Australian Politics Forum

lee Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 21724 Gender:	Re: Ice watch Reply #480 - Aug 6^th, 2017 at 8:48pm Jovial Monk wrote on Aug 6^th, 2017 at 8:40pm: You are the one lying, so scared of AGW. Why? If you are scared of it then call for action against it. Too scared for that, guess you want Daddy to make it go away? Oh dear. What a way to lose what ever little credibility you had .
Back to top	IP Logged

Grendel Gold Member Offline OzPolitic Posts: 28080 Gender:	Re: Ice watch Reply #481 - Aug 6^th, 2017 at 9:13pm oh I think he lost that ages ago... Build more fences keep those clouds corralled.
Back to top	IP Logged

Jovial Monk

Gold Member

Offline

Dogs not cats!

Posts: 51474
Gender: male

Re: Ice watch
Reply #482 - Aug 6^th, 2017 at 9:22pm

You think? I think you never had any credibility. You are clearly scared of admitting AGW is a problem and go to any length to deny it, even to making yourself a figure of fun. When you are asked to provide information that you can’t find on a denier site you are completely helpless, no ability to think.

Then we get all this crap “Natural variation must be the null hypothesis” when I have shown what a null hypothesis must be. I showed you this must be 10 times, yet you never learned, did you?

Then we get this crap “We had more CO2 before, didn’t hurt us” and “It has been hotter and colder before” as if any of that is relevant. I posted screeds from a paper showing how the increasing brightness of the sun over geologic time balanced the CO2—until we started emitting CO2 nilly willy. None of that sunk in, did it?

No, Lees, you have no credibility at all, never had.

Back to top

OzPolitic needs a >real< Environment MRB now!
OzPolitic needs a >real< Food MRB now!
OzPolitic needs a >real< Health MRB now!
OzPolitic needs a >real< Economics MRB now!

Topics in the right MRB!

IP Logged

lee Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 21724 Gender:	Re: Ice watch Reply #483 - Aug 6^th, 2017 at 9:30pm Jovial Monk wrote on Aug 6^th, 2017 at 9:22pm: You think? Yeah . More than you. Nice rant though. Of course with your lack of credibility your opinion counts for nought.
Back to top	IP Logged

Jovial Monk Gold Member Offline Dogs not cats! Posts: 51474 Gender:	Re: Ice watch Reply #484 - Aug 6^th, 2017 at 9:36pm Actually, you don’t think. That is why you are flummoxed when you need to actually think instead of quoting some denier site. Your inability to learn what is a theory, what is an alternative hypothesis and what is a null hypothesis is a case in point.
Back to top	OzPolitic needs a >real< Environment MRB now! OzPolitic needs a >real< Food MRB now! OzPolitic needs a >real< Health MRB now! OzPolitic needs a >real< Economics MRB now! Topics in the right MRB! IP Logged

lee Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 21724 Gender:	Re: Ice watch Reply #485 - Aug 6^th, 2017 at 9:37pm Jovial Monk wrote on Aug 6^th, 2017 at 9:36pm: Instead of quoting some denier site You mean denier sites like NOAA, NASA?
Back to top	IP Logged

Jovial Monk Gold Member Offline Dogs not cats! Posts: 51474 Gender:	Re: Ice watch Reply #486 - Aug 6^th, 2017 at 9:41pm You can’t actually think, can you?
Back to top	OzPolitic needs a >real< Environment MRB now! OzPolitic needs a >real< Food MRB now! OzPolitic needs a >real< Health MRB now! OzPolitic needs a >real< Economics MRB now! Topics in the right MRB! IP Logged

lee Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 21724 Gender:	Re: Ice watch Reply #487 - Aug 6^th, 2017 at 9:51pm Jovial Monk wrote on Aug 6^th, 2017 at 9:41pm: You can’t actually think, can you? Oh dear, your argument is getting W e a k e r .
Back to top	IP Logged

Jovial Monk Gold Member Offline Dogs not cats! Posts: 51474 Gender:	Re: Ice watch Reply #488 - Aug 6^th, 2017 at 9:58pm So, tell me the theory, its implications, the alternate and null hypotheses for your theory excuse of natural variation? I’ll wait.
Back to top	OzPolitic needs a >real< Environment MRB now! OzPolitic needs a >real< Food MRB now! OzPolitic needs a >real< Health MRB now! OzPolitic needs a >real< Economics MRB now! Topics in the right MRB! IP Logged

Jovial Monk Gold Member Offline Dogs not cats! Posts: 51474 Gender:	Re: Ice watch Reply #489 - Aug 6^th, 2017 at 10:02pm Oh yeah, and what test you would use to test/falsify H0.
Back to top	OzPolitic needs a >real< Environment MRB now! OzPolitic needs a >real< Food MRB now! OzPolitic needs a >real< Health MRB now! OzPolitic needs a >real< Economics MRB now! Topics in the right MRB! IP Logged

lee Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 21724 Gender:	Re: Ice watch Reply #490 - Aug 6^th, 2017 at 10:08pm Jovial Monk wrote on Aug 6^th, 2017 at 10:02pm: Oh yeah, and what test you would use to test/falsify H0. It would depend on who you sleep with. But really I would never call you a HO.
Back to top	IP Logged

Jovial Monk Gold Member Offline Dogs not cats! Posts: 51474 Gender:	Re: Ice watch Reply #491 - Aug 6^th, 2017 at 10:10pm See, you can’t think for yourself.
Back to top	OzPolitic needs a >real< Environment MRB now! OzPolitic needs a >real< Food MRB now! OzPolitic needs a >real< Health MRB now! OzPolitic needs a >real< Economics MRB now! Topics in the right MRB! IP Logged

lee Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 21724 Gender:	Re: Ice watch Reply #492 - Aug 6^th, 2017 at 10:30pm Jovial Monk wrote on Aug 6^th, 2017 at 10:10pm: See, you can’t think for yourself. Oh. You mean the null hypothesis and natural variation being the null hypothesis. And you can't or won't believe that, so it makes me the denier.
Back to top	IP Logged