Australian Politics Forum

lee Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 21742 Gender:	Re: Ice watch Reply #345 - Jul 29^th, 2017 at 6:43pm Jovial Monk wrote on Jul 29^th, 2017 at 6:38pm: You would have no trouble finding it either. Maybe, because of your alleged superior intellect, you could give a clue. A name perhaps.
Back to top	IP Logged

Jovial Monk Gold Member Offline Dogs not cats! Posts: 51474 Gender:	Re: Ice watch Reply #346 - Jul 29^th, 2017 at 7:24pm I do not care to share. Go look!
Back to top	OzPolitic needs a >real< Environment MRB now! OzPolitic needs a >real< Food MRB now! OzPolitic needs a >real< Health MRB now! OzPolitic needs a >real< Economics MRB now! Topics in the right MRB! IP Logged

lee Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 21742 Gender:	Re: Ice watch Reply #347 - Jul 29^th, 2017 at 7:29pm Jovial Monk wrote on Jul 29^th, 2017 at 7:24pm: I do not care to share. Well it wasn't Arrhenius.
Back to top	IP Logged

Jovial Monk

Gold Member

Offline

Dogs not cats!

Posts: 51474
Gender: male

Re: Ice watch
Reply #348 - Jul 29^th, 2017 at 7:54pm

Sure about that?

Quote:

Svante Arrhenius : Feature Articles - NASA Earth Observatory
https://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/Features/Arrhenius/arrhenius_2.php
In 1895, Arrhenius presented a paper to the Stockholm Physical Society titled, “On the Influence of Carbonic Acid in the Air upon the Temperature of the Ground.”. This article described an energy budget model that considered the radiative effects of carbon dioxide (carbonic ...

1895.

Back to top

OzPolitic needs a >real< Environment MRB now!
OzPolitic needs a >real< Food MRB now!
OzPolitic needs a >real< Health MRB now!
OzPolitic needs a >real< Economics MRB now!

Topics in the right MRB!

IP Logged

lee Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 21742 Gender:	Re: Ice watch Reply #349 - Jul 29^th, 2017 at 9:05pm Jovial Monk wrote on Jul 29^th, 2017 at 7:54pm: Sure about that? Yep. He was talking about a heat energy budget. Not AGW.
Back to top	IP Logged

Jovial Monk Gold Member Offline Dogs not cats! Posts: 51474 Gender:	Re: Ice watch Reply #350 - Jul 29^th, 2017 at 9:26pm He also said carbonic acid not CO2. Just different words is all. Global warming — heat budget. Seem related.
Back to top	OzPolitic needs a >real< Environment MRB now! OzPolitic needs a >real< Food MRB now! OzPolitic needs a >real< Health MRB now! OzPolitic needs a >real< Economics MRB now! Topics in the right MRB! IP Logged

lee Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 21742 Gender:	Re: Ice watch Reply #351 - Jul 29^th, 2017 at 9:35pm Jovial Monk wrote on Jul 29^th, 2017 at 9:26pm: He also said carbonic acid not CO2. Just different words is all. Global warming — heat budget. Seem related. His 1906 paper also adjusted his calculations. But alarmists don't want to admit that. But you specifically said AGW - so it is not true.
Back to top	IP Logged

Jovial Monk Gold Member Offline Dogs not cats! Posts: 51474 Gender:	Re: Ice watch Reply #352 - Jul 29^th, 2017 at 9:38pm “Alarmists” Actually “alarmist” suits you better, you get alarmed every time AGW gets confirmed.
Back to top	OzPolitic needs a >real< Environment MRB now! OzPolitic needs a >real< Food MRB now! OzPolitic needs a >real< Health MRB now! OzPolitic needs a >real< Economics MRB now! Topics in the right MRB! IP Logged

lee Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 21742 Gender:	Re: Ice watch Reply #353 - Jul 29^th, 2017 at 9:55pm Jovial Monk wrote on Jul 29^th, 2017 at 9:38pm: “Alarmists” Actually “alarmist” suits you better, you get alarmed every time AGW gets confirmed. I keep asking you to confirm AGW, but so far nada, zip, nothing.
Back to top	IP Logged

Jovial Monk Gold Member Offline Dogs not cats! Posts: 51474 Gender:	Re: Ice watch Reply #354 - Jul 29^th, 2017 at 9:57pm Watch out! AGW is right behind you!
Back to top	OzPolitic needs a >real< Environment MRB now! OzPolitic needs a >real< Food MRB now! OzPolitic needs a >real< Health MRB now! OzPolitic needs a >real< Economics MRB now! Topics in the right MRB! IP Logged

lee Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 21742 Gender:	Re: Ice watch Reply #355 - Jul 29^th, 2017 at 9:59pm Jovial Monk wrote on Jul 29^th, 2017 at 9:57pm: Watch out! AGW is right behind you! Oooh, confirmation bias.
Back to top	IP Logged

Grendel Gold Member Offline OzPolitic Posts: 28080 Gender:	Re: Ice watch Reply #356 - Jul 29^th, 2017 at 11:16pm Jovial Monk wrote on Jul 29^th, 2017 at 5:12pm: A bit of publicity is useful sometimes. Actually, interesting article. But making a prediction or forecast is a risky thing to do. but you quote and support people that predict what it will be like, 100 years from now
Back to top	IP Logged

Grendel

Gold Member

Offline

OzPolitic

Posts: 28080
Gender: male

Re: Ice watch
Reply #357 - Jul 29^th, 2017 at 11:18pm

Jovial Monk wrote on Jul 29^th, 2017 at 3:26pm:

Who said I believe Al Gore?

I quote scientists, experiments made and the results.

You don’t even see the sense of what somebody said, just because he said “weather” instead of climate—but he paints a clear word picture (he is a journo) of how things have changed, how climate bands are creeping north.

Oh dear... Roll Eyes

Back to top

IP Logged

Jovial Monk

Gold Member

Offline

Dogs not cats!

Posts: 51474
Gender: male

Re: Ice watch
Reply #358 - Jul 29^th, 2017 at 11:18pm

Grendel wrote on Jul 29^th, 2017 at 11:16pm:

Jovial Monk wrote on Jul 29^th, 2017 at 5:12pm:

A bit of publicity is useful sometimes.

Actually, interesting article. But making a prediction or forecast is a risky thing to do.

but you quote and support people that predict what it will be like, 100 years from now Cheesy

Can you find ONE instance?

Back to top

OzPolitic needs a >real< Environment MRB now!
OzPolitic needs a >real< Food MRB now!
OzPolitic needs a >real< Health MRB now!
OzPolitic needs a >real< Economics MRB now!

Topics in the right MRB!

IP Logged

Jovial Monk

Gold Member

Offline

Dogs not cats!

Posts: 51474
Gender: male

Re: Ice watch
Reply #359 - Jul 29^th, 2017 at 11:20pm

Grendel wrote on Jul 29^th, 2017 at 11:18pm:

Jovial Monk wrote on Jul 29^th, 2017 at 3:26pm:

Who said I believe Al Gore?

I quote scientists, experiments made and the results.

You don’t even see the sense of what somebody said, just because he said “weather” instead of climate—but he paints a clear word picture (he is a journo) of how things have changed, how climate bands are creeping north.

Oh dear... Roll Eyes

Do you have an actual point, roach? You think you can refute how climate bands have moved north?

Back to top

OzPolitic needs a >real< Environment MRB now!
OzPolitic needs a >real< Food MRB now!
OzPolitic needs a >real< Health MRB now!
OzPolitic needs a >real< Economics MRB now!

Topics in the right MRB!

IP Logged