Home Articles Forum Wiki Poll Garden Contact

 
 
 
  
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
 
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

  Australian Politics Forum › General Discussion › General Board › A good subject for debate ... faces on TV
‹ Previous Topic | Next Topic ›
Pages: 1 ... 7 8 9 10 11 
Send Topic Print
A good subject for debate ... faces on TV (Read 6106 times)
mothra
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 36379
Gender: female
Re: A good subject for debate ... faces on TV
Reply #120 - Jan 14th, 2016 at 7:41pm  
ian wrote on Jan 14th, 2016 at 7:38pm:
mothra wrote on Jan 14th, 2016 at 7:16pm:
captain spaulding wrote on Jan 14th, 2016 at 7:15pm:
mothra wrote on Jan 14th, 2016 at 7:13pm:
captain spaulding wrote on Jan 14th, 2016 at 7:12pm:
captain spaulding wrote on Jan 14th, 2016 at 7:11pm:
mothra wrote on Jan 14th, 2016 at 7:08pm:
captain spaulding wrote on Jan 14th, 2016 at 7:06pm:
Are KKK women "scrags" Mothballs???
So you whinge about sexist action against women but you personally  excuse yourself  from doing it ? Why don't you start a topic detailing what a stinking hypocrite you are??



Yep.

So you whinge about sexist action against women but you personally  excuse yourself  from doing it ? Why don't you start a topic detailing what a stinking hypocrite you are??




Scrag fits.  I don't see how it's sexist to call them scrags.
The thing that bugs me about you Mothballs is that you are your typical attention seeking female. You chuck on a thread highlighting how hard done by you are. It was absolutely pathetic.




IT wasn't to coplain about "how hard done by" i was. It was to highlight the sexist debating tactics that are used by certain males on this forum.
Yet quite often you are the first to use these tactics.



Link?
Back to top
 
If you can't be a good example, you have to be a horrible warning.
 
IP Logged
 
captain spaulding
Full Member
***
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 120
Gender: male
Re: A good subject for debate ... faces on TV
Reply #121 - Jan 14th, 2016 at 7:44pm  
greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 14th, 2016 at 7:37pm:
captain spaulding wrote on Jan 14th, 2016 at 7:30pm:
Wrong. Think of John Carpenter. Don't look it up either. I'll know.


I prefer Rob's clown.


You better not have looked that up pecca!!!!!
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
ian
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 9451
Re: A good subject for debate ... faces on TV
Reply #122 - Jan 14th, 2016 at 7:46pm  
mothra wrote on Jan 14th, 2016 at 7:40pm:
ian wrote on Jan 14th, 2016 at 7:37pm:
mothra wrote on Jan 14th, 2016 at 7:13pm:
ian wrote on Jan 14th, 2016 at 7:12pm:
mothra wrote on Jan 14th, 2016 at 7:07pm:
ian wrote on Jan 14th, 2016 at 7:04pm:
mothra wrote on Jan 14th, 2016 at 7:00pm:
ian wrote on Jan 14th, 2016 at 6:58pm:
mothra wrote on Jan 14th, 2016 at 6:52pm:

The anti-social behaviour you describe is prevalent amongst all demographics with limited educational , social incision opportunities and employment opportunities. It is not a symptom of being Aboriginal.

This is blatantly evidenced by the large number of Aboriginal people who do not behave badly.

I don't assume somebody with dark skin is a Aboriginal because they are behaving badly and 'more white' if they are not, as you claim to do.

Which makes you a racist. A pig-ignorant racist.

No one claimed the anti social behaviour was a symptom of being Aborignal . only that it is far more prevalent amongst Aboriginal people. I can see how you are "running rings around me" by arguing a non existing premise.


You said, correct me if i am wrong, that you wouldn't recognise that woman who is clearly Aboriginal as Aboriginal unless she was behaving badly.

Bit of a back-pedal Ian?

I know what you said was silly but you have to own it.

What arent you understanding here? anti social behaviour is prevalent amongst aboriginal people. Behavioural clues give me a hint as to ethnciity, capische? You are twisting and turning here more than an olympic diver. Just admit that Aboriginal people commit far more crime and anti social behaviour than other groups. Why is it so hard to admit the truth?




Me twisting and turning? Projection much.

You said you would not identify a brown skinned woman with obvious Aboriginal features as being actually Aboriginal unless she was behaving badly.  What would you describe her as? More white? A 'dragoon'? Something classy like that?

Just own it. This is getting tiresome.
Im not disputing I said that. My observation would be based on cultural, not racial issues Is this what you are not understanding? Is all you see skin colour Mothra? Certainly seems that way.




What would you call a dark-skinned person with Aboriginal features that isn't behaving badly Ian? WHy do you keep dodging the question?
There is no clear racial definiition of Aboriginality Mothra. You only see race dont you?




http://www.theesportsblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/backpedaling34.jpg
Thanks Mothra. White flag accepted.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 150311
Gender: male
Re: A good subject for debate ... faces on TV
Reply #123 - Jan 14th, 2016 at 7:59pm  
captain spaulding wrote on Jan 14th, 2016 at 7:44pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 14th, 2016 at 7:37pm:
captain spaulding wrote on Jan 14th, 2016 at 7:30pm:
Wrong. Think of John Carpenter. Don't look it up either. I'll know.


I prefer Rob's clown.


You better not have looked that up pecca!!!!!


I'm a Rob Zombie fan.

That's why I posted the John 5 clue.
Back to top
 
GOP = Guardians Of Paedophiles
 
IP Logged
 
mothra
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 36379
Gender: female
Re: A good subject for debate ... faces on TV
Reply #124 - Jan 14th, 2016 at 8:01pm  
ian wrote on Jan 14th, 2016 at 7:46pm:
mothra wrote on Jan 14th, 2016 at 7:40pm:
ian wrote on Jan 14th, 2016 at 7:37pm:
mothra wrote on Jan 14th, 2016 at 7:13pm:
ian wrote on Jan 14th, 2016 at 7:12pm:
mothra wrote on Jan 14th, 2016 at 7:07pm:
ian wrote on Jan 14th, 2016 at 7:04pm:
mothra wrote on Jan 14th, 2016 at 7:00pm:
ian wrote on Jan 14th, 2016 at 6:58pm:
mothra wrote on Jan 14th, 2016 at 6:52pm:

The anti-social behaviour you describe is prevalent amongst all demographics with limited educational , social incision opportunities and employment opportunities. It is not a symptom of being Aboriginal.

This is blatantly evidenced by the large number of Aboriginal people who do not behave badly.

I don't assume somebody with dark skin is a Aboriginal because they are behaving badly and 'more white' if they are not, as you claim to do.

Which makes you a racist. A pig-ignorant racist.

No one claimed the anti social behaviour was a symptom of being Aborignal . only that it is far more prevalent amongst Aboriginal people. I can see how you are "running rings around me" by arguing a non existing premise.


You said, correct me if i am wrong, that you wouldn't recognise that woman who is clearly Aboriginal as Aboriginal unless she was behaving badly.

Bit of a back-pedal Ian?

I know what you said was silly but you have to own it.

What arent you understanding here? anti social behaviour is prevalent amongst aboriginal people. Behavioural clues give me a hint as to ethnciity, capische? You are twisting and turning here more than an olympic diver. Just admit that Aboriginal people commit far more crime and anti social behaviour than other groups. Why is it so hard to admit the truth?




Me twisting and turning? Projection much.

You said you would not identify a brown skinned woman with obvious Aboriginal features as being actually Aboriginal unless she was behaving badly.  What would you describe her as? More white? A 'dragoon'? Something classy like that?

Just own it. This is getting tiresome.
Im not disputing I said that. My observation would be based on cultural, not racial issues Is this what you are not understanding? Is all you see skin colour Mothra? Certainly seems that way.




What would you call a dark-skinned person with Aboriginal features that isn't behaving badly Ian? WHy do you keep dodging the question?
There is no clear racial definiition of Aboriginality Mothra. You only see race dont you?




http://www.theesportsblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/backpedaling34.jpg
Thanks Mothra. White flag accepted.




If you say so ...  Shocked

Now what would you call a brown-skinned woman with Aboriginal features who wasn't behaving badly?

Is there some reason you refuse to answer that question Ian?
Back to top
 
If you can't be a good example, you have to be a horrible warning.
 
IP Logged
 
captain spaulding
Full Member
***
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 120
Gender: male
Re: A good subject for debate ... faces on TV
Reply #125 - Jan 14th, 2016 at 8:02pm  
greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 14th, 2016 at 7:59pm:
captain spaulding wrote on Jan 14th, 2016 at 7:44pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 14th, 2016 at 7:37pm:
captain spaulding wrote on Jan 14th, 2016 at 7:30pm:
Wrong. Think of John Carpenter. Don't look it up either. I'll know.


I prefer Rob's clown.


You better not have looked that up pecca!!!!!


I'm a Rob Zombie fan.

That's why I posted the John 5 clue.

well done!!!
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
ian
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 9451
Re: A good subject for debate ... faces on TV
Reply #126 - Jan 14th, 2016 at 8:06pm  
mothra wrote on Jan 14th, 2016 at 8:01pm:


Now what would you call a brown-skinned woman with Aboriginal features who wasn't behaving badly?

Is there some reason you refuse to answer that question Ian?
  if asked to describe her I would describe her as a brown-skinned woman with Aboriginal features who wasn't behaving badly.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
mothra
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 36379
Gender: female
Re: A good subject for debate ... faces on TV
Reply #127 - Jan 14th, 2016 at 8:10pm  
ian wrote on Jan 14th, 2016 at 8:06pm:
mothra wrote on Jan 14th, 2016 at 8:01pm:


Now what would you call a brown-skinned woman with Aboriginal features who wasn't behaving badly?

Is there some reason you refuse to answer that question Ian?
  if asked to describe her I would describe her as a brown-skinned woman with Aboriginal features who wasn't behaving badly.



So not just an Aboriginal? Do you reserve that for people behaving badly?
Back to top
 
If you can't be a good example, you have to be a horrible warning.
 
IP Logged
 
ian
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 9451
Re: A good subject for debate ... faces on TV
Reply #128 - Jan 14th, 2016 at 8:15pm  
mothra wrote on Jan 14th, 2016 at 8:10pm:
ian wrote on Jan 14th, 2016 at 8:06pm:
mothra wrote on Jan 14th, 2016 at 8:01pm:


Now what would you call a brown-skinned woman with Aboriginal features who wasn't behaving badly?

Is there some reason you refuse to answer that question Ian?
  if asked to describe her I would describe her as a brown-skinned woman with Aboriginal features who wasn't behaving badly.



So not just an Aboriginal? Do you reserve that for people behaving badly?
At the point where you couldnt back your claim that Aboriginals dont commit crime out out of all proportion to their numbers you lost the argument. I have outlined the facts. All you are doing now is what we call a "greggary" i.e. an attempt to use semantics to deflect from the fact that you are and were wrong.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
mothra
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 36379
Gender: female
Re: A good subject for debate ... faces on TV
Reply #129 - Jan 14th, 2016 at 8:18pm  
ian wrote on Jan 14th, 2016 at 8:15pm:
mothra wrote on Jan 14th, 2016 at 8:10pm:
ian wrote on Jan 14th, 2016 at 8:06pm:
mothra wrote on Jan 14th, 2016 at 8:01pm:


Now what would you call a brown-skinned woman with Aboriginal features who wasn't behaving badly?

Is there some reason you refuse to answer that question Ian?
  if asked to describe her I would describe her as a brown-skinned woman with Aboriginal features who wasn't behaving badly.



So not just an Aboriginal? Do you reserve that for people behaving badly?
At the point where you couldnt back your claim that Aboriginals dont commit crime out out of all proportion to their numbers you lost the argument. I have outlined the facts. All you are doing now is what we call a "greggary" i.e. an attempt to use semantics to deflect from the fact that you are and were wrong.



I didn't deny it. I addressed it. Did you fail to understand?

Why won't you answer the question Ian? Afraid it will make you sound like a racist? Too late for there to be any doubt about that i'm afraid.   You may as well answer.
Back to top
 
If you can't be a good example, you have to be a horrible warning.
 
IP Logged
 
ian
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 9451
Re: A good subject for debate ... faces on TV
Reply #130 - Jan 14th, 2016 at 9:20pm  
mothra wrote on Jan 14th, 2016 at 8:18pm:
ian wrote on Jan 14th, 2016 at 8:15pm:
mothra wrote on Jan 14th, 2016 at 8:10pm:
ian wrote on Jan 14th, 2016 at 8:06pm:
mothra wrote on Jan 14th, 2016 at 8:01pm:


Now what would you call a brown-skinned woman with Aboriginal features who wasn't behaving badly?

Is there some reason you refuse to answer that question Ian?
  if asked to describe her I would describe her as a brown-skinned woman with Aboriginal features who wasn't behaving badly.



So not just an Aboriginal? Do you reserve that for people behaving badly?
At the point where you couldnt back your claim that Aboriginals dont commit crime out out of all proportion to their numbers you lost the argument. I have outlined the facts. All you are doing now is what we call a "greggary" i.e. an attempt to use semantics to deflect from the fact that you are and were wrong.



I didn't deny it. I addressed it. Did you fail to understand?

Why won't you answer the question Ian? Afraid it will make you sound like a racist? Too late for there to be any doubt about that i'm afraid.   You may as well answer.
Ive answered it.  I never judge people purely on racial characteristics. Youve lost Mothra, you are trying to prove me a racist, but Im not. Im a cultural and racial realist. You are trying to avoid acknowledging I am right, but thats ok. I always demolish people,in arguments like this, facts are unkind to people who have taken up predetermined stances based on emotion. I never expect an ackowledgement and my ego doesnt depend on it.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
mothra
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 36379
Gender: female
Re: A good subject for debate ... faces on TV
Reply #131 - Jan 14th, 2016 at 9:22pm  
ian wrote on Jan 14th, 2016 at 9:20pm:
mothra wrote on Jan 14th, 2016 at 8:18pm:
ian wrote on Jan 14th, 2016 at 8:15pm:
mothra wrote on Jan 14th, 2016 at 8:10pm:
ian wrote on Jan 14th, 2016 at 8:06pm:
mothra wrote on Jan 14th, 2016 at 8:01pm:


Now what would you call a brown-skinned woman with Aboriginal features who wasn't behaving badly?

Is there some reason you refuse to answer that question Ian?
  if asked to describe her I would describe her as a brown-skinned woman with Aboriginal features who wasn't behaving badly.



So not just an Aboriginal? Do you reserve that for people behaving badly?
At the point where you couldnt back your claim that Aboriginals dont commit crime out out of all proportion to their numbers you lost the argument. I have outlined the facts. All you are doing now is what we call a "greggary" i.e. an attempt to use semantics to deflect from the fact that you are and were wrong.



I didn't deny it. I addressed it. Did you fail to understand?

Why won't you answer the question Ian? Afraid it will make you sound like a racist? Too late for there to be any doubt about that i'm afraid.   You may as well answer.
Ive answered it.  I never judge people purely on racial characteristics. Youve lost Mothra, you are trying to prove me a racist, but Im not. Im a cultural and racial realist. You are trying to avoid acknowledging I am right, but thats ok. I always demolish people,in arguments like this, facts are unkind to people who have taken up predetermined stances based on emotion. I never expect an ackowledgement and my ego doesnt depend on it.




More posturing. You're a racist. You've proven it.

Now answer the question. You say you have already. I must have missed it. Surely you won't mind repeating it?
Back to top
 
If you can't be a good example, you have to be a horrible warning.
 
IP Logged
 
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 150311
Gender: male
Re: A good subject for debate ... faces on TV
Reply #132 - Jan 14th, 2016 at 9:24pm  
mothra wrote on Jan 14th, 2016 at 9:22pm:
More posturing. You're a racist. You've proven it.


He's actually admitted it.

In a thread, a year or so ago, he proudly owned up to his racism.
Back to top
 
GOP = Guardians Of Paedophiles
 
IP Logged
 
mothra
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 36379
Gender: female
Re: A good subject for debate ... faces on TV
Reply #133 - Jan 14th, 2016 at 9:25pm  
greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 14th, 2016 at 9:24pm:
mothra wrote on Jan 14th, 2016 at 9:22pm:
More posturing. You're a racist. You've proven it.


He's actually admitted it.

In a thread, a year or so ago, he proudly owned up to his racism.




I can believe it.
Back to top
 
If you can't be a good example, you have to be a horrible warning.
 
IP Logged
 
ian
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 9451
Re: A good subject for debate ... faces on TV
Reply #134 - Jan 14th, 2016 at 9:31pm  
greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 14th, 2016 at 9:24pm:
mothra wrote on Jan 14th, 2016 at 9:22pm:
More posturing. You're a racist. You've proven it.


He's actually admitted it.

In a thread, a year or so ago, he proudly owned up to his racism.

The definition of racist was in question, in  this case i am using yours and Mothras defintiion of   unfailrly  discriminatory towards a person because of their race. you may recall , in the thread where i admitted to being a racist, i also stated that my definition did not involve unfair discrimination.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 ... 7 8 9 10 11 
Send Topic Print
‹ Previous Topic | Next Topic ›
 
 

  « Forum ‹ Board Top of this page

Australian Politics Forum » Powered by YaBB 2.5.2!
YaBB Forum Software © 2000-2026. All Rights Reserved.

Valid RSS Valid XHTML Valid CSS Powered by Perl Source Forge