Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 2 3 4 
Send Topic Print
Why are Savva's 'sources' too gutless to say? (Read 2710 times)
matty
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 11055
East Sydney
Gender: male
Re: Why are Savva's 'sources' too gutless to say?
Reply #15 - Mar 11th, 2016 at 9:39am
 
Dsmithy70 wrote on Mar 11th, 2016 at 8:33am:
Seems Bronwyn is confirming Savva's account.

But that would be the only true story in the book wouldn't it?

http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/newslocal/northern-beaches/bishop-backs-savvas-...

Quote:
A WAR of words has erupted between one-time allies Bronwyn Bishop and Tony Abbott over her claim the former PM stopped her publicly apologising about the Choppergate scandal.

The Mackellar MP appeared to confirm to the Manly Daily that she wanted to publicly say sorry as the scandal over her use of a taxpayer-funded helicopter engulfed the government.

But Mr Abbott persuaded her not too, substantiating claims in journalist Niki Savva’s explosive book Road to Ruin: How Tony Abbott and Peta Credlin Destroyed Their Own Government.

Yesterday in Clareville, the embattled former Speaker confirmed the story as “basically true”.

She said: “It’s best to leave those things for people to draw their own conclusions about but the way it’s been reported is basically true”.



There's a conundrum for you Matty, who to back Bronnie or Tones


What conundrum, smithy? I detest Bishop.
Back to top
 

BILL SHORTEN WILL NEVER BE PM!!!!
 
IP Logged
 
Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 89929
Proud Old White Australian Man
Gender: male
Re: Why are Savva's 'sources' too gutless to say?
Reply #16 - Mar 11th, 2016 at 9:42am
 
matty wrote on Mar 11th, 2016 at 9:39am:
John Smith wrote on Mar 11th, 2016 at 9:35am:
matty wrote on Mar 11th, 2016 at 9:34am:
She is only out for herself, a nasty piece of work.



whereas abbott was is in it for peta sake, right?


Abbott is a man of integrity and character. His work for charity and other causes speaks for itself. Also his loyalty (to his own detriment) to Hockey (who was loyalty in turn) and Bishop (who betrayed him).


We all noticed that when he dirtbag-manned Pauline Hanson.... but he's a character all right...

Where have you gone, Joe Di Hockey-o, a nation turns its laughing eyes to you....

Bishop to political pawn 5 ....... checkmate!

Peta awoke with a jerk, and after unwrapping his arms locked around her, shook the jerk awake......

"Tony... TONY!  It's time to get home to Margie and the kids... it's six o'clock!"

"Umph.. err... plenty of time then!"

"Six AM, you d1ck!"

"Oh... ahhh.... sh1t happens."... *snores*....

Back to top
 

“Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.”
― John Adams
 
IP Logged
 
crocodile
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 6683
Gender: male
Re: Why are Savva's 'sources' too gutless to say?
Reply #17 - Mar 11th, 2016 at 9:43am
 
matty wrote on Mar 11th, 2016 at 9:39am:
John Smith wrote on Mar 11th, 2016 at 9:35am:
matty wrote on Mar 11th, 2016 at 9:34am:
She is only out for herself, a nasty piece of work.



whereas abbott was is in it for peta sake, right?


Abbott is a man of integrity and character. His work for charity and other causes speaks for itself. Also his loyalty (to his own detriment) to Hockey (who was loyalty in turn) and Bishop (who betrayed him).


No doubt he is a loyal and charitable fellow. However, he sucked as PM.
Back to top
 

Very funny Scotty, now beam down my clothes.
 
IP Logged
 
cods
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 88048
Re: Why are Savva's 'sources' too gutless to say?
Reply #18 - Mar 11th, 2016 at 9:43am
 
matty wrote on Mar 11th, 2016 at 9:34am:
cods wrote on Mar 11th, 2016 at 7:43am:
matty wrote on Mar 11th, 2016 at 12:51am:
She claims that many Liberal party politicians (no doubtedly of the moderates like she) told her all of the information about Abbott and Credlin, yet won't name who they are.

So either she is blatantly lying and making it up, or these politicians are too gutless and cowardly to put their names to these claims.



matty from what I gather most are staffers.. not pollies... so beware...

in the public service there is so much jealousy and bitching...and Savva plans to make money out of it...

the ABC might serialise it who knows.. Wink Wink


She is an absolute opportunist, cods. She is only out for herself, a nasty piece of work.



I am not that interested really I would just like to know WHY NOW?..to release a book of this caliber  is kind of weird unless you on the other side...

what behind it?????.......is she that desperate for the limelight???.... Roll Eyes Roll Eyes

gotta be more than that..... maybe she is a shortarse mole... Grin Grin

just sayin!
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
matty
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 11055
East Sydney
Gender: male
Re: Why are Savva's 'sources' too gutless to say?
Reply #19 - Mar 11th, 2016 at 9:47am
 
cods wrote on Mar 11th, 2016 at 9:43am:
matty wrote on Mar 11th, 2016 at 9:34am:
cods wrote on Mar 11th, 2016 at 7:43am:
matty wrote on Mar 11th, 2016 at 12:51am:
She claims that many Liberal party politicians (no doubtedly of the moderates like she) told her all of the information about Abbott and Credlin, yet won't name who they are.

So either she is blatantly lying and making it up, or these politicians are too gutless and cowardly to put their names to these claims.



matty from what I gather most are staffers.. not pollies... so beware...

in the public service there is so much jealousy and bitching...and Savva plans to make money out of it...

the ABC might serialise it who knows.. Wink Wink


She is an absolute opportunist, cods. She is only out for herself, a nasty piece of work.



I am not that interested really I would just like to know WHY NOW?..to release a book of this caliber  is kind of weird unless you on the other side...

what behind it?????.......is she that desperate for the limelight???.... Roll Eyes Roll Eyes

gotta be more than that..... maybe she is a shortarse mole... Grin Grin

just sayin!


I think that is is purely motivated for two reasons. First is that her husband is a Turnbull staffer. Second is that she is a Liberal in the ilk of Turnbull - ie not a conservative. She is a Turnbull lover and an Abbott hater. She is trying to justify Turnbull's knifing of Abbott with slander, rumours, lies and gossip. Disgusting.
Back to top
 

BILL SHORTEN WILL NEVER BE PM!!!!
 
IP Logged
 
cods
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 88048
Re: Why are Savva's 'sources' too gutless to say?
Reply #20 - Mar 11th, 2016 at 9:48am
 
crocodile wrote on Mar 11th, 2016 at 9:43am:
matty wrote on Mar 11th, 2016 at 9:39am:
John Smith wrote on Mar 11th, 2016 at 9:35am:
matty wrote on Mar 11th, 2016 at 9:34am:
She is only out for herself, a nasty piece of work.



whereas abbott was is in it for peta sake, right?


Abbott is a man of integrity and character. His work for charity and other causes speaks for itself. Also his loyalty (to his own detriment) to Hockey (who was loyalty in turn) and Bishop (who betrayed him).


No doubt he is a loyal and charitable fellow. However, he sucked as PM.



well I for one didnt think so.. he had guts and balls.. dont see anything like that anywhere else....you may not have liked what he did.. but at least he did it..

what we have now is stagnant..

a smelly rancid stagnant pile of impotent  wannabees...

following in the footsteps of the shortarse created
impasse...

now we look as if all we have are EGO bashing selfish its all about meeeeeeee people running the joint..

you want popular.. well thats what you have got...

at least thats what the polls tell us.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
matty
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 11055
East Sydney
Gender: male
Re: Why are Savva's 'sources' too gutless to say?
Reply #21 - Mar 11th, 2016 at 9:49am
 
Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM wrote on Mar 11th, 2016 at 9:42am:
matty wrote on Mar 11th, 2016 at 9:39am:
John Smith wrote on Mar 11th, 2016 at 9:35am:
matty wrote on Mar 11th, 2016 at 9:34am:
She is only out for herself, a nasty piece of work.



whereas abbott was is in it for peta sake, right?


Abbott is a man of integrity and character. His work for charity and other causes speaks for itself. Also his loyalty (to his own detriment) to Hockey (who was loyalty in turn) and Bishop (who betrayed him).


We all noticed that when he dirtbag-manned Pauline Hanson.... but he's a character all right...

Where have you gone, Joe Di Hockey-o, a nation turns its laughing eyes to you....

Bishop to political pawn 5 ....... checkmate!

Peta awoke with a jerk, and after unwrapping his arms locked around her, shook the jerk awake......

"Tony... TONY!  It's time to get home to Margie and the kids... it's six o'clock!"

"Umph.. err... plenty of time then!"

"Six AM, you d1ck!"

"Oh... ahhh.... sh1t happens."... *snores*....



I don't defend what he did to Pauline, but it was not illegal.
Back to top
 

BILL SHORTEN WILL NEVER BE PM!!!!
 
IP Logged
 
matty
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 11055
East Sydney
Gender: male
Re: Why are Savva's 'sources' too gutless to say?
Reply #22 - Mar 11th, 2016 at 9:49am
 
crocodile wrote on Mar 11th, 2016 at 9:43am:
matty wrote on Mar 11th, 2016 at 9:39am:
John Smith wrote on Mar 11th, 2016 at 9:35am:
matty wrote on Mar 11th, 2016 at 9:34am:
She is only out for herself, a nasty piece of work.



whereas abbott was is in it for peta sake, right?


Abbott is a man of integrity and character. His work for charity and other causes speaks for itself. Also his loyalty (to his own detriment) to Hockey (who was loyalty in turn) and Bishop (who betrayed him).


No doubt he is a loyal and charitable fellow. However, he sucked as PM.


A matter of opinion. I disagree.
Back to top
 

BILL SHORTEN WILL NEVER BE PM!!!!
 
IP Logged
 
cods
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 88048
Re: Why are Savva's 'sources' too gutless to say?
Reply #23 - Mar 11th, 2016 at 9:50am
 
matty wrote on Mar 11th, 2016 at 9:47am:
I think that is is purely motivated for two reasons. First is that her husband is a Turnbull staffer. Second is that she is a Liberal in the ilk of Turnbull - ie not a conservative. She is a Turnbull lover and an Abbott hater. She is trying to justify Turnbull's knifing of Abbott with slander, rumours, lies and gossip. Disgusting



perhaps.... but you have to admit the timing is weird I would like someone to ask her WHY NOW nikki??...what did you hope to achieve?. Roll Eyes Roll Eyes

when you release a book its all about timing matty..
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
John Smith
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 78311
Gender: male
Re: Why are Savva's 'sources' too gutless to say?
Reply #24 - Mar 11th, 2016 at 10:10am
 
matty wrote on Mar 11th, 2016 at 9:36am:
John Smith wrote on Mar 11th, 2016 at 9:16am:
matty wrote on Mar 11th, 2016 at 12:51am:
She claims that many Liberal party politicians (no doubtedly of the moderates like she) told her all of the information about Abbott and Credlin, yet won't name who they are.

So either she is blatantly lying and making it up, or these politicians are too gutless and cowardly to put their names to these claims.





she did name sources you boof head. Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy


On the Chris Smith Show:

Smith - "Who said she fed him"?

Savva - "I'm not going to tell you".

Smith - "Who said he slapped her on the bum".

Savva - "I'm not going to tell you that either".


so don't watch stupid shows
Back to top
 

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.
 
IP Logged
 
John Smith
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 78311
Gender: male
Re: Why are Savva's 'sources' too gutless to say?
Reply #25 - Mar 11th, 2016 at 10:12am
 
matty wrote on Mar 11th, 2016 at 9:39am:
John Smith wrote on Mar 11th, 2016 at 9:35am:
matty wrote on Mar 11th, 2016 at 9:34am:
She is only out for herself, a nasty piece of work.



whereas abbott was is in it for peta sake, right?


Abbott is a man of integrity and character. His work for charity and other causes speaks for itself. Also his loyalty (to his own detriment) to Hockey (who was loyalty in turn) and Bishop (who betrayed him).



Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin;D Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin;D Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin;D Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin;D Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin;D Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin;D Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin;D Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin;D Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin;D Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin;D Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin;D Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin;D Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin;D Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin;D Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin;D Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin;D Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin;D Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin;D Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin;D Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin;D Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin;D Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin;D Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin


Back to top
 

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.
 
IP Logged
 
crocodile
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 6683
Gender: male
Re: Why are Savva's 'sources' too gutless to say?
Reply #26 - Mar 11th, 2016 at 11:28am
 
cods wrote on Mar 11th, 2016 at 9:48am:
crocodile wrote on Mar 11th, 2016 at 9:43am:
matty wrote on Mar 11th, 2016 at 9:39am:
John Smith wrote on Mar 11th, 2016 at 9:35am:
matty wrote on Mar 11th, 2016 at 9:34am:
She is only out for herself, a nasty piece of work.



whereas abbott was is in it for peta sake, right?


Abbott is a man of integrity and character. His work for charity and other causes speaks for itself. Also his loyalty (to his own detriment) to Hockey (who was loyalty in turn) and Bishop (who betrayed him).


No doubt he is a loyal and charitable fellow. However, he sucked as PM.



well I for one didnt think so.. he had guts and balls.. dont see anything like that anywhere else....you may not have liked what he did.. but at least he did it..

what we have now is stagnant..

a smelly rancid stagnant pile of impotent  wannabees...

following in the footsteps of the shortarse created
impasse...

now we look as if all we have are EGO bashing selfish its all about meeeeeeee people running the joint..

you want popular.. well thats what you have got...

at least thats what the polls tell us.


Unfortunately, that does not lift him in the good PM stakes. Nobody is suggesting that his usurper is any better. In fact Mal is not as good as he thought he was.
Back to top
 

Very funny Scotty, now beam down my clothes.
 
IP Logged
 
crocodile
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 6683
Gender: male
Re: Why are Savva's 'sources' too gutless to say?
Reply #27 - Mar 11th, 2016 at 11:34am
 
matty wrote on Mar 11th, 2016 at 9:49am:
crocodile wrote on Mar 11th, 2016 at 9:43am:
matty wrote on Mar 11th, 2016 at 9:39am:
John Smith wrote on Mar 11th, 2016 at 9:35am:
matty wrote on Mar 11th, 2016 at 9:34am:
She is only out for herself, a nasty piece of work.



whereas abbott was is in it for peta sake, right?


Abbott is a man of integrity and character. His work for charity and other causes speaks for itself. Also his loyalty (to his own detriment) to Hockey (who was loyalty in turn) and Bishop (who betrayed him).


No doubt he is a loyal and charitable fellow. However, he sucked as PM.


A matter of opinion. I disagree.


The relativism argument is not much use without hard data.
Back to top
 

Very funny Scotty, now beam down my clothes.
 
IP Logged
 
BatteriesNotIncluded
Gold Member
*****
Offline


MediocrityNET: because
people died for this!

Posts: 26966
Re: Why are Savva's 'sources' too gutless to say?
Reply #28 - Mar 11th, 2016 at 12:02pm
 
cods wrote on Mar 11th, 2016 at 7:46am:
Labor voter wrote on Mar 11th, 2016 at 7:36am:
I don't remember you complaining about "un-name sources" from labor party members when there was all negative things said about Gillard when she was PM.

You get all high and mighty when someone says something about Abbott, you carry on like a pork chop in a Synagogue

no offence to andrei




really?? did you spring to gillards defence   when she was accused of having an affair with a staffer????....

ooops I dont think she was... but maybe you know better?????...

this is at the end of the day gutter politics....savvas husband does work with turnbull..she does have an AXE to grind....

and those who like Abbott have as much right to stand up for him..

as you do standing up for shortarse.. Roll Eyes Roll Eyes

aren't we talking about savva: WHY WILL NO ONE STAND UP FOR THE POOR B**** ?
Back to top
 

*Sure....they're anti competitive as any subsidised job is.  It wouldn't be there without the tax payer.  Very damned difficult for a brainwashed collectivist to understand that I know....  (swaggy) *
 
IP Logged
 
BatteriesNotIncluded
Gold Member
*****
Offline


MediocrityNET: because
people died for this!

Posts: 26966
Re: Why are Savva's 'sources' too gutless to say?
Reply #29 - Mar 11th, 2016 at 12:07pm
 
cods wrote on Mar 11th, 2016 at 9:50am:
matty wrote on Mar 11th, 2016 at 9:47am:
I think that is is purely motivated for two reasons. First is that her husband is a Turnbull staffer. Second is that she is a Liberal in the ilk of Turnbull - ie not a conservative. She is a Turnbull lover and an Abbott hater. She is trying to justify Turnbull's knifing of Abbott with slander, rumours, lies and gossip. Disgusting



perhaps.... but you have to admit the timing is weird I would like someone to ask her WHY NOW nikki??...what did you hope to achieve?. Roll Eyes Roll Eyes

when you release a book its all about timing matty..

Ten million voters asked that three days ago and now they don't care: everyone knows she is an irrelevant cow and this is her way of ending her career... no one else could do it because she is the endless drone we all apparently need and love called political commentary!

This country is dam you**** and she is the perfect example of shite democracy in action... pies akerman was more entertaining atleast!
Back to top
 

*Sure....they're anti competitive as any subsidised job is.  It wouldn't be there without the tax payer.  Very damned difficult for a brainwashed collectivist to understand that I know....  (swaggy) *
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 3 4 
Send Topic Print