Australian Politics Forum - Can you employ 67 ppl with a turnover of $2-3M

Aussie, Senior Member Offline Folks are dumb where I come from. Posts: 296 Gender:	Can you employ 67 ppl with a turnover of $2-3M Jun 6^th, 2016 at 7:13pm This is an interesting business model. I'd like to hear more about how this is achieved DSmithy. Can you expand on it a bit more?
Back to top	IP Logged

John Smith Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 78311 Gender:	Re: Can you employ 67 ppl with a turnover of $2-3M Reply #1 - Jun 6^th, 2016 at 7:16pm Can you employ 67 ppl with a turnover of $2-3M of course you can. Dsmithy works in the restaurant industry. A lot of those would be casuals. What I find hard to believe is your claim that you employ 5 .... I'm calling bullsh1t
Back to top	Our esteemed leader: I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus. IP Logged

Aussie,

Senior Member

Offline

Folks are dumb where I
come from.

Posts: 296
Gender: male

Re: Can you employ 67 ppl with a turnover of $2-3M
Reply #2 - Jun 6^th, 2016 at 7:26pm

John Smith wrote on Jun 6^th, 2016 at 7:16pm:

Can you employ 67 ppl with a turnover of $2-3M

of course you can. Dsmithy works in the restaurant industry. A lot of those would be casuals.

What I find hard to believe is your claim that you employ 5 .... I'm calling bullsh1t

Most people would list the number of employees as FTEs, but I'm open to see how he manages to employ 67 people for $2-3M turnover. If so, he'll must be paying them the very minimum along with minimum hours for each of them and making a GP so far above the average restaurant that he update be one of the most expensive restaurants in town with the smallest plates and a very exclusive clientele who will pay mega bucks for little food and rotating roster of service people through a single meal...but I'll wait for DSmithy to respond before drawing a conclusion.

Back to top

IP Logged

John Smith Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 78311 Gender:	Re: Can you employ 67 ppl with a turnover of $2-3M Reply #3 - Jun 6^th, 2016 at 7:28pm that's it .... you've just confirmed that you don't employ 5.
Back to top	Our esteemed leader: I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus. IP Logged

Aussie, Senior Member Offline Folks are dumb where I come from. Posts: 296 Gender:	Re: Can you employ 67 ppl with a turnover of $2-3M Reply #4 - Jun 6^th, 2016 at 7:31pm John Smith wrote on Jun 6^th, 2016 at 7:28pm: that's it .... you've just confirmed that you don't employ 5. Bzzt, try again.
Back to top	IP Logged

Mistress Nicole Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 1278 Gender:	Re: Can you employ 67 ppl with a turnover of $2-3M Reply #5 - Jun 6^th, 2016 at 7:38pm In answer to the thread question, no. Wages would outstrip TO, or close enough to it to detract from the owner undertaking the business. Unless he employs Aussies Indian wife. They could save on toilet paper costs
Back to top	IP Logged

Lisa Jones Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 39047 Sydney Gender:	Re: Can you employ 67 ppl with a turnover of $2-3M Reply #6 - Jun 6^th, 2016 at 7:42pm Mistress Nicole wrote on Jun 6^th, 2016 at 7:38pm: In answer to the thread question, no. Wages would outstrip TO, or close enough to it to detract from the owner undertaking the business. Unless he employs Aussies Indian wife. They could save on toilet paper costs
Back to top	If I let myself be bought then I am no longer free. HYPATIA - Greek philosopher, mathematician and astronomer (370 - 415) IP Logged

Aussie

Gold Member

Offline

OzPolitic

Posts: 39698
Gender: male

Re: Can you employ 67 ppl with a turnover of $2-3M
Reply #7 - Jun 6^th, 2016 at 7:44pm

Mistress Nicole wrote on Jun 6^th, 2016 at 7:38pm:

In answer to the thread question, no. Wages would outstrip TO.

Cabs drive many more than 67 'mentally handicapped' people to their employment every working day right here on the Sunshine Coast. The Endeavour Foundation is their employer. They destroy confidential documents. I doubt they would have a turn-over in excess of even $M1.

We are all too quick to pigeon hole/box people, aren't we.

Back to top

IP Logged

Bobby. Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 117370 Melbourne Gender:	Re: Can you employ 67 ppl with a turnover of $2-3M Reply #8 - Jun 6^th, 2016 at 7:45pm 3M / 67 = $44,776 per person. It seems possible.
Back to top	IP Logged

Aussie

Gold Member

Offline

OzPolitic

Posts: 39698
Gender: male

Re: Can you employ 67 ppl with a turnover of $2-3M
Reply #9 - Jun 6^th, 2016 at 7:46pm

Mistress Nicole wrote on Jun 6^th, 2016 at 7:38pm:

In answer to the thread question, no. Wages would outstrip TO, or close enough to it to detract from the owner undertaking the business.

Unless he employs Aussies Indian wife. They could save on toilet paper costs

What is that supposed to mean? Nah....on second thoughts ~ bugger it, explain it to Hicks, I can't be arsed with this Member family abuse.

Back to top

IP Logged

Aussie,

Senior Member

Offline

Folks are dumb where I
come from.

Posts: 296
Gender: male

Re: Can you employ 67 ppl with a turnover of $2-3M
Reply #10 - Jun 6^th, 2016 at 7:49pm

Mistress Nicole wrote on Jun 6^th, 2016 at 7:38pm:

In answer to the thread question, no. Wages would outstrip TO, or close enough to it to detract from the owner undertaking the business.

Unless he employs Aussies Indian wife. They could save on toilet paper costs

Even if the 67 were all casuals and all employed for the minimum of 3-4 hours as they are legally obliged to do (sorry kids, your after school job at the newsagent is no longer viable because unions), I cannot see how this would be possible.

DSmithy?

Back to top

IP Logged

Aussie,

Senior Member

Offline

Folks are dumb where I
come from.

Posts: 296
Gender: male

Re: Can you employ 67 ppl with a turnover of $2-3M
Reply #11 - Jun 6^th, 2016 at 7:51pm

Aussie wrote on Jun 6^th, 2016 at 7:46pm:

Mistress Nicole wrote on Jun 6^th, 2016 at 7:38pm:

In answer to the thread question, no. Wages would outstrip TO, or close enough to it to detract from the owner undertaking the business.

Unless he employs Aussies Indian wife. They could save on toilet paper costs

What is that supposed to mean? Nah....on second thoughts ~ bugger it, explain it to Hicks, I can't be arsed with this Member family abuse.

You could address the question in the OP?
Imagine if you ran a fleet of Uber cabs that turned over $2-3M and had 67 drivers.

Could you make it work?

Back to top

IP Logged

Mistress Nicole

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 1278
Gender: female

Re: Can you employ 67 ppl with a turnover of $2-3M
Reply #12 - Jun 6^th, 2016 at 7:52pm

Aussie, wrote on Jun 6^th, 2016 at 7:49pm:

Mistress Nicole wrote on Jun 6^th, 2016 at 7:38pm:

In answer to the thread question, no. Wages would outstrip TO, or close enough to it to detract from the owner undertaking the business.

Unless he employs Aussies Indian wife. They could save on toilet paper costs

Even if the 67 were all casuals and all employed for the minimum of 3-4 hours as they are legally obliged to do (sorry kids, your after school job at the newsagent is no longer viable because unions), I cannot see how this would be possible.

DSmithy?

Not only that, but restaurant trade is busiest on weekends. We're talking time and a half or double time.

Back to top

IP Logged

John Smith

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 78311
Gender: male

Re: Can you employ 67 ppl with a turnover of $2-3M
Reply #13 - Jun 6^th, 2016 at 7:54pm

Aussie, wrote on Jun 6^th, 2016 at 7:49pm:

Mistress Nicole wrote on Jun 6^th, 2016 at 7:38pm:

In answer to the thread question, no. Wages would outstrip TO, or close enough to it to detract from the owner undertaking the business.

Unless he employs Aussies Indian wife. They could save on toilet paper costs

Even if the 67 were all casuals and all employed for the minimum of 3-4 hours as they are legally obliged to do (sorry kids, your after school job at the newsagent is no longer viable because unions), I cannot see how this would be possible.

DSmithy?

you might want to run through your numbers again

Back to top

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.

IP Logged

Aussie, Senior Member Offline Folks are dumb where I come from. Posts: 296 Gender:	Re: Can you employ 67 ppl with a turnover of $2-3M Reply #14 - Jun 6^th, 2016 at 7:56pm Bobby. wrote on Jun 6^th, 2016 at 7:45pm: 3M / 67 = $44,776 per person. It seems possible. We are talking turnover, not net, not gross. DSmithy?
Back to top	IP Logged