Australian Politics Forum - Refugees stage drowning photo

Cynik

Junior Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 64

Re: Refugees stage drowning photo
Reply #120 - Feb 8^th, 2016 at 8:15pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 8^th, 2016 at 8:13pm:

Cynik wrote on Feb 8^th, 2016 at 8:12pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 8^th, 2016 at 8:09pm:

Cynik wrote on Feb 8^th, 2016 at 8:06pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 8^th, 2016 at 8:03pm:

Cynik wrote on Feb 8^th, 2016 at 8:02pm:

You should try observation instead of waiting for the lefty media to tell you what to think and repeating adnauseum strawman arguments.

What media was this "pretend" act reported in?

That's all I'm asking you.

Why can't you answer?

Why does it need to be reported in the media?

Where was it reported, then?

"Refugees stage drowning photo".

Staged for what?

Why does it need to be reported?
It would have been staged for the same reason Pallywood productions are staged. Sympathy from the bedwetters, bedwetter.

Why would they stage a photo, and then not publish it?

Where was it published, and what was the caption?

Because the photo showed they were only in a foot of water. Seriously, try to keep up.

Back to top

IP Logged

greggerypeccary Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 150871 Gender:	Re: Refugees stage drowning photo Reply #121 - Feb 8^th, 2016 at 8:21pm Cynik wrote on Feb 8^th, 2016 at 8:15pm: Because the photo showed they were only in a foot of water. Seriously, try to keep up. Who claimed anything to the contrary?
Back to top	GOP = Guardians Of Paedophiles IP Logged

Cynik Junior Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 64	Re: Refugees stage drowning photo Reply #122 - Feb 8^th, 2016 at 8:28pm greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 8^th, 2016 at 8:21pm: Cynik wrote on Feb 8^th, 2016 at 8:15pm: Because the photo showed they were only in a foot of water. Seriously, try to keep up. Who claimed anything to the contrary? Who said you claimed it to the contrary?
Back to top	IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 150871
Gender: male

Re: Refugees stage drowning photo
Reply #123 - Feb 8^th, 2016 at 8:32pm

Cynik wrote on Feb 8^th, 2016 at 8:15pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 8^th, 2016 at 8:13pm:

Cynik wrote on Feb 8^th, 2016 at 8:12pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 8^th, 2016 at 8:09pm:

Cynik wrote on Feb 8^th, 2016 at 8:06pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 8^th, 2016 at 8:03pm:

Cynik wrote on Feb 8^th, 2016 at 8:02pm:

You should try observation instead of waiting for the lefty media to tell you what to think and repeating adnauseum strawman arguments.

What media was this "pretend" act reported in?

That's all I'm asking you.

Why can't you answer?

Why does it need to be reported in the media?

Where was it reported, then?

"Refugees stage drowning photo".

Staged for what?

Why does it need to be reported?
It would have been staged for the same reason Pallywood productions are staged. Sympathy from the bedwetters, bedwetter.

Why would they stage a photo, and then not publish it?

Where was it published, and what was the caption?

Because the photo showed they were only in a foot of water.

Yep.

That's how it looks to me.

What's your point?

Back to top

GOP = Guardians Of Paedophiles

IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 150871
Gender: male

Re: Refugees stage drowning photo
Reply #124 - Feb 8^th, 2016 at 8:42pm

Cynik wrote on Feb 8^th, 2016 at 8:15pm:

... the photo showed they were only in a foot of water.

Give or take a few inches, I don't think anyone in here would disagree with you.

I certainly wouldn't.

To me, it looks like they are in shallow water.

Now that we've established that fact, what is it you're trying to say?

If you have a point, now would be the time to reveal it to us all.

Back to top

GOP = Guardians Of Paedophiles

IP Logged

Cynik Junior Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 64	Re: Refugees stage drowning photo Reply #125 - Feb 8^th, 2016 at 8:45pm Quote: Why would they stage a photo, and then not publish it? Yep. Looks like you got an answer to your inane question. Do you have a point other than the one on your head?
Back to top	IP Logged

greggerypeccary Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 150871 Gender:	Re: Refugees stage drowning photo Reply #126 - Feb 8^th, 2016 at 8:46pm Cynik wrote on Feb 8^th, 2016 at 8:45pm: Do you have a point ? Absolutely. Nobody has said that they are in deep water, drowning. Do you dispute that?
Back to top	GOP = Guardians Of Paedophiles IP Logged

double plus good Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 5693 Gender:	Re: Refugees stage drowning photo Reply #127 - Feb 8^th, 2016 at 8:47pm If that photo hasn't been doctored it's a smacking scam.
Back to top	IP Logged

greggerypeccary Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 150871 Gender:	Re: Refugees stage drowning photo Reply #128 - Feb 8^th, 2016 at 8:49pm double plus good wrote on Feb 8^th, 2016 at 8:47pm: If that photo hasn't been doctored it's a smacking scam. Let's all assume it's been doctored. What's your point?
Back to top	GOP = Guardians Of Paedophiles IP Logged

ian Gold Member Offline OzPolitic Posts: 9451	Re: Refugees stage drowning photo Reply #129 - Feb 8^th, 2016 at 8:52pm greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 8^th, 2016 at 8:46pm: Nobody has said that they are in deep water, drowning. Do you dispute that? So why are they pretending to be?
Back to top	IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 150871
Gender: male

Re: Refugees stage drowning photo
Reply #130 - Feb 8^th, 2016 at 8:53pm

Cynik wrote on Feb 8^th, 2016 at 8:15pm:

the photo showed they were only in a foot of water.

Give or take a few inches, I don't think anyone in here would disagree with you.

I certainly wouldn't.

To me, it looks like they are in shallow water.

Now that we've established that fact, what is it you're trying to say?

If you have a point, now would be the time to reveal it to us all.

What are you waiting for?

Back to top

GOP = Guardians Of Paedophiles

IP Logged

greggerypeccary Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 150871 Gender:	Re: Refugees stage drowning photo Reply #131 - Feb 8^th, 2016 at 8:54pm ian wrote on Feb 8^th, 2016 at 8:52pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 8^th, 2016 at 8:46pm: Nobody has said that they are in deep water, drowning. Do you dispute that? So why are they pretending to be? How are they pretending to be in deep water, and drowning?
Back to top	GOP = Guardians Of Paedophiles IP Logged

Cynik

Junior Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 64

Re: Refugees stage drowning photo
Reply #132 - Feb 8^th, 2016 at 8:54pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 8^th, 2016 at 8:49pm:

double plus good wrote on Feb 8^th, 2016 at 8:47pm:

If that photo hasn't been doctored it's a smacking scam.

Let's all assume it's been doctored.

What's your point?

Let's all assume it hasn't. Let's all assume it's botched Pallywood production hence the reason why it hasn't been "reported in the media". Let's all assume you aren't very bright.

Now go from there. Occam's razor innit.

Back to top

IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 150871
Gender: male

Re: Refugees stage drowning photo
Reply #133 - Feb 8^th, 2016 at 8:55pm

Cynik wrote on Feb 8^th, 2016 at 8:15pm:

the photo showed they were only in a foot of water.

Give or take a few inches, I don't think anyone in here would disagree with you.

I certainly wouldn't.

To me, it looks like they are in shallow water.

Now that we've established that fact, what is it you're trying to say?

If you have a point, now would be the time to reveal it to us all.

What are you waiting for?

Back to top

GOP = Guardians Of Paedophiles

IP Logged

double plus good

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 5693
Gender: male

Re: Refugees stage drowning photo
Reply #134 - Feb 8^th, 2016 at 8:57pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 8^th, 2016 at 8:55pm:

Cynik wrote on Feb 8^th, 2016 at 8:15pm:

the photo showed they were only in a foot of water.

Give or take a few inches, I don't think anyone in here would disagree with you.

I certainly wouldn't.

To me, it looks like they are in shallow water.

Now that we've established that fact, what is it you're trying to say?

If you have a point, now would be the time to reveal it to us all.

What are you waiting for?

Why do they need to float on their back in a buoyancy device in 3 foot of water numpty?

Back to top

IP Logged