In another Thread, a Poster said this:

Quote:


To avoid de-railing that Thread, I'm asking here what is being referred to there in that Post?

Keating did the same thing prior to the introduction of 'domestic violence laws' which were clearly, and remain, against Law - when he told the States that unless they adopted uniform legislations to cater to that demand, funding would be cut.  That was around 1992, and all that has happened since those 'laws' were introduced is that more families have been shattered, more women killed and injured, more men killed, injured and criminalised, and more children emotionally destroyed.

Beware of all kinds of Fascists bearing gifts...... they always bring wars with them, and they themselves never suffer the costs.

It seems this kind of stand-over is SOP for all our backyard Fascists masquerading as politicians.

Valkie wrote on Jul 24^th, 2016 at 2:02pm:


Snake in the grass. Aussies got played like fiddles.

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 24^th, 2016 at 8:12pm:


What about taking a country to war without senate approval?

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 24^th, 2016 at 8:12pm:


And you, sir, are still struggling with your lack of real life history and with your functional inability to view anything outside your closed little world... there are definitions for that these days...

Some of us seek to struggle against REAL issues of REAL harm and to view and deal with those dispassionately - those such as yourself are the IS vandals of this world, having no real idea but a seriously fixed adherence to some mythical existence in fairyland.

Indeed - state and federal legislatures have and will continue to pass laws that contravene the rule of Law... that is precisely why we need a total overhaul of the entire process of law-making and its insertion into the anuses collective of this society.

longweekend58 wrote on Jul 24^th, 2016 at 11:09pm:


Ah - so they cannot make laws that contravene the laws they make, eh?  So they CAN make laws that contravene the rule of Law, as long as they don't contravene the laws they make for themselves...

If you had half a brain you'd look at history, and specifically at the NAZIs and the Stalinists.... they were experts at making laws that contravened the Rule of LAW.

That is precisely why one of my dissertations is on the differences between legislation, law as practiced based on legislation, and Law Itself - and into that pot I also threw regulation, since 70% of government is by regulation and department policy and NOT legislation.

You are not even on the right track yet.... and your response is indicative of a form of intellectual autism....

Grappler Truth Teller wrote on Jul 24^th, 2016 at 11:18pm:



Based on your other confused, confusing and contradictory writing I acan only image what this 'dissertation' is like. You are seek to create this 'Rule of Law' notion as if it is something you define rather than it being itself the body of law as it exists and the notion of obiedence to same.

Like so many other conspiracy nutters, you create this 'law' that serves your purpose despite it either not existing or not being what you think it is. You should try reading the Flat Earthers understand of the Law of Perspective. I grant you are brighter than they are (who isnt!) but the concept is the same.