Australian Politics Forum - A good subject for debate ... faces on TV

mothra

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 36379
Gender: female

Re: A good subject for debate ... faces on TV
Reply #60 - Jan 14^th, 2016 at 6:31pm

ian wrote on Jan 14^th, 2016 at 6:26pm:

mothra wrote on Jan 14^th, 2016 at 4:50pm:

Born to a full-blooded mother. I don't know abou her father but it cannot be claimed she has "more white in her":

https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/736x/cd/f4/a4/cdf4a492394f2f911f2384061dafe...

Give me a break. You claim to have lived amongst aboriginals, shes at least half white.

Where did i claim to have lived amongst Aboriginal people? You shouldn't just make stuff up Ian.

And her mother is full-blood. I said i didn't know about her father.

But what would you call her Ian? If you saw her on the street? Would you call her an Aboriginal or would you call her a white person? How do you think she is perceived?

ANd she is darker than that photo shows. She is shot in harsh light in that photo. It is obvious from the reflection on her skin.

Back to top

If you can't be a good example, you have to be a horrible warning.

IP Logged

... Gold Member Offline Posts: 23673 WA Gender:	Re: A good subject for debate ... faces on TV Reply #61 - Jan 14^th, 2016 at 6:33pm mothra wrote on Jan 14^th, 2016 at 6:31pm: ANd she is darker than that photo shows. She is shot in harsh light in that photo. It is obvious from the reflection on her skin. Why would they want to make her skin appear lighter?
Back to top	In the fullness of time... IP Logged

mothra

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 36379
Gender: female

Re: A good subject for debate ... faces on TV
Reply #62 - Jan 14^th, 2016 at 6:34pm

... wrote on Jan 14^th, 2016 at 6:18pm:

mothra wrote on Jan 14^th, 2016 at 5:59pm:

... wrote on Jan 14^th, 2016 at 5:47pm:

mothra wrote on Jan 14^th, 2016 at 4:58pm:

And i think that women is a 10. So does the industry she works for.

What proportion of her industry do you think are straight males?

You think the modelling industry doesn't understand the current standard of beauty?

The fashion industry is run by women and homos, for women and homos.

The straight male dollar is but a drop in their bucket, and has little relevance to which model they find the hottest.

On the plus side, feminists needn't worry about being held to "ideals" like this:

http://riseandstand.net/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/003-anorexic-model-catwalk.jp...

That is not an ideal for straight men. That is an artificial standard, devised by people whos opinions are irrelevant.

SHe's clearly not emaciated like the woman in our photo. Erecting a strawman Honky?

Back to top

If you can't be a good example, you have to be a horrible warning.

IP Logged

mothra

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 36379
Gender: female

Re: A good subject for debate ... faces on TV
Reply #63 - Jan 14^th, 2016 at 6:35pm

... wrote on Jan 14^th, 2016 at 6:33pm:

mothra wrote on Jan 14^th, 2016 at 6:31pm:

ANd she is darker than that photo shows. She is shot in harsh light in that photo. It is obvious from the reflection on her skin.

Why would they want to make her skin appear lighter?

That photo was over-exposed. There are others that show her much darker.

Back to top

If you can't be a good example, you have to be a horrible warning.

IP Logged

...

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 23673
WA
Gender: male

Re: A good subject for debate ... faces on TV
Reply #64 - Jan 14^th, 2016 at 6:37pm

mothra wrote on Jan 14^th, 2016 at 6:35pm:

... wrote on Jan 14^th, 2016 at 6:33pm:

mothra wrote on Jan 14^th, 2016 at 6:31pm:

ANd she is darker than that photo shows. She is shot in harsh light in that photo. It is obvious from the reflection on her skin.

Why would they want to make her skin appear lighter?

That photo was over-exposed. There are others that show her much darker.

I didn't ask how, I asked why?

Back to top

In the fullness of time...

IP Logged

ian

Gold Member

Offline

OzPolitic

Posts: 9451

Re: A good subject for debate ... faces on TV
Reply #65 - Jan 14^th, 2016 at 6:37pm

mothra wrote on Jan 14^th, 2016 at 6:31pm:

ian wrote on Jan 14^th, 2016 at 6:26pm:

mothra wrote on Jan 14^th, 2016 at 4:50pm:

Born to a full-blooded mother. I don't know abou her father but it cannot be claimed she has "more white in her":

https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/736x/cd/f4/a4/cdf4a492394f2f911f2384061dafe...

Give me a break. You claim to have lived amongst aboriginals, shes at least half white.

Where did i claim to have lived amongst Aboriginal people? You shouldn't just make stuff up Ian.

And her mother is full-blood. I said i didn't know about her father.

But what would you call her Ian? If you saw her on the street? Would you call her an Aboriginal or would you call her a white person? How do you think she is perceived?

ANd she is darker than that photo shows. She is shot in harsh light in that photo. It is obvious from the reflection on her skin.

I would look at her like that and think she was attractive, its obvious she is mixed but unless she was behaving in an anti social manner I wouldnt identify her as aboriginal.

Back to top

IP Logged

mothra

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 36379
Gender: female

Re: A good subject for debate ... faces on TV
Reply #66 - Jan 14^th, 2016 at 6:38pm

... wrote on Jan 14^th, 2016 at 6:37pm:

mothra wrote on Jan 14^th, 2016 at 6:35pm:

... wrote on Jan 14^th, 2016 at 6:33pm:

mothra wrote on Jan 14^th, 2016 at 6:31pm:

ANd she is darker than that photo shows. She is shot in harsh light in that photo. It is obvious from the reflection on her skin.

Why would they want to make her skin appear lighter?

That photo was over-exposed. There are others that show her much darker.

I didn't ask how, I asked why?

You'd have to ask the photographer why he or she wanted to over-expose the photo. They do that sometimes.

I know you are trying to look for some racist agenda but that would be a big fail on your part. If they wanted a white woman, they would have shot a white woman.

Back to top

If you can't be a good example, you have to be a horrible warning.

IP Logged

mothra

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 36379
Gender: female

Re: A good subject for debate ... faces on TV
Reply #67 - Jan 14^th, 2016 at 6:40pm

ian wrote on Jan 14^th, 2016 at 6:37pm:

mothra wrote on Jan 14^th, 2016 at 6:31pm:

ian wrote on Jan 14^th, 2016 at 6:26pm:

mothra wrote on Jan 14^th, 2016 at 4:50pm:

Born to a full-blooded mother. I don't know abou her father but it cannot be claimed she has "more white in her":

https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/736x/cd/f4/a4/cdf4a492394f2f911f2384061dafe...

Give me a break. You claim to have lived amongst aboriginals, shes at least half white.

Where did i claim to have lived amongst Aboriginal people? You shouldn't just make stuff up Ian.

And her mother is full-blood. I said i didn't know about her father.

But what would you call her Ian? If you saw her on the street? Would you call her an Aboriginal or would you call her a white person? How do you think she is perceived?

ANd she is darker than that photo shows. She is shot in harsh light in that photo. It is obvious from the reflection on her skin.

I would look at her like that and think she was attractive, its obvious she is mixed but unless she was behaving in an anti social manner I wouldnt identify her as aboriginal.

Unless she was acting in an ati-social manner?

You're just a pig-ignorant racist, like Honky.

Back to top

If you can't be a good example, you have to be a horrible warning.

IP Logged

... Gold Member Offline Posts: 23673 WA Gender:	Re: A good subject for debate ... faces on TV Reply #68 - Jan 14^th, 2016 at 6:40pm mothra wrote on Jan 14^th, 2016 at 6:38pm: You'd have to ask the photographer why he or she wanted to over-expose the photo. They do that sometimes. Yeah true. They might have done it because they wanted her to look worse. They do that sometimes.
Back to top	In the fullness of time... IP Logged

mothra

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 36379
Gender: female

Re: A good subject for debate ... faces on TV
Reply #69 - Jan 14^th, 2016 at 6:41pm

... wrote on Jan 14^th, 2016 at 6:40pm:

mothra wrote on Jan 14^th, 2016 at 6:38pm:

You'd have to ask the photographer why he or she wanted to over-expose the photo. They do that sometimes.

Yeah true.

They might have done it because they wanted her to look worse. They do that sometimes.

Sometimes it's for less sinister reasons, like making the eyes 'pop'.

Back to top

If you can't be a good example, you have to be a horrible warning.

IP Logged

ian

Gold Member

Offline

OzPolitic

Posts: 9451

Re: A good subject for debate ... faces on TV
Reply #70 - Jan 14^th, 2016 at 6:41pm

mothra wrote on Jan 14^th, 2016 at 6:40pm:

ian wrote on Jan 14^th, 2016 at 6:37pm:

mothra wrote on Jan 14^th, 2016 at 6:31pm:

ian wrote on Jan 14^th, 2016 at 6:26pm:

mothra wrote on Jan 14^th, 2016 at 4:50pm:

Born to a full-blooded mother. I don't know abou her father but it cannot be claimed she has "more white in her":

https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/736x/cd/f4/a4/cdf4a492394f2f911f2384061dafe...

Give me a break. You claim to have lived amongst aboriginals, shes at least half white.

Where did i claim to have lived amongst Aboriginal people? You shouldn't just make stuff up Ian.

And her mother is full-blood. I said i didn't know about her father.

But what would you call her Ian? If you saw her on the street? Would you call her an Aboriginal or would you call her a white person? How do you think she is perceived?

ANd she is darker than that photo shows. She is shot in harsh light in that photo. It is obvious from the reflection on her skin.

I would look at her like that and think she was attractive, its obvious she is mixed but unless she was behaving in an anti social manner I wouldnt identify her as aboriginal.

Unless she was acting in an ati-social manner?

You're just a pig-ignorant racist, like Honky.

Not ignorant at all. Just observant.

Back to top

IP Logged

mothra

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 36379
Gender: female

Re: A good subject for debate ... faces on TV
Reply #71 - Jan 14^th, 2016 at 6:43pm

ian wrote on Jan 14^th, 2016 at 6:41pm:

mothra wrote on Jan 14^th, 2016 at 6:40pm:

ian wrote on Jan 14^th, 2016 at 6:37pm:

mothra wrote on Jan 14^th, 2016 at 6:31pm:

ian wrote on Jan 14^th, 2016 at 6:26pm:

mothra wrote on Jan 14^th, 2016 at 4:50pm:

Born to a full-blooded mother. I don't know abou her father but it cannot be claimed she has "more white in her":

https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/736x/cd/f4/a4/cdf4a492394f2f911f2384061dafe...

Give me a break. You claim to have lived amongst aboriginals, shes at least half white.

Where did i claim to have lived amongst Aboriginal people? You shouldn't just make stuff up Ian.

And her mother is full-blood. I said i didn't know about her father.

But what would you call her Ian? If you saw her on the street? Would you call her an Aboriginal or would you call her a white person? How do you think she is perceived?

ANd she is darker than that photo shows. She is shot in harsh light in that photo. It is obvious from the reflection on her skin.

I would look at her like that and think she was attractive, its obvious she is mixed but unless she was behaving in an anti social manner I wouldnt identify her as aboriginal.

Unless she was acting in an ati-social manner?

You're just a pig-ignorant racist, like Honky.

Not ignorant at all. Just observant.

Definitely ignorant. And racist.

Racists are always ignorant.

Back to top

If you can't be a good example, you have to be a horrible warning.

IP Logged

ian

Gold Member

Offline

OzPolitic

Posts: 9451

Re: A good subject for debate ... faces on TV
Reply #72 - Jan 14^th, 2016 at 6:46pm

mothra wrote on Jan 14^th, 2016 at 6:43pm:

ian wrote on Jan 14^th, 2016 at 6:41pm:

mothra wrote on Jan 14^th, 2016 at 6:40pm:

ian wrote on Jan 14^th, 2016 at 6:37pm:

mothra wrote on Jan 14^th, 2016 at 6:31pm:

ian wrote on Jan 14^th, 2016 at 6:26pm:

mothra wrote on Jan 14^th, 2016 at 4:50pm:

Born to a full-blooded mother. I don't know abou her father but it cannot be claimed she has "more white in her":

https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/736x/cd/f4/a4/cdf4a492394f2f911f2384061dafe...

Give me a break. You claim to have lived amongst aboriginals, shes at least half white.

Where did i claim to have lived amongst Aboriginal people? You shouldn't just make stuff up Ian.

And her mother is full-blood. I said i didn't know about her father.

But what would you call her Ian? If you saw her on the street? Would you call her an Aboriginal or would you call her a white person? How do you think she is perceived?

ANd she is darker than that photo shows. She is shot in harsh light in that photo. It is obvious from the reflection on her skin.

I would look at her like that and think she was attractive, its obvious she is mixed but unless she was behaving in an anti social manner I wouldnt identify her as aboriginal.

Unless she was acting in an ati-social manner?

You're just a pig-ignorant racist, like Honky.

Not ignorant at all. Just observant.

Definitely ignorant. And racist.

Racists are always ignorant.

I recognise the antii social behaviour prevalent amongst Aboriginal people. how is that racist to tell the truth? Are you claiming that Aboriiginal people dont commit far more crime in proportion than any other group Mothra? If so thats an extraordinary claim and you will have to back it up, although it will be fun to see you try.

Back to top

IP Logged

Lord Herbert Gold Member Offline Posts: 34441 Gender:	Re: A good subject for debate ... faces on TV Reply #73 - Jan 14^th, 2016 at 6:48pm greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 14^th, 2016 at 4:26pm: http://vignette3.wikia.nocookie.net/goodtimes/images/c/c3/Good-Times-1.jpg That's it. It was top notch entertainment. Good acting, good scripts, lots of funny bits, and some pathos too.
Back to top	IP Logged

... Gold Member Offline Posts: 23673 WA Gender:	Re: A good subject for debate ... faces on TV Reply #74 - Jan 14^th, 2016 at 6:48pm We're at the name-calling, throwing-your-toys-out-of-the-cot stage now are we? Forgiven.
Back to top	In the fullness of time... IP Logged