Australian Politics Forum

lee Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 21688 Gender:	Re: Ice watch Reply #525 - Aug 8^th, 2017 at 7:45pm Jovial Monk wrote on Aug 8^th, 2017 at 7:28pm: I am enjoying this I'm sure. "It can be expected that the periodicity of G7, lasting 2000 years so far, will persist also for the foreseeable future. It predicts a temperature drop from present to AD 2050, a slight rise from 2050 to 2130, and a further drop from AD 2130 to 2200 "
Back to top	IP Logged

Jovial Monk Gold Member Offline Dogs not cats! Posts: 51474 Gender:	Re: Ice watch Reply #526 - Aug 8^th, 2017 at 7:50pm Does that take into account CO2? You still haven’t THOUGHT about this, have you To me it sounds like classic denialism “It wuz de sun diddit!”
Back to top	OzPolitic needs a >real< Environment MRB now! OzPolitic needs a >real< Food MRB now! OzPolitic needs a >real< Health MRB now! OzPolitic needs a >real< Economics MRB now! Topics in the right MRB! IP Logged

lee Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 21688 Gender:	Re: Ice watch Reply #527 - Aug 8^th, 2017 at 8:16pm Jovial Monk wrote on Aug 8^th, 2017 at 7:50pm: To me it sounds like classic denialism “It wuz de sun diddit!” yeah, but that's because you ascribe to the Alarmist mantra "the CO2 is so bad, we're all gunna fry".
Back to top	IP Logged

Jovial Monk Gold Member Offline Dogs not cats! Posts: 51474 Gender:	Re: Ice watch Reply #528 - Aug 8^th, 2017 at 8:21pm No, but I have shown how GHGs do prevent IR leaving the surface of the earth, warming it.
Back to top	OzPolitic needs a >real< Environment MRB now! OzPolitic needs a >real< Food MRB now! OzPolitic needs a >real< Health MRB now! OzPolitic needs a >real< Economics MRB now! Topics in the right MRB! IP Logged

Bobby. Moderator Offline Australian Politics Posts: 122712 Melbourne Gender:	Re: Ice watch Reply #529 - Aug 8^th, 2017 at 8:23pm Jovial is like an empty kettle that makes the most noise. He didn't even know that nuclear reactors work at high pressure yet he started a thread on nuclear power.
Back to top	IP Logged

Jovial Monk

Gold Member

Offline

Dogs not cats!

Posts: 51474
Gender: male

Re: Ice watch
Reply #530 - Aug 8^th, 2017 at 8:28pm

Bobby. wrote on Aug 8^th, 2017 at 8:23pm:

Jovial is like an empty kettle that makes the most noise.

He didn't even know that nuclear reactors work at high pressure
yet he started a thread on nuclear power.

Says the man who believes an obvious liar and has wasted a lot of his life watching the lying videos and reading comments from lunatics.

The turbine is not near the reactor.

Back to top

OzPolitic needs a >real< Environment MRB now!
OzPolitic needs a >real< Food MRB now!
OzPolitic needs a >real< Health MRB now!
OzPolitic needs a >real< Economics MRB now!

Topics in the right MRB!

IP Logged

lee Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 21688 Gender:	Re: Ice watch Reply #531 - Aug 8^th, 2017 at 8:39pm Jovial Monk wrote on Aug 8^th, 2017 at 8:21pm: No, but I have shown how GHGs do prevent IR leaving the surface of the earth, warming it. Nope. Wrong theory. Try again. At what altitude is this CO2 the prevents IR leaving the surface of the earth? At 0.04%?
Back to top	IP Logged

lee

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 21688
Gender: male

Re: Ice watch
Reply #532 - Aug 8^th, 2017 at 8:45pm

Jovial Monk wrote on Aug 8^th, 2017 at 7:50pm:

Does that take into account CO2?

"Robust scientific evidence shows the sun angle controls water vapour content of the atmosphere, the main component of back radiation, as it cycles annually. Water vapour content measured as the ratio of the number of water molecules to CO2 molecules varies from 1:1 near the Poles to 97:1 in the Tropics. The effect of back radiation on Earth’s atmosphere is up to 200 times larger than that of CO2 and works in the opposite direction. Thus, if CO2 has any effect on atmospheric temperature and climate change we show it is negligible."

http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0958305X17722790

Back to top

IP Logged

Jovial Monk Gold Member Offline Dogs not cats! Posts: 51474 Gender:	Re: Ice watch Reply #533 - Aug 8^th, 2017 at 8:52pm That is crap. It is contradicted by the findings about GHGs and IR. How can you believe rubbish like that? I looked through the other articles they published, a fair proportion of obvious denier rubbish.
Back to top	OzPolitic needs a >real< Environment MRB now! OzPolitic needs a >real< Food MRB now! OzPolitic needs a >real< Health MRB now! OzPolitic needs a >real< Economics MRB now! Topics in the right MRB! IP Logged

lee Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 21688 Gender:	Re: Ice watch Reply #534 - Aug 8^th, 2017 at 8:53pm Jovial Monk wrote on Aug 8^th, 2017 at 8:52pm: That is crap. It is contradicted by the findings about GHGs and IR. Oh? It is contradicted by your preferred theory? Bugger.
Back to top	IP Logged

Bobby.

Moderator

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 122712
Melbourne
Gender: male

Re: Ice watch
Reply #535 - Aug 8^th, 2017 at 8:54pm

Jovial Monk wrote on Aug 8^th, 2017 at 8:28pm:

Bobby. wrote on Aug 8^th, 2017 at 8:23pm:

Jovial is like an empty kettle that makes the most noise.

He didn't even know that nuclear reactors work at high pressure
yet he started a thread on nuclear power.

Says the man who believes an obvious liar and has wasted a lot of his life watching the lying videos and reading comments from lunatics.

The turbine is not near the reactor.

The turbine is in the secondary circuit after the heat exchanger.
Are you lying about your BSc?

Back to top

IP Logged

Jovial Monk Gold Member Offline Dogs not cats! Posts: 51474 Gender:	Re: Ice watch Reply #536 - Aug 8^th, 2017 at 8:54pm CO2 sending IR back to the surface.
Back to top	OzPolitic needs a >real< Environment MRB now! OzPolitic needs a >real< Food MRB now! OzPolitic needs a >real< Health MRB now! OzPolitic needs a >real< Economics MRB now! Topics in the right MRB! IP Logged

lee Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 21688 Gender:	Re: Ice watch Reply #537 - Aug 8^th, 2017 at 9:22pm Yes. Feldman et al 2015. Assuming CO2 windows were accurate because H2O doesn't get a mention. And now Lighfoot and Mamer 2017. Science doesn't stand still.
Back to top	IP Logged

Grendel Gold Member Offline OzPolitic Posts: 28080 Gender:	Re: Ice watch Reply #538 - Aug 8^th, 2017 at 9:27pm Jovial Monk wrote on Aug 8^th, 2017 at 7:50pm: Does that take into account CO2? You still haven’t THOUGHT about this, have you To me it sounds like classic denialism “It wuz de sun diddit!” Oh and there you go again. You told me you didn't believe in the Correlation equals Causation Theory. YOU LIED.
Back to top	IP Logged

Grendel Gold Member Offline OzPolitic Posts: 28080 Gender:	Re: Ice watch Reply #539 - Aug 8^th, 2017 at 9:28pm Jovial Monk wrote on Aug 8^th, 2017 at 8:54pm: https://skepticalscience.com//pics/FeldmanGrowingRF.png CO2 sending IR back to the surface. Polly wants a Cracker.... Polly wants a Cracker... POlly.......
Back to top	IP Logged