such an important post. 

Seems his loyalties lie elsewhere...to another tribe, if you will.


They used to say that about J Edgar Hoover. He didn't belong to another tribe, he was a raging hommer.

Not that there's anything wrong with that.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
longweekend58
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male
Re: Lieberman for FBI?
Reply #7 - May 22nd, 2017 at 1:38pm
 
Big Donger wrote on May 22nd, 2017 at 1:31pm:
... wrote on May 22nd, 2017 at 1:18pm:
I wouldnt hire anyone named lieberman for such an important post. 

Seems his loyalties lie elsewhere...to another tribe, if you will.


They used to say that about J Edgar Hoover. He didn't belong to another tribe, he was a raging hommer.

Not that there's anything wrong with that.


and cross-dresser.
Back to top
 

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."
 
IP Logged
 
Richdude
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 8457
NC
Gender: male
Re: Lieberman for FBI?
Reply #8 - May 22nd, 2017 at 2:04pm
 
bogarde73 wrote on May 22nd, 2017 at 7:02am:
Just like the pathetic ALP in this country, the Democrats have no time for an ex party figure who has EVER dared to question the party line on anything.
So moderate Jo Lieberman was against some if the radical Mohammed Obama's policies. So he favoured McCain over Obama when he was an independent.

Now they won't have a bar of him as FBI Director. They use the excuse that he's not a law enforcement professional. You have to be a specialist to be a CEO?No, you just have to be a seasoned, experienced person of sound judgement.

The only flaw I can see with Lieberman is in ever getting involved in that ratbag party as it now is.



Sorry Bogarde.

I know you mean well but  don't agree.

Lieberman is a neo-con and insider - another word compromised.

We need a clean outsider, no blemishes an innocent and a straight talker - Trey Gowdy or Judge Nepolitano perhaps?
Back to top
 

The mediocre mind is incapable of understanding the man who refuses to bow blindly to conventional prejudices and chooses instead to express his opinions courageously and honestly.”
 
IP Logged
 
Big Donger
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 102389
Re: Lieberman for FBI?
Reply #9 - May 22nd, 2017 at 2:31pm
 
Richdude wrote on May 22nd, 2017 at 2:04pm:
bogarde73 wrote on May 22nd, 2017 at 7:02am:
Just like the pathetic ALP in this country, the Democrats have no time for an ex party figure who has EVER dared to question the party line on anything.
So moderate Jo Lieberman was against some if the radical Mohammed Obama's policies. So he favoured McCain over Obama when he was an independent.

Now they won't have a bar of him as FBI Director. They use the excuse that he's not a law enforcement professional. You have to be a specialist to be a CEO?No, you just have to be a seasoned, experienced person of sound judgement.

The only flaw I can see with Lieberman is in ever getting involved in that ratbag party as it now is.



Sorry Bogarde.

I know you mean well but  don't agree.

Lieberman is a neo-con and insider - another word compromised.

We need a clean outsider, no blemishes an innocent and a straight talker - Trey Gowdy or Judge Nepolitano perhaps?


The point everybody's making is you need an FBI investigator.

What are you going to do? Put your political stooges through a couple of years training at Quantico?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
SadKangaroo
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Not sad, just paying attention
to how cooked it is

Posts: 22188
Meeanjin (Brisbane)
Re: Lieberman for FBI?
Reply #10 - May 23rd, 2017 at 7:31am
 
Jo Lieberman and his firm have too much history with Trump, there is a conflict of interest, again.  But does it surprise anyone?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
longweekend58
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male
Re: Lieberman for FBI?
Reply #11 - May 23rd, 2017 at 1:46pm
 
SadKangaroo wrote on May 23rd, 2017 at 7:31am:
Jo Lieberman and his firm have too much history with Trump, there is a conflict of interest, again.  But does it surprise anyone?


It does seem that with Trump, the idea is not to choose the right person but rather, the LOYAL person.

It isnt going to help. Trump will still get impeached.
Back to top
 

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."
 
IP Logged
 
SadKangaroo
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Not sad, just paying attention
to how cooked it is

Posts: 22188
Meeanjin (Brisbane)
Re: Lieberman for FBI?
Reply #12 - May 23rd, 2017 at 4:13pm
 
longweekend58 wrote on May 23rd, 2017 at 1:46pm:
SadKangaroo wrote on May 23rd, 2017 at 7:31am:
Jo Lieberman and his firm have too much history with Trump, there is a conflict of interest, again.  But does it surprise anyone?


It does seem that with Trump, the idea is not to choose the right person but rather, the LOYAL person.

It isnt going to help. Trump will still get impeached.


We'll see, but he's been bullet proof this entire time.  He set the bar in his attacks on Clinton as to what sort of behaviour and ties were unacceptable for whoever hold the Oval Office, but he's not even tried to reach that bar but instead limbo under it, and his supporters don't care.

They're not chanting "lock him up" and anyone who speaks out or reports on these instances are either labelled a butthurt snowflake who can't accept Trump won the elections or it's dismissed as Fake News.

Even Trump is trying to feed that other than with the obvious "you're fake news" but now he's claiming to be the victim in all of this saying no other President has had to face what he has and again his supporters rally behind that.  It doesn't matter if his claim isn't true, they don't care.

His way or the highway, you're either with "us" or against us.

Concrete evidence in this sort of landscape may not even be enough...

I've tried to avoid it at the risk of it simple being "these people don't agree with me therefore they're stupid", but there has to come a time now that his supporters are not only applauding his actions that when Clinton was being accused of the same (often without merit) they were foaming at the mouth, they're not only applauding Trump taking these actions, but they're defending it and attacking his critics.

Surely, at some point that starts to just become plain stupid...

But either way, people are taking bets and Trump out before Christmas seems to be popular.  I for one however just can't see it happening.  Yes Trump has operated without impunity in the business world because he held all the cards (and was litigious as bugger) and there is no way he can continue his MO in the Oval, but since ever scandal to date would have been enough to bring down any other President, I just can't imagine, and I don't think I really want to, what it would take to actually bring him down and serve him some well overdue accountability for his actions.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
longweekend58
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male
Re: Lieberman for FBI?
Reply #13 - May 23rd, 2017 at 4:31pm
 
SadKangaroo wrote on May 23rd, 2017 at 4:13pm:
longweekend58 wrote on May 23rd, 2017 at 1:46pm:
SadKangaroo wrote on May 23rd, 2017 at 7:31am:
Jo Lieberman and his firm have too much history with Trump, there is a conflict of interest, again.  But does it surprise anyone?


It does seem that with Trump, the idea is not to choose the right person but rather, the LOYAL person.

It isnt going to help. Trump will still get impeached.


We'll see, but he's been bullet proof this entire time.  He set the bar in his attacks on Clinton as to what sort of behaviour and ties were unacceptable for whoever hold the Oval Office, but he's not even tried to reach that bar but instead limbo under it, and his supporters don't care.

They're not chanting "lock him up" and anyone who speaks out or reports on these instances are either labelled a butthurt snowflake who can't accept Trump won the elections or it's dismissed as Fake News.

Even Trump is trying to feed that other than with the obvious "you're fake news" but now he's claiming to be the victim in all of this saying no other President has had to face what he has and again his supporters rally behind that.  It doesn't matter if his claim isn't true, they don't care.

His way or the highway, you're either with "us" or against us.

Concrete evidence in this sort of landscape may not even be enough...

I've tried to avoid it at the risk of it simple being "these people don't agree with me therefore they're stupid", but there has to come a time now that his supporters are not only applauding his actions that when Clinton was being accused of the same (often without merit) they were foaming at the mouth, they're not only applauding Trump taking these actions, but they're defending it and attacking his critics.

Surely, at some point that starts to just become plain stupid...

But either way, people are taking bets and Trump out before Christmas seems to be popular.  I for one however just can't see it happening.  Yes Trump has operated without impunity in the business world because he held all the cards (and was litigious as bugger) and there is no way he can continue his MO in the Oval, but since ever scandal to date would have been enough to bring down any other President, I just can't imagine, and I don't think I really want to, what it would take to actually bring him down and serve him some well overdue accountability for his actions.


I think this is an unprecedented presidency and so most of the old rules dont apply and we are having to come up with new ones and frankly, mostly guesswork. But the undeniable truth is that Trump is exceedingly UNpopular. Even his base has shrunk by 10% and those opposed to him are very much opposed. Because he is incapable of changing and unable to take advice we can safely assume that things will not get better, but will get worse. And presumably, the rate at which it gets worse will increase. As the various investigations start to reveal increasingly bad news, his polls will continue to slide.

Like you, I am gobsmacked by the stupidity of trump supporters at large. If Clinton or Obama had done just one of the 30 things this clown has done, they would be calling for his head. If Obama had sought to interfere into an investigation into himself, Republicans would have impeached him - an rightly so. Perhaps why I am so disgusted by Republicans is because they are just so incredibly partisan, so amazingly in favour of vote rigging and cheating and almost desperate to make poor people suffer. But worst of all is that so many of them appear to place Party before Country. IN any fair and reasonable congress, filled with men and women of integrity, honesty and patriotism, Trump would already be looking at impeachment or at the very least Congressional Censure. But there is nothing... yet.

it is my firm belief that the sheer quantity of scandals and lies will force reluctant Republicans to act, if only for their own political skins. It will take time, but there is a massive unknown still brewing in the background and that is Russia.

Suppose that compelling evidence arises that the Trump campaign colluded with Russia. This is not just a smoking gun but a nuke exploding in the WH. Even if Trump had nothing to do with it personally, he will still be thrown out for simply being aligned with these people plus, who is going to believe he was in the dark anyhow? The man lies like most people breathe. His word is not credible. He is one of those people whose every word needs to be proven otherwise we assume lies.

I believe that the sheer accelerating mass of scandal and evidence for corruption and possible treason will take down Trump and possibly do so quickly.

Nixon won 49 states in a landslide and yet the democrats won the next election comfortably. And Nixon was only accused of covering up a crime. Trump concievably has committed much, much greater crimes.  The republicans will soon realise that their only hope of not being massacred for the next 20 years is to stand up for what is right - even if it is for self-preservation reaons.
Back to top
 

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."
 
IP Logged
 
Big Donger
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 102389
Re: Lieberman for FBI?
Reply #14 - May 23rd, 2017 at 4:56pm
 
longweekend58 wrote on May 23rd, 2017 at 4:31pm:
Even if Trump had nothing to do with it personally, he will still be thrown out for simply being aligned with these people plus, who is going to believe he was in the dark anyhow? The man lies like most people breathe. His word is not credible. He is one of those people whose every word needs to be proven otherwise we assume lies.


Trump has been singing Putin's praises for years. He is, perhaps, the only high profile American celebrity/politician who has. In terms of foreign policy, Trump brought little: bring back sanctions on Iran, ban all people from Muslim countries until he works out what's going on, list China as a currency manipulator on his first day in office, send Mexican rapists, murderers and drug smugglers back to Mexico, and last but not least, work with Russia to defeat global terrorism.

Why Russia? Because Trump has so much in common with "a man like Putin". They hear each other, they can work together, they can get things done.

Now something tells me there's a lot more to this than foreign policy. There's Russian loans to Trump, key presidential staffers who've lived and done business in Russia, and Trump campaign meetings with the Russian government. Trump has publicly defended Putin to the point of undermining the US, and now, he's meeting with the Russian government and handing over state secrets.

While staffers in the Trump campaign will almost certainly cop the blame, the Russia connection goes all the way to the top. If there was any collusion with Moscow over the Democrat campaign's email hack, Trump certainly would have been involved. Whether Trump was smart enough to keep his involvement under wraps is another story.

Either way, Trump's ties to Russia run deep, and they are not the sort of ties that have anything to do with making Amerika great again.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 3 
Send Topic Print