Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 ... 6 7 8 9 10 11
Send Topic Print
A good subject for debate ... faces on TV (Read 6104 times)
Bobby.
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 117159
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: A good subject for debate ... faces on TV
Reply #105 - Jan 14th, 2016 at 7:14pm
 
greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 14th, 2016 at 7:05pm:
Lord Herbert wrote on Jan 14th, 2016 at 7:04pm:
Bobby. wrote on Jan 14th, 2016 at 6:54pm:
Dear Herby - did you see the TV show last night about the KKK  ?


Relevance?



Honky and ian.

Isn't it obvious?

What channel was it on, old boy?




13th Jan 2016


Inside The Ku Klux Klan
(Repeat)

    8.30pm - 9.30pm
    Nine

2015 marks the 150th anniversary of America's most notorious white supremacist group, the Ku Klux Klan. Dan Vernon gains access to the extreme organisation that many believe disbanded generations ago.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Bobby.
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 117159
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: A good subject for debate ... faces on TV
Reply #106 - Jan 14th, 2016 at 7:14pm
 
No Asians or blacks here - looks like Herby has a point:


...


The cast of Home and Away pose in the awards room after
winning the Logie Hall of Fame Award at the 57th Annual Logie
Awards at Crown Palladium on May 3, 2015 in Melbourne, Australia.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
captain spaulding
Full Member
***
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 120
Gender: male
Re: A good subject for debate ... faces on TV
Reply #107 - Jan 14th, 2016 at 7:15pm
 
mothra wrote on Jan 14th, 2016 at 7:13pm:
captain spaulding wrote on Jan 14th, 2016 at 7:12pm:
captain spaulding wrote on Jan 14th, 2016 at 7:11pm:
mothra wrote on Jan 14th, 2016 at 7:08pm:
captain spaulding wrote on Jan 14th, 2016 at 7:06pm:
Are KKK women "scrags" Mothballs???
So you whinge about sexist action against women but you personally  excuse yourself  from doing it ? Why don't you start a topic detailing what a stinking hypocrite you are??



Yep.

So you whinge about sexist action against women but you personally  excuse yourself  from doing it ? Why don't you start a topic detailing what a stinking hypocrite you are??




Scrag fits.  I don't see how it's sexist to call them scrags.
The thing that bugs me about you Mothballs is that you are your typical attention seeking female. You chuck on a thread highlighting how hard done by you are. It was absolutely pathetic.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
mothra
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 36379
Gender: female
Re: A good subject for debate ... faces on TV
Reply #108 - Jan 14th, 2016 at 7:16pm
 
captain spaulding wrote on Jan 14th, 2016 at 7:15pm:
mothra wrote on Jan 14th, 2016 at 7:13pm:
captain spaulding wrote on Jan 14th, 2016 at 7:12pm:
captain spaulding wrote on Jan 14th, 2016 at 7:11pm:
mothra wrote on Jan 14th, 2016 at 7:08pm:
captain spaulding wrote on Jan 14th, 2016 at 7:06pm:
Are KKK women "scrags" Mothballs???
So you whinge about sexist action against women but you personally  excuse yourself  from doing it ? Why don't you start a topic detailing what a stinking hypocrite you are??



Yep.

So you whinge about sexist action against women but you personally  excuse yourself  from doing it ? Why don't you start a topic detailing what a stinking hypocrite you are??




Scrag fits.  I don't see how it's sexist to call them scrags.
The thing that bugs me about you Mothballs is that you are your typical attention seeking female. You chuck on a thread highlighting how hard done by you are. It was absolutely pathetic.




IT wasn't to coplain about "how hard done by" i was. It was to highlight the sexist debating tactics that are used by certain males on this forum.
Back to top
 

If you can't be a good example, you have to be a horrible warning.
 
IP Logged
 
mothra
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 36379
Gender: female
Re: A good subject for debate ... faces on TV
Reply #109 - Jan 14th, 2016 at 7:17pm
 
..... if you can call it debating.
Back to top
 

If you can't be a good example, you have to be a horrible warning.
 
IP Logged
 
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 150311
Gender: male
Re: A good subject for debate ... faces on TV
Reply #110 - Jan 14th, 2016 at 7:20pm
 
captain spaulding wrote on Jan 14th, 2016 at 7:15pm:
The thing that bugs me ...


... is goat meat and tree-loppers.

Yes, we've heard all the stories.

Back to top
 

GOP = Guardians Of Paedophiles
 
IP Logged
 
captain spaulding
Full Member
***
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 120
Gender: male
Re: A good subject for debate ... faces on TV
Reply #111 - Jan 14th, 2016 at 7:20pm
 
mothra wrote on Jan 14th, 2016 at 7:16pm:
captain spaulding wrote on Jan 14th, 2016 at 7:15pm:
mothra wrote on Jan 14th, 2016 at 7:13pm:
captain spaulding wrote on Jan 14th, 2016 at 7:12pm:
captain spaulding wrote on Jan 14th, 2016 at 7:11pm:
mothra wrote on Jan 14th, 2016 at 7:08pm:
captain spaulding wrote on Jan 14th, 2016 at 7:06pm:
Are KKK women "scrags" Mothballs???
So you whinge about sexist action against women but you personally  excuse yourself  from doing it ? Why don't you start a topic detailing what a stinking hypocrite you are??



Yep.

So you whinge about sexist action against women but you personally  excuse yourself  from doing it ? Why don't you start a topic detailing what a stinking hypocrite you are??




Scrag fits.  I don't see how it's sexist to call them scrags.
The thing that bugs me about you Mothballs is that you are your typical attention seeking female. You chuck on a thread highlighting how hard done by you are. It was absolutely pathetic.




IT wasn't to coplain about "how hard done by" i was. It was to highlight the sexist debating tactics that are used by certain males on this forum.
Grin Grin You have a cry about being called ugly and nobody her knows what you even look like. if you can handle insult (after giving it) then don't come on here. Leave the female sook tactics at the entrance.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
captain spaulding
Full Member
***
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 120
Gender: male
Re: A good subject for debate ... faces on TV
Reply #112 - Jan 14th, 2016 at 7:23pm
 
Have a guess pecca where I got the inspiration for Captain Faulding? It's a  character in a movie other than a marx brothers movie.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 150311
Gender: male
Re: A good subject for debate ... faces on TV
Reply #113 - Jan 14th, 2016 at 7:26pm
 
captain spaulding wrote on Jan 14th, 2016 at 7:23pm:
Have a guess pecca where I got the inspiration for Captain Faulding? It's a  character in a movie other than a marx brothers movie.


Back to top
 

GOP = Guardians Of Paedophiles
 
IP Logged
 
captain spaulding
Full Member
***
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 120
Gender: male
Re: A good subject for debate ... faces on TV
Reply #114 - Jan 14th, 2016 at 7:30pm
 
Wrong. Think of John Carpenter. Don't look it up either. I'll know.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
ian
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 9451
Re: A good subject for debate ... faces on TV
Reply #115 - Jan 14th, 2016 at 7:37pm
 
mothra wrote on Jan 14th, 2016 at 7:13pm:
ian wrote on Jan 14th, 2016 at 7:12pm:
mothra wrote on Jan 14th, 2016 at 7:07pm:
ian wrote on Jan 14th, 2016 at 7:04pm:
mothra wrote on Jan 14th, 2016 at 7:00pm:
ian wrote on Jan 14th, 2016 at 6:58pm:
mothra wrote on Jan 14th, 2016 at 6:52pm:

The anti-social behaviour you describe is prevalent amongst all demographics with limited educational , social incision opportunities and employment opportunities. It is not a symptom of being Aboriginal.

This is blatantly evidenced by the large number of Aboriginal people who do not behave badly.

I don't assume somebody with dark skin is a Aboriginal because they are behaving badly and 'more white' if they are not, as you claim to do.

Which makes you a racist. A pig-ignorant racist.

No one claimed the anti social behaviour was a symptom of being Aborignal . only that it is far more prevalent amongst Aboriginal people. I can see how you are "running rings around me" by arguing a non existing premise.


You said, correct me if i am wrong, that you wouldn't recognise that woman who is clearly Aboriginal as Aboriginal unless she was behaving badly.

Bit of a back-pedal Ian?

I know what you said was silly but you have to own it.

What arent you understanding here? anti social behaviour is prevalent amongst aboriginal people. Behavioural clues give me a hint as to ethnciity, capische? You are twisting and turning here more than an olympic diver. Just admit that Aboriginal people commit far more crime and anti social behaviour than other groups. Why is it so hard to admit the truth?




Me twisting and turning? Projection much.

You said you would not identify a brown skinned woman with obvious Aboriginal features as being actually Aboriginal unless she was behaving badly.  What would you describe her as? More white? A 'dragoon'? Something classy like that?

Just own it. This is getting tiresome.
Im not disputing I said that. My observation would be based on cultural, not racial issues Is this what you are not understanding? Is all you see skin colour Mothra? Certainly seems that way.




What would you call a dark-skinned person with Aboriginal features that isn't behaving badly Ian? WHy do you keep dodging the question?
There is no clear racial definiition of Aboriginality Mothra. You only see race dont you?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
mothra
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 36379
Gender: female
Re: A good subject for debate ... faces on TV
Reply #116 - Jan 14th, 2016 at 7:37pm
 
captain spaulding wrote on Jan 14th, 2016 at 7:20pm:
mothra wrote on Jan 14th, 2016 at 7:16pm:
captain spaulding wrote on Jan 14th, 2016 at 7:15pm:
mothra wrote on Jan 14th, 2016 at 7:13pm:
captain spaulding wrote on Jan 14th, 2016 at 7:12pm:
captain spaulding wrote on Jan 14th, 2016 at 7:11pm:
mothra wrote on Jan 14th, 2016 at 7:08pm:
captain spaulding wrote on Jan 14th, 2016 at 7:06pm:
Are KKK women "scrags" Mothballs???
So you whinge about sexist action against women but you personally  excuse yourself  from doing it ? Why don't you start a topic detailing what a stinking hypocrite you are??



Yep.

So you whinge about sexist action against women but you personally  excuse yourself  from doing it ? Why don't you start a topic detailing what a stinking hypocrite you are??




Scrag fits.  I don't see how it's sexist to call them scrags.
The thing that bugs me about you Mothballs is that you are your typical attention seeking female. You chuck on a thread highlighting how hard done by you are. It was absolutely pathetic.




IT wasn't to coplain about "how hard done by" i was. It was to highlight the sexist debating tactics that are used by certain males on this forum.
Grin Grin You have a cry about being called ugly and nobody her knows what you even look like. if you can handle insult (after giving it) then don't come on here. Leave the female sook tactics at the entrance.




Not true. Failed to understand the point, did you?

I'm not overly surprised.
Back to top
 

If you can't be a good example, you have to be a horrible warning.
 
IP Logged
 
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 150311
Gender: male
Re: A good subject for debate ... faces on TV
Reply #117 - Jan 14th, 2016 at 7:37pm
 
captain spaulding wrote on Jan 14th, 2016 at 7:30pm:
Wrong. Think of John Carpenter. Don't look it up either. I'll know.


I prefer Rob's clown.


Back to top
 

GOP = Guardians Of Paedophiles
 
IP Logged
 
ian
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 9451
Re: A good subject for debate ... faces on TV
Reply #118 - Jan 14th, 2016 at 7:38pm
 
mothra wrote on Jan 14th, 2016 at 7:16pm:
captain spaulding wrote on Jan 14th, 2016 at 7:15pm:
mothra wrote on Jan 14th, 2016 at 7:13pm:
captain spaulding wrote on Jan 14th, 2016 at 7:12pm:
captain spaulding wrote on Jan 14th, 2016 at 7:11pm:
mothra wrote on Jan 14th, 2016 at 7:08pm:
captain spaulding wrote on Jan 14th, 2016 at 7:06pm:
Are KKK women "scrags" Mothballs???
So you whinge about sexist action against women but you personally  excuse yourself  from doing it ? Why don't you start a topic detailing what a stinking hypocrite you are??



Yep.

So you whinge about sexist action against women but you personally  excuse yourself  from doing it ? Why don't you start a topic detailing what a stinking hypocrite you are??




Scrag fits.  I don't see how it's sexist to call them scrags.
The thing that bugs me about you Mothballs is that you are your typical attention seeking female. You chuck on a thread highlighting how hard done by you are. It was absolutely pathetic.




IT wasn't to coplain about "how hard done by" i was. It was to highlight the sexist debating tactics that are used by certain males on this forum.
Yet quite often you are the first to use these tactics.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
mothra
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 36379
Gender: female
Re: A good subject for debate ... faces on TV
Reply #119 - Jan 14th, 2016 at 7:40pm
 
ian wrote on Jan 14th, 2016 at 7:37pm:
mothra wrote on Jan 14th, 2016 at 7:13pm:
ian wrote on Jan 14th, 2016 at 7:12pm:
mothra wrote on Jan 14th, 2016 at 7:07pm:
ian wrote on Jan 14th, 2016 at 7:04pm:
mothra wrote on Jan 14th, 2016 at 7:00pm:
ian wrote on Jan 14th, 2016 at 6:58pm:
mothra wrote on Jan 14th, 2016 at 6:52pm:

The anti-social behaviour you describe is prevalent amongst all demographics with limited educational , social incision opportunities and employment opportunities. It is not a symptom of being Aboriginal.

This is blatantly evidenced by the large number of Aboriginal people who do not behave badly.

I don't assume somebody with dark skin is a Aboriginal because they are behaving badly and 'more white' if they are not, as you claim to do.

Which makes you a racist. A pig-ignorant racist.

No one claimed the anti social behaviour was a symptom of being Aborignal . only that it is far more prevalent amongst Aboriginal people. I can see how you are "running rings around me" by arguing a non existing premise.


You said, correct me if i am wrong, that you wouldn't recognise that woman who is clearly Aboriginal as Aboriginal unless she was behaving badly.

Bit of a back-pedal Ian?

I know what you said was silly but you have to own it.

What arent you understanding here? anti social behaviour is prevalent amongst aboriginal people. Behavioural clues give me a hint as to ethnciity, capische? You are twisting and turning here more than an olympic diver. Just admit that Aboriginal people commit far more crime and anti social behaviour than other groups. Why is it so hard to admit the truth?




Me twisting and turning? Projection much.

You said you would not identify a brown skinned woman with obvious Aboriginal features as being actually Aboriginal unless she was behaving badly.  What would you describe her as? More white? A 'dragoon'? Something classy like that?

Just own it. This is getting tiresome.
Im not disputing I said that. My observation would be based on cultural, not racial issues Is this what you are not understanding? Is all you see skin colour Mothra? Certainly seems that way.




What would you call a dark-skinned person with Aboriginal features that isn't behaving badly Ian? WHy do you keep dodging the question?
There is no clear racial definiition of Aboriginality Mothra. You only see race dont you?




...
Back to top
 

If you can't be a good example, you have to be a horrible warning.
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 ... 6 7 8 9 10 11
Send Topic Print