Australian Politics Forum

lee Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 21678 Gender:	Re: Ice watch Reply #15 - May 19^th, 2017 at 4:46pm Jovial Monk wrote on May 19^th, 2017 at 7:48am: May 16th & 17th, melting has resumed on the west coast, low level as yet. Mostly outside the Arctic Circle. How scary is that?
Back to top	IP Logged

Jovial Monk Gold Member Offline Dogs not cats! Posts: 51474 Gender:	Re: Ice watch Reply #16 - May 20^th, 2017 at 8:10am May 18, melt is continuing to increase.
Back to top	« Last Edit: May 20^th, 2017 at 8:24am by Jovial Monk » OzPolitic needs a >real< Environment MRB now! OzPolitic needs a >real< Food MRB now! OzPolitic needs a >real< Health MRB now! OzPolitic needs a >real< Economics MRB now! Topics in the right MRB! IP Logged

lee Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 21678 Gender:	Re: Ice watch Reply #17 - May 20^th, 2017 at 11:02am Wow. Down in the noise.
Back to top	IP Logged

Jovial Monk Gold Member Offline Dogs not cats! Posts: 51474 Gender:	Re: Ice watch Reply #18 - May 21^st, 2017 at 6:51am May 19th—melt is continuing, is now above the interdecile range. Still early in the season tho.
Back to top	OzPolitic needs a >real< Environment MRB now! OzPolitic needs a >real< Food MRB now! OzPolitic needs a >real< Health MRB now! OzPolitic needs a >real< Economics MRB now! Topics in the right MRB! IP Logged

lee Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 21678 Gender:	Re: Ice watch Reply #19 - May 21^st, 2017 at 12:33pm Certainly looks scarifying. Now melting North of the Arctic Circle. But that happens every year. Jovial Monk wrote on May 21^st, 2017 at 6:51am: May 19th—melt is continuing, is now above the interdecile range. Yep but within the interquartile. That means it was warmer more than 10 years ago. The AGW must be going backwards.
Back to top	IP Logged

Jovial Monk Gold Member Offline Dogs not cats! Posts: 51474 Gender:	Re: Ice watch Reply #20 - May 21^st, 2017 at 12:39pm Quote: Interdecile range - Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interdecile_range In statistics, the interdecile range is the difference between the first and the ninth deciles (10% and 90%). The interdecile range is a measure of statistical ... Oops, Lees gets it wrong again.
Back to top	OzPolitic needs a >real< Environment MRB now! OzPolitic needs a >real< Food MRB now! OzPolitic needs a >real< Health MRB now! OzPolitic needs a >real< Economics MRB now! Topics in the right MRB! IP Logged

Unforgiven Gold Member Offline I have sinned Posts: 8879 Gender:	Re: Ice watch Reply #21 - May 21^st, 2017 at 12:40pm Sea ice volume, which is related to thickness is a better measure of the effect of global warming.
Back to top	“I’ll let you be in my dreams if I can be in yours” Bob Dylan IP Logged

Jovial Monk

Gold Member

Offline

Dogs not cats!

Posts: 51474
Gender: male

Re: Ice watch
Reply #22 - May 21^st, 2017 at 12:43pm

Unforgiven wrote on May 21^st, 2017 at 12:40pm:

Sea ice volume, which is related to thickness is a better measure of the effect of global warming.

Yup. It shows old ice is just a tiny part of the whole Arctic ice. Ice extent is affected by things like wind that blows the floes around, dispersing or packing it tighter or blowing it right out the Arctic Ocean into the Pacific which happened not so long ago.

Volume is better but harder to measure.

Back to top

OzPolitic needs a >real< Environment MRB now!
OzPolitic needs a >real< Food MRB now!
OzPolitic needs a >real< Health MRB now!
OzPolitic needs a >real< Economics MRB now!

Topics in the right MRB!

IP Logged

lee

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 21678
Gender: male

Re: Ice watch
Reply #23 - May 21^st, 2017 at 12:52pm

Jovial Monk wrote on May 21^st, 2017 at 12:39pm:

Quote:

Interdecile range - Wikipedia
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interdecile_range
In statistics, the interdecile range is the difference between the first and the ninth deciles (10% and 90%). The interdecile range is a measure of statistical ...

Oops, Lees gets it wrong again.

So I did. Now all you have to do is admit your mistakes. Wink

Back to top

IP Logged

Jovial Monk Gold Member Offline Dogs not cats! Posts: 51474 Gender:	Re: Ice watch Reply #24 - May 21^st, 2017 at 12:58pm You stuff up heaps, Lees. That your ignorance of science or your desperation to pretend the world isn’t warming, you think?
Back to top	OzPolitic needs a >real< Environment MRB now! OzPolitic needs a >real< Food MRB now! OzPolitic needs a >real< Health MRB now! OzPolitic needs a >real< Economics MRB now! Topics in the right MRB! IP Logged

lee

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 21678
Gender: male

Re: Ice watch
Reply #25 - May 21^st, 2017 at 1:00pm

Jovial Monk wrote on May 21^st, 2017 at 12:43pm:

Yup. It shows old ice is just a tiny part of the whole Arctic ice. Ice extent is affected by things like wind that blows the floes around, dispersing or packing it tighter or blowing it right out the Arctic Ocean into the Pacific which happened not so long ago.

Good of you to compare the whole Arctic to JM's fixation with Greenland. Wink

DMI shows 2017 tracking 2016 -

You just have to choose which model of volume you believe. Wink

Back to top

IP Logged

Jovial Monk Gold Member Offline Dogs not cats! Posts: 51474 Gender:	Re: Ice watch Reply #26 - May 21^st, 2017 at 6:21pm Jovial Monk wrote on May 21^st, 2017 at 12:58pm: You stuff up heaps, Lees. That your ignorance of science or your desperation to pretend the world isn’t warming, you think? How long before Lees turns up?
Back to top	OzPolitic needs a >real< Environment MRB now! OzPolitic needs a >real< Food MRB now! OzPolitic needs a >real< Health MRB now! OzPolitic needs a >real< Economics MRB now! Topics in the right MRB! IP Logged

Jovial Monk Gold Member Offline Dogs not cats! Posts: 51474 Gender:	Re: Ice watch Reply #27 - May 21^st, 2017 at 7:23pm 60 minutes!
Back to top	OzPolitic needs a >real< Environment MRB now! OzPolitic needs a >real< Food MRB now! OzPolitic needs a >real< Health MRB now! OzPolitic needs a >real< Economics MRB now! Topics in the right MRB! IP Logged

lee

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 21678
Gender: male

Re: Ice watch
Reply #28 - May 21^st, 2017 at 7:27pm

Jovial Monk wrote on May 21^st, 2017 at 6:21pm:

Jovial Monk wrote on May 21^st, 2017 at 12:58pm:

You stuff up heaps, Lees. That your ignorance of science or your desperation to pretend the world isn’t warming, you think?

How long before Lees turns up? Wink

Why? Disappointed I didn't respond to your pontifications immediately?

I quote science, You generally quote the Garudian or SKS. But you don't see the difference. So much for being a scientist,

I notice you haven't admitted to any stuff ups. Must be perfect. Wink

Where have I said the world isn't warming? Direct quotes please. or you can continue to lie.

Back to top

IP Logged

Jovial Monk Gold Member Offline Dogs not cats! Posts: 51474 Gender:	Re: Ice watch Reply #29 - May 21^st, 2017 at 7:28pm See how you go tomorrow.
Back to top	OzPolitic needs a >real< Environment MRB now! OzPolitic needs a >real< Food MRB now! OzPolitic needs a >real< Health MRB now! OzPolitic needs a >real< Economics MRB now! Topics in the right MRB! IP Logged