Australian Politics Forum - Action on AGW, is it enough?

lee Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 21599 Gender:	Re: Action on AGW, is it enough? Reply #180 - Jul 12^th, 2017 at 4:01pm Jovial Monk wrote on Jul 12^th, 2017 at 3:57pm: Deniers to the left of me, clowns to the right. And a dickhead in between. What is the world coming to?
Back to top	IP Logged

Grendel

Gold Member

Offline

OzPolitic

Posts: 28080
Gender: male

Re: Action on AGW, is it enough?
Reply #181 - Jul 12^th, 2017 at 4:03pm

Oh and Monk...

https://wattsupwiththat.com/2012/12/07/a-brief-history-of-atmospheric-carbon-dio...
Conclusions
Atmospheric CO2 concentration records were being broken long before anthropogenic emissions became significant.
Atmospheric CO2 levels were rising much faster than anthropogenic emissions from 1750-1875.
Anthropogenic emissions did not “catch up” to atmospheric CO2 until 1960.
The natural carbon flux is much more variable than the so-called scientific consensus thinks it is.
The equilibrium climate sensitivity (ECS) cannot be more than 2°C and is probably closer to 1°C.
The worst-case scenario based on the evidence is comparable to the IPCC’s most greentopian, best-case scenario.
Ice cores with accumulation rates less than 1m/yr are not useful for ECS estimations.

What's up with that eh? Cheesy

Back to top

IP Logged

greggerypeccary Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 156083 Gender:	Re: Action on AGW, is it enough? Reply #182 - Jul 12^th, 2017 at 4:06pm Jovial Monk wrote on Jul 12^th, 2017 at 4:00pm: And foul mouthed idiots ahead of me. Monk, I'm being very polite. Why do you consider 166 years a "long enough period"?
Back to top	GOP = Guardians Of Paedophiles IP Logged

Jovial Monk Gold Member Offline Dogs not cats! Posts: 51474 Gender:	Re: Action on AGW, is it enough? Reply #183 - Jul 12^th, 2017 at 4:19pm I have gone 100 rounds with denialist idiots, OK? You are a denialist idiot. Go and amuse yourself. In other words: fvvck off.
Back to top	OzPolitic needs a >real< Environment MRB now! OzPolitic needs a >real< Food MRB now! OzPolitic needs a >real< Health MRB now! OzPolitic needs a >real< Economics MRB now! Topics in the right MRB! IP Logged

greggerypeccary Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 156083 Gender:	Re: Action on AGW, is it enough? Reply #184 - Jul 12^th, 2017 at 4:21pm Jovial Monk wrote on Jul 12^th, 2017 at 4:19pm: I have gone 100 rounds with denialist idiots, OK? You are a denialist idiot. Go and amuse yourself. In other words: fvvck off. Monk, I'm being very polite, and I have no issue with you personally. I just want to know why you consider 166 years a "long enough period"?
Back to top	GOP = Guardians Of Paedophiles IP Logged

Jovial Monk

Gold Member

Offline

Dogs not cats!

Posts: 51474
Gender: male

Re: Action on AGW, is it enough?
Reply #185 - Jul 12^th, 2017 at 4:26pm

Grendel wrote on Jul 12^th, 2017 at 4:03pm:

Oh and Monk...

https://wattsupwiththat.com/2012/12/07/a-brief-history-of-atmospheric-carbon-dio...
Conclusions
Atmospheric CO2 concentration records were being broken long before anthropogenic emissions became significant.
Atmospheric CO2 levels were rising much faster than anthropogenic emissions from 1750-1875.
Anthropogenic emissions did not “catch up” to atmospheric CO2 until 1960.
The natural carbon flux is much more variable than the so-called scientific consensus thinks it is.
The equilibrium climate sensitivity (ECS) cannot be more than 2°C and is probably closer to 1°C.
The worst-case scenario based on the evidence is comparable to the IPCC’s most greentopian, best-case scenario.
Ice cores with accumulation rates less than 1m/yr are not useful for ECS estimations.

What's up with that eh? Cheesy

Watts Up? Complete denialist bullshit website!

We know that GHGs block IR radiation, heating the globe. Everything else is just denialism and bullshit. You just KNOW that anything roach backs is a lost cause.

Back to top

OzPolitic needs a >real< Environment MRB now!
OzPolitic needs a >real< Food MRB now!
OzPolitic needs a >real< Health MRB now!
OzPolitic needs a >real< Economics MRB now!

Topics in the right MRB!

IP Logged

Grendel

Gold Member

Offline

OzPolitic

Posts: 28080
Gender: male

Re: Action on AGW, is it enough?
Reply #186 - Jul 12^th, 2017 at 5:05pm

Jovial Monk wrote on Jul 12^th, 2017 at 4:26pm:

Grendel wrote on Jul 12^th, 2017 at 4:03pm:

Oh and Monk...

https://wattsupwiththat.com/2012/12/07/a-brief-history-of-atmospheric-carbon-dio...
Conclusions
Atmospheric CO2 concentration records were being broken long before anthropogenic emissions became significant.
Atmospheric CO2 levels were rising much faster than anthropogenic emissions from 1750-1875.
Anthropogenic emissions did not “catch up” to atmospheric CO2 until 1960.
The natural carbon flux is much more variable than the so-called scientific consensus thinks it is.
The equilibrium climate sensitivity (ECS) cannot be more than 2°C and is probably closer to 1°C.
The worst-case scenario based on the evidence is comparable to the IPCC’s most greentopian, best-case scenario.
Ice cores with accumulation rates less than 1m/yr are not useful for ECS estimations.

What's up with that eh? Cheesy

Watts Up? Complete denialist bullshit website!
Ah no... the only complete denialist around here is YOU. And now you're even abusing Gweggy.
We know that GHGs block IR radiation, heating the globe. Everything else is just denialism and bullshit. You just KNOW that anything roach backs is a lost cause.
Could be true I backed you against that lot you call the Sewer, look where that got me. But unlike you I have an open mind on this issue and have yet to be convinced like yourself without conclusive evidence that the alarmist claims are warranted or even that their theory based on correlation not causation is true.

Back to top

IP Logged

Jovial Monk Gold Member Offline Dogs not cats! Posts: 51474 Gender:	Re: Action on AGW, is it enough? Reply #187 - Jul 12^th, 2017 at 5:20pm No, wattsup is famous for all the wrong crap it posts. Go away cretin!
Back to top	OzPolitic needs a >real< Environment MRB now! OzPolitic needs a >real< Food MRB now! OzPolitic needs a >real< Health MRB now! OzPolitic needs a >real< Economics MRB now! Topics in the right MRB! IP Logged

lee Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 21599 Gender:	Re: Action on AGW, is it enough? Reply #188 - Jul 12^th, 2017 at 5:27pm Jovial Monk wrote on Jul 12^th, 2017 at 5:20pm: No, wattsup is famous for all the wrong crap it posts. Go away cretin! Then you should have some doozies to post.
Back to top	IP Logged

lee Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 21599 Gender:	Re: Action on AGW, is it enough? Reply #189 - Jul 12^th, 2017 at 8:04pm lee wrote on Jul 12^th, 2017 at 5:27pm: Jovial Monk wrote on Jul 12^th, 2017 at 5:20pm: No, wattsup is famous for all the wrong crap it posts. Go away cretin! Then you should have some doozies to post. I guess not. Jovial Monk Gold Member ***** Online
Back to top	IP Logged

Jovial Monk Gold Member Offline Dogs not cats! Posts: 51474 Gender:	Re: Action on AGW, is it enough? Reply #190 - Jul 12^th, 2017 at 9:48pm 9.17 9.26 9 minutes!
Back to top	« Last Edit: Jul 12^th, 2017 at 9:57pm by Jovial Monk » OzPolitic needs a >real< Environment MRB now! OzPolitic needs a >real< Food MRB now! OzPolitic needs a >real< Health MRB now! OzPolitic needs a >real< Economics MRB now! Topics in the right MRB! IP Logged

Emma Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 9853 OZ Gender:	Re: Action on AGW, is it enough? Reply #191 - Jul 14^th, 2017 at 12:58am Jovial Monk wrote on Jul 12^th, 2017 at 3:57pm: Deniers to the left of me, clowns to the right. Stuck in the middle with you
Back to top	live every day IP Logged

Jovial Monk Gold Member Offline Dogs not cats! Posts: 51474 Gender:	Re: Action on AGW, is it enough? Reply #192 - Jul 14^th, 2017 at 9:28am Hey Emma, we will fight them on the beaches, we will fight them in the hills. . .
Back to top	OzPolitic needs a >real< Environment MRB now! OzPolitic needs a >real< Food MRB now! OzPolitic needs a >real< Health MRB now! OzPolitic needs a >real< Economics MRB now! Topics in the right MRB! IP Logged

Grendel Gold Member Offline OzPolitic Posts: 28080 Gender:	Re: Action on AGW, is it enough? Reply #193 - Jul 14^th, 2017 at 9:46am Try sobering up first...
Back to top	IP Logged

Emma Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 9853 OZ Gender:	Re: Action on AGW, is it enough? Reply #194 - Jul 14^th, 2017 at 11:08pm sigh another pointless post. So anyhow, we are seeing in the media a change.... NOW we see reports of govts rushing to acknowledge the need for action. ..whatever deniers say. It all remains pissweak and irrelevant IMHO. Too late Pancho.
Back to top	live every day IP Logged