Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 2 3 
Send Topic Print
The 'Other' Opposition Leader's Speech (Read 2586 times)
____
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 33410
Australia
Gender: male
The 'Other' Opposition Leader's Speech
Jan 29th, 2016 at 7:49am
 
Tony Abbott and the right to dissent from the new morality


Ironically, the reaction to Tony Abbott's decision to speak to the Alliance Defending Freedom proves that group right when it claims that our religious freedoms are under threat as never before, writes Michael Jensen.

Freedom of religion?

It has to be written with a question mark these days, because there is no guarantee that in a Western democracy in the 21st century you will be able to exercise it.

A new censorship has arisen which threatens the right of individuals and groups to dissent from the new morality. Oppose abortion? Unthinkable. Suggest that people who aren't born with wombs but who want to call themselves 'women' aren't actually women? Disgusting. Argue dispassionately that the definition of marriage is between a man and a woman? You should be ashamed of yourself.

And so we have former PM Tony Abbott being invited to speak to America's Alliance Defending Freedom, which is, to describe it in its own terms, "an alliance-building legal ministry that advocates for the right of people to freely live out their faith", or, to describe it in the terms of the Australian media, a "gay-hate group" - and copping a barrage of outrage.

I have found nothing in the ADF literature which could be fairly characterised as "gay hate". What you have to remember is that the American habit of fighting ideological battles through the courts isn't what we do here in Australia. The ADF is (as I understand it) about fighting legal battles in which claims for religious rights and freedoms are pitted against other claims for rights. For example, it defends the right of private groups and societies to decide what their criteria for membership are, over against the claim that such groups should not be allowed to discriminate - and defends it doughtily. Or, it defends the right of students to express their faith on university campuses.

It stands against the encroachment of a secularising liberalism in the USA, a form of liberalism which is anything but liberal, since it actively seeks to eradicate religion from public life entirely.

That ideology is becoming more and more active in Australia, it has to be said, particularly in Victoria. It uses political, legal, and bureaucratic instruments, such as the heavy-handed new guidelines for Special Religious Instruction introduced by the Andrews Government in Victoria.

The castigation of Mr Abbott for accepting the invitation to speak at an ADF dinner is telling. Most of all, it reveals that Australian media pundits hold their ethical positions on matters such as abortion and same-sex marriage as self-evidently true - which is to say, abortion (for example) is held to be beyond argument, and a person or group who opposes it beyond the pale.

And so, the only possible response to Abbot's move is sneering derision. If the ADF opposes abortion rights, or takes a different view of the family, it must be a 'far-right' group - that is, not worth taking seriously at the level of argument.

Now, as it happens, I don't agree with everything that the ADF says, or with its approach to church-state relations. But these are serious people who make sustained legal and intellectual arguments for their positions, and use legitimate tactics to pursue them. Even a passionate pro-choice advocate should surely recognise that the issue of abortion is extremely morally complex. It deserves argument, whatever your position. The place and shape of the family is likewise a matter for serious debate, whatever one's views.

We seem to have lost the vision of a genuine pluralism, in which competing points of view on serious moral issues are both allowed to coexist so that the arguments for each may be put. Rather, we resort to tweeting and shouting. Thankfully, Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull has injected a sensible note in the discussion, noting that people in his own party hold different views and that it is actually unsurprising. It may even be a good thing.

Ironically, the treatment of Mr Abbott rather proves the ADF right when it claims that our religious freedoms are under threat as never before. The ADF website states that "we will prayerfully enter every battle expecting to win while always demonstrating respect toward those who oppose us".

That respect seems to be in short supply.

Dr Michael Jensen is the rector at St Mark's Anglican Church, Darling Point, NSW.

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-01-29/jensen-freedom-of-religion/7123204


Thoughts?

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
mariacostel
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 7344
Sydney
Gender: female
Re: The 'Other' Opposition Leader's Speech
Reply #1 - Jan 29th, 2016 at 8:07am
 
It is a superb article and very powerfully makes the point about the growing inflexibility of society to accept diverging views.

It is a characteristic of 'internet debate' that if you oppose gay marriage then you are apparently 'homophobic' ie afraid of gays. The mere suggestion that you may oppose it on moral, religious or other grounds never seems to occur. I doubt very much that this article will get much discussion here. It is a tad too complex for most and introduces concepts such as the right to validly hold an opposing position without being a bigot, phobic or a retard.

The internet has given everyone a voice. The trouble is, it allowed us to discover that the majority of voices belong to the ignorant, the uninformed and ironically, the bigot.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
____
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 33410
Australia
Gender: male
Re: The 'Other' Opposition Leader's Speech
Reply #2 - Jan 29th, 2016 at 8:19am
 
Enquiring on the topic of Abortion.

Do conservative religionists see death as a punishment, rather than a returning back to God. At the core of the abortion debate, are religionists really atheists?

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
____
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 33410
Australia
Gender: male
Re: The 'Other' Opposition Leader's Speech
Reply #3 - Jan 29th, 2016 at 12:00pm
 
Tony Abbott has right to address Alliance Defending Freedom in US on same-sex marriage, Michaelia Cash says


Cabinet Minister Michaelia Cash has defended Tony Abbott's right to address a conservative Christian lobby group on marriage ahead of a proposed same-sex marriage plebiscite in Australia.

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-01-29/cash-defends-abbott's-right-to-address-chr...
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
macman
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 2435
australia
Gender: male
Re: The 'Other' Opposition Leader's Speech
Reply #4 - Jan 29th, 2016 at 12:14pm
 
I believe he also has a responsibility to be in australia carrying out the duties he was elected to do, represent his electorate in federal parliament. If he finds addressing RWNJ's in the USA more appealing, well resign and f&*k off over there full time. Very few will miss you.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Dsmithy70
Gold Member
*****
Offline


ire futuis vobismetipsis

Posts: 13147
Newy
Gender: male
Re: The 'Other' Opposition Leader's Speech
Reply #5 - Jan 29th, 2016 at 12:21pm
 
Is it satire?

You are free to practice your religion, just as people should be free to marry who they want.

Ironic you are complaining about not being able to limit others freedom as oppression.

Don't agree with abortion - Don't have one

Don't agree with gay marriage - Don't marry someone of your same gender

Back to top
 

REBELLION is not what most people think it is.
REBELLION is when you turn off the TV & start educating & thinking for yourself.
Gavin Nascimento
 
IP Logged
 
bwood1946
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 1598
Gender: male
Re: The 'Other' Opposition Leader's Speech
Reply #6 - Jan 29th, 2016 at 12:25pm
 
macman wrote on Jan 29th, 2016 at 12:14pm:
I believe he also has a responsibility to be in australia carrying out the duties he was elected to do, represent his electorate in federal parliament. If he finds addressing RWNJ's in the USA more appealing, well resign and f&*k off over there full time. Very few will miss you.



Good to see Tony is still causing you to have hissy fit's

Wink Grin
Back to top
 

TPI  VETERAN
bwood1946 bwood1946  
IP Logged
 
21st Century Dialup Network
Senior Member
****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 399
Brisbane
Gender: male
Re: The 'Other' Opposition Leader's Speech
Reply #7 - Jan 29th, 2016 at 4:34pm
 
If he doesn't love Australia he should bugger off - isn't that what we all get told???
Back to top
 

Good Government V 305????
 
IP Logged
 
The Heartless Felon
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 2869
Gender: male
Re: The 'Other' Opposition Leader's Speech
Reply #8 - Jan 29th, 2016 at 5:00pm
 
macman wrote on Jan 29th, 2016 at 12:14pm:
I believe he also has a responsibility to be in australia carrying out the duties he was elected to do, represent his electorate in federal parliament. If he finds addressing RWNJ's in the USA more appealing, well resign and f&*k off over there full time. Very few will miss you.


Parliament isn't sitting...
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
lee
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 19931
Gender: male
Re: The 'Other' Opposition Leader's Speech
Reply #9 - Jan 29th, 2016 at 5:05pm
 
The Heartless Felon wrote on Jan 29th, 2016 at 5:00pm:
Parliament isn't sitting...



Don't bring logic into it.  Wink
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
mariacostel
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 7344
Sydney
Gender: female
Re: The 'Other' Opposition Leader's Speech
Reply #10 - Jan 29th, 2016 at 6:03pm
 
lee wrote on Jan 29th, 2016 at 5:05pm:
The Heartless Felon wrote on Jan 29th, 2016 at 5:00pm:
Parliament isn't sitting...



Don't bring logic into it.  Wink



Or difficult concepts like the right to free speech and to hold a particular opinion. If it were a government minister speaking at a gay marriage convention, they would applaud it.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
____
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 33410
Australia
Gender: male
Re: The 'Other' Opposition Leader's Speech
Reply #11 - Jan 29th, 2016 at 6:15pm
 
Was Abbott's assassination by the Liberal Party because of his anti choice for women concerning abortion and his negative stance towards marriage equality?

Are the Liberal Party against conservative christian values?
Back to top
« Last Edit: Jan 29th, 2016 at 6:25pm by ____ »  
 
IP Logged
 
lee
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 19931
Gender: male
Re: The 'Other' Opposition Leader's Speech
Reply #12 - Jan 29th, 2016 at 6:31pm
 
Is Greens_Win for real? Tune in next time to another fabulous instalment.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
mariacostel
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 7344
Sydney
Gender: female
Re: The 'Other' Opposition Leader's Speech
Reply #13 - Jan 29th, 2016 at 6:33pm
 
____ wrote on Jan 29th, 2016 at 6:15pm:
Was Abbott's assassination by the Liberal Party because of his anti choice for women concerning abortion and his negative stance towards marriage equality?

Are the Liberal Party against conservative christian values?


Was the former Green leader assassinated because she was a closet STRAIGHT?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
____
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 33410
Australia
Gender: male
Re: The 'Other' Opposition Leader's Speech
Reply #14 - Jan 29th, 2016 at 6:34pm
 
Personal attack rather than replying ... interesting behaviour.

repeat of my question.
Abbott was assassinated by the Liberal Party.
Was this assassination because of Abbott's conservative christian values?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 3 
Send Topic Print