Australian Politics Forum - Can you employ 67 ppl with a turnover of $2-3M

President Elect, The Mechanic Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 17501 Gender:	Re: Can you employ 67 ppl with a turnover of $2-3M Reply #60 - Jun 6^th, 2016 at 10:04pm hell.. even if he was running a low paid immigrant whore house I wouldn't believe this garbage... the lease on a 67 room building power water condoms sex toys KY jelly mouth wash batteries sheet cleaning fuel for the kick start vibrator feed for the pony.. the expenses never stop..
Back to top	Q The STORM has arrived Every Dog Has Its Day... Dark to Light. Sheep no more. IP Logged

Aussie,

Senior Member

Offline

Folks are dumb where I
come from.

Posts: 296
Gender: male

Re: Can you employ 67 ppl with a turnover of $2-3M
Reply #61 - Jun 6^th, 2016 at 10:10pm

Aussie wrote on Jun 6^th, 2016 at 9:53pm:

Quote:

t's not an invasion of privacy, it's asking him to confirm what he has stated.

So, when he said that he did, you would not accept what he said, and want to delve into his privacy. Me, I accept what he said. He always has been a pretty straight shooter in my experience, and gets up me almost always.

No privacy was involved. He claimed he employed 67 people so I asked him a simple question based on business knowledge. He cam up wanting

Quote:

I guess you must be annoyed that I called him out on his claim of employing 67 people and asked him to confirm based on his turnover (none of which reveals any personal details) but seems to have confirmed his lack of business knowledge.

I gave you a simple and easy example, one you have ignored completely.

I have asked you to repeat this. You have failed to do so

Quote:

It seems you have a problem with your own side being called out for their stupidity. You seem to lead by example as well.

I have neither side nor dog in this fight.

You seem to love jumping in for Leftwing idiots who like make up stuff they know nothing about, just like you.

Back to top

IP Logged

Aussie,

Senior Member

Offline

Folks are dumb where I
come from.

Posts: 296
Gender: male

Re: Can you employ 67 ppl with a turnover of $2-3M
Reply #62 - Jun 6^th, 2016 at 10:21pm

DSmithy?

I understand that you are looking after all those employees, so you time would be valuable, but anyone who has that many employees would have enough of their finger on the pulse to be able to give some basic figures.

These aren't difficult figures and they are generally at the top of the mind of any businessman because they depend on them for operating, employing and keeping the doors open.

Unless you were lying of course...

Back to top

IP Logged

Aussie

Gold Member

Offline

OzPolitic

Posts: 39707
Gender: male

Re: Can you employ 67 ppl with a turnover of $2-3M
Reply #63 - Jun 6^th, 2016 at 10:23pm

Aussie, wrote on Jun 6^th, 2016 at 10:10pm:

Aussie wrote on Jun 6^th, 2016 at 9:53pm:

Quote:

t's not an invasion of privacy, it's asking him to confirm what he has stated.

So, when he said that he did, you would not accept what he said, and want to delve into his privacy. Me, I accept what he said. He always has been a pretty straight shooter in my experience, and gets up me almost always.

No privacy was involved. He claimed he employed 67 people so I asked him a simple question based on business knowledge. He cam up wanting

Nah. You started to delve into his private details and he immediately arced up.

Quote:

I guess you must be annoyed that I called him out on his claim of employing 67 people and asked him to confirm based on his turnover (none of which reveals any personal details) but seems to have confirmed his lack of business knowledge.

I gave you a simple and easy example, one you have ignored completely.

I have asked you to repeat this. You have failed to do so

And I'm not going to. Read the Thread. It is there.

Quote:

It seems you have a problem with your own side being called out for their stupidity. You seem to lead by example as well.

I have neither side nor dog in this fight.

You seem to love jumping in for Leftwing idiots who like make up stuff they know nothing about, just like you.

I do not believe DSmithy made anything up. That would be you being your usual self.

Back to top

IP Logged

Aussie,

Senior Member

Offline

Folks are dumb where I
come from.

Posts: 296
Gender: male

Re: Can you employ 67 ppl with a turnover of $2-3M
Reply #64 - Jun 6^th, 2016 at 10:25pm

Aussie wrote on Jun 6^th, 2016 at 9:53pm:

Quote:

t's not an invasion of privacy, it's asking him to confirm what he has stated.

So, when he said that he did, you would not accept what he said, and want to delve into his privacy. Me, I accept what he said. He always has been a pretty straight shooter in my experience, and gets up me almost always.

Quote:

I guess you must be annoyed that I called him out on his claim of employing 67 people and asked him to confirm based on his turnover (none of which reveals any personal details) but seems to have confirmed his lack of business knowledge.

I gave you a simple and easy example, one you have ignored completely.

Quote:

It seems you have a problem with your own side being called out for their stupidity. You seem to lead by example as well.

I have neither side nor dog in this fight.

Maybe you could tell us what happens when a $500k investment (such as taxi plates) drops to $250k and how that affects the business and employing your second cousins thrice removes as you employ them on a 457 visa?

Back to top

IP Logged

Aussie,

Senior Member

Offline

Folks are dumb where I
come from.

Posts: 296
Gender: male

Re: Can you employ 67 ppl with a turnover of $2-3M
Reply #65 - Jun 6^th, 2016 at 10:31pm

Aussie wrote on Jun 6^th, 2016 at 10:23pm:

Aussie, wrote on Jun 6^th, 2016 at 10:10pm:

Aussie wrote on Jun 6^th, 2016 at 9:53pm:

[quote]t's not an invasion of privacy, it's asking him to confirm what he has stated.

So, when he said that he did, you would not accept what he said, and want to delve into his privacy. Me, I accept what he said. He always has been a pretty straight shooter in my experience, and gets up me almost always.

No privacy was involved. He claimed he employed 67 people so I asked him a simple question based on business knowledge. He cam up wanting

Nah. You started to delve into his private details and he immediately arced up.

Your claim has no basis

Quote:

I guess you must be annoyed that I called him out on his claim of employing 67 people and asked him to confirm based on his turnover (none of which reveals any personal details) but seems to have confirmed his lack of business knowledge.

I gave you a simple and easy example, one you have ignored completely.

I have asked you to repeat this. You have failed to do so

And I'm not going to. Read the Thread. It is there.

You fail to so again

Quote:

It seems you have a problem with your own side being called out for their stupidity. You seem to lead by example as well.

I have neither side nor dog in this fight.

You seem to love jumping in for Leftwing idiots who like make up stuff they know nothing about, just like you.

I do not believe DSmithy made anything up. That would be you being your usual self.

Of course you wouldn't. You love Leftwing posters no matter how much they lie or get caught out lying. It happens to you daily.

Back to top

IP Logged

Aussie

Gold Member

Offline

OzPolitic

Posts: 39707
Gender: male

Re: Can you employ 67 ppl with a turnover of $2-3M
Reply #66 - Jun 6^th, 2016 at 10:38pm

And as is you want....you are just such a predictable person, you yet again want to delve into the private business affairs of others.

Quote:

Maybe you could tell us what happens when a $500k investment (such as taxi plates) drops to $250k and how that affects the business and employing your second cousins thrice removes as you employ them on a 457 visa?

Such is your level of ignorance on how it all works. But, I guess if all you have is to toss personal grenades ~ someone like you will. 457 visas? My second cousins thrice removed???? Why are you so obsessed with the private details and business arrangements of other Members here?

Back to top

IP Logged

Aussie,

Senior Member

Offline

Folks are dumb where I
come from.

Posts: 296
Gender: male

Re: Can you employ 67 ppl with a turnover of $2-3M
Reply #67 - Jun 6^th, 2016 at 10:46pm

Aussie wrote on Jun 6^th, 2016 at 10:38pm:

And as is you want....you are just such a predictable person, you yet again want to delve into the private business affairs of others.

Quote:

Maybe you could tell us what happens when a $500k investment (such as taxi plates) drops to $250k and how that affects the business and employing your second cousins thrice removes as you employ them on a 457 visa?

Such is your level of ignorance on how it all works. But, I guess if all you have is to toss personal grenades ~ someone like you will. 457 visas? My second cousins thrice removed???? Why are you so obsessed with the private details and business arrangements of other Members here?

Someone claimed while defending socialist policies that they employed 67 peoples. I simply asked what their TO was to support those 67 employees.

Their claims did not match reality.
That is what is called "calling people out"
You seem to have a problem with that. Why?a

That I managed to have a dig at you while calling out an alleged liar does not reflect on me. It reflects on you because you inserted yourself in the conversation.

If you can't handle the heat, stay out of the kitchen bitch.

Back to top

IP Logged

John Smith Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 78311 Gender:	Re: Can you employ 67 ppl with a turnover of $2-3M Reply #68 - Jun 6^th, 2016 at 10:50pm Aussie, wrote on Jun 6^th, 2016 at 9:41pm: John Smith wrote on Jun 6^th, 2016 at 9:38pm: Aussie, wrote on Jun 6^th, 2016 at 9:34pm: I've given you most of the costs involved. I drool into my cornflakes. That's closer to the truth. and that's about all you have
Back to top	Our esteemed leader: I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus. IP Logged

Aussie,

Senior Member

Offline

Folks are dumb where I
come from.

Posts: 296
Gender: male

Re: Can you employ 67 ppl with a turnover of $2-3M
Reply #69 - Jun 6^th, 2016 at 10:55pm

John Smith wrote on Jun 6^th, 2016 at 10:50pm:

Aussie, wrote on Jun 6^th, 2016 at 9:41pm:

John Smith wrote on Jun 6^th, 2016 at 9:38pm:

Aussie, wrote on Jun 6^th, 2016 at 9:34pm:

I've given you most of the costs involved.

I drool into my cornflakes.

That's closer to the truth.

and that's about all you have

Let me know when you have something to add about business and employment cost which I guess will be never considering you are barely employable and wouldn't have a clue.

Seriously, I would have weeded your kind out in the first round of interviews. No one wants to employ your ilk.

Back to top

IP Logged

Aussie

Gold Member

Offline

OzPolitic

Posts: 39707
Gender: male

Re: Can you employ 67 ppl with a turnover of $2-3M
Reply #70 - Jun 6^th, 2016 at 10:56pm

Aussie, wrote on Jun 6^th, 2016 at 10:46pm:

Aussie wrote on Jun 6^th, 2016 at 10:38pm:

And as is you want....you are just such a predictable person, you yet again want to delve into the private business affairs of others.

Quote:

Maybe you could tell us what happens when a $500k investment (such as taxi plates) drops to $250k and how that affects the business and employing your second cousins thrice removes as you employ them on a 457 visa?

Such is your level of ignorance on how it all works. But, I guess if all you have is to toss personal grenades ~ someone like you will. 457 visas? My second cousins thrice removed???? Why are you so obsessed with the private details and business arrangements of other Members here?

Someone claimed while defending socialist policies that they employed 67 peoples. I simply asked what their TO was to support those 67 employees.

Their claims did not match reality.
That is what is called "calling people out"
You seem to have a problem with that. Why?a

That I managed to have a dig at you while calling out an alleged liar does not reflect on me. It reflects on you because you inserted yourself in the conversation.

If you can't handle the heat, stay out of the kitchen bitch.

Pathetic as usual.

Yet again, in your passion to invade privacy and to minimize your 'dig' (why bother ~ oh.....is that why you are here ~ to have a 'dig' at people???) at me you now invent an insertion which simply did not occur.

Read the Thread.

Back to top

IP Logged

John Smith

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 78311
Gender: male

Re: Can you employ 67 ppl with a turnover of $2-3M
Reply #71 - Jun 6^th, 2016 at 10:58pm

Aussie, wrote on Jun 6^th, 2016 at 10:55pm:

John Smith wrote on Jun 6^th, 2016 at 10:50pm:

Aussie, wrote on Jun 6^th, 2016 at 9:41pm:

John Smith wrote on Jun 6^th, 2016 at 9:38pm:

Aussie, wrote on Jun 6^th, 2016 at 9:34pm:

I've given you most of the costs involved.

I drool into my cornflakes.

That's closer to the truth.

and that's about all you have

Let me know when you have something to add about business and employment cost which I guess will be never considering you are barely employable and wouldn't have a clue.

Seriously, I would have weeded your kind out in the first round of interviews. No one wants to employ your ilk.

still pretending you know what you're on about? Grin

You had an opportunity to put up your numbers, you ran away from it.

are you related to Lisa perchance?

Back to top

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.

IP Logged

Aussie,

Senior Member

Offline

Folks are dumb where I
come from.

Posts: 296
Gender: male

Re: Can you employ 67 ppl with a turnover of $2-3M
Reply #72 - Jun 6^th, 2016 at 11:05pm

Aussie wrote on Jun 6^th, 2016 at 10:56pm:

Aussie, wrote on Jun 6^th, 2016 at 10:46pm:

Aussie wrote on Jun 6^th, 2016 at 10:38pm:

And as is you want....you are just such a predictable person, you yet again want to delve into the private business affairs of others.

Quote:

Maybe you could tell us what happens when a $500k investment (such as taxi plates) drops to $250k and how that affects the business and employing your second cousins thrice removes as you employ them on a 457 visa?

Such is your level of ignorance on how it all works. But, I guess if all you have is to toss personal grenades ~ someone like you will. 457 visas? My second cousins thrice removed???? Why are you so obsessed with the private details and business arrangements of other Members here?

Someone claimed while defending socialist policies that they employed 67 peoples. I simply asked what their TO was to support those 67 employees.

Their claims did not match reality.
That is what is called "calling people out"
You seem to have a problem with that. Why?a

That I managed to have a dig at you while calling out an alleged liar does not reflect on me. It reflects on you because you inserted yourself in the conversation.

If you can't handle the heat, stay out of the kitchen bitch.

Pathetic as usual.

Yet again, in your passion to invade privacy and to minimize your 'dig' (why bother ~ oh.....is that why you are here ~ to have a 'dig' at people???) at me you now invent an insertion which simply did not occur.

Read the Thread.

There is no invading of privacy here, as much as you like to project your own failings into onto others.

This was simply about calling out a claim made by a poster who has yet to justify his figures considering his reveal of employees vs turnover. Of course if he he had any business sense whatsoever, he could have mentioned anything, but the fact that he had no idea and revealed his lie i uspct irks you more than anything.

Perhaps you should have all Leftwing members on speed PM so you can advise them before they put their foot in it. I suspect you will be not only busy, you will have to answer to the complete crap you spew as well.

Back to top

IP Logged

Aussie Gold Member Offline OzPolitic Posts: 39707 Gender:	Re: Can you employ 67 ppl with a turnover of $2-3M Reply #73 - Jun 6^th, 2016 at 11:13pm Okay....back to the Topic question. You very obviously can and you can do so without having to account to a stalker seeking to invade your privacy as to how.
Back to top	IP Logged

Aussie,

Senior Member

Offline

Folks are dumb where I
come from.

Posts: 296
Gender: male

Re: Can you employ 67 ppl with a turnover of $2-3M
Reply #74 - Jun 6^th, 2016 at 11:25pm

Aussie wrote on Jun 6^th, 2016 at 11:13pm:

Okay....back to the Topic question. You very obviously can and you can do so without having to account to a stalker seeking to invade your privacy as to how.

Are you drunk?

I have done nothing but wait for DSmithy to advise how he can employ 67 people on a turnover of $2-3M.

This requires no revealing of personal information (which I know you love). All it requires is a knowledge of business and costs of doing business. It is to rocket science. It does not require you hand me your books or your accountants number.

It requires you can demonstrate a basic knowledge of $$$ inputs and outputs. Both of which have been lacking and you deliberately stiring the pot to distract form the failings of the others.

Here's a hint. It doesn't distract from the failings of the others. It just puts you in the same pot of failures.

Back to top

IP Logged